Flight Level View
Flight Level View
  • 14
  • 44 538
Aviation Education: How to read and write Coordinates
This is a quick lesson on how to read and write / understand coordinates.
0:36 Latitude explanation
1:44 Coordinate formats
3:57 Short hand method
Переглядів: 551

Відео

Aerodynamics for Pilots: Climb part 1
Переглядів 2802 роки тому
This is part 1 of a fairly long series on airplane climb
Aviation Education: Coffin Corner explained correctly
Переглядів 3,3 тис.3 роки тому
This is an aviation education video explaining in detail what coffin corner is. 0:39 General 1:00 PFD AOA 1:39 High Speed Mach Buffet 2:18 Low Speed Mach Buffet 3:24 STALL 4:41 PFD AOA 4:50 Summary
Thunderstorm flying
Переглядів 1643 роки тому
Thunderstorm flying
Crash Course 206 VMCA / VMCG Minimum Control Speed
Переглядів 8783 роки тому
This is a refresher video for pilot already familiar with multi engine flying.
Crash Course 201 Multi Engine Airplanes (introduction)
Переглядів 1463 роки тому
This is a short intro to my Crash Course 200 series. 1:39 Constant Speed Prop 3:12 "Non Constant Speed Prop"
Aviation Education: HF Radios explained.
Переглядів 11 тис.3 роки тому
This video covers routine HF radio operation in an airplane. Example 1. 2:00 Example 2. 3:10
Crash Course 104 Induced Drag explained
Переглядів 5103 роки тому
Easy to understand explanation of induced drag
Crash Course 103 STALL explained
Переглядів 853 роки тому
Crash Course is a crash course in aviation education. Learn about a aviation topic in short time.
Crash Course 102 : Angle of Attack AOA
Переглядів 1533 роки тому
Crash Course is a crash course in aviation education. Learn about a aviation topic in short time. 1:14 Typical example of AOA 1:44 Aerobatic example of AOA 2:05 Aircraft 1 2 3 2:50 Lead & Lag
Crash Course 101
Переглядів 1304 роки тому
Crash Course is a crash course in aviation education. Learn about a aviation topic in short time.
Aviation Education: Polar Navigation. Grid Navigation
Переглядів 2,9 тис.4 роки тому
Explanation of polar grid navigation, basic theory and practice calculations.
Aviation education: Balance Field Length explained. V1 speed. ASDA TODA
Переглядів 15 тис.4 роки тому
This is an aviation education video. For pilots new to jets. Accelerate stop accelerate go 0:31 V1 speed 1:10 ASDA TODA 1:32 Stop Go comparison 3:47 Balanced V1 4:42
Aviation education (use time stamps): Assume Temperature Method & Derate explained
Переглядів 9 тис.4 роки тому
This video is primarily for airline aviation education. If you want to see other aviation videos please feel free to right down subjects in the comment section. I'll get to it asap 1:57 Engine rating 6:40 Assume Temperature Method 7:09 Thrust Required explanation 9:02 Derate 12:37 Derate continued 15:10 Derate animated continued

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @juliomanalo7074
    @juliomanalo7074 14 днів тому

    Balanced, not balance

  • @이동규-g2w
    @이동규-g2w 22 дні тому

    Hello! Thank you for your really nice explanations. Do we need to do position report(wpt time FL , estimating next wpt time , 3rd wpt) and selcal chk again at W150 even it’s the same CZAK FIR? Thank you

  • @rsb5575
    @rsb5575 22 дні тому

    Love it, all these lovely airline pilot topics.

  • @kelvinchow5721
    @kelvinchow5721 Місяць тому

    Great video and demo!! But what if we are CPDLC established and ADS connected, is the HF voice position report still mandatory?

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 Місяць тому

      Thanks for commenting. The CPDLC procedures are slightly different per country. SFO “KZAK” requires a quick HF call. Acronym: CARD CPDLC connection Aircraft Registration N number Airport Origin and Destination Most of the time lately normal scheduled flights don’t even have to do CARD

  • @NW-yy3pz
    @NW-yy3pz Місяць тому

    Well explained …. But for yourself only, sorry😊

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 Місяць тому

      Lol… the videos are mostly for pilots. Thanks for watching

  • @hangil94
    @hangil94 Місяць тому

    Thank you for your clip , I have a question. Why do you only call 89 instead of 8942 (8903) ?

