Відео

Really cool video interesting discussion

no far from the best but better than Rises which was garbage

I watched a movie and I thought that those cops were dumb the entire time 😂

Double Impact is supposed to be just a guy film, no logic or rhyme or reason except for action,guns,hot women, awesome soundtrack,booze,drugs and badass Martial Arts.

Good video, i agree a lot about most movies being in that 5-6 out of 10 range, but when you go to discussion about the movie people jump to extremes way too often. I use scale slightly different: 1 through 4 is different levels of bad; 5-6 is mediocre and decent; 7 through 10 is different levels of good; that way i have 4 stars for each bad and good, and 2 stars for mixed reactions. And my rating system is as follows: 1 - Abysmal. A kind of movie you laugh at and not laugh with. Also just painful to get through (example: Home Alone 4) 2 - Terrible. The movie is functional, but very dull and fails on each level. The biggest compliment i can give to it is that it's watchable (example: Dark Phoenix) 3 - Very bad. Fundamentally broken kind of movie. It provides some entertainment and has some glimmers of hope, but too many bad things about it and it's a head-scratcher. (example: Venom: Let There Be Carnage) 4 - Bad. Has some redeeming qualities and a vision, but falls short and ends up being underwhelming. (example: Alien 3) 5 - Mediocre. A mixed bag. Some good, some bad. Wouldn't say i wasted my time, but didn't left being quite satisfied either. (example: The Strangers) 6 - Decent. Enjoyable, while i'm aware of the issues the movie has, it's still a respectable effort. If i had to rewatch it for some reason, i wouldn't mind. (example: Equilibrium) 7 - Good. That's a solid film, which gets most things right. It's not groundbreaking, but it delivers and i would definitely recommend it. (example: Bronson) 8 - Great. A well-rounded kind of movie. Acting, script, premise, direction it has it all and it's thoroughly enjoyable. (example: Wind River) 9 - Amazing. Remarkably good, it sticks with me, it stands out among other movies, strong piece of filmmaking. (example: Memento) 10 - Masterpiece. Exceptionally well crafted movie, it transcends the genre, it changed the way i look at movies, and i think about it a lot (example: Chinatown)

This is a fantastic video, I have personally come to a very similar view of things. I started out rating things on a bell curve, because as a more stem minded person it just seemed like the appropriate thing to do. But my thoughts shifted over time for the same reason as yours, most people are going to naturally want to watch movies that are good. People know their own taste, generally, and are going to seek out things they think they will like while ignoring film that looks bad. If you were to watch every move that was ever made, the bell curve distribution would probably be moved to the left of center, partially because most of what people recommend and talk about is good stuff in the same way most people only listen to the top couple percentage of artists. But this would also be because you're watching a lot of content that doesn't interest you. I believe this is why when we rate things individually, a 3.5 or 7 should be a pretty good/average movie. 3 or 6 you still enjoy but maybe there's some flaws. 2.5 or 5, I personally use for content I'm apathetic to, and then below that is anything I didn't like or find to be good. I have 2's or 4's that I still found somewhat fun at moments, just didn't think were good. That's why my curve is similarly shifted to the right, where the largest category of ratings I give is a 3.5 or 7 and then less and less down to 5's or 10's. For me this feels like it gives a very natural way to approach the ratings for what I watch, and my ratings curve has remained fairly consistent overall. edit: Wanted to add that I think it's also a good idea overall to look at these ratings relative to other films in their categories, like a tier list, where it becomes easier to get a perspective on what makes that film the rating you gave it. That can often help you to see "oh, these all belong together because they're similar quality". For this reason my own curve isn't super tall, it's a bit shorter and spread out, because there's so much nuance and I'm always trying to find another 5 or 10.

very insightful video

How I use the Star rating 5 stars = Perfection in Cinema 4 and a Half stars = Almost Perfection 4 Stars = Amazing 3 and a Half stars = Really Good 3 stars = Average 2 and a Half stars = Schlock Entertainment 2 stars = This is Really Bad 1 and Half stars = Awful 1 Star = Down Right Abysmal Half a Star = The Worst Thing in the Entire World and offers No value Whatsoever

