Відео

Hey Housewife. Sorry to hear about this. Do you still have this question or have you been answered?

This is very unlikely. I'm assuming packed red cells were what you received. Your body has a natural process called autophagy, which "recycles" out old cells as your body is constantly making new ones. Those transfused cells should be long gone, and the risk of something at this stage is infinitesimally small. What was the risk when you granted the transfusion? Probably considerably higher.

​@@vandalayindustries8036 are you sure. Or did you read it in a text book . Corpuscles can be in you until you die, that's what I heard from pundits.

My friend this is a terrible take. One treatment of Albumin is collected from the donated blood of no less than 50 people. Albumin makes up 2-3% of blood volume, while WBCs make up 1%. So how is it that you have decided that Albumin (completely derived from human blood), is "not blood", but WBCs (also completely derived from human blood), are "blood". Is it the word blood in the name? What if we called it "blood Albumin". Would that make it sound worse? Your religion has taken an ancient dietary restriction (that wasn't even enforced in the OT), and made it mean something it was never intended. Blood is not the think that is holy in the Bible. Life is. To elevate the symbol of life, above life itself, seems absurd. Particularly when the prohibition of not eating a dead animals blood that you killed for food.....is literally NOTHING like an alive, willing, human, donor, giving you some packed red cells that your body will recycle out of your system.....to help you out of a temporary jam. Add to that the hypocrisy that JWs can take this product made from the blood of 50 humans, but are forbidden from donating their own to help others. Your analogy because of this hypocrisy is more analogous to a person running a sex trafficking ring for other people, but since they are not "committing fornication"....it's all good.

not the place to preach... chill out

Jehovah's Witnesses do not care whether it's actually harmful or not, though. They are doing it because of something they read in the Bible.

Wrong. The Bible never says that. It's a dietary restriction. Bleeding out due to trauma and superstitious teachings is what is dangerous for you.

@@vandalayindustries8036 Once again you are incorrect and making assumptions. Studies are increasingly showing that those of the JW faith AND the thousands of others who choose not to have a blood transfusion for whatever personal reason, experience lower risk and better outcomes than those who have a blood transfusion WHEN correct non blood management is provided. There are many thousands in the medical profession who are on record as saying they would never accept a blood transfusion because 1. They are aware of the many alternatives 2. They fully understand both the short- and long-term risks associated with blood transfusions. My experience in the field is that the majority of those who I've met who take a fervent "blood saves lives" stance despite being shown evidence to the contrary, do so more out of religious prejudice and intolerance than any altruistic motive.

You can't argue with stupid

You are absolutely wrong. In the US alone, 4.9 Million blood products are used every year. Using them when needed does not make you "unhealthy". If you happen to need a blood product.....you are already having a pretty bad day. JWs hyocriticaly accept certain parts of blood their leaders allow them to, from the same donor pools as the ones they are forbidden from taking under threat of communal shunning. Of course this is all moot. The Bible never forbids anything but the eating of blood. Using it for it's intended purpose in the body is perfectly reasonable, especially considering that when someone DID eat blood in the Hebrew scriptures, the punishment was either very mild or non-existent. JWs have elevated a biblical symbol of life, above life itself. And then they latch onto anything that rightfully shows the risks in medical intervention, feeling this somehow vindicates the thousands (including children), that have, and continue to loose their lives.

@@vandalayindustries8036 you definetely live in 1945. Its 2020 now. Well if you think that way why dont you try to get blood transfussion and look and see what happen in your body. I am a midwife nurse in hospital and I witness with my own eyes how that stupid blood transfussion ruin my patients' life, bring MORE disease and DEATH. Go a head try it. Dont you lie to yourself saying by not eating it but put barrels of blood into your body. You're the hypocrite one! Lol

@@vandalayindustries8036 and no body talked about how blood transfussion take sooo many people's life too, even worse, HAD TO SUFFER FOR LONG TIME first then Dead. Is that you called medication????? Educate yourself enroll to be a medical student and watch it for yourself, you Mr./Mrs.Know It All. Thanks to Jehovah's Witnesses because of the persistent of our faith, the medical well known professional doctors in THE WORLD find the better way to lessen lost of blood and way way way more better to keep it clean, steril without side effect! Before you comment you better educate your brain first.