  • @jorgedapper5615
    @jorgedapper5615 Місяць тому

    Hey! You’re one of the most valuable resources, can you please continue making videos?

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 Місяць тому

      Thank you for the compliment. Im sorry i have been away for so long. Im stuck in a lazy season. Any topics you are interested in? Thanks for watching? Have you subscribed? Are you a pilot mechanic or dispatcher?

  • @spilo-m1h
    @spilo-m1h 5 місяців тому

    Thank you man!

  • @jobintomy2112
    @jobintomy2112 5 місяців тому

    ✈️ Great Video sir. U deserve much more subscribers. ❤ .Absolute quality content. 🎉

  • @bibrakc
    @bibrakc 5 місяців тому

    How would you know your latitude and longitude if GPS doesnt work?

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 5 місяців тому

      You can use your inertials or DMEDME equipment. Thanks you for watching.

  • @FerreiraWINGS
    @FerreiraWINGS 5 місяців тому

    Great video, thanks for sharing! Out of curiosity, what is that position number on the initial calls? I mean "DELTA 158 POSITION 89" and then "DELTA 158 POSITION 10".. Thanks =)

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 5 місяців тому

      Thank you for watching and commenting. "89" are the first two digits of the HF frequency (8903) when communicating in HF "speak" you read off the first two digits instead of the whole HF frequency. I think I will make a quick part 2 on HF communications. DELTA 158 POSITION "07" I rewatched my video. I think you meant 07,,, that is the minutes of the hour (the UTC time that you crossed the way point ADNAP) All of these strange phraseology's are in Position Reporting chapter in the ICAO documents. Also are you a Subscriber or just a visitor?

    • @FerreiraWINGS
      @FerreiraWINGS 5 місяців тому

      @@flightlevelview2115 Thank you so much for getting back to me. Ohh yeah.. I meant the "89" and "10" on initial calls. I got it, they were the frequencies, thanks for the explanation =) That was the first video I watched from your profile, I've just started following you here on UA-cam. =)

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 5 місяців тому

      @@FerreiraWINGS Thank you for Sub ing. I ask all my viewers this. Are you a pilot, dispatcher, mechanic, ATC controller, enthusiast?

    • @FerreiraWINGS
      @FerreiraWINGS 5 місяців тому

      @@flightlevelview2115 I’m pilot as well. :)

