Відео

thank you!

Gracias!

Although I have tried it myself, id say if you make your bus Ambisonics then you should be able to export that bus (without decoder inserted), I don't see why it wouldn't be possible. Let me know if you try it

Sinceramente no sabria decirte - me imagino que simplemente con hacer que tu master bus sea 1OA y sin decodificador insertado, haces el export, no?

No es mala idea probar esto, voy a ver y te digo q onda. Gracias!

@@AudioBrewers. con Linear PCM de Salida funcionó, Saludos y gracias!

Genial!

In PT there are several ways - the one I recommend is to create an Ambisonics AUX and make sure I route all my ambisonics signals are sent there, then all you have to do is commit the AUX track and then export the file from the file list. Doing it this way you don't have to be messing with your master bus.

Yep, things are much more streamlined in 19! 😊

Buena pregunta... 😉

con respuesta clara y definida 😃

🤣 Te tocaría mirar, jamás lo he intentado! 🤣

@@AudioBrewers, veo que si luego después de la conversión 3OA se rutea hacía un track de tipo Adaptive 4 y se elige este mismo track de audio para salvarlo para UA-cam, quizá funcione o me equivoco?

@@Boretoto Un video con audio Ambisonics necesita metadata que le informe al reproductor. Que yo sepa 18.6 no soporta eso

Our plugins work with Davinci 18.6 and above, as far as I know with v17 you're very limited, my recommendation would be to use Reaper (free) + ab Encoder

@@AudioBrewers, thank you! Does the 18. 6 have a native support for Ambisonics or only v19?

@@Boretoto Our plugins where written initially to make 18.6 compatible with Ambisonics up to 3rd Order using a Dolby Atmos 9.1.6 track, so in a way, thanks to the Audio Brewers ecosystem, you can use Ambisonics on Resolve 18.6

@@AudioBrewers, se ven muy prácticos e interesantes, no los reconoce tampoco la ver. free 19 de Davinci? Gracias

@@Boretoto Ambisonics funciona unicamente en la version Studio

12, but little to no changes in v13

So, as long as you remember the RODE records in A-Format, and you MUST change it to be B-Format somewhere before decoding. I am NOT sure if RODE's plugin work in Resolve, but I can tell you that in the next month, our 'ab Transcoder' will have a HUGE update not only to be compatible with Resolve, but also to have a mode specifically calibrated for the RODE, and that will literally do what you are looking for :)

@@AudioBrewers Thanks! That is the best reply I could hope for! What version of ab Transcoder do I need to be on the lookout for ?

You dont NEED to convert a Quad file to Ambisonics for Atmos, but it could certainly benefit you as the encoding to Ambisonics and then Decoding to Atmos beds (or three-dimensional objects) will help you expand your signal in the whole bed a bit more evenly - especially if you use three-dimensional sound effects, with Quad they will always work in Quad, in Ambisonics they will expenad through your whole 3D soundfield and then the Atmos decoding will be much more uniform around the listener.

@@AudioBrewers I could decode my sounds to Atmos in Nuendo without crashing, and my tracks are two quads of High and low , which ambisonic order are they ?

Well are they quad or Ambisonics? only you know

@@AudioBrewers When I import them in Nuendo they would import as a quad, and they are written as "3DSurround" title

Nuendo won't be able to differentiate between a Quad and a 1st order ambisonics, you have to import the file to a track manually created by yourself, so you must know if the sound is either quad or Ambisonics. As a general rule if a sound is ambisonics, check the waveform, generally speaking in ambisonics, the first channel should look a bit louder than the other three. Another thing of course is to create an ambisonics sound with sounds on the left, right, front, back and then import it to nuendo, that way you can see if the export from davinci is being done correctly.

Good questions - We specialise in Audio so your queries are a bit outside our scope, perhaps seeing with a video editor? :/

@@AudioBrewers OK, I was hoping, so far haven't found anyone else reporting clearly on how to use the ambisonics in Resolve 19..

@@SailInFinland If you mean to export a video with Ambisonics audio, what's stopping you from simply using an Ambisonics BUS> Just make sure it's 1st Order which is what most platforms (including VR) need...

@@alejocazu6 Is that enough to track a 360 video? How do I align the video and audio directions when they are recorded in different devices? For case 1) the video would be exported with regular stereo output so in this case I need to somehow automate the ambisonics field.

So yeah, as long as you export your video in Ambisonics 1st order, that will be enough (make sure the exported video has the 4-channel audio). Regarding orientation, in ambisonics front centre will automatically be the front centre of your 360-video, so that should be an issue!

All the plugins used are ours, we create native Ambisonics plugins, which work three-dimensionally by design! All our plugins are now compatible with Resolve 19. Not sure about other developers, you should come in contact with them.

Resolve is using VST2 by now

@@aviationodyssey1892 VST3 work here perectly fine. Maybe re-scan? Add the folder manually?

@@alejocazu6 Good news, thank you!

