- 72
- 8 875
Mr. Khai
Приєднався 16 тра 2024
Anarchy | Philosophy | Economics
To discuss or debate with me, check out my:
Discord (easy way to contact me): mr_kha1
To discuss or debate with me, check out my:
Discord (easy way to contact me): mr_kha1
What is a WOMAN?? | WHATEVER PODCAST REACTION | PART 2
Contact me here to debate or talk:
x.com/anarcheosis
Discord: mr_kha1
x.com/anarcheosis
Discord: mr_kha1
Переглядів: 7
Відео
What is a WOMAN?? | WHATEVER PODCAST REACTION | PART 1
Переглядів 24День тому
Contact me here to debate or talk: x.com/anarcheosis Discord: mr_kha1
The REDPILL is GOOD
Переглядів 2714 днів тому
Contact me here to debate or talk: x.com/anarcheosis Discord: mr_kha1
The REDPILL is a Force for GOOD???
Переглядів 3714 днів тому
Contact me here to debate or talk: x.com/anarcheosis Discord: mr_kha1 Quibbles Over Coffee Channel: www.youtube.com/@quibblesc
What the HECK is Georgism????
Переглядів 5814 днів тому
Contact me here to debate or talk: x.com/anarcheosis Discord: mr_kha1 Quibbles Over Coffee Channel: www.youtube.com/@quibblesc
Reacting to SOSCAST Redpill Segment
Переглядів 1021 день тому
Contact me here to debate or talk: x.com/anarcheosis Discord: mr_kha1
Destiny, Israel vs Palestine, Jordan Peterson, IQ
Переглядів 3221 день тому
Contact me here to debate or talk: x.com/anarcheosis Discord: mr_kha1
TRUE Christians are ANARCHIST
Переглядів 66621 день тому
Contact me here to debate or talk: x.com/anarcheosis Discord: mr_kha1
Egoism is TRUE
Переглядів 8521 день тому
Contact me here to debate or talk: x.com/anarcheosis Discord: mr_kha1
Practical vs Principled Libertarianism
Переглядів 9921 день тому
Contact me here to debate or talk: x.com/anarcheosis Discord: mr_kha1
Meeting Fabian Liberty
Переглядів 4921 день тому
Contact me here to debate or talk: x.com/anarcheosis Discord: mr_kha1
Trans Rights is about IDENTITY
Переглядів 2228 днів тому
Contact me here to debate or talk: x.com/anarcheosis
DESTROYING Moral Realism
Переглядів 10228 днів тому
Contact me here to debate or talk: x.com/anarcheosis
Egoism is LOGICALLY True
Переглядів 28Місяць тому
Contact me here to debate or talk: x.com/anarcheosis
Capitalism is BETTER for Climate Change
Переглядів 28Місяць тому
Contact me here to debate or talk: x.com/anarcheosis
Reacting to Jubilee's Capitalism vs Communism Debate | Part 2
Переглядів 332 місяці тому
Reacting to Jubilee's Capitalism vs Communism Debate | Part 2
Reacting to Jubilee's Capitalism vs Communism Debate
Переглядів 453 місяці тому
Reacting to Jubilee's Capitalism vs Communism Debate
@SpookyScarySocialist is Wrong About Communism | Part 2
Переглядів 3333 місяці тому
@SpookyScarySocialist is Wrong About Communism | Part 2
@SpookyScarySocialist is Wrong About Communism | Part 1
Переглядів 1,8 тис.3 місяці тому
@SpookyScarySocialist is Wrong About Communism | Part 1
Vaush Doesn't Make Sense Part 2 | DEBATE REVIEW | Featuring @KingSithis
Переглядів 3343 місяці тому
Vaush Doesn't Make Sense Part 2 | DEBATE REVIEW | Featuring @KingSithis
Vaush Doesn't Make Sense Part 1 | DEBATE REVIEW | Featuring @KingSithis
Переглядів 5023 місяці тому
Vaush Doesn't Make Sense Part 1 | DEBATE REVIEW | Featuring @KingSithis
Are We Required to Help Trans People? | Discussion with Hounding
Переглядів 783 місяці тому
Are We Required to Help Trans People? | Discussion with Hounding
Interviewing Ayn Rand's Strongest Soldier Part 2 | Featuring @ProphetDivinityy
Переглядів 394 місяці тому
Interviewing Ayn Rand's Strongest Soldier Part 2 | Featuring @ProphetDivinityy
Interviewing Ayn Rand's Strongest Soldier Part 1 | Featuring @ProphetDivinityy
Переглядів 604 місяці тому
Interviewing Ayn Rand's Strongest Soldier Part 1 | Featuring @ProphetDivinityy
Thank you guys for looking out for me
I give up life for my art because of me being lonely 😔
Morality is based on human values, it’s subjective not objective. There are no intrinsic values just ones triangulated from people seeking their own desires.