@@ratihningrum969 you are wrong again. Once again.....4.9M blood products a year. Most of which, JWs will accept if broken down enough (hypocriticaly). Perhaps you can explain to me why WBCs are forbidden under threat of communal shunning, while Albumin is allowed? I don't know what back woods hospital you claim to work for, but there are certain situations in which nothing but some good ole packed red cells will do. Others, salvage and other blood products might suffice. Out of those 4.9M blood products just in the US do you know how many people die a year? It's not a secret. It is a federal requirement to report these deaths to the blood service. It's an average of 50. And those are almost always due to human error ie: not the actual blood. ALL medical interventions have risks. 3,000 people die a year from taking Aspirin in some way. Does this make Aspirin (a minor medical intervention) inherently dangerous? No. It is only dangerous if the situation dictates it. Pretending your religious superstition around blood is somehow justified because modern medicine is coming up with ways to conserve the resource and look for better outcomes in some methods, is not only ridiculous, but it disrespects the memory of the thousands who have died just following instructions from old dudes in NY with zero knowledge, and it disrespects the hard working men and women that get PTSD whenever they see the "no blood" sign over a hospital bed. Your doctrine is wrong medically, biblically, logically, and morally. I can prove it on every front. You can start with the WBC/Albumin question if you like.

This video explains risk. All medical intervention has risks. When able to properly plan out long term care for even a complicated procedure, many times we have the luxury of using alternatives and/or management. However, this is absolutely case by case, and even "no blood" hospitals have quick access to packed red cells because things can and do go wrong. The JW prohibition on blood is tantamount to superstition. Acknowledgement of risk when Millions of products are used every year, is not vindication of a doctrine that has claimed the lived of men women and children over the decades. People should be able to make these decisions with their doctors, without the interference of church leaders, or with the threat of communal shunning from all loved ones if they do not refuse to fall in line......even when life is on the line.

God also allowed humans to eat meat (Noah). And we know that even if the animal is bled, there obviously are traces of blood in the meat God allowed them to eat. So how did that go along with the command from God to Noah not to eat blood?

Yes it's about treating Blood with respect, when it's used in conjunction with how it was created to function then there is no disrespect. Using the example of bleeding animals, as long as the animals blood has been poured out onto the earth - the proper degree of respect has been shown. The minute amount of blood that is in mother's milk in some cases is not considered the 'lifeblood' and is part of the natural process.

Just want to add too please ... The Elders aren't an authority on our spirituality - that is our own responsibiity before Jehovah - we should do our own research not lump it on those dear Brothers who are working on their own spirituality, balancing the spiritual, physical, emotional needs of their families and shepherding the congregation. What is more valuable? Costume Jewellery or the gems we dig up ourselves?

@@nukasnook1561 I think you might be missing the point. Blood is not intrinsically sacred. What it represents (life), is. The reality is that the WT bans the acceptance of certain fractions of blood and allows others. For seemingly arbitrary reasons. White blood cells are forbidden. But mother's milk and colostrum is absolutely silly with them. It's a unique and interesting thing that occurs, as it's the only way we know of that blood cells pass to and from the circulatory system with eating them being the conduit. In short, the bibles prohibition on eating the blood of an animal you killed for food, has no correlation to an alive, willing, human donor, giving you some packed red cells that get used in the circulatory system (where blood belongs), to help you out of a temporary jam. You have elevated the symbol of life, above life itself.