  • @steffenleo5997
    @steffenleo5997 5 місяців тому

    thanks a lot for such great video Sir.....👍👍

  • @guillermocuevas1688
    @guillermocuevas1688 5 місяців тому

    Hello. Stumbled across this video while I'm studying high altitude aero for my ATP. This video helped me to understand coffin corner a little better because it actually made me think. However, there is an inadequacy in your explanation. The PFD/Attitude indicator does not show direct AOA of the wings. It is only telling the pilot the angle between longitudinal axis and the horizon (nose of the airplane vs horizon to put it simply). This is something that I have drilled into my student's heads over and over, the PFD/attitude is not an AOA indicator. Angle of attack is angle between chord line and relative wind. Pitch angle from the PFD/attitude indicator does not tell you that. Most planes do not have AOA indicators, although the attitude indicator can give you a general idea of where your AOA is at. But you are correct when you say a stall has nothing to do with speed, it does not. Only critical AOA. What I did get from this video is that at the low speed buffet, your AOA is high enough (although perhaps not at the conventional critical AOA) to now induce a supersonic flow over the wings due to the airplane's TAS through the air. This will cause a shockwave and move the center of pressure back, but not as much as with the high speed buffet. This shockwave will induce a low speed mach buffet. It is not necessarily a stalled condition as you defined it due to the angle of attack not being at critical AOA, but it is almost like a stall as there is separation of airflow from the wings surface and the boundary layer is disrupted. Which will result in buffeting and reduced control effectiveness as would happen in a stall at a lower altitude and at 17-18° AOA. So to conclude, with a low speed mach buffet, you perhaps have not exceeded the defined critical AOA, but your AOA is excessive enough to induce shockwaves from airflow acceleration and basically "stall" your airplane. However, as we don't really have AOA indicators in many airplanes, we use speeds as known guidelines to avoid "stalls" at higher altitudes (the low speed buffet), although an airplane can stall at any given airspeed. The air data computer in the airplane will calculate a corresponding IAS and put that on the screen as the speed the pilot should avoid to prevent the low speed (or high speed as well) buffeting. I think we could also compare low speed buffet and what is happening to the AOA to icing on wings: ice will start to disrupt the boundary layer and smooth airflow, and eventually separate the airflow at an AOA MUCH LOWER than that of the critical angle if the pilot tries to increase the AOA. This is stated in the Pilot's Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge Chapter 5, implying that you can stall or have a severe reduction in lift even at an AOA much less than critical AOA if there is a reason for it to happen. This is basically also what is happening with a low speed mach buffet, except the reason for the early airflow separation is the shockwave rather than icing. Now is the low speed mach buffet a stall? Depends on how you define it and how you're looking at the whole critical AOA situation, but you definitely have severe reduction of lift. There's also fluid dynamics magic happening in all this I'm sure, but I'm not an aerodynamic engineer and I'm not even going to begin trying to solve this at that level. I just fly the things safely and have fun. This has been my two yen on the topic.

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 5 місяців тому

      Thank you for watching and writing such a long comment. You can find the AOA by taking the difference between the FPV (flt path vector) and the "piper" (the cross hairs/ the nose of the attitude indicator) Even in you don't have a dedicated AOA indicator. Example: In level flt. A jet typically flies at a positive AOA 2.5 degrees... How would I know that? If I am at FL350 my FPV would be level at the horizon while the nose of the airplane (longitudinal axis) would be aimed upwards at 2.5 typically. The reason why I am so adamant that the low spd mach buffet should be classified different from a traditional STALL is because there a lot of pilots who actually think the Low Spd MACH Buffet is the same as a traditional STALL. They are not the same. If you're the type of pilot who understand the difference between the two concepts and prefers to call it a "SHOCK STALL" instead of "Low Spd Mach Buffet" because Shock Stall is easier to say. Then that is fine. If you really want to simple it down... Lets redefine a STALL like this. Hyperbole: "When the wings don't fly anymore" obviously a joke. I hope I answered your questions please write back give me suggestions on what next videos I could do. Thank you again.

    • @guillermocuevas1688
      @guillermocuevas1688 5 місяців тому

      @@flightlevelview2115 Thank you for the clarification. I have learned something new and useful for my ATP. I did confirm that the difference between FPV and the pitch attitude will equal AOA, that is very good to know. I come from a general aviation background where even the more advanced GA glass cockpit aircraft won't have a FPV, and they may have separately installed AOA indicators. This info on FPVs will be very useful for me soon. 👍 And I do agree with you that a low speed mach buffet is not a traditional stall, as discussed in my previous post which I wrote a whole essay to wrap it around in my mind. "Shock stall" is definitely less of a mouthful than "low speed mach buffet" so I can see why people refer to it as such, but it is definitely not a traditional stall exceeding the critical AOA. However, the symptoms of buffeting will make it SEEM LIKE a traditional stall, although the reasons for the airflow separation are different. Chapter 16 of the FAA Airplane Flying Handbook states "Mach buffet is a function of the speed of the airflow over the wing-not necessarily the forward speed of the airplane-and the shock wave strength, rather than a stall, [is what] creates the airflow separation." Hope that helps. Thanks again.

