Відео

the heatshield would blow up if you are going faster than 4000m/s and have no ablaitor. it would just be a better idea to make the drag and heat occlusion glitch and have alot of high twr stages

unless the heatshield is also protected from heat then it would work

Why

@@NexusVR_heinzbeanz command pods explode at 3000m/s. that craft went 5000 and it wasnt even close to exploding

Radiators

@@liquidtempest8526 radiators arent that good. they would generate alot of drag and generate more heat than they give out. also that craft has no radiators so

Nuh-uh

Its bad

@@KAngel32 any explanation of what caused the team to be fired and/or leave? will it be bought and programed more or is it a bust? to me the game showed ;OTS of promise

@@josephgavlek3419 the game studio behind it dissolved and they were way over their budget

@@Nicolas_Gamer5476 well seeing how the game looked BEAutiful as fuck I believe it, I may not like it

@@josephgavlek3419 ksp1 almost looks better with mods

Yes lol

Idk how the pod survived, I might have forgot to turn heating to 100%

Next landing will be Mach 2 at the KSC runway so it will be easier to see.

@@funevidz4819 I believe that. Nevertheless I ended up always putting lights on the bottom of my landers or planes, anywhere I land, it's always better to see the lights.

Glad you liked it!

nah, free bird

I had to lightly tap the keys (w & s) but SAS was on so it kept it stable

Or do caps lock

For the majority of the slowdown, the I'm pretty sure the airbrakes (and natural air resistance of the craft) was doing the heavy lifting. Max Gs looked like probably right around 14-15 Gs

@@Charlie-js8rj it only shows up to 15 Gs the actual number is in the results screen and i didnt even notice the airbrakes lol

​​​@@Charlie-js8rjI looked at the results screen after the recording, Max Gs were around 40, but after looking at the slowing down, it looks like about 14 Gs. And yes the most of the slowing down was done by the airbrakes.

Around 14 Gs

@@Charlie-js8rj ground friction did nothing??

Yes, on the north pole

I was inspired to make this video after watching yours.

@@funevidz4819 I'm still trying to do the Mach 2 full stop runway landing.

​@@KerbalOnDres1 I will try it too

​@@KerbalOnDres1I was grinding attempts when I got one that landed on the runway at around 660 m/s, went off the end of the runway, and safely came to a stop.

No go straight to mach 10 >:)

​​ @kenzieaw9058 Idk if that is possible, that is past kerbin escape velocity (mach 10 is 3430 m/s, kerbin escape velocity is around 3100 m/s) But the land speed record is 4000 m/s, so it may be possible with the perfect design & careful piloting

@@funevidz4819 theres a dude manage reach near light speed (vanila) named martin that rainbow frog guy in that game

@@kenzieaw9058 it wasnt vanila

Yes

Sorry for the late reply. I will add these features soon. 1: Currently I can't implement it because while they are spawning, some of the fragments fly off the screen before any planets are spawned. I can implement it when I fix this bug & change object spawning. 2: I could implement it but instead of showing the ratio I would probably just show a counter for objects devoured by the star & one counter for objects ejected. And to answer your questions, 3: If two objects come near eachother, unless they are both fragments (they don't pull objects toward them or collide with other fragments) they will eventually collide. 4: Because the collision & mass system is extremely basic, the current criteria is: If two fragments collide, nothing happens. (currently) If a fragment collides with a planet, the fragment is deleted & the planet gets bigger. If two planets collide, then fragments are generated. More fragments generate from collisions between the bigger planets. Hope this answers your questions. Have a good day!

Thanks!

Yeah it kinda isn't planetballs lol

lol

hello

Thanks!