Ingesting a minuscule amount of blood that is digested by powerful acids and enzymes, is not comparable to introducing a large amount of totally foreign (mixing DNA)product directly into the lifeforce (unique vibrational structure), of our circulatory system. I'm a victim, was lied to and covered up the first time by "doctors"? Felt wrong next day, now anemic!? Why? Just had mega transfusion, now nauseous, dizzy, tired, weak, confused, anxious, achy, mood off, I felt so damn different inside, a total personality change from positive, happy, funloving, optimistic, patient, superwoman to a stranger to myself and my family. Strange baffling, incongruent changes, (doctors know, but talk and no practice), so told I had developed an autoimmune disorder (fibromyalgia the new made up catch all). Went from being robust and healthy to being told (it just happens, or genetic, maybe the pregnancy). It was 3rd baby, but first transfusion, 2 units, had hemorrhaged post delivery, believed there was no alternative..perfectly safe...NOT! Then was delivered the "near fatal" transfusion, decades later, and suffered toxic hemolytic reaction, (compatible blood type, not error) severe liver damage, and exponential increase in symptoms and new, unrelated and worsening chronic pain, and degeneration of entire musculoskeletal system plus a myriad of other ill effects. So, I sought out less known or popular sources for older, forgotten or repressed knowledge, hidden, buried or falsely discredited studies, facts and research on the most valuable and mysterious commodity. Blood has hundreds of variables beyond A, AB, B or O (rh+ or rh-), not to mention the viruses, bacterial infections, conditions and diseases that are not detected or removed yet covered up by corrupt profiteering money laundering organizations (like the Red Cross) perpetrated on the expendable public. Simplifying typing to only Blood type or rh factor is an egregious lie and manipulation perpetrated not only on the public, but the dumbed down medical students who are fed falsehoods and lies from the Big Pharma Rockefeller funded indoctrination centers posing as medical schools. Modern Western doctors are unqualified hacks programmed to prescribe as many overpriced toxins, and useless (or painful and harmful) expensive treatments, therapies, chemos, surgeries, implants, transplants, replacements, transfusions etc. ensuring the maximum profit for the millionaire shareholders in all these barbaric products and procedures that prolong your life just long enough for you to work yourself to an early grave as a wage slave, and die within a few years of benefit collection eligibility. But they have now raised retirement age because they stole the SS coffers, and have to cover it up, so most current employees will die while still working and will never see a dime of the thousands they continue to have withdrawn from meager wages after income tax theft. "It's a great big club, and you ain't in it," as quoted by the brilliant George Carlin. And now "Cough-id" 18, they are laughing while the masses sleep. Sweet Dreams!

Correlation isnt causation my friend. Blood transfusions ARE saving lives. The risks that are associated with blood transfusions are lower than ever and the procedures taken to ensure that blood is donated safely are now more improved than ever. Take off your tinfoil hat

@@kurtvillarosa2037 they have improved with their screening, but as the world leading blood specialists have proven with clear scientific evidence that you don't need a blood transfusion to save a life, they agree the best transfusion given, 'is the that's not given'. As proven if it was to be presented to the administration to be inspected as a safe viable medical treatment, it would not pass. Blood trans course more damage later to the patient. Even evidence is showing crossing a male to female DNA via trans is changing the gender of the patient & even passing on to the off spring. Hay, with the evidence available beyond this short video, go ahead have a trans, we all have the free gift of free will, no ones can stop you.☠

@@simonpatcharin Can you show me a source that says that blood trans changes gender? As far as I know it only poses a risk for men to receive blood donors from pregnant women since they produce antibodies in their blood that can trigger reactions to the recipients body, which is why pregnant women arent allowed to donate blood.

@@kurtvillarosa2037 No I don't have it, it's been talked about amongst in the field, remember in this short video, the facts show clearly that 1. 59.3% of transfusions not beneficial at all. 2. 28.8% was uncertain of any benefit, 3. ONLY! ONLY! 11.8% deemed to be helpful. Would you jump of a cliff with only 11.8% chance of surviving, & if you do survive you will have health problems for the rest of your life which will most likely shorten it, or walk down the steps with complete confidence you will have heaps better outcome with little or no side effects? That's how clear cut it is. But we understand that it is hard to teach an old tradie newer, proven, faster & safer ways to get the job done, I'm even guilty of that, so I hope you look further into it, you'll be glad you did.