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 5 місяців тому

      @@guillermocuevas1688 simple rule… if the airplane is buffeting or if the tail (not the airplane) is buffeting something bad is gonna happen. Also, If you are in 1 G level flight the AOA is the pitch attitude. Meaning the relative wind is the equal and opposite direction to your flight path then your pitch attitude is your AOA. FPV helps only when your climbing descending or pulling G s

    • @guillermocuevas1688
      @guillermocuevas1688 5 місяців тому

      @@flightlevelview2115 Agreed with your simple rule on buffeting. And yes, technically speaking in 1 G level flight the relative wind is exactly opposite of flight path and thus the pitch attitude/artificial horizon could be used as an AOA indicator. I don't disagree with you, but I will explain why I wouldn't teach that in general aviation to any of my students. It would get confusing for them very quickly and in most GA planes there is neither an FPV or a direct AOA indicator. But even starting a stall from 1G level flight the pitch attitude indicator will not directly tell you AOA unless, as you said before, you have an FPV on it. Especially when I practice stalls with students in general aviation, even when we do start from 1G level flight, our flight path will change depending on the type of stall we do (power-on, power-off, accelerated), and that will immediately change the relative wind, and thus the AOA will not reflect anymore on just the pitch attitude, unless we can see our flight path. So we (at least I definitely don't) don't teach in general aviation that the pitch attitude indicator will show you your angle of attack at all. Lest some poor pilot think that pitch attitude does equal AOA and then someday ends up pulling the nose of the airplane up to 10° pitch while pulling a 45° bank and then they're wondering why the airplane is stalled and spinning towards the ground even though the pitch hasn't reached anywhere near 20° as it does starting from a 1 G level stall.

  • @gerardmoran9560
    @gerardmoran9560 5 місяців тому

    Great video! Recently retired Delta captain. I stayed domestic for my whole career, flew enough trans-oceanic back in my USAF days. The C-141 didn't have selcall and some nights the HFs were miserable. At times over the North Atlantic I couldn't reach Shanwick but heard pilots making reports over the Pacific or Indian Ocean (skipping off the ionosphere). We had a chart for selecting the best frequency. The higher the sun or more distant the station the higher the best frequency (11176 vs. 2282). As you likely know the Delta domestic routes include Canada, Mexico and the Carribean so I used HF now and then. It was sure nice to have selcall and SATCOMM as a backup. Happy landings!

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 5 місяців тому

      Thank for watching and commenting Captain. Its been a while since i updated my videos but im gonna start again soon. Thank you for watching

  • @leocan
    @leocan 6 місяців тому

    A good explanation. Thank you

  • @TheJessy8888
    @TheJessy8888 7 місяців тому

    I love your videos, they do great as a refreshment for concepts we learned and lost through the years. Thank you I can’t find part 2 though Anyway, great explanation thank you

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 7 місяців тому

      Thanks for watching and commenting. I haven’t made a video in a long while. Are you a pilot, dispatcher or mechanic? Or just an enthusiast? Could you write your topic suggestion in the comment. Ill see if i can make some new videos

  • @hiflyer2270
    @hiflyer2270 7 місяців тому

    Ok explanation

  • @someone3.2007
    @someone3.2007 7 місяців тому

    Woah this is way more complicated than VHF radios... Why do the waypoint names look like coordinates?

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 7 місяців тому

      When you fly over the ocean (not on permanent airways) Your waypoints are coordinates.

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 7 місяців тому

      In PACOTS (Pacific) and NAT (Atlantic) tracks the waypoints are coordinates

  • @lurker7105
    @lurker7105 8 місяців тому

    Thank you for the great video, helps me a lot as someone new doing a Boeing type rating. Just a quick question: it states in the FCTM for the 737 that when using a combination of derate and ATM that we must always select the derate first and then the assumed temperature, is there any specific reason for this?

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 8 місяців тому

      First of all thank you for watching and commenting…

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 8 місяців тому

      I think i understand what youre asking. If you wish to use both DERATE and ATM. You need to first select the derate (TO 1 TO2) because if you don’t The FMS would by default be set to D-TO (“FULL RATE”) If you do not select TO 1 or TO 2 first before you insert the ATM temperature, you will just be using solely the ASSUME TEMP METHOD. (D-TO) In a way, pilots are ALWAYS using a mixture of (De/Rating and Assumed Temperature Method.) Example. D-TO 53C FULL RATE with ATM. (This is what pilots consider using only ATM with no derate) D-TO1 53C Derate 10% with ATM D-TO2 53C DERATE 20% with ATM I hope this helps

  • @khaledalmasri4620
    @khaledalmasri4620 9 місяців тому

    I’m more confused than I ever was 😂

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 8 місяців тому

      Oh really? Oh well thank you for the comment. Are you a pilot by any chance?

