Відео

i thought the game was capped at 60 fps on pc

O my god its not game its real

how u have +100 fps in dornogal wtf

Was für ein sinnloser test. Im späteren Spielverlauf kriegst du es mit 10+ huntern gleichzeitig zutun. Dann kommt die Hardware ordentlich ins Schwitzen.

How many FPS on medium-high settings?

Hey dude will i ever get 120 fps on rtx 3050 laptop 75 watt?

Nice benchmark. What cooler are you using for the 5800x3d? 360 AIO? Air?

Tough watch it with 360p on phone

Nice one, thanks!

why u have usage of 6gb ram and 900 mb of vram, when i play the game i have constatnyl 3gb vram usage and 14.5gb ram usage ( ON LOWEST PRESET ! )

How do you get that overlay?

I don't know why UA-cam reccomend Me a performance test of a 12 year old game or neither why did I watched it.

If you don't mind the starwars quote We will watch your growth with great enthusiasm

HTF does the police always know where I am if I kill someone. Makes no sense.

I would say yes, but to unfold the full potential of this world you need 5 expansions, in other words I would play them all!

Phantom Liberty broke me that fucking Robot i was so mad after the Mission

I just wish your companion's had something to do while your out running around. Honestly they gota be the laziest bunch of space explorers I've ever seen. It would of been so much better if after arriving back at the lodge I had calls or emergency transmissions from other members like Beret captured by pirates, you could've had Noel ask you to take her on a mission to gather specimens or Sam radio for help fighting spacers!....Just give these corrector's something to do beside sitting around waiting for us to do it.

I assume that humanity in space would change our height or weight because of different gravity. Some are dependent on oxygen tank in certain planets. It still feels like playing fallout game but only humans. It just lacks world building, like your still playing on the surface of earth but its space you know.

This guy lives in a huge castle in transylvania. I'm sure of it.

Games are art and like with any art, most if not all aspects of it are subjective. However, something that's not subjective but scientifically proven because mathematical is the amount of loading screens. But I am wondering now, could there actually be people who are so numb to loading screens they don't mind even such an insane amount?