@@simonpatcharin That still doesnt prove how it changes gender.

Look up bloodless medicine and surgery

Severe anemia must get more iron in there diet.

Interesting .

@@masm3608 it isn't though. That simply isn't accurate. Stored blood funnels into the circulatory system and is capable of transporting oxygen when it is still viable. Unused blood is discarded. It gets more complicated than that. but this statement is not accurate.

please search natural ways to replenish your blood cells because my mother is going through very similar situation and they only way Is to heal our organs that are in charge of our red blood production via iron and minerals the body is lacking due to a westernized diet

Life is good for us.

The Bible forbids the eating of blood. Not transfusion. There have been and continue to be circumstances where only blood will do. JWs even accept hyocriticaly blood products from the same donor pools as the products they refuse. Talk about missing the point of those scriptures, and elevating the symbol of life above life itself.

Vandalay Industries Acts 15:29 “that ye abstain from things sacrificed to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication; from which if ye keep yourselves, it shall be well with you. Fare ye well”

And he drowned almost all life in the world once.

On a major trauma case where a patient has significant suddent loss of blood, a blood transfussion is necessary. This video really applies to most elective surgeries where thr patient can be properly assesed, prepared, blood loss to be anticipated and managed.

@@rebirth1629 at 5:31 it shows where even in severe blood loss non blood expanders can keep the veins open until the heart makes more blood which it can within minutes.

It's a life saver for humans in emergency....don't confuse people with negative descriptions....I am scared bcoz today only I had my first transfusion... 2 remaining getting ready for hysterectomy.....

@@nukasnook1561 the heart does not make blood. You have absolutely no clue what you are talking about. Stop spreading misinformation thinking it props us religious superstition.

@@vandalayindustries8036 correct that the heart does not make blood. What I don't understand is the connection to religious superstition.

Migi even with a blood transfusion, mixing blood even if it’s clean is scientifically proven to be risky because mixing blood cells causes complications. That’s why HIV can develop, just by blood to different blood. There’s different forms of saving someone’s own blood if they’re loosing so much of it to clean it and put it back in their body. Doctors just use blood transfusions because it’s easier

There are alternatives, the reliance on blood is part of a mind set that is changing due to faster healing and the option to use alternatives in the vast majority of cases.

What the heck are you talking about? Most pregnant women never need a transfusion. That only occurs when a complication arises. I've had six kids and had a transfusion once, because I hemorrhaged, but it really wasn't necessary. I worked as a doula for years and never saw someone need blood, either.

@@nukasnook1561 bullshit

@@sars5891 My Father had a triple heart bypass without blood and this was in the 80's. He got better quicker than everyone else who had the same op the same day. He was also the only one who didn't Hallucinate. I'm speaking from a basis of research and experiences ... YOU are worth the best medical care available to you ... ask for it if you ever need it.

Untested blood?

You are very STRONG my mother had 2 because of her severe anemia but. now we are looking into holistic healing and eating more nutrient snd minerals to restore her hemoglobin and white blood cells iron and magnesium levels

You was alive with 4, so why add donor blood, as the evidence show, you most likely would have been better with expanderas. Some are saying cross DND could be possible. Their are many other side affects that science have proved from donor blood, this video is the tip of the "ice burg". Science is now hoping we as patients, (not Doctor) can make a more informative choice of what goes into our own bodies. All the best DTlove

@@simonpatcharin you have not "crossed DNA". The blood this person received, is not even in their body anymore. Cells recycle themselves in a constant cycle. Autophagy has long since cleared out those cells and their body made new ones. This video is about overuse or unneeded transfusion. There are simply situations in which nothing else will do. I have no idea why JWs feel the need to comment on something they know so little about. It's the Dunning-Kruger effect in real life.

