Відео

Info Slide: During the recent economic crisis, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has provided certain conditions to developing countries for receiving loans. These conditions require governments to adopt more market based economic policies. Targets include reducing government budget deficits and increasing international currency reserves. The policy conditions provided by the IMF include 1) reducing or eliminating fuel subsidies and fertilizer subsidies; 2) setting the currency exchange rate to international market rates; 3) implementing market-based interest rates; 4) anti corruption provisions.

Is Will Jones' speech redacted or was it an error in the upload?

"opposition builds monuments to perfection on the blood of the trampled. They give a few dead men a stranglehold not over just the nation's identity but its very moral fabric". His speech is art, his speech is poetry, tobi is the greatest debater i know.

Dayum

Wonder where these people are now

great debate!

26:47 the overwhelming sigh has me dead😂😂😂😂

CG are really fantastic

Terrible video. Not the content

During the recent economic crisis, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has provided certain conditions to developing countries for receiving loans. These conditions require governments to adopt more market based economic policies. Targets include reducing government budget deficits and increasing international currency reserves. The policy conditions provided by the IMF include 1) reducing or eliminating fuel subsidies and fertiliser subsidies; 2) setting the currency exchange rate to international market rates; 3) implementing market-based interest rates; 4) anti corruption provisions.

CO was runner-up btw. CG won

THE MAN THE MYTH THE LEGEND CAVAN TAY

What a PM-LO exchange

this room is packed dayum

My fiipino book brought me here

1st speaker speaks like a robot(on a sarcastic ground) Nice!

That's why I believe there should be reply speeches in BP for the diagonal benches to directly response. Great debate by OG and CO!

Ben and Will were a power combo here…

Thank you so much for posting this video. My father debated in it and it is amazing watching him!

POI to PM showing BP has gone too far

tobi <3

Love the CO POI and response

Tejas GOAT

Go Dartmouth!!!!!!!

the last guy COOKED shieeee

Is there an info slide attached to this motion?

Debate starts 3:05

brother debating in a vest wtf

I’m so proud of the Bulgarian team

Honestly, I’m a bit let down by the quality of organisation on the side of social publicity. WUDC 2016, which is like 7 years old has better video and audio. This is appalling

Matt Caito … being allocated towards traditional forms of journalism and institutions that produce press The reason why this is true is that as the widespread consumption of citizen journalism has precipitated increased production of it as producers strive to meet demand. This is why particular production has created the incentives and norms for individual citizens to produce more of this kind of journalism we think that therefore it likely means that insofar as that consumption does not happen other sources take that place secondly we think insofar as consumption represents time dedicated towards reading collecting and analyzing citizen journalism that people are engaging with people probably spend the time that they're spending engaging with that citizen journalism elsewhere in so far as people are inherently curious and have a drive to find out information in the world and so on we think they likely means they revert to more traditional forms of news sources as well thirdly insofar as there's likely still demand for authenticity in reporting and there is a revealed preference of stories that citizen journalists break because they happen to be well placed them like if they're on the ground in a major city when an event is happening like a terrorist attack or a war we think would likely still be efforts to cater to that demographic insofar as people have a real preference for that kind of reporting so this looks like things like more embedded reporting more summaries of these things like ethnographies more reporting on the ground through major news organizations and attempt to try to get boots on the ground in places like combat zones and so on and so forth