  • @Linlds21
    @Linlds21 9 місяців тому

    Very fleshing idea about low speed buffet, instructors in my airline always talk about an airplane will always stall at a constant IAS, so as altitude increases the stalling speed will be the same IAS, but TAS will increase because higher altitude. Hence the low speed buffet. But I am inclined to your explanation because that makes more sense to me.

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 9 місяців тому

      THank you for commenting. Thank you for watching. Which airline if i may ask.

  • @rubes3927
    @rubes3927 9 місяців тому

    Thanks for this 🙌🏻 CASA lists the concept of derating as part of our syllabus knowledge required for an ATPL (A), but the aircraft used for the performance exam is the 727, with no graphs or procedures provided for derating take-offs 🥴🤣🤦🏻‍♂️🤷🏼‍♀️. As such, the main theory provider for the ATPL syllabus here in Aus does not cover the concept of derating at all 😂

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 9 місяців тому

      Thanks for watching and commenting. If you want to know something else listen to off some ideas. Ill see if i can make the next video.

  • @aimhigheagle1
    @aimhigheagle1 Рік тому

    Thank you sir for your beautiful explanation.

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 Рік тому

      Thank you for watching. Are you a pilot by any chance or just a UA-cam surfer?

  • @fightingfulcrum8108
    @fightingfulcrum8108 Рік тому

    As you climb, the air becomes less dense, and your wings need more airflow to generate the same amount of lift. The true stall speed increases as you climb, regardless of the AoA.

    • @graysonmalitsky5019
      @graysonmalitsky5019 6 місяців тому

      @@flightlevelview2115 Could you explain why that’s incorrect? Not a pilot, but I would have thought true stall speed increased with altitude because of the air density. Would love to hear your explanation as an expert, and thanks for your content!

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 6 місяців тому

      @@graysonmalitsky5019 thank you for commenting. Too many pilots focus on “speed” when discussing stalls. Yet all pilots know stalls are dependent on AOA. Rhetorical Question: Why do pilots focus on speed when they should be focusing on AOA? The stalling AOA doesn’t change with density altitude. At 1G level flight at 5000ft the stalling AOA should result in a corresponding pitch attitude. If the airplane is at 1 G flight at a higher altitude the stalling pitch attitude should be the same as the lower altitude. If the airplane reaches “low spd mach buffet” or (low speed shock stall) --some people find it easier to understand the term shock stall, its not quite accurate though-- at a different pitch attitude from where it should have normally STALLED i can conclude that the low speed shock stall is NOT airflow separation due to an exceedance of the stalling AOA. I hope that made sense. You said you were not a pilot. Are you a dispatcher or mechanic by any chance?

    • @zaildarbains
      @zaildarbains 6 місяців тому

      @@flightlevelview2115 i see . Your pointing out that Coffin corner low speed loss of lift is not the traditional stall caused by boundary layer separation. rather its airflow experiencing disruption due to Mach effect. the AOA is low enough for air to pass freely and create a low pressure on top of a wing but Mach effects are ruining our streamline. either ways the actions are the same. lower nose , increasing speed .

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 5 місяців тому

      @@zaildarbains decrease altitude. If you pitch the nose of a jet down like a Cessna at those altitudes your might approach your MMO spd. Smoothly descend and your coffin corner with spread out

    • @milehiaviation
      @milehiaviation 3 місяці тому

      @@flightlevelview2115 He is absolutely correct. You are talking nonsense. Stall speed in IAS remains constant, but the TAS associated with that given IAS absolutely will increase with altitude. Sure, low speed mach buffet occurs at a lower AOA than a traditional stall due to compressibility effects, but saying that stall speed in TAS does not increase with altitude is just wholly incorrect.