@@vandalayindustries8036 Facts are as you know, a individuals blood is a liquid organ, is it not? and stays a individuals organ like transplanting a liver, logically the donor's liquid organ would be still their in circulation just like the donor's liver stays the donor's liver. As far as I know, the organization behind Jehovah's Witnesses are the ones who has helped from beginning to establish the best & safest now known forms of blood Conservation strategies know to man, they know more then what you have possibly been lead to believe. And I believe that JW.org has never taken even 1 cent for all 1000ks of hours of their time pouring into the medical industry to help others live long and happier. Kind regard.

@@simonpatcharin with respect, you are wrong on almost every front. First while blood can be called a liquid organ, it does NOT stay in you indefinitely. In fact, your blood recycles itself every couple of months. Your marrow is constantly making new blood, and autophagy is the process by which your body gets rid of the older cells. You could absolutely not be more wrong I'm afraid. Before the next point, it's of note that your religion allows organ transplants. If blood is just a liquid organ, should it not also be allowed? Your logic doesn't track my friend. On the next front, the only thing JWs have done in regards to this issue, is create a need. They have absolutely not developed one single solitary procedure. If they have, I would ask you for some sort of evidence for that claim. I'm pretty certain if it was true, not only would I know about it having worked with the HLC, but they would be crowing about it. The HLC has arranged for a steady stream of JW guinea pigs to have experimental procedures tested.

Blood donors whilst well meaning, are also deceived by the propaganda that blood saves lives. People who still chant this mantra do so because that's what they're indoctrinated to believe. They hold this mistaken belief so dear that they simply refuse to accept the medical facts as outlined in this video and hundreds of other similar studies by experts in the medical profession. The reality, like it or not, is that it is rare for a blood transfusion to save a live where alternative options would equally save a life with better outcomes and lower associated risks. Procedures and critical care performed on those for either religious or other personal reasons has proven this time and time again over many decades.

The masses have never thirsted after truth. They turn aside from evidence that is not to their taste, preferring to deify error, if error seduce them. Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master; whoever attempts to destroy their illusions is always their victim. An individual in a crowd is a grain of sand amid other grains of sand, which the wind stirs up at will. Gustave Le Bon, سيكولوجية الجماهير Like Likes: 139

Our Father in Heaven told us in his bible; accept no other human blood or products. Reckon we should follow his laws.

That's not true. Father in Heaven forbids old Jews to eat blood and not to use blood for a transfusion that still saves lifes!Some Christians have understood this nonsense in the Bible wrongly and now erroneously preach to people and thus endanger lives and even kill their Christian brothers

Acts chapter 15. It seems the bible is right on this.

What is the difference between eating blood and injecting it, to me thats the something

The masses have never thirsted after truth. They turn aside from evidence that is not to their taste, preferring to deify error, if error seduce them. Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master; whoever attempts to destroy their illusions is always their victim. An individual in a crowd is a grain of sand amid other grains of sand, which the wind stirs up at will. Gustave Le Bon, سيكولوجية الجماهير Like Likes: 139 Put that in your pipe and smoke it, it's not rocket science, you can't argue with STUPID 😜.

+Vinh Lai Try searching Cytogenetics. I think Cytoscan is a scan of that.

The masses have never thirsted after truth. They turn aside from evidence that is not to their taste, preferring to deify error, if error seduce them. Whoever can supply them with illusions is easily their master; whoever attempts to destroy their illusions is always their victim. An individual in a crowd is a grain of sand amid other grains of sand, which the wind stirs up at will. Gustave Le Bon, سيكولوجية الجماهير Every thing is politics Bradley, you can't argue with stupid, . Pontius Pilate said what is truth to Jesus. Nothing much has changed, well we have the Murdochs to sacrifice our children instead Molech