Get in contact with fielder audio. Best

@@AudioBrewers it was solved. It was the welcome screen. It was huge and the close button was not easy to find. All is well ... I changed my desktop box rez settings & the main screen appeared :)

Thank you so much for the suggestion! Will keep it in mind for an upcoming update! If you have more suggestions feel free to let us know at hello@audiobrewers.com

Get better soon! :)

@@AudioBrewers I may have turned a corner last night, but it's been terrible. Used to being strong. 2k a day in pool etc. the knee was shot and had to do this. Orhtopedic said I was an excellent candidate instead of knee replacement. FINALLY better today.

Happy to hear!

Thank you! ! I'll keep it in mind!

Unfortunately it looks like UA-cam has stopped supporting 5.1. All videos claimed to be 5.1 are now playing in stereo. I found a comment that this happened sometime in 2019. Perhaps this feature is only available on UA-cam TV now.

@gapirus nope, it still works and it's officially supported since last year too (it was "experimental" before), but 1. there are a lot of fake 5.1 videos on yt 2. it depends on the device you're using, it works on the youtube app for TVs for sure (youtube tv is a different thing), probably not on smartphones or on a PC browser

@gapirus you can check the video I personally uploaded a few months ago eventually, just search for Unlearning Machines - SERVANT OF THE PIGS (Official Lyric Video), on TVs you just need to enable the surround sound option in the video settings.

@@ToneScientist I see. I checked on PC (Google Chrome). I have the ability to listen in a 7.1 setup. And I observe sound in all channels on test sites, but unfortunately UA-cam gives only stereo even my own audio files mixed in 5.1. It seems that the matter is in the PC version.

Thank you!

I love RME's. However, for a 7.1.4 Array you need a total of 12 Outputs, so if a card you like has them, you can go ahead and get it :)

So, even if you have the audio card you still have to position the speakers to relate to the channels of audio relative to the atmos settings , but you can do it.

@@hifidavid Of course, if you use a 5.1 layout, simply set 5.1 in the atmos renderer, and of course, the speakers must be position in the Dolby 5.1 way :)

Hi there... 90% of this video covers 'ab Astrometry' with a Mono source (a Guitar connected to a DI-BOX and from there to my Mono Input of the SoundCard)! Astrometry is 100% compatible with Mono and Stereo signals! No need for fancy mics :) You will not be missing anything at all.

@@AudioBrewers Thank you! I just purchased it for iOS and am looking forward to using it. Best to you! 🎶🔉

Enjoy!

Thank you!

Thank you for your comments!

No - a Binaural recording already contains all the baked stereo signal to sound binaural, you cannot grab the original signal from there. It's already processed. You can encode the Binaural to Ambisonics by treating it just like just another stereo signal (which in a way, is) and then mess about with it - 'ab Imager Express' could work for that, but nothing will ever "re-create" the original space.

I didn't include DP as it doesn't support Atmos layouts and for it to work with them, a whole rerouting headache had to be followed (see Michael Wagner's video). So if I were to include it, I probably would have disqualified it, too - should they update the track's layouts throughout 2024, I'll have it in the to-do list 😉

@@AudioBrewers Tx a lot, Ale!

Thank you!

Thank you, Sam!

Thanks so much for watching and enjoying our products! :)

Very true, but if you think about it, this applies to most major DAWs, and Reaper has a quick solution: Create a new track, and insert your track inside the new track (i.e. Folder), and then add the beam to the folder. It's not a fancy solution, but just to think of the solution on the other DAWs gives me the cringes ;) However, as you mentioned, I wish the fader and panner could be moved as if they were inserts!

@@AudioBrewers don't get me wrong, I switched to Reaper 5 years ago and it's now my only DAW I mix and master and I love it. I still convert stuff on PT, Logic and Cubase. But Studio One, Sonar, Cubase and Ardour (MixBus) do have post-fader inserts. I think this would not be too hard thing in Reaper since it seems so modular. I wish they would even make parameter modulation with fader. This would offer a quite usable hack.

In that I completely agree with you 👌😊

@@vesalaasanen2158 Yeah, lets hope Cockos implements Post Fader Inserts sooner than later. Would be a killer feature. We are using Reaper since 2010 as main DAW. We will publish a special tutorial on how to use DAC in Reaper without actually having the headache/need for post fader inserts, thanks to some really neat routing features of Reaper. Stay tuned.

@@fiedler-audio , looking forward to it! I have couple of script approaches but they either: - are very complex to control with external surface - clutter TCP and/or MPC - Have DAC and other plugins separated by hundred tracks Just to have fader as parameter modulation source would make this a piece of cake. Come on Cockos!

This video explains it in 2 minutes ua-cam.com/video/mFFJ4vqQ2tQ/v-deo.html if you have further questions feel free to write us an email at hello@audiobrewers.com

Thank you! It is indeed interesting to see how different developers approach a similar idea!

Completely agree with you! The DAW is just a tool, we should never hide behind what it can/cannot do - we are the artistans.

Thank you!

If you are using a stereo sample Library send the stereo output of kontakt to an ambisonics bus, if you are using an ambisonics sample Library you must add a 4-channel output in kontakt so that you have a "quad" channel in cubase and then there you add our decoder