  • @jcrudele
    @jcrudele 2 роки тому

    Great video! If the balanced field V1 gives a shorter runway required than the actual runway, I asume the airlines can increase the paying load of the airplane, so the weight will be higher and the curves will move up in the graphic. The question is, the new balanced field V1 will be similar, faster or slower? Thanks!

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

      Thanks for commenting man. I thinking what you’re talking about is optimum V1. you’re in a way “unbalancing” the field length so you can use all of the useable runway to its full potential to increase payload.

    • @jcrudele
      @jcrudele 2 роки тому

      @@flightlevelview2115 I get it. Thanks!

  • @balasahebmule_IITkgp
    @balasahebmule_IITkgp 2 роки тому

    Short but In depth explanation... Impressive 🙌

  • @kadirsarac2203
    @kadirsarac2203 2 роки тому

    Awesome

  • @flightdeckq400pilot4
    @flightdeckq400pilot4 2 роки тому

    Good one

  • @shah8641
    @shah8641 2 роки тому

    Beautiful... made it very easy to grasp...

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

      Glad you like the video. Can you give a quick intro of yourself? Are you a pilot? Type?

  • @bcrow8163
    @bcrow8163 2 роки тому

    Don’t really fully understand why aoa wouldn’t decrease with an increase in altitude considering the air density is significantly reduced, I get airspeed is increased but certainly not as significantly as the air density is reduced at a cruising altitude. Maybe I just don’t understand the math of it. But in conclusion both low and high speed Mach buffet are essentially caused by air over the wing going super sonic causing shockwaves? I’d assume then low speed buffet causing the cop to move rear wards just like a high speed buffet? Also causing a Mach tuck? Im a pilot in training for my atp already took the atp written

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

      Thank you for commenting. Not sure what you were asking. Do you not understand why the speeds encroach towards each other? Could you ask again in a different way?

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

      A stall “exceeding the Stalling AoA” does not depend on altitude (air density). Please write back i would love to chat, and perhaps you could give me another idea for a video

    • @zaildarbains
      @zaildarbains 6 місяців тому

      @@flightlevelview2115 i think bccrow thinks that Level flight AoA should be lower than 3 degrees as seen in your PFD. Above FL310 the aircraft is going fast , but the AOA is still high because IAS is low at HIGH ALT due to pressure and density . IAS determines AoA , not Ground speed. in the mid altitudes flying fast can result in 0 degree level flight because the you can attain IAS greater than 320 knots.

  • @glaremoonlight2695
    @glaremoonlight2695 2 роки тому

    With a speed of 120 miles an hour 🤣 & head stuck out of the car , for sure one will understand what parasitic drag is😂

  • @tonymcflattie2450
    @tonymcflattie2450 2 роки тому

    Fun fact, hf radio gets around the earths curvature

  • @cwliu5733
    @cwliu5733 2 роки тому

    V1 Action Speed

  • @Ahmedtwelve
    @Ahmedtwelve 2 роки тому

    Beautiful, Have a safe trip.

  • @kinshuk-311
    @kinshuk-311 2 роки тому

    Hey. I hope you are doing great. As a suggestion, can you make some videos on ETOPS covering especially the fuel requirements, critical fuel scenarios and the concept of ‘Re-dispatch’ in the air among other things. Thanks.

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

      OH thank you for the great idea... i will do that. Could you list what exact point you want to understand? I will focus on those points.

    • @kinshuk-311
      @kinshuk-311 2 роки тому

      @@flightlevelview2115 Wow looking forward to that. This might be more concerned to the dispatchers, but will you be able to focus a little bit on the concept of ‘Re-dispatch’ that I have heard is used for saving fuel. Thanks a lot.

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

      @@kinshuk-311 you're a dispatcher? Thats a quick video redispatching is a quick concept

    • @kinshuk-311
      @kinshuk-311 2 роки тому

      @@flightlevelview2115 Nope... Just a curious pilot :) You can maybe do a video with some interesting insights into ETOPS, I think that will appeal to a wider audience, and you can talk about redispatch as well. Or you can make a quick video just about redispatch. Whichever way you find suitable.