Morality doesn’t exist, I agree. At least, not as a scientific phenomena, or an empiric But georgism is also a pragmatic, utilitarian position, for a lot of people Its not per se based on a moral system
Thanks for having me on - interesting conversation!
Great talk man
True Christians are against anarchy 😂
ROMANS 13 1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. 2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.
Such a low IQ video with low IQ comments
AnCaps aren't anarchists
Theocratic monarchists. True Christians are theocratic monarchists.
Imo jesus was a peaceful revolutionary.
Indeed not really wanting to go to war with people as real battles are the powers and principalities that betrayed God, to make mankind follow our flesh. But God our Lord rejoice in the destruction of evil that dwell in man's heart.
12:14 Wrong. The primary problem with the problem of evil is it relies on the perspective of man. By your logic, it's evil that God sent Joseph to Egypt and it would have been good if millions starved in the famine. The entire book of Job addresses the problem of suffering and God's answer is, "Trust me." Whether it's a trial, punishment, or the effects of Eden's sin, suffering will come. Your job is to respond as Job, "Naked I came, naked I leave. Blessed be the name of the Lord."
Um...no. Christianity is ultimately theocratic. Theocracy is a form of monarchism. The Bible marks it as a constitutional monarchism. Anarchism is known by the slogan "No Gods, No Masters"
It speaks in the Bible that Jesus to rule as king of the world and those that died in Christ to be given rule over the world while the survivors of the apocalypse will have to build Tabernacles to continue worship since all remaining believers would be all killed off. He'll rule for a millennia. You can make guesses on a political system that is. But nowadays we are supposed to obey our rules and laws even if it's a fascist leadership as long as they do not go against God. Then we shall silently break the rules for obedience of God.
35:00 no. poor people are humble and dependent on God to survive. the rich man is dependent on himself and money, so there's no need to worship God. thats why is more difficult for him.
i d0nt think the rich can hardly w0rship anything but themselves idk why christians arnt m0re leery 0f th0se that m0ney change :P i f0r 0ne think the d0llar sign is already the mark 0f the beast because the things ive seen pe0ple d0 f0r the d0llar w0uld curse the wh0le w0rld t0 hell if they saw
sorry for being rude, but people truly have to stop with this foolish argument. THERE IS NO PROBLEM OF EVIL! our actions brought SIN/EVIL into the universe. that's it! evil does not disprove God, it proves Him.
But, I think people can still argue with this, because didn't God create us? If we were created in a flawed way, which ensured that we would be liable to transgress against God and create sin, is not God responsible for creating that capacity for error of ours? In this way, God would have created a universe in which we were doomed to be sinful. After all, it's the Christian perspective that we are all fundamentally flawed and damned without Jesus. So, the problem becomes "didn't Christ come to absolve us of guilt, which ultimately derives from the sin that God made us to commit?". Sorry if I've gotten something horribly wrong. Let me know if there's a problem with this.
@spaghettiking653 it's not worth arguing if there's not a problem and people keep calling it a problem, when it was done on purpose as punishment. it's because He is all good that there's evil. we chose our own way and this is life without Him (well, this is just a taste. life without Him fully will be hell.). if there's only 0.00000001% of dirt in the water, then the water is dirty. but anyway, He told Adam if they ate from the fruit they would surely die. there are some mistakes you only get to make them once. you can recover from smoking a cigarrette, but if you fall off of the eifel tower, you cant go back. i dont know what death means to you, but if someone says that to me, i'm not trying it.
we werent created in a flawed way. we were created with the ability to say no, to make our own choice. just like we can say no to evil, we can say no to good. that doesnt make us flawed. "In this way, God would have created a universe in which we were doomed to be sinful." not if we had made the right decision "After all, it's the Christian perspective that we are all fundamentally flawed and damned without Jesus." yes, but only after eating the fruit "sin that God made us to commit" He didnt make us commit any sin, He revealed who we are.
@spaghettiking653 we are made in God's likeness and image. so we want to be our own gods, just like He is His own God. He showed us why that is not a good a idea.