wow debate has changed so much

Solo: Hook: When's the monkey god valesim but tells Rama the Hindu all-knowing god that he's honored to have sins because it makes him better.That’s a more accurate portrayal of humanity allows humanity to be more forgiving to themselves and to other individuals and decreases loyalty and blind loyalty to ideology which creates greater nuances in critical thinking Descriptions Five things: - Firstly the alternative world probably looks like a world where the predominant religions continue to be Hinduism or Greek. It is not a change tomorrow but has been how the world has looked like based on doctrine and religious writing it can probably still be Christianity but Christianity must change themselves to be like this - Secondly we see God as not uniquely in Mighty but as a mirror instead of how humans can redeem themselves can be set on the right paths. To make this debate clear, I ... do we think religion is bad because I think that makes the debate messy, we think on gov it's good when it's a source of hope and inspiration uniquely such as the Hindu goddess of wealth Lakshmi being an inspiration for the Hindu feminist movement or the Greek goddess Artemis as a source of power for modern free women who practice a Greek faith when the individual uniquely has autonomy still and religion is relegated to our role of consultation. This rule requires a lower loyalty to religion as in fact better when they aren't fully dependent on the God as compared to moral infallibility that is when you are saying that gods are all-knowing all present and always the best of morality we think at that point that's when it crosses the threshold of bad because it encourages humanity to forever be dedicated to this God. The lying we draw is that at the point where you make your identity about the defense of their principles the defense of that morality and that morality could be forever perfect and any sin or deviation from this is intrinsically evil that is bad. The problem with this is you hold yourself to the standard of the god and that's why we think it's harmful, things like Christianity telling you you're made in this image and likeness of God and that's why you ought to be perfect or morality being used in status quo to define what is morality within binaries, you intrinsically have to compare yourself to how God's easy to gain religious words Four arguments: 1. Firstly why fallibility allows an individual to be forgiving to themselves EXPLAIN: There are three reasons for why you're likely to condemn yourself on opposition - Primarily because as humans it's impossible to make mistakes firstly humans will likely stray for morality regardless this is a necessity for up to work because you need to make a distinction between very decent for humans as opposed to morally pure Gods at the point where you must make mistakes they view themselves as irredeemable because they help they are healthy the standard of God they are not like Jesus Christ who is like perfect in general -> Compare this to our world where potentially when you speak from humanity it is something you are more willing to forgive yourself for because if Aphrodite she can cheat on her faces but then and find redemption later on and uniquely that's important these Gods create Redemption get punishment by them by Zeus or whoever other deity like Rama for example like release that likely means that this is something you view to actually be a pathway for right - The second reason is that the goal post for morality on Opp are ever changing because it is not just defined in Doctrine but also in practice especially the majority of religious facts are anecdotal that means it's up the interpretation on either side the problem with this on opp is when humans are in control of that interpretation it's a lot easier for you to be exclusive to individuals aging Christianity and Doctrine being utilized against queer people being utilized against women in the past because they utilize the interpretation to demonize these individuals as compared to our world where potentially things like homophobia Etc might still have been around but it might still have existed but it's a lot easier for you to approach it with empathy and kindness because you view the not as people who strayed the path but as individuals who would still want to be redeemed, individuals once will be forgiven and individuals who are just as well in terms of their rights to be like as bad as they honest as were because these individuals are still are able to redeem themselves but - Thirdly, morms are constantly changing and defined by different cultures focusing on retaining a clear-cut moral compass means you will be doing something wrong in one culture if you do something right in another culture,that means it’s impossible for you to not sin under the metric of opposition IMPACTS: There are three major impacts of this: - The first is that on opposition you force a religious guilt on the majority of individuals who subscribe to religion, that's terrible because a) this creates an excessively negative self-perception which means that if you are incredibly religious which is likely to be encouraged on the Opp side because individuals tell you that for you to be freed by sin you ought to believe in God that likely means that you feel like you will never amount to that suffering and that's why you often lead the things like depression or slip into that. b) But certainly even if it doesn't lead to excessive negative self-perception it likely means that individuals will not seek guidance for the God and that's why they're not going to get that inspiration that we outline at the start of a speech . c) But thirdly even if you don't have religious guilt this is used by religions to justify aggressive recruitment as I explained earlier and the reason why that's the case is they want to be able to allow you to redeem yourself under the scope of God that's why if you join the church and give control of your autonomy to priests over your individual decision making you are seen as good. That's problematic because that is uniquely the standard visa to be bad because now individuals are harmed COMPARE: So on your side you may stand there these standards are never proven to actually be good suddenly it allows individuals to be more forgiving to others on our side There are two reasons why you're lucky to be less forgiving on their side and last all around: - Firstly, because as we point that out it's easier to be utilized against other individuals as opposed to our world where even he utilizee, the power of is less important but suddenly even if your God is forgiving you create a hierarchy that you're closer or more moral to God, which means under Opp world you often intrinsically have hierarchy that makes it far worse. That's why things like Greek religions or things like Hinduism for example are less structured and less hierarchical .Only comparative doing sins and mistakes is seen as good and important because things like how like Balisim for example but because it made them better it feels like this is something as part of this development these are things that people are more welcomed towards people are more willing to be discussive towards and people are less reliant on their own morality towards God There are two impacts - Firstly you have increased empathy across individuals but also certainly communities themselves are healthier and nicer that was uniquely good even if like religions are weaker because at least under our side individuals get better forms of self-determination - Thirdly why do you have less loyalty to ideology under our side. So independent of individual experiences why is it better under our side. For example because you feel less of a need to justify and defend the God's best decisions as always right when something bad happens to you in religion you tell yourself this is God's will or when God for example allowed the woman to be small to that in Bible you say that's probably good that means that you are forced to be more loyal to God and be more extreme but all of a secondarily you're less tolerant of different interpretations of it because you're always ought to be a linear God -> in the comparative you decrease religious extremism and violence because you don't need to be as loyal to God and you're more independent I'm not going to say we stop violence in its totality but we at least decrease one level of violence the Opp cannot have but - Lastly and most crucially we create greater nuances in critical thinking. Opp will say that religion is good because of morality I'll say the Greeks had Plato Aristotle and Socrates that allow them to create the dispersive implications of what sin goodness and evil are that's better because there is no hierarchy that places a god up top but instead places a reason at the top and describes implications that allow people to have a more critical faculties and approaching institutions but be a lot more accountability it's not perfect but it's far better than status quo

Runner up who?

David Africa the GOAT

Great debate!

good content in 30 min

it should be illegal to be so(o) good at deb8

i still havent got why they were clapping

yo

wow the 90s feels recent but a lot has changed

omg the Narnia lies claimed as spec really hurt nooooooo!

OG won in a 4-3 split over CO

Pakistan Zindabaad!

Unjust results, the case was clearly opps

Such an awesome LO speech

Info Slide During the recent economic crisis, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has provided certain conditions to developing countries for receiving loans. These conditions require governments to adopt more market based economic policies. Targets include reducing government budget deficits and increasing international currency reserves. The policy conditions provided by the IMF include 1) reducing or eliminating fuel subsidies and fertiliser subsidies; 2) setting the currency exchange rate to international market rates; 3) implementing market-based interest rates; 4) anti corruption provisions.

2.16 start

Opp whip omg

I realized this is a Monster motion