There are many blood alternatives out there - it's just that the knowledge isn't readily given to the patient. Such as epo, saline, vit K, blood circulating machine and a few more others. Not only that but think, the minute blood is removed from the host, it starts to die. Sadly, in Australia, bloodless surgery isn't promoted and yet it's readily available in other western countries. What we have is a lack of training for doctors who are comfortable with what they know. The reason blood is used so much is the lack of education in the medical community and patient awareness. But as you can see in the vid, it's no longer accepted as a safe way to save a person's life. Often blood transfusions were given to alleviate the DOCTORS discomfort rather than assist the patient. There are plenty of information out there and you'll find there is so much out there advocating for bloodless transfusion and the links to post-op deaths due to blood transfusion. Hope this helps clear some things up for you Mary. :) Just another personal point, I don't like the idea of having someones blood in me. Generally if you get a blood transfusion, it's not one person but several, anywhere from 20-100. I had to have an op recently and said I didn't want a blood transfusion and they gave me all these other options. I found out later, that they actually had a blood salvager machine. What that machine does, is take your blood from you, clean it and pump it straight back in. It wasn't talked about and I certainly didn't know about it until someone who I knew was in the hospital liaison comity mentioned it to me.

***** Um, I'm basing it on facts and statistics Jamie. Blood transfusion save far more lives what it "creates serious problems for." In the USA alone, blood transfusions save over 4.5 million lives. I don't have the statistics for how many people die FROM taking blood transfusions, but I'm sure I can find it if you're interested. Then we can compare the two.

Jodie V There's no doubt that alternatives can be used which is great. Unfortunately, there are many times when nothing other than blood will help.

***** Here's a link on the subject: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18156879

***** Sorry, I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. Can you clarify a bit?

L.A. November 2019 Because the blood transfusion industry make much money with this product. It isn't save your live..., it destroys your healthy. They present it as your would it save lives. The truth is that it costs many people there lives or healthy trough many risks and complications ‼️

Sadly not likely to happen whilst the Red Cross in this country takes donated blood and on sells it to the medical industry for millions of $$$ annually. It’s not about saving lives, it’s about making money. So much research has now been done internationally into the outcomes of non blood management that the superiority of bloodless surgery is undeniable.

@@marksoya712 what absolute rubbish. The Red Cross is a non profit. One that does amazing work that dwarfs most faith based initiatives. Blood collection, storage, and delivery is a complicated, high touch thing my friend. Bloodless medicine has it's place, and when it is possible and appropriate it absolutely is preferred. But that is NOT in every scenario. In fact, it is in a minority of them. Sometimes, nothing but some packed red cells will help you out of a jam. JWs know this, which is why they now allow in just this century, multiple blood products to be taken by their membership, while still bizarrely saying others cannot be.

@@vandalayindustries8036 May I suggest you recheck your facts. The Red Cross DOES sell blood to hospitals. It maintains it’s non profit status as these funds are reinvested into the organisations actives including the processing of blood for transfusion, relief works and of course the huge costs of the day to day running of the organisation including staff wages etc. In fact, each bag of blood clearly states that it has been made available at cost. Blood is not free to the patient. The cost is reimbursed direct to the hospital by the Australian Government. As regards Jehovah’s Witnesses, once again you are incorrect. Their faith is based on the Bible edict to abstain from blood as in a whole blood product which includes platelets, plasma and other whole blood components. The organisation does not dictate what their members can and cannot have when it comes to blood fractions, it is left up to the conscience of each individual Witness. Many complete and sign an Advanced Health Directive (an official government legal document) stating which treatments or medications incorporating minor blood components they personally will or will not accept. You can verify this for yourself by researching the Red Cross Australia web site or the Jehovah’s Witness JW.ORG web site. Thanks to the pioneering efforts of the medical profession on Jehovah’s Witness patients in regard to bloodless surgery techniques, major health benefits have flown on to the wider community. The “Blood Saves Lives” mantra is little more than a marketing slogan. Contrary to popular belief, studies have shown that as a population demographic, those of the Jehovah’s Witness faith do not have a higher rate of death as a result of refusing a blood transfusion when competent non blood management is provided. In fact, and somewhat ironically, Jehovah’s Witness patients who have bloodless surgery often recover more quickly and have less short and long term side effects than those receiving the same operation with the use of a blood transfusion. These facts are readily verifiable by taking time to actually do a little research rather than making emotive statements based on hearsay.