Відео

Slant.

wow very informative #mathlife

oh man, good stuff. ☺️😊👍

hi chav :D

This was very helpful thanks Chav!!🥸☝️

Thanks for the useful video... Is it correct to say that if we have a triangle, given two sides and the INCLUDED angle (SAS), that the law of cosines will ALWAYS work giving only ONE possible angle?? Thanks much!!!

Thsi is the most helpful video out there #mathlife.

great video 10/10 very helpful showed my entire family. #mathlife

THIS HELPED ME FINISH MY DELTA MATH AND GET 70% CREDIT BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!........TRUE LIFESAVER!!!! #MATHLIFE

I'm trying to figure out how this got into my feed. BTW, I was there.

this is the best video I have ever watched 10/10

first

Even I could follow the lesson!!!

Thanks chav! Great video :) got my 100%

first

PLZ I THINK THE GUEST IS A LITTLE FRIGHTENED

MATHLIFEEEEEEE 🥳🥳🥳

the surprise guest LOL

Best video by far!!

I so appreciate the tutorial; this will come in handy during college!

Thank you so much for explaining this, I never understood the complexities until today, but now I do!

Love it! Amazing tutorial!

f6djd vyn.fyi

Love the rhyming title!

Thank you very much!👍

At the 5:04 mark, I made a mistake and inserted a second negative. That was an accident. The total expression itself is a negative, so it should have read as just "negative e to the power (5pi/4) multiplied by sqrt(2)/2." Sorry about that guys.

hi chav, i found a BIT OF A MISTAKE on time 16:17 where you said -tan(θ) but actually circled tan(θ) just lyk :D

luv it!

great job!

This is super awesome math stuff. Keep up the good work. Imma continue to follow.

He's not wrong about the last problem. Derivatives are so much faster than limits, but you do need the limits for proofs. Also, I miss this. Appreciate Chav cause he's one of the best. My calc prof this summer wasn't bad but Chav is still >>>>. #MathLife #PreMIT

L'Hopitals! Love that man lol

Love the smiley faces! (^○^)

Awesome video as always Chav! #MathLife

At 2:14 I say “we don’t care about the denominator...I meant to say “we don’t care about the numerator”

At 21:36, I saw “2 away from the original” to describe the last odd number. Meant to say 2 away from the middle, 4 away from the original, hence, the x+4.

At 18:35, f'(7) should be negative, as evident of the calculator output. Interesting enough, I wrote the explanation correct! I had that negative value stuck in my head but it didn't register when I was writing down f'(7). Sorry guys.

At 23:44, I say Unit vector with magnitude of negative 1, I’m sure I meant to say “Magnitude of 1”...I correct myself eventually...I probably said “negative” because of the “opposite” deal they want in the problem. Sorry guys. Hope I didn’t confuse.

Error at the 7:24 mark. The correct antiderivative should be (1/2)ln(4x-1). When you evaluate and do upper minus lower, you get ln(3). Sorry for my mistake. Credit goes to Revilla for catching my error.

We miss you chav!!