Відео

Press on.

This.

That's the problem with god and the Bible, it Should be easy to comprehend. Also it has many contradictions and its history is very hit and miss. There was no mass exodus from Egypt, nor was there a Abraham nor Moses!

so trinitarianism is a shell game... you are so close... shell games to dupe marks really makes a perfect analogy tho.

13:19 What is "hard to understand" about Paul is what Paul himself admits. He has a bias. His Theophany occurred suddenly, post-pentecost. His Theology reflects the sudden conversion bias. Paul has Inspired writings, for sure. But we often put the cart before the horse. We put theology before the gospel. Jesus said "the kingdom of heaven is at hand" Tell the children about the kingdom, and the pearl of great price. It is so simple, You are on the right track, keep going!

My son in law and his worship team did a short study with this book. The book blessed him and he believes it brought him to deeper place of worship. He shared it with me too. I pray it does continue to wake up the souls of others as we sing a hallelujah! Thumbs up for me.

I liked your analogy of the shell game.

I enjoyed your post I refer you to Dale Tuggy Trinities podcast I think you will find him interesting

John 5:25 is in line with John’s’ style and language of using the present tense with a future sense, similar to the so-called prophetic perfect, past tense of prophecy. In other words, examples of the “as good as done” form of prophetic speech. * John 4:23 to the Samaritan woman "the hour is coming and now is [here]"; ref. to Pentecostal, outpouring of the spirit, the Temple or holy places no longer needed; * John 16:32 "the hour is coming, indeed it has come [past tense], when you will be scattered"; * 1 John 2:18 "this is the last hour; the antichrist is coming," and "many antichrists have come." NOTE the tense structure of Old English only had two tenses (present and past) some of which survives today, e.g., "I return to England next week." “I am shopping tomorrow.” These are similar examples of a present tense with a future sense. For more see: rfcogstudy.blogspot.com/2024/04/present-tense-of-prophecy-list.html

I really appreciated a ton of insight you brought in this video. Thank you. The closing was gold and genuine. New subscriber!

More interesting Wayne Grudem "Systematic Theology" quotes, Rev. 1: “Was Jesus fully human? He was so fully human that even those who lived and worked with him for thirty years, even those brothers who grew up in his own household, did not realize that he was anything more than another very good human being. They apparently had no idea that he was God come in the flesh.” page 535 “Nowhere do we have an indication of the human and divine natures talking to each other or struggling within Christ, or any such thing….the Bible itself does not say “Jesus’ human nature did this” or “Jesus’ divine nature did that”. Page 555 “Anything that is DONE by one nature or the other is done by the person of Christ.” (Italics in original, all caps added.) page 561 Notice that the natures “do” things, and as a result, the person does those things. Grudem's "person" is merely a puppet of the nature! “Evangelical theologians in previous generations have not hesitated to distinguish between things done by Christ’s human nature but not by his divine nature, or by his divine nature but not by his human nature. It seems that we have to do this if we are willing to affirm the Chalcedonian statement about “the property of each nature being preserved.”” page 558 When we are talking about Jesus’ human nature, we can say that he ascended to heaven and is no longer in the world (John 16:28; 17:11; Acts 1:9-11). But with respect to his divine nature, we can say that Jesus is everywhere present: “Where two or three are gathered in my name…”” page 558

Sing next

Bro, you are the one who cant see the forest! First of all, are u unitarian? Secondly, you reason EXACTLY like a jehovahs witness. They say the same thing. "It was a wrong idea on part of the PHARISEES". You cant seem to see the gravitas of Jesus claim. John simply recaps the incident. Like a news reporter. 1- Jesus DID BREAK the sabbath. That has nothing to do w sinlessness on Jesus part. In other passages- like John ch 8- Jesus reminds them there are MITIGATING circumstances to do so. For eg. Circumcision. Or for humane reasons- if your donkey falls into a pit, etc. He even quotes the old testament that David ate the showbread when hungry- which was not lawful- so Jesus and his apostles could 'thresh' some grain on the sabbath if they were hungry. This time, in John 5, he doesnt do that. He instead speaks of his own ONTOLOGICAL nature as GOD, because he says the FATHER works ON THE SABBATH, and jews believed that of course, and I WORK ON THE SABBATH. So whats the big deal? Well the sabbath is Gods holy day. 'YOU will keep MY DAY holy.' MY DAY. Jesus is saying I can do whatever i want as LORD of the sabbath. This is outrageous blasphemy to the jews, because he is claiming a prerogative that is only JEHOVAHS. After jesus prefaces his explanation by admitting he is subject to the Father in authority- i can do nothing of my own initiative- he then lists point after point of how he is EQUAL TO GOD! Father raises the dead, gives life- me too. Whatever father does- me too. Honor me THE SAME as u honor the Father. Fathet judges NOONE . I DO ALL THE JUDGING. Father is life, I AM LIFE. I GIVE LIFE. On and on... how can u miss that? Dr Keener must be a jehovah witness...