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

      @@kinshuk-311 did you give a quick intro of yourself? If not please do. Nothing too detailed. Student CPL CFI ATP pilot. Type rating

  • @joydasgupta9445
    @joydasgupta9445 2 роки тому

    Navigation

  • @kinshuk-311
    @kinshuk-311 2 роки тому

    @3:28 An ideal relationship is one without trust issues. 'Trust Available' more than 'Trust Required' xD Just Kidding... Got the idea. Really good content, the glitches are a bit of a distraction, yes, but I managed.

  • @flightlevelview2115
    @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

    The video is glitchy. It was not doing that when I was working on it. Is the distraction too much for you? if so tell me and I will delete the video and do it over.

  • @derekpratte7259
    @derekpratte7259 2 роки тому

    Nice job. Thank you.

  • @kinshuk-311
    @kinshuk-311 2 роки тому

    Really amazing video. Please do keep making them whenever time allows. Shared with my friends and subscribed, would love to do what I can to help the channel.. PS : You also motivated me to work on my drawing skills xD

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

      Thanks for watching. Could you give a quick intro of yourself, nothing too detailed. Just are you a pilot or dispatcher or up coming pilot etc. My drawings aren’t that great, I’m trying to up my youtube game. Thank you for watching Also are your friends pilots or dispatchers or up comers.

    • @kinshuk-311
      @kinshuk-311 2 роки тому

      @@flightlevelview2115 I’m a pilot about to start an airline career, just got a TR on A320. Also my friends are pilots at various stages of their training and careers.

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

      @@kinshuk-311 thats good to hear. You're on a great jet. 👍 Thank you for watching and commenting. You can ask anything aviation anytime.

  • @yohanjojo4020
    @yohanjojo4020 2 роки тому

    Amazing content brother!! Its funny how experienced pilots still believe low speed stall is just a regular stall. The truth is, shock waves start to appear due to acceleration of air over the wing surface when AoA is increased. Keep up the good work!

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

      Thank you for watching. Jojo. Could you give a quick intro to yourself? Are you a pilot? Dispatcher? or enthusiast?

  • @hellosiri1483
    @hellosiri1483 2 роки тому

    Request: make a detailed video on Critical engine

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

      Mr. Hello Siri, you are now the most responsive commenter on my channel. Thank you for coming back and watching my videos. As for critical engine: You need to understand 1 Accelerated slip stream 2 P Factor 3 Torque Followed by Multi engine "engine out" flight 4 Zero Yaw 5 Zero Side Slip follwed by multi engine "eng out" aerodynamics and performance 6 Thrust/Power required vs Thrust/Power available. This is the majority of a multi engine ground school. Are you a newbie or do you just want a refresher?

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/RcPPK2UlWjY/v-deo.html

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

      Another pilot made a quick video on Crit Engine, if you needed an explanation in a timely manner.

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

      My point was, its going to take a while to make that video you requested

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

      If you're dissatisfied with the other videos on UA-cam, text me, and I'll get started on the video. But please go and actually watch the other videos first.

  • @flightlevelview2115
    @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

    2:04 correction I drew the pink rudder arrow in the wrong direction. The arrow direction should be opposite from the rudder deflection

  • @hellosiri1483
    @hellosiri1483 2 роки тому

    Why scree height reduce to 15ft on wet runway? i hope you will make a complete playlist for ATPL performance I’m struggling a lot

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

      Thank you for watching my videos. The “screen height” is 35 ft dry for Class A airplanes. A320 B737 B777 A380 The screen height is 15 ft wet for Class A airplanes It is written in the regulations. I forget exactly where it is written. Ill try and look it up for you. But as for the reason why it is 15 ft and not 17 ft or 14 ft or 9.5 ft. i am not sure why.

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

      What ATPL videos do you want to see? make me a list.

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

      Also. Could you give me a quick introduction of yourself? Are you a student pilot, commercial pilot, or airline pilot? Are you a dispatcher? Are you an enthusiast?

