Відео

It only works on pc

Check the link in the description

Would it work even if you didn’t buy the game?

@@Djmhyde6224 no but the game dont cost mutch 200

@@Djmhyde6224 do you know what cd keys is?

Pc players made mods that way they can continue playing online

Sorry for the late response but basically I changed the armored suit to the default with UPK explorer and added some different textures then spawned in the regular Batman/Man via commands and key binds

of course man wb even cut the crap and fired Rocksteady. I am sure now we will get great arkham games again with proper storyline

​@Yusa25 you probably missed the news mate, it wasnt WB who ruined the game, Sefton-fucking-Hill decided to personally write a shitty Avengers-like story that completely ruins everything from top to bottom. As of recently - he and the entire Rocksteady studio has abandoned their old title to make a new one (Shining Star Studio) to escape the backlash about the truth of how the game was a total failure, both in arkhamverse and financial matters.

@@ThatOneCringyEdgelord I mean, the game says in the credits it was written by Sefton Hill and Ian Ball, who also wrote Arkham Knight's story which was also pretty bad. Everyone should have known from the jump the mistakes with the writing were their fault. They are game designers, they write with game design in mind. If there was pressure from WB to go live service to make more money, they wrote SSKTJL with that in mind as well, hence why the game has a completely unfinished and largely unsatisfying story. I would still place most blame on WB in that situation although from what I've heard Sefton not knowing anything about live service development certainly didn't help. WB allowing their best singleplayer action adventure studio to make a live service game is on them though because any good publisher should know that's a stupid idea.

@UnoLeonJay Still, after I learned the truth about the game, I still hate Rocksteady for this catastrophic failure of SS Game that should NOT exist under ANY circumstances like those. Sefton Hill in my opinion deserves to burn for the fucked up judgement he had while writing and directing the development. Yes, he was under the boot of WB, but that doesn't mean that he should just cut the throat of the entire arkham lore, like it was nothing. He had a brilliant legacy, that its story could be branched further into multiple other outcomes of AK, but no. He dropped this smelly trashcan on us, then he took whatever of his faithful team members had, then ran away like a coward. Seriously - this is fucking unacceptable. What I also find infuriating is that Sefton probably consulted bloody Sweet Baby Inc. that resulted in the woke'ish implementations like black green lantern and gay joker. I personally had no problem with Deadshot based upon the SS movie, but the rest is a definitive No-No, that I will not stand for. It's simply not canon to DC-verse or ANY verse at. All. End of my Blabbering. I'm done with this thread. -_-

@@ThatOneCringyEdgelord Oh no, you're a SBI guy. Black Green Lantern has existed for a really long time my dude. He was the main GL in the 2000s animated show, did that show somehow also consult with SBI? The Joker is gay? Maybe I missed something but I played to unlock him and never saw anything that said he was gay. Even if he was, it's not the Arkham Joker, so it's not like they changed an existing character. This is a Joker who is completely different in every way from the comics and from Arkham and he sucks for reasons completely unrelated to any sexuality he might have. I'm gonna say look up what wokespotting is and how grifters use it to control and make money off people's outrage. SBI doesn't control as much as you've been told they do. It's a narrative consulting company, they can't change the whole story or alter aspects of the game outside of minor changes. Some UA-camrs use them as a boogeyman for what's "ruining gaming" because it's easy to blame everything on "the minorities." Suffice to say, they weren't the ones who chose Jon Stewart over Hal Jordan or chose what sexuality Joker would have. This might surprise you, but lots of people in fields of art happen to also be people who want to make an impact in furthering progression, and including other characters of differing backgrounds is part of that. It's not a "woke agenda." It's just them acknowledging there are other people who don't look like/have the same sexuality as the majority who also want to see themselves in the media they consume. It's just how the world is. When you see a black gay guy in the street do you immediately assume he was planted there by the "woke?" If that is "woke" I'm sorry to tell you but games have been "woke" for decades now. By your logic, even Arkham City could be considered "woke" because they use the Michael Lane (black man) version of Azrael instead of the Jean Paul (white man) version. That game came out in 2011. Did they consult with Sweet Baby Inc then too? If you think representation doesn't matter, I have to ask do you create a character that looks like you when you play games? Because I do. I create a white dude almost everytime unless I'm playing some shit like Baldur's Gate. So if someone else plays games, they want to be able to play someone like them as well. Hope that makes sense.

There’s a mod that allows me and others to play origins online once more, it’s in the description. EDIT: I also have a video tutorial to set it up correctly.

His punishment must be more severe.