Your reasoning is faulty. You are artificially combining both statements. We can call God Father due to the presence of the Holy Spirit within us. And the Holy Spirit is equal to God.

wow, Thank you sir for the well thought out info. wow. amazing. you are a great youtuber and Im so glad I learned of your channel

God foreknew the number of hairs on our heads before we were all born, and all things work together for the good of those who love God... so it's difficult to surprise God with anything that isn't part of his plan. Contrasts give us better context! : )

Context is king! Brings me back to Mark Scott's preaching class at Ozark. Enjoyed the video!

Interesting, thought provoking and cliff hanger as to how this pans out... what do Yall think?

Of course, and where'd the early-model protestant's go wrong? ah, yes: *sexual* immorality was at the very *core* of their acting-up... that shows you why no Christian can ever endorse the petrine office, nor the 'god' that, while the Deity Himself, set up that tyrannical office that has been foisting things that're intrinsically immoral as "good".

Sounds like you’re talking about Taylor Marshall lol thanks for your commentary

The architects of Fiducia Supplicans imagine that God will bless a relationship that his Church teaches is "objectively disordered" (CCC #2358). How stupid and absurd. To bless a same-sex couple is to bless their union, for without a union, there is no couple ... or are we to believe that the same-sex couple being blessed will have a celibate relationship? LOL! Wake up! FS is a nefarious document - its aim is to make same-sex relationships acceptable in the Church. 666

Thank you so much!

👏

May God bless you sir

Amen! I was sent here by a catholic channel! You’ve earned a subscriber. It kills me that some Catholics and Protestants are using this as an excuse to attack the pope. 99% of them are wrong since they don’t read the document and trust sources that don’t read these documents but do have biases against the pope. I hope this wakes some people up!

Thank you for actually reading the document🙏

Thank you for your honesty. As a catholic I read this document and it was crystal clear and easy to understand. My brother you have explained it better than anyone else I've heard on UA-cam. Including Catholics. God bless you.

Thanks for shining the light (and taking the time to actually research it). Luke 12:2. We're called to search for the truth. It's one thing to trash someone's denomination (coming from other Christians), but dang -- get it right. And in this case, those criticizing Pope Francis were wrong. He never said same-sex marriages should be blessed. He never said the Catholic Church was changing its position on same-sex marriages. In fact, Fiducia Supplicans goes out of its way to make that point.

The same-sex couple ‘blessing’ causes a number of questions. Why is it couple blessing if “People are blessed; not the union”? What is a homosexual couple seeking by asking for a blessing? What is the Church offering in response? What is the Holy Spirit called for and what is exactly being blessed? What is a spiritual purpose of such a ‘blessing’ and what sort of a particular help it intends to provide? Love and acceptance can make miracles of soul transformation, and Pope Francis' vision on the same-sex unions seems to be about love and acceptance. Yet, the same-sex couple blessing would make sense if the Church dumps viewing the same-sex relationship per ser as a sin. Without that, such a 'blessing' appears conflicting and self-contradictory. The entire issue of the homosexuality as such and the sin does not look straightforward at all. For example, some people refer to Leviticus 20:13: "If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them". Does this mean that about 4% of human population should be now "put to death"? Would it be a proclaimed Christian way of love and acceptance? Would it be compatible with the words of our Lord: "Let He Who Is Without Sin Cast the First Stone" (John 8:7)? Apostle Paul in 1 Cor 6:9,10 was talking specifically about "men who have sex with men" with the intention to just satisfy their lust, but said nothing about homosexuality as such. The Holy Scripture condemns sexual lust in all its appearances - ‘traditional’ and ‘pervert’, but says nothing at all specifically about homosexuality and same sex people, who want to live together in love and faith. Nevertheless, this unlikely defends the incompatibility of the same-sex couple blessing with the current Church doctrines and policies. Faithfully yours, bishop Vincent Berg.

John did point to Jesus,and all in that chapter is showing how to become the virgin bride/His Church. You may agree or disagree,it's up to you. I do not read of study,not working for a food that perish,but asking for my daily bread.. Jesus was not baptizing with the water..Jesus was baptize with the Word. Because His words are Spirit and life.. Act 16 : 32 Then they SPOKE THE WORD of the Lord Act 16 : 33 AND IMMEDIATELY he and all his family were baptized. John 3 : 27 John answered and said, “A man can receive nothing unless it has been given to him from heaven. Mat 16 : 17 Jesus answered and said to him, “Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah, for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but My Father who is in heaven. - and on this rock I will build My church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it. John 6 : 45 - When Father teach you,no false teachers,prophets can prevail ... When you know the truth the devil is powerless..And yes,mouth/tongue is the gate of hell Only who hears is the Church,rest self taught,from others,schools,all harlot..They do not ask husband at home,but dining with others.. Eph 4 : 20 But you have not so learned Christ, Eph 4 : 21 if indeed you have heard Him and have been taught by Him, as the truth is in Jesus: - who stands and hears him, rejoices greatly because of the bridegroom’s voice Then they SPOKE THE WORD of the Lord to him and to all who were in his house. Eph 5 : 26 that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word,

'PromoSM' 😊

This one is very good.