Doesnt the bible teach for christians to "support their leaders, for they were installed there by God?"
This video is a couple idiots talking through their asses.
If Christians ruled, it would be a monarchy with God at the top. Would still need the normative authority of The Church to maintain the faith. Christianity doesn't come from The Bible. Christianity produced it.
Highschool debate niggas take to discord
Tru anarchists arent christian 😂
Why?
@spaghettiking653 Well true Christians are just that, Christian. We are not democratic Christians we are not communist Christians we are not anarchist Christians. True Christians don't care about the government or ideologies of the world as much as we do with christ. Nor care to mix our faith with such things. We can co exist with any ideology or government as long as they don't put them selfs on a equal or higher level of important s as god. Be careful of those wolf's in sheep's clothing that profess that to be of the faith you must subscribe to a government or ideology.
@spaghettiking653 In the video, he never really gave a why, so why would anyone?
Im jk @spaghettiking653
@@KingSithis Fair enough lmao
We love Scott
FABIAAN WOOOO
Listening to this back and wow the arguments I gave here hold up actually pretty strongly
Hey so praxeology doesn’t actually arrive at an egoist view, if you’re interested then we can definitely talk about it
I'll hit you up
50:00 Please, guys, are you kidding? Liberal is not the opposite of conservative. Liberal conservative is a perfectly reasonable label. Conservatism is the opposite of progressivism. And oxymoron is the word you can't think of.
Also, liberalism falls within the center-left to right segments of the spectrum Liberal conservatism makes sense as a label if we're using the actual segments and identities of such groups and not the weird American L=L and C=R shorthand
What do you think anarcho-communism means? What the hell is an ancom state?
A lot of what Dev says in this video about ‘liberal conservative’ and positive/negative freedoms becoming the same thing sounds like a load of Hegelian dialectic nonsense.
Strongly disagree with the title but enjoyed the discussion haha.
5:16 ancaps: *talking about anarcho communist state* me: why the fuck do i let youtube autoplay?
Yeah that was pretty dumb
I mean, both anarchists have terrible answers to the military question so all anarchists can be ignored. They are likely to just get rubbed out by one of their neighbors before long.
Do they want to be wiped out by their neighbors? No. So will they act so as to avoid being murdered? Yes.
@@authenticallysuperficial9874 This might come as a shock but not all global political actors are rational. To some weakness is provocation. A weak country is just another brick in their global revolution. How did Melos offend Athens again? Ah right, being peaceful. Just because you believe in the NAP doesn't mean they do.
In every comment section he finds a way to mention he's a liberal conservative, so I'm not sure I will need 55 mins of video to learn something that every single follower of his already knows...
43:30 I don't want to abolish any functional institutions, just the state.
With ancaps do you have laws or is it just libertarianism with another name?
We belive in natural law
There's different philosophies to it, but we all believe in the Non-Aggression Principle
@@Mr_Kha1 Who enforces the non aggression principle?
@@John-ee5jeyou do. You protect you. When you become violated you may appeal to friends who will help you protect yourself.
@nicoroberts7388 What if the person who harmed me has more friends than I do?
Hey, I just found your channel and would be interested in having a discussion/debate with you, I don’t have a specific topic in mind but from what I’ve watched of you so far I think we disagree on a lot (egoism, anarchism, potentially trans issues). I’ve debated KingSithis before and that debate is up on my channel if you want to know what some of my philosophical positions are. Let me know if you’re down to talk!
DM me on Discord: mr_kha1
@@Mr_Kha1 Just sent you a friend request!
Zulu doesn't say initiating force is always wrong without context-the context is reality. There is scarcity and man is always engaging in scarcity for as long as they always act by their nature and have to deal with the fact that man's life is also social so there can be conflicts over their use. Aggression is irrational and argumentatively unjustifiable behavior. It's anti-mind and therefore in principle it is anti-life and against flourishing and therefore, to use Rothbard's words, against the nature of man. In other words, aggression goes against the natural law for man's life in social contexts. Even Rothbard talks about this. There is more to ethics than mere autistic ethics but interpersonal ethics, i.e., where morally justified violence fits in with man's social life when scarcity is a fact of reality.
"Yes! I would say yes." Fuck me man the confidence people have to go and start a podcast lmao. You lose a debate to a three year old video dog
business owner works way longer hours than a worker sometimes double there hours
That's a cool fact. It would be even cooler if you could prove it.