I’m strict when I rate movies with the star rating. I personally feel that you have to be as objective as you can be. I’ve seen people give so many movies 4 and 5 stars and I feel well what’s the point in it all then?, if you’re going to do that. A 5 star movie to me is perfection, and even though I’ve still yet to see some classic movies I personally have only ever watched two movies that I’ve rated 5 stars, and they are The Shining and Goodfellas, those two movies are perfection. A 4 star movie to me is a fantastic movie but just doesn’t quite reach perfection levels to me. Movies that I’ve rated 4 stars are Jaws, Alien, Terminator 2, Pulp Fiction, Reservoir Dogs, Taxi Driver, Casino, Heat, Psycho, Django Unchained, The Exorcist, etc etc. They are all fucking phenomenal movies but they just don’t quite hit perfection to me. I have rated two movies with 4 and half stars that are just near the tip of perfection in The Exorcist 3 which is better than the original, and Primal Fear. Those two movies hit so close to perfection but not fully perfect. For me The Shining and Goodfellas are perfection in Cinema.

They would have gotten away with if they used another witness that doesn't know them or the suspect.

FANTASTIC Movie!! A MUST see!!! ❤😊

I used to have a 10-1 rating system. Now its this. 5 - my favourite and most flawless: Masterpieces. 4.5 - extraordinary with littlest flaws and misses: Excellences. 4 - wonderful with minimal flaws: Gems. 3.5 - amazing with perceptible flaws: Merits. 3 - good with highly apparent flaws: Solids. 2 - highly flawed/bloated: Fodder. 1 - garbage: Garbage. Unrated - the worst film of all time: Garbage Juice.

I think it is difficult to rate a movie without any kind of emotional attachment, but omitting a category for enjoyability must help. This is the difference between favour (subjective); and greatness (objective)

I agree! Rates are good for quick communication, and you can expand on that with arguments. I also prefer the clean 1 to 10 scale. Pitchfork goes hardcore by adding decimals 😅

Good movie

Your review can’t be further off

When I talk about movies, shows, books, games, etc, to my friends. I just put them into tiers: Tier 6: Dogsh*t(don't watch) Tier 5: Forgettable(had decent ideas but failed as a whole) Tier 4: Mixed(might be worth seeing, but wouldn't recommend to others or hype it up) Tier 3: Solid(worth checking out, probably better if you're already into that particular genre) Tier 2: Spectacular(definitely worth seeing, resonates with me) Tier 1: Iconic(hit me deep down, and most likely inspirational to me, whether it comes down to writing fiction or my personal approach to life like specific mindsets, interests, or hobbies)

See you at the party Richter

I very very much love the reboot...only because of Kate as Lori...she is so hot and badass. Just love her, she is such a great character that i very much adore

With TOTAL RECALL and ROBOCOP, it amazes that anyone could think it would be a good idea to remake any Paul Verhoeven film. Not only remake them but to do them straight and humourless. So bizarre.

The fact that you have last Boy Scout in the background got you a sub I love old movies and this one is underrated af loved it

I literally saw this today - it was fine for it’s time The duo worked well - both were great

My Rating System: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ = Something that I think is worth a 5 star rating ⭐⭐⭐⭐ 1/2 = Something that I think is worth a 4 and a half star rating ⭐⭐⭐⭐ = Something that I think is worth a 4 star rating ⭐⭐⭐ 1/2 = Something that I think is worth a 3 and a half star rating ⭐⭐⭐ = Something that I think is worth a 3 star rating ⭐⭐ 1/2 = Something that I think is worth a 2 and a half star rating ⭐⭐ = Something that I think is worth a 2 star rating ⭐ 1/2 = Something that I think is worth a 1 and a half star rating ⭐ = Something that I think is worth a 1 star rating 1/2 = Something that I think is worth a half-star rating

I liked hearing about how your rating system is done, mine is sorta similar but allows me to categorize a film, on being amazing to terrible in technicality, while leaving space to be specific with how I felt about it. for me 8-10 is classics, 10 beings films with a profound impact on me, while 9 being maybe just as good but didn't reach that personal spark you'd need for a 10. 8 out of 10 is meaning I enjoyed it quite a fair amount and think the work in it is stellar, but there wasn't any peak of major enjoyment for me that stretches it into the higher scores. 5-7 are more run-of-the-mill movies, and the rating of 5 to 7 is purely on enjoyment, and allows a 7 being something I'd still recommend while it's being a newer film. while 2-4 are films are what I'd consider bad. the twist is usally a bad film that I give a 4, I usually enjoy more then the run of the mill films I give a 5. but this all really allows me to to add an extra layer on my rating system, so when looking back at it I cant really know what a number means. and for what 1 means, well... I try not to go there. In short I usually decide to rate a film on the 3 categories of technicality, then choose one of the three rating all based on how I felt.

