Відео

Thanks for the video! ❤

If blackmagic could make a new 4k with mft but also continues auto focus. That would be killer.

Pocket 4K is in my opinion the most successful M43 camera ever made. Pyxis and S5ii just show how legendary this Sony IMX410 sensor is.

how can the pyxis and s5iix have the same sensor, yet different rolling shutter time?

Ignore the other comments, clearly they didn’t actually watch the video. You stated you were showing the capability of each camera without the crazy editing to make things “cleaner” on each test

Thank you for showing love to the pocket 4K! I've been using it for about 4 years now with the .64xl Speedbooster and it's a low light champ!! Haven't found a reason to upgrade yet!

Knocked it out of the park with the humor and informative mix again! Looking forward to the next video

@10:51 Fingerprint mania! The horror 😱. Wait is the screen protector foil still on? 🧐

....finally someone who hasn't been paid off ! great true content !

You focus too hard on making the talking head shot look good that when it comes to test footage it looks extremely bland, and didnt get as much time to crafting/fine tuning. So you cant be too upset or on the defense when someone calls out the "real" world test segment when it looks like it was given like 1/8th of your attention 😅 All these beautiful cameras in your posession and you give us these type of results 💔

Nice comparison video. FYI adjust your shutter angle to 75-90 degrees and add motion blur back in post for better gyro results.

Great video...I actually want to get an S5IIx, it is more versatile, but I wouldn't think that the Pyxis (which I love) would be a comparison to it...I get that they have similar features, but its a mirrorless vs a box camera. I would assume that the Black Magic Cinema 6k would be the S5IIx competitor, as they have similar form factor. Either way, really nice video.

Real world??? You shit some street light and placed someone in front of a camera, and called it real world ??? 😂😂😬😂😂 lame as fuck!!!

Man i like this kind of dark humor! Excelent comparison

the Lumix has built in NR. The cinema camera doesn't!

So are we just going to ignore the whole kidnapping that happened throughout this video?

👀 ditch that sigma 18-35mm and rent the SLR Magic 12mm mft mount I don’t use a speed booster which reduces the image quality to me. I had a 18-35 with a speed booster and it was lame so I sold it and got the Slr magic years ago. I can out class those two cameras with the 4k and the SLR Magic which I still have am just saying the pocket is a monster and since I started learning lighting before I sold it the last 3 videos I’ve shot I can mix the footage with the fx30 and u wouldn’t able to tell the difference. Those videos haven’t been uploaded yet by the client since am still editing the third video for them so don’t go looking for them on my page 😂😂😂😂

Great video! I don't know if you know but half the video is blank 😅

Came for the likely clickbait title... subbed for the authentic, well balanced view. Also, neutral flares FTW. ;)

the s9 launch was scab that got picked off and everyone noticed the puss filled wound which is the youtube camera space and the network of shills / filmamkers that just make adverts for chinese trinkets.

holy crap a horror unboxing , love this <3

Well I'm glad I bought mine and I'm loving it

What’s in the (un)boxxxxiiinnnngggg

Pandoras box unboxing

🤣🤣🤣 I had to comment am looking forward to seeing what u do with your new camera brother. BTW am still here am just liking and watching from the shadow realm ❤

This video unboxed my brain 🤯

Which cam use for this Unboxing? Best unboxing ever

I don't even want the pyxis and you dropped the hardest unboxing video on the internet.

Bro you’re weird!🥴

Creepy dolls😲

Wormy basement🤮

You ate maggots!😮

Did you forgot to pay the electric bill? 😂

Good

Eric Talk more about Cato auto focus lens

The blazer Remus and Cato suck for professional film.. they are only good for UA-cam videos

Who gives a shit about a few guys fighting over their take on some cheap lenses? Oh yes, bickering is fun after all.

I fell down a rabbit-hole of anamorphic drama when I came across your video, and that led me down a different rabbit hole, that was THIS video, and holy shit, it ticks all the boxes of satirical high-art man. It's almost like if the existentialism of Linklater's Waking Life was remixed with Panos Cosmatos's style and Lynch's heavily unsettling storytelling. Fuck man, this is insanely good!!!!!!

4:21 cam is self absorbed

Stay pro, kings/queens.

You sold me on the plastic football 😆

I think the biggest point of contention and the through line for every major critique on any of the so called "shills" is the simple/obvious difference between an honest critical review vs a straight up ad. A couple of Cams videos really seem to blur that line and it feels very much like we're being sold something, which would be fine if it weren't being packaged as a simple Pros vs Cons list from a working pro lookin to help others cut through the wave of inflated/inaccurate marketing content. He's clearly adding to the hype and to say Cam's channel isn't a "review channel" seems like a stretch cuz that's exactly what the guy is known for. I mean he's literally a famous youtuber with tons of subscribers and while those things aren't mutually exclusive he's just not really known for his filmmaking. Which is fine and if he wants to make a name in the filmmaking or even just the ad space, I genuinely hope he has just as much success as he's had with his YT tutorials & reviews.