Yeah, I can't see Starfield as anything more than Bethesda game design poorly applied to an unfamiliar ganre that they have no experience in. The big thing that they pushed was space exploration and making you feel small among the stars. The saying goes "as vast as an ocean, as deep as a puddle." Reigns true for this game. For the technical achievement, next gen experience, we have bite-sized areas laoded in by a cutscene + loading screen. Moving to a new area also has the same result, so buckle up for a truly riveting time waster. The planets you land on, or maps may or may not have copy-pasted areas spread so far apart, it takes too long to go to each one, basically a shitty Death Stranding. Yeah, it's not gonna feel good to play. You have the Star map to travel to different systems, then the system map to travel to planets? So what the hell am I exploring? Why can't I just fly from planet to planet myself? It's all just one big loading screen simulator. Cities have no local map, so that's a big issue, and it's just barely be8ng addressed. Having to find my way around a city is annoying and involves trial and error. If they wanted to go this route, give me in-game map boards to point me in the right direction. Morrowind did this, so why can't Starfie? It would be so easy to implement, just a big board with a map on it in different places like a tour guide. They have them in malls today, street sighns man cmon! Thank god Star Citizen was competent enough to do this. Most importantly, you mean to tell me, the player, that this is humanities main planet and we have 1 city? On top of that, none of these people know what's actually on it since you can scan everything and sell it as a discovery. It's probably the worst joke of all time. NPC's are braindead and dont react to anything that you do. Fire your weapon in a populated area, and the most you get is a stare from cold, dead eyes, and maybe a facial expression that clearly doesn't look right. AI has devolved, and it's funny because BGS sucked at this anyway. The game is more polished than previous games, but they probably saw how ass this game was and said "well we botched this job. The least we can do is polish the game up a little." Truly a game from this current generation. Companions are stuck to you like gum on your shoe or a shit-stain on your underwear. Even if you treat them like crap or do things they hate, they never leave. How they messed that up is beyond me, considering games like F3, F4, and NV. The companies are also pretty damn forgettable. They can never hold a candle to followers like Kate, Piper, Hancock, Veronica, Rex, Cassidy, Raul, Jericho, Dogmeat, and Fawkes Most importantly, we can't forget the LEGENDARY, cream of the crop, mega chad, crack shot of the Mojave, BOONE! Quest design is extremely lacking, considering most of it is planet hopping to talk to different people (LOADING SCREEN SIMULATOR) or fetch quests. With the technology they have, apparently, they have no phones, radios, or any kind of long-distance communication aside from what already exists in the ships systems. Yet if you steal any kind of item without anybody seeing you, then get arrested, the authorities somehow know that was stolen. Yeah, this guy knows I stole that specific pen in an entirely different star system. Considering the lack of communication, word sure does travel fast, huh? That and they are somehow all psychic for whatever reason. The main quest is terribly written, and considering some people say its the best story they have produced really speaks volumes. You get to play a main story that is one massive fetch quest, and also partake in the worst mini-game of all time in the form of 0 g where's Waldo. Dialog choices majority of the time dont matter because you get the same result every time. If you want to shoot a guy in the face, you'll likely be stopped to progress the quest as normal. Even if you could, it wouldn't matter due to essential characters. This is in every BGS game, and it's by far the biggest hindrance on in-game immersion. Gunplay is basic, and the melee is as horrible as always. With the special powers you get being Walmart brand shouts, and the majority of them are useless. The combat, in general, is outdated. it's sad considering games like Farcry 3, and Half Life 2 feels far better in this aspect. What's the point of ship design if you can just fast travel from planet to planet? It is one of the best parts of the game, and it's useless aside from ship combat that is also lacking. Upgrading your ship doesn't matter either unless you partake in combat. The only reason you would need to upgrade is to jump longer distances due to fuel consumption. You can just make shorter jumps and still get to where you need to go, so what's the point? The UI is a problem as well, needing to rely on modders to fix it as usual. The fact that it took so long to implement FOV is ridiculous because it's the same problem, same .ini file each time. Bethesda is so lazy when it comes to true, proper optimization. Hostile planets dont feel hostile when it comes to environmental effects. It's so minor that it's more of an annoyance, and that shouldn't be the case. It kills the idea of being prepared with the right equipment before taking on a dangerous world. It's one of those things that hurts the exploration because going from place to place doesn't require any thought at all. Where am I going? What's the atmosphere like? What dangerous wildlife could be there? These are questions you should ask, but due to the nature of it, none of that even matters, when it should be the most important aspect. This game would be better if they took the survival approach, but they didn't. The dangers are so pointless aside from annoying icons that I'm surprised they don't just let us breathe in space. As an RPG, Starfield does nothing to keep me invested. It doesn't hook me in to keep playing. Other games have been doing this a lot better, whether it be a pure RPG experience or space exploration. The fantasy of traveling the stars does not exist here. You would be better off playing Star Citizen, Elite Dangerous, No Mans Sky, Space Engineer, Outer Wilds, or Outer Worlds. It's bad enough that top modders are refusing to make content for the game. That's a big problem, considering this game needs it desperately. Even if it had mods, a turd is still a turd even if you polish it up and put a bow on it. What a sad, sorry attempt. I wanted to like this game so bad, and I was so hyped for it. When I started playing this game, I was ok for about 10 to 12 hrs, but after that, it got worse and worse. I became more critical and perceptive of its problems over time. In the end, I had to set the controller down because I couldn't endure it. I became more and more angry with every hr that passed playing this game. Trying to like this game is harder than any souls boss I have ever fought. If you like the game, then hats off to you because you are indeed a very special individual. This game does nothing for me, and it does not respect the time spent playing it. I believe it was deserving of not getting a single award. It fell flat on its face. not that the GA matters anyway. I dont like Skyrim, but at least that game understood the idea of the adventure. The journey you took was full of things to find along the way to your destination without being interrupted unless you entered an interior. I could play that game for 30 min to an hour uninterrupted by a loading screen just traveling. Seeing something interesting in the distance made you want to explore it, even if it's not related to a quest. In Starfield, there may be a cave or a mining outpost, but none of it is interesting, especially after seeing it 2 or 3 times. You never have the need to explore because there is nothing there, except maybe loot that you can buy or find during an actual quest. The travel to locations is so boring that more often you'll avoid side areas so you can just do what you gotta do, then leave. F3, F4, FNV, ESM, ESOB, and ESS didn't have this problem. Even 76 does this better than SF, and that's a slap to the face. The scenery can be nice because Starfield can be a good-looking game at times. Aside from a single moment, and maybe a screenshot that doesn't matter, you'll move on and still be bored the entire way through. Sitting through another loading screen and having your time wasted is all that awaits you.