Your point "You should grade a lot of movies as 5s" is flawed. In order not to waste my time, I avoid mediocre or terrible movies. Usually, my established rule-of-thumb is, if it has less than 7 stars on IMDb, I'm not gonna watch it, unless it is controversial (i.e., probably a lot of unjustified downvotes) or a cult classic, ...or I'm just in the mood for something trashy to "cleanse my palate". Hence, most of the ratings I give are 6s to 9s, with 7 being most common.

Great video!

Personally i marathoned 1-7 with an ex of mine abt 10yrs ago. Cant say i remembered much abt the series and i definitely didnt keep up with it. I had never even heard of jigsaw and spiral til after i watched saw x. I dont go to the movies/tv much, and i have lots of ad blockers, so when my partner asked me out on a halloween movie date and asked what was playing that id be interested in watching, i just picked saw because it sounded familiar. Went in basically blind, other than vague recollections of key moments from the early movies, thats it. And for that reason, i feel like i went in with the best circumstances possible. The opening didnt drag for me, i really enjoyed all the time we got to spend with jigsaw the person. Helped build character, motivation and empathy. But on the other hand, because the first half of the movie was so normal, to be honest, by the time he discovered hed been conned, id forgotten i was watching a horror movie, if that makes sense. Id kinda gotten into the mindset of it being a poorly-written drama? So when he starts kidnapping people, it was so jarring to me that i got physical whiplash. The first trap after the kidnapping, i was so unprepared i nearly passed out. And i dont normally have a weak stomach with horror movies. Perhaps some kind of mesh of shortening that long setup and easing viewers into the horror aspects wouldve been better?

When you can watch a movie multiple times and never get bored of it, that's when you know it's a ten. For me that movie is Joker and Gladiator.

Great video! For me it’s: 10 = Masterpiece 9 = Amaziing 8 = Great 7 = Good 6 = Okay 5 = Meh 4 = Bad 3 = Awful 2 = Terrible 1 = Disaster

Wolf of wall street and John carpenters the thing, they live and Halloween. Are all 10 out of 10s for me and nightmare on elm street 2 , TMNT 3 and on her majesty's secret service will always be 1s for me

This movie is fire 🔥

"promo sm" 🙄

Great video!! Do you have a letterboxd account where you rate movies or other specific website? I would love to follow you and read your views.

Both meg and meg2

the ridiculous aspects of the movie is the reason you go and see it. it is a movie meant to be fun almost like a cartoon.

I wouldn’t say I loved it but, all the tech aspects and the acting is very good. It’s not something I’d buy for my collection but, I’d still say a postive score.

truee

My Latest Movie Review: ua-cam.com/video/6p-LKWESqUs/v-deo.html; Latest How I Rate Movies: ua-cam.com/video/sYjVDQQ_MXU/v-deo.html

Not gonna post any 'spoilers' from the trailer here, but is the spoiler you're referring to in reference to a certain voice we hear asking - of all the men to cheat, you picked John Kramer? I suspect it is that, but if you think about it - it's not really a spoiler considering when Saw X takes place, between Saw and Saw II, and that certain character was present during those films.

I recently started rating movies and I realized my ratings are flawed as I easily gets influenced from imdb ratings and other online reviewers. I was searching for a video on how to rate a movie efficiently and I think this video is the best. I appreciate it so much. I would love if you can make a video on giving examples on movies that are flawed in some ways and explanation on how to find flaws. Like what is missing in Die Hard 2 that you think it's not 10, but 8/9.

I really liked the perspective you offered about not being afraid to give movies fives. A lot of the time I end up dismissing movies as bad if they're not great and you make really good points about it being a gradient and it not being great but a 4-6 rating is a really natural place for a lot of movies to end up at.

I haven’t seen any of these. Eventually I’ll dive into them though. I hear it’s a great franchise.

I enjoyed it. It’s not an amazing movie but, compared to other stuff this year I didn’t think it was that bad.

65 is a pointless movie - pitch black -jurassic w copy

The comedy in this movie I didn’t get every joke but, there were some laughs for me. I wish the horror part was a little less goofy. It was a good one time watch for me. Subbed to your channel. Have a great week!

Yea this movie was kool pac did his thang tho he was be a touch notch actor...gridloc?¿?

☠️ st least your honest?

“I didn’t like their first one that much” -No one ever.

I would only recommend it if you want some good laughs.

Not a fan of the movies Hollywood bleeds them dry as much money as they can get