Відео

The only thing to say during an interrogation is “I want a lawyer” and keep your mouth shut after that no matter what. Police are legally required to end the interrogation after that.

The cops get 72 hours before having to make their official IA statement for the exact reasons that you mentioned. If its good enough for them it's good enough for a citizen

Huh you just say no wow

Qualified immunity is absolutely went too far, it’s getting us very close to become a THIRD WORLD COUNTRY instead of number one country in the world.

He should have said “I *did not* break into Mr Smith’s home”

dudes toeing the line between malpractice and good lawyer

And now make it loud and clear..... Bad edit.....

Dont talk to the police without a lawyer. Ever.

Thank you! So if we ask the police which one it is, are they obligated to tell us?

Never speak to police Sheriff crooked ass FBI and DOJ without an attorney

Perhaps the tva didnt interfere becausr it was what was supposed to happen. The tva doesnt want multiple differebt timelines. They want the one true timeline, which means what the avengers were doing was part of the one true timeline. You'll botice that the tva appeared just minutes after loki used the space stone to jump to a different location. Thus shows that the tva would not have waited to see if all the stones were returned to their timelines. This is because they did what they were supposed to do The biggest conflict i could see with this is captain wasnt pruned when he stayed in the old timeline. Sure that was obvioisly scripted, or else he wouldve been pruned, but it means that there was a time when there were 2 captain americas. One was frozen while the other was living his normal life. I womder how that was explained when he showed up to the old timeline. Like everyone knew he crashed, but then he just randomly shows up...??

how does that help?

The only reason is that you have planted fake evidence against me, because you’re corrupt cops!

This is great and all but the reality is that police actually do conduct investigations and collect evidence. Them asking you 'why would your finger prints be at the scene' doesn't at all mean that they're trying to get you to change anything, its a legitimate question. And the reality is that if you have no real reason thats actually worse because at trial they are going to preaent that physical evidence and the jury will see that you dont have a legitimate excuse which will often times sway them towards the series of events outlined by the procecution.

That last part is all you need to remember.

Excellent discussion from attorneys at the Bronx Defenders on the Brothers in Law Podcast from 5/3, "A Voice for the Voiceless: The Power of the Jury" on this topic

Enjoying your content as I gear up for a basic trial skills prep program for work!

Great educational video.

That qualified immunity is sickening the law enforcement in this country should face the same consequences every other person no more no less and until this happens you will never see them abide by the law we the people are the only ones to change this god bless thanks

But when your lawyer shows up you have been moved. To Gitmo.🤭

Just ask for a lawyer and shut up.

Your almost completey accurate. The interrogation is taking the information from the interview AND any facts, witness statements, Evidence, that points to the suspect. Yes it's a more direct tactic....cleared millions if cases over the course of history. Misused? Yes by unethical officers/agents. You be surprised how many suspects want to unburden themselves

Essential Advice; Ask for an attorney and 5:11 Shut Up !! (Remember, the Police are Never your Friends !! )

Abolish Qualified Immunity. Qualified immunity is a type of legal immunity that protects a government official from lawsuits when a the official violated a person's rights,

that only works if the two people have met. if im taken in to court and i dont even know this mr smith guy i wouldnt remember his name

This is a load of crap LMAO. Guilty or not I will minimize all information. Infact in some cases I might not give any information at all. In a court of law it is not our job to prove our innocence. It is however their job to prove our guilt. "Innocent till proven guilty" Know your rights and invoke them.

All interrogators are highly trained in the diabolical 9 Step Reid Technique of Interrogation. Been around since the 1950's. They intimidate and lie. Don't play the game. Invoke your right to remain silent and demand an attorney. Then shut the phuck up.

✔️ Promo'SM

Attorney up always. Tell the police have a good day and remain Silent . Always Attorney up and remain Silent

Always Attorney up no matter what. Tell the police have a good day and remain Silent. Attorney up always

I shouldn’t know your opinion on the matter based on how you explain it. That’s called propaganda. You didn’t state an opinion, but I know you’re more against qualified immunity in general than in favor of it. You literally tried to explain it in a negative way and I just wanna know what it is not your biased, political viewpoint. You didn’t even say why it would be a good thing. You basically just did a strawman of that helps police officers, commit police brutality and get away with it. Cool…

Because I’ve heard of this concept, and because now the people viewing it have heard of this concept, it may be unethical for us to serve on a jury without informing the council during voir dire (jury picking). Probably not the greatest idea to broadcast like this, but important nonetheless. (I’m not a lawyer, no idea of the scope of ramifications from this)

Whew, talking about playing dangerous with that line there, councilor lol.

You cannot tell a man how to defend that's the problem we keep being submissive to the law and to the government that are not friends

So the law abiding person has to remain reasonable while the criminal acts unreasonably. The law abider must use the least force but there is no guarantee that the criminal will do the same. The law abider must play by rules even when criminals ignore them. Sounds like a system designed to protect criminals and leave law abiding people in constant fear, of the criminal and punishment for defending against the criminal as well as the system that should be protecting him against criminals. Yet the system itself uses unreasonable force against both the criminal and the citizen and turns the citizen into a criminal for defending himself. Make it make sense. The law isn't valid it's logically unsound and it is based on beliefs just like a religion not facts and since we have freedom of religion you can preach your edicts to another crowd. We do not consent to your governance.

Ask for an attorney then shut up!

We see why THEY put that loophole within the law for THEMSELVES 😮👍

Seen so many vids of people asking "am i free to leave?" An police become so pissed than go about being quiet or they just ignore what you just said an proceed to asking the same questions they was asking before. 😅

define a Terry stop

Ask for an attorney then SHUT UP

It should not exist !!!!

They can knowingly violate a persons civil rights but can’t be held liable for that violation. Well, that’s fucked up.

Qualified immunity is bullshit is what it is.

Kings X

We need power back to the people

What do you mean often it's over used, it is why cops walk around with that smug I do as I wish whenever I like you know the arrogance of a cop

If a cop acts unlawfully in his suppression of rights his immunity is likely to be of no help to him. And he has the burden to prove his actions were lawful

All you do is laugh at the interrogator . It’s their job to prove you are guilty not your job to prove your innocent

Why is this a thing?

I'll take "something to repeal for $200 trebek"