It’s not that bad, but in mechanics, features, and content compared from previous titles, I can say it’s more regressed

Lol... people are still playing Starfield?

I don’t think it’s a bad game. It’s okay. I’ve never been much of a space fan anyway but I enjoyed what was there.

was the missng L in the title handed todd ?

It's...mediocre. It's got both good and bad, but the writing and universe are too bland. Too boring. Takes no risks. The Red Mile feels like a kindergarten sandbox rather than what is described in the game.

Starfield needs a machinima series...WAIT - it HAS one!!! Enjoy, and get ready for a wild ride. 🙂

Can't really say, I simply didn't want to waste my time playing that crap.

I quit at level 37. The only missions left were all the temple ones and artifact. Once I went to 3 identical temples in a row I just quit. What a repetitive, godawful game.

You can improve the games outdated systems and visuals with mods, but you can’t really change the awful dialogue and story.

Yes

It's so bad that just trying to watch your video causes Kodi to crash.

Is that really how you spell really?

Yes, it is that bad...

idk my guy ur doing less dmg than a disc priest in LFR on flame though

And what population settings did you have?

As a person who mainly played action RPGs (and a few turn-based ones like DIvinity OS2) I really identified with almost everything that was said during the video. I got lost in the D&D system and only after watching some build videos I understood more or less how the skills work. Just enough to combine an effect or damage with a secondary. I'm on my second play and I have no idea how people on UA-cam manage to do hundreds of damage points per turn. Despite this issue of an abundance of information and feeling like I didn't understand much about D&D mechanics, the combat hasn't been as difficult as expected. Of course, on many occasions one or two party members get pretty injured. But with the exception of a line of dialogue in the Creche that led to a Game Over, I didn't even use the resurrection scrolls. Of course, this is justified because it is on Normal difficulty. Now, on my second play, I'm on Tactician but knowing about the encounters in the game ended up being even easier. The first time I really felt a difference being in Tactician was when fighting doppelgangers in Act 3, as they have a buff exclusive to this difficulty that reduces the accuracy of ranged enemies (3/4 of my party). It makes me curious to follow someone completely new to a new campaign, to observe the choices made by that person and understand the difficulties encountered in order to weigh the different experiences that each player may have.

I find your feedback odd. You say that you want a sense of adventure, yet you feel pressured to quicksave so much. Seems like you're more worried about getting the perfect adventure vs creating your own unique path based on your in-game choices?

For me the game needs to have a harder difficulty. BG3's tactician is easier then Divinitiy Original Sin 2 normal. Also romances are sometimes really annoying imo. Still a GOTY for me and 8 out 10.

I personally love baldurs gate but I think everyone has a unique view and opinion ,Its always nice to just see people make videos they enjoy and not worry too much about other peoples responses

Probably the easiest way to counter invisibility is 'create water' spell. Also, you can get eye surgery from Volo that will give you permanent buff to see invisibile.

In my opinion it is not overrated. Plot came flat in the end but really fun.

Invest time in doing captions, my dude. Either that, or mumble less.

I agree with a lot of what you had to say. Overall, I enjoy the game, but it is one of the most over-rated cRPG I have played in a very long time, imo.

Wish when people do these tests for hardware on new world they would actually go in a town with people to see the performance then open world fps has never been a problem

What was your CPU before and did it make a noticeable difference swapping to the X3D? I have a 5900X but plan on selling it for the 5800X3D since the extra cache lowers CPU frametimes in VR games but I'm curious if it makes any difference in STALKER

check act 3 in town fps

Super Mario!

dachte schon nur bei mir geht der 5800x3D in dem game auf über 70 grad^^

❤