27:25 wow! I am agnostic, so I enjoyed the beginning for the parallels with the Mahābhārata , but stayed for the analysis. And boy, am i glad i did! Being agnostic, i always felt this in my soul.. God is the universe and everything in it, and i am just one of billions of perceptions of it. Reducing that to an object feels like heresy But im not sure i agree (not that i have to) with the conclusion and general message here: Looking to Jesus is not enough. It is about what you do. Darkness benefits evil. If god is the universe, then our actions, any action, is worship. Jesus bears our curse, but that object is not enough to save us. Its just enough for eternal life, but also eternal death.

to be born again ... is referring to the resurrection ... jesus was a man teaching the way to the kingdom ... then he died ... then he was resurrected from the dead .... but some will say that he is god ... god does not die nor can he die ... and if he does not die then he can not be resurrected ... the preaching of paul is the life , death , and resurrection of jesus christ

There's not much outside the bible re jesus. Definitely nothing re resurrection. So, intellectually honest people should reject the magical claims. Invested Christians can invoke faith for their belief. But we all know faith is a crappy way to go about the things.

Absolutely! Reader beware of words added, changed and deliberately mistranslated. Jn. 6:4 added, gives Jesus a 3 and 1/2 year ministry as the Lamb of God, making Him out to be an illegitimate Lamb of God. Sabbaths 26 times stripped from our New Testament translations. From the Koine Greek New Testament: Mt.28:1 Evening now (2) Sabbaths (ending) into the full on, over, above-lighting of the (event/day) one of (7) Sabbaths... It was the first moment of the 50 day count to Pentecost when Jesus was resurrected immediately following the weekly sabbath. The sun had just set in the West and the Moon won't rise in the East for two and a half hours. The light on, over and above this event is the Glory of God. The Greek word επιφωσκω; epi = on, over and above, phos = light is describing God's glory; the light of the world over the rebirth of His Son. Romans 6:4 you will be raised by the glory of the Father. Jesus was buried exactly 72hrs earlier when the stone dropped into place at the first moment of the High Sabbath of Unleavened Bread in the middle of the week. There were two Preparation days and two Sabbaths that week, as normal. The Early Roman Church manipulated the scriptures , changing who Jesus was and what He did. Jesus was fulfilling His Father's appointed times all on time, in perfect order to the smallest detail. The priesthood was TRANSFERRED and the Law was TRANSFERRED. The only thing that was changed was the address.

I like your message, not 100 on everything you said, the water and spirit part, I don't think it has to do with baptism, in the very next verse Jesus says that which is flesh is flesh, so I believe this is speaking more to our natural birth, in contrast to the birth of Spirit, I get your idea of being strong in your faith, and not relying on certain teachers, I agree to a point but certain teachers have brought me to examine passages dig deeper to help me to defend my faith when being confronted by unbelievers, so guys like J Warner Wallace have some good material in that regard, you mentioned not ascribing to some of his work, without any real examples. You said you studied this or that and that is why you were not a fan of his work, or he overstated without really saying what exactly...anyway good job. God bless Shalom

There's some spectacular ministry happening! It would be so different to live in a city you can't drive to

Excellent stuff Andy!

There is no truth in any iron age myth

WOOHOO!!! that was awsome! Thank you .

how’s life?, Apostle's~ that's unusual ~ 🌟

Water into blood? Are you talking about Exodus Ch. 7? The first sign God commanded of Moses was to turn his staff into a serpent. Water into blood was NOT the first sign? Is there another instance of turning water into blood?

I really enjoyed this video- I appreciate your perspective on believers who have different beliefs on certain issues. Your comments about distrusting the doctrines instituted by governing officials centuries into the church age has me thinking about how much trust modern protestants put in the novel teachings of people in just the last 200-300 years.. It seems to me that the restorationists aspects of this period produced some of the most prolific heretical (totally apostate) groups. The restorationists had zero confidence in tradition.. to the point that they said the church was completely corrupt until their day and it was their calling to restore the church.. I see this extreme disassociation from the historical church as falling off into the other ditch.. I personally believe the enemy is waging war within the church from this angle and has sadly led many astray since the first and second great awakenings.

Did I miss the Peru video yet? .

still waiting for a Peru video...

The joy it would bring to know that in you the Fullness of God is pleased to dwell...

I caught that! (For those unaware, the “yah” at the end is a short form of Yahweh, so that word literally means “praise Yahweh!”)