American girl moved to australia and found out joining a party in government there more than 125 taxes in australia > she calculated 40% taxes on lower class ' more taxes if you middle class or upper class ! you drink here you tax 100% ' you buy $100000 car it tax $40000 ' you buy $200000 car it tax $80000 ' you buy fuel it tax 75% ' you buy smokes it tax 120% ! income tax is 32% to 48% if you earn over $180000 a yr it the hiden high taxes that gougers consumers but leftb blame capitalism for it
Oh no! Not he money you were going to waste on shit you don't need! How awful!
how many taxes in the products you buy never mentioned by marxist ! in australia i only see conservative media and conservative parties mentioning excise taxes ' duties & gst ! i bought a italian shaver that was tax 40%
Taxes are not necessary under socialism. It can be done away with. Neither socialist Albania nor North Korea have/had taxes
Yes they're idiot and the countries you mentioned a communism
reveune dont mean shit it your net profit that matters ! more taxes by government makes it harder to make a net profit why product prices go up and less people can afford to live ! been happening in australia since the 80s the fucking government growing bigger
gen z getting dumber every year blame the eduction system controlled by left parties
Just because you can't get a date doesn't mean western society is falling
independent owners become franchise owners aswell
without capitalism there wouldnt be a middle class & upper class who would vote for that stupid system communism hell
left parties & left media don't know what a franchise is either ? they claim corporation own majorty of businesses which is lies
poltical class & union leaders self intrest why they get richer when government bigger
under communism everyone in lower class poor ! there no middle class & upper class under communism
majorty of us are capitalist idiot ! middle class & upper class are duh!
The middle class is disappearing, since profits are at an all time law, and salaries are thus stagnant at best, or falling. The left had predicted this, with the law of falling rate of profit, explained by economists like Brenner, Shaikh, Patnaik.
@@LadyInsipidity Government socialist polices shrinks the middle class why less franchise owners today ! there alot of middle class left the business owners & home owners
@@LadyInsipidity net profit fallen left idiot it revenue costs that a higher
franchise is small business not a big business idiot
you know how you reach middle class or upper class you work harder than everyone else and live below your means ??? My parents haven't bought new cars since mid 90s that why the multi millionaires in retirement ! they have just bought a luxuyr penthouse apartment on the harbor living the rich life they deserve it they worked very long hours and lived below there means 40 yrs they made sacfrices to get to there position
Your parents are part of a system that has ruined many, many families due to the sheer unfairness of inheritance. It is a system that will make your life more and more difficult as the years pass, and as western capitalism inevitably fails. Don’t cling desperately to what is going to eat you eventually.
media lies and claims reveune profit when it cost then you have these left moron that claim business owners earn milions a year is false ! My Dad keep 500k that 5% net profit from 10 million reveune that very big chunk of your profit and government takes biggest share in taxes aswell
taxes pushes up cost of food 1 when taxes & regulations go up the owners net profit falls this guys an idiot ! Corporation different to a franchise owner
Without taxes you won’t be able to run welfare, which means when you run into economic crisis (as capitalist societies always do), and when you’re laid off and there is surplus labour, you starve. A medical emergency? You’re finished. My State in India, run by the Communist Party, has been able to guarantee a far higher standard of living and human development than anywhere else in my country, via welfare fuelled by taxes. Taxes help public sector undertakings, which aren’t dependant on profit to keep running. They’re more accountable to the people who collectivise and run it together, to produce services for each other (the collective).
Welfare fuelled by taxes increases the purchasing power of the people, which makes the market more favourable for private investment and business expansion, which in turn provides jobs. This heavy tax levy is what fuelled the American boom in the 50s. But it is a system which cannot last once American manufacturers move production plants to the 3rd world where labour is cheaper, abandoning American workers. You are rooting for a system fundamentally disloyal to the majority. The majority will rise against it as times get harder. The west is on the brink of recession due capitalism’s tendency to undermine itself. Cling on to these last days, it’s going to be a wild, RED ride ahead.
@@LadyInsipidity more taxes enriches poltical class & union leaders in Government ??? taxation theft
@@LadyInsipidity more taxes & regulations lower purchsing power left idiot ! you obvoiously dont live in hgh tax country . Usa way cheaper to live than Australia > moron in my country vote more taxes voting communist & socialist parties lefty
False. Food preposition is heavily subsidised by the government to lower prices and protect farmers income.
owner has a mortgage to pay off left retard a home & business ! business owners arent millionaire either