Great stuff! A company asked me to take down a video that showed a minor issue I had with their product. I laughed because the video is mostly positive but they get scared of people seeing fact based issues. Safe to say the video is still up. If we don’t show each other the real world, we will all buy the wrong stuff.

I love the look of the Pavo's. my buddy was just on a movie that used them, and the limited frames I was able to see (mostly just trees lol, everything else was NDA'd) but they looked gorgeous. Definitely an intense look, but would be great for a specific project.

Scam Mackay not just does the most to sell products, but he actively goes after commenters that have balanced questions or potential criticisms about set products… used to be a fan of the guy, but saw way too much of that stuff, after about the 10th or 15th time I saw that unsubscribed stopped following him.

i bought the cato lens looks fine to me i love distortion thats what im looking for. just the fact that is a pl lens thats 2x anamorphic is amazing but let see once i get them. altho it looks those lenses seem to be s35 that happen to have large coverage.

I’ve been sent this video by a few people! Couple points I’ll make. Access journalism is real. A lot of people do it and it’s usually pretty easy to tell the ones who are in that boat, Just wait a couple months after their video and see what the non sponsored video say! If it doesn’t lineup with consensus time and time again, you know! They also shouldn’t be calling anything a review when they have been paid to make a video about it or they have talking points as part of their agreement! That is by nature preview and order review! I can’t speak for everyone else but for us if we don’t like something we will often talk to the brand and ask them if they want to continue with the video! We are not going to lie to our audience and we are not big enough at this point where we are doing it full-time and we don’t have sponsors for each video so we don’t necessarily want to make a video about we don’t like we don’t really want to make a video crapping on a company or product! We have also had companies react very negatively to our criticisms, . A lighting company asked me to take down my review because they said their sales had dropped since I posted it. They were expecting a promotional piece, not a review! In a video where we recommended the lights, they said we were too negative 🤣 We have also had lens companies use our footage to promote their lenses but they’re not include us in the next round of reviews for new products. Because they don’t want reviews, they want promotional pieces. Generally, I’m okay with that as long as we’re not going to lie to our audience and the brand is clear that’s what they want from the start! in which case we will try to get some kind of funding for the video and we will fully disclose that it sponsored and not a Review! An issue with UA-cam versus actual news organisations is the news organisations generally have funding when a lot of these UA-camrs rely on to be able to get their hands on products to make videos so there is an incentive for them to try to keep that positive! Most companies weren’t ever tell you can’t criticise. We have definitely been blacklisted by a couple of companies because we didn’t give them glowing reviews without criticism

Companies will align with people who enjoy using their kit - and those people will often go out and showcase how they'd use it and share their experiences with it - that doesn't mean the person is lying to you. It doesn't mean they are being paid to make all this stuff up and put on an act. People who don't like something can also be biased, it works both ways. Obviously there's a positivity bias in that people tend to make videos about stuff they like - but this is true whether you purchase the kit yourself, rent it or get sent it. You're still choosing to make a video for a certain reason, which involves some form of bias. The very act of making a video about anything involves some form of bias. Bias is inescapable - if you're optimising your video to perform well on UA-cam there's bias, if you have an outside sponsor - there's bias. If you're rich and wealthy and self fund everything - still bias. If you have a personal UA-cam channel - 9/10 you're gonna be sharing your own personal tastes and preferences, which shockingly yes, will be biased. There is nothing wrong with that. People are allowed to make videos about the things they like. No one has been forced to buy anything. There's responsibility on all sides. There's a space for cold technical reviews (which are still biased) but there's also space for creators to showcase the gear and share their excitement in using it. We have space for people to like something and not like it. I think if you don't like something - make a video about why YOU don't like it, explain your reasoning and contribute to the discussion and provide your audience with actual useful information as to why you don't think it's a good product, but don't forget that that's your opinion(!) There's just a toxic culture thats developed around this whole industry and at the end of the day it's just cameras. You can't say anything on UA-cam now without be attacked by which ever group disagrees with you - if you like a camera you're a shill! If you don't like a camera you're clearly in the pocket of a rival brand or you're not a professional or a enough of an expert... or don't know what you're talking about etc. etc.

its called access jounalisim, most companies wont tell you to not include something but they will hint at it and they wont send stuff to you if you criticize.

Great job! Thank you!