    • @hellosiri1483
      @hellosiri1483 2 роки тому

      i would appreciate if you make performance atpl theory videos and thank you so much

    • @hellosiri1483
      @hellosiri1483 2 роки тому

      Commercial Pilot with IR now studying for ATPL theory

  • @hellosiri1483
    @hellosiri1483 2 роки тому

    Please make a series on ATPL performance lots of respect from Bangladesh

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

      Whats kinda of series do you want? You have to respond to my comments in order get your request in.

  • @orhananildemir4022
    @orhananildemir4022 3 роки тому

    I am not sure about your low speed buffet explanation. In the lift equation there is air density; which is pretty low at high altitudes. Decrease in speed will lead to reduction in lift. However you are already be at the critical value of air density that barely enough for required lift and I think thats why aircraft will stall.??

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 3 роки тому

      Thank you for responding. I really appreciate it. Not too detailed but are you an airman by any chance? I just wana know for my channels sake who’s watching my content. What videos you prefer go pro or educational

    • @orhananildemir4022
      @orhananildemir4022 2 роки тому

      @@flightlevelview2115 I am a Pilot, CPL holder. However the matter is, there is only one correct answer about the low speed stall at high altitudes. If what I know is incorrect I would appreciate to be corrected, if you have a source that proves your claim.

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

      @@orhananildemir4022 my sources come from my aerodynamic knowledge. I think I explained in the video why the low spd mach buffet isn't due to a stall. A stall is defined as the CL not increasing with a further increase in AOA. (The CL is decreasing) A stall doesn't depend on altitude or spd. At 1 G level flight at high altitude, the stalling AOA is no different, and assuming the stalling AOA is around 15~17 degrees That means the airplane would have to be at about 15 to 17 degrees pitch up in order to "STALL". The airplanes do not arrive at the low spd mach buffet at 15 ~ 17 degrees. That's why I am ruling out stall from the reasons why the nose drops once you hit the low spd mach buffet. The low spd mach buffet involves shockwaves. If you would like to explain why you think the low spd mach buffet is due to stalling. Please feel free to comment. Let's have a discussion. Once again, thank you for taking the time to comment.

    • @MikeSierra8282
      @MikeSierra8282 2 роки тому

      just check what is the stall and what is caused by. Stall is exceeding critical angle of attack which is as "flight level view" said constant with altitude and it should be around 16-17 degrees. Low speed mach buffet is exactly what he showed in this content. EVen if you think that way, why is this called low speed mach buffet? if there would be any stall they would probably call it stall buffet or just the stall:-) BTW. you can decrease critical angle of attack by lowering the flaps for example. Efective AoA increases and because of that AoA crit decreases

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 2 роки тому

      @@MikeSierra8282 thank you for commenting... are you a sub or a just a visitor?

  • @michaelmiller9719
    @michaelmiller9719 3 роки тому

    Very cool please explain the HF radio frequencies and how to enter them in the radio. Thankyou

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 3 роки тому

      Thank you for commenting. Are you a pilot by any chance? What exactly do you mean by “enter them in the radio”?

  • @alexkurnia3127
    @alexkurnia3127 3 роки тому

    thank you for your explanation! but why it called coffin btw?

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 3 роки тому

      Coffin Corner is just a name, I "think" it got the name because because you're flying in such a tight speed margin.

    • @Romeojulietless
      @Romeojulietless 2 роки тому

      You get it wrong , you end up in a coffin 😉

    • @mosty85
      @mosty85 Рік тому

      ​​@@flightlevelview2115I don't think that's correct. I think its more sinister than that. I believe the 'corner' part of it refers to the tight margins, but the 'coffin' part refers to the potential human consequences of losing control of the aircraft due to the small margin for error.

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 Рік тому

      @@mosty85 thank you for commenting and watching. Are you a subscriber?

    • @flightlevelview2115
      @flightlevelview2115 11 місяців тому

      @@mosty85 thank you for the comment

  • @user-ey3rg3nc5s
    @user-ey3rg3nc5s 3 роки тому

    As always brilliant ....

  • @flightlevelview2115
    @flightlevelview2115 3 роки тому

    Departed our of BOSTON