Відео

There's actually a lot of involvement on the human side even when creating Ai music. Watch some of my other videos where I go into a bit of detail.

Glad it was helpful!

Suno are currently in back and forths with record companies on this. But so far so good

Ooooh... swing. I might try that

And it's going to get better!

This is the exciting part of having this platform. Having an audience that finds this stuff interesting and wants to talk about it. Very exciting times and I think about what all this could look like in the future. How about editing tools as part of Suno? So if you want to tweak the songs a bit, you can.

lol... Maybe I'm his Ai avatar.

I've done a whole video response to this. I don't agree and I'm not going to jump on stage and perform on my computer and Suno. I don't want ai music to replace human music either. And I don't go pushing out anything that I don't myself feel is something that I enjoy. So I won't be pumping out 800 songs per day just to get a payday.

It's been a few weeks since I made this video. But I swear I mentioned that this was made very basic. I didn't alter the lyrics very much in the making of this video. Normally, I spend at least a week working the lyrics. Hey, look up my other works. Praise Be Vinyl. Enjoy the soothing sounds.

if you do that you will probably be sued for a lot of money first by suno as they say you cannot use any music you generate if you only have a free account. second distrokid because you cannot register music with them if you dont own it. andyou cannot own it as you cannot copyright a.i. generated work.

Hi, sorry for the late reply. I did read the terms a while back. I believe with Suno, if you have a paid subscription, it's yours and they mentioned that you don't have to credit. But say something along the lines of "But it would be nice". (Terms change, so have a look). The free version, they require you to give them credit.

No never. Only what is produced by a human. Had he written the lyrics at least, that portion could be copyrighted. He didn't feed the AI the lyrics. Anyone can use his track and he will have no leverage to enforce copyright. Even the cover art can't be claimed. Artist have it worse than musicians when it comes to AI. Write all the lyrics to have any chance for protection and claims. U.S. Copyright Office AI Activities The Office explained that human authorship is required for copyright protection, that it will refuse to register works solely generated by AI, and that any material which is not the product of human authorship must be disclaimed on a registration application.

no.

@@happyfndeplorable1605 I get you. This AI at the moment gives artists no grounds when it comes to copied music. As they own diddly squat.

@@dagga07 Indeed.

There is nothing currently saying you can't copyright ai material. The biggest legal case said that one instance couldn't be. But nowhere does it state you can't. And I'm sorry to hear that you don't appreciate my soothing and loving tunes. I feel very motivated to work harder and win you over. Subscribe and follow my channel.

As the tech gets better, the songs will be better. But as we do it now and get better with what we have, we're actually doing pretty well. Thanks for checking out the channel. I'll swing by and have a listen to your stuff.

This is the dream for me. I've been experimenting with ways to modify the vocals in other ai tools and eventually I'll do something about that in a video. But for now, we've got what we've got.

That's one of the major downsides to Suno at least. But since I'm going the "rock band" route I can implement the multi-vocalist format. lol

I appreciate that and have been wanting to do that for some time now. Just sooo much content to get through with ai. I'm loving doing it . Let me bump that up to priority and I'll come back here and give you a big "thanks" high five

Sorry to come to this a bit late. I was having a chat to a friend of mine last night about this topic. He's been in a band and writes his own music etc. Nobody ever said you can't copywrite AI music. From my understand, nobody has done it yet. There's nothing saying you can't do it. And for sure, you absolutely protect the lyrics that you write. Totally happy to be told otherwise. But what good would the music be without the words?

@@AiDIYTECH…of course AI can generate the words also. I guess it depends on your prompts to the AI engine.

​@AiDIYTECH check out Top music Attorney youtube channel, she explains that courts have ruled that you cannot Copyright A.i created work. Prompting a.i. is not enough to classify it as your own work. Also you cannot collect royalties from a.i. music and what ever you create will be public domain so anyone else can use it. Best place to get your info in this case is the music Attorneys. You clearly used chat gpt for lyrics too so they cannot be Copyright protected either. If you register it as your own work you are breaking current laws.

@@AiDIYTECH youtube.com/@topmusicattorney?si=qsJIRzHoJLOmvxgk

​@dagga07 What if you only use the AI to generate songs you've written lyrics for and then simply using the AI output as a template for live musicians to expand upon further? Surely THAT could be copyrighted?

People don't know how much thought and work goes into it when you really want to do it well. I'm super excited to see how far this tech goes and I appreciate your comment.

it's shadow banned now

1000px. Yes you have to pay distrokid and others.

It's funny you ask that because the first song I did that I actually cared about was about a dude that became addicted to AI and lost contact with everyone. It's ok, he came through in the end and is ok.

Ai can be your friend. I’ve seen it happen to me. It’s programming is limited. Like no legal advice etc…

Photoshop doesn’t sing. AI can mimic a human singing. It’s a bad comparison

@@joshhernandez6974

I take issue with AI, but after seeing the work and creativity required to build the prompts to get good results, I can’t call it laziness in good faith.

⁠@@magicwordxyzzybro, don’t pretend someone writing a 15 word prompt is on par with writing a novel or something. Of course it’s lazy.

I promise you that this isn't a 15 word prompt. It might start with an initial 15 word prompt. But I refine it over hours. Then the music to go with the lyrics takes a couple hours after that. In my opinion, it is art. I feel like I have something I want to say in some way, in the end, if I don't feel like enough of that message came from me, I scrap it.

Here's my take: use AI if you want If not, don't. Stick with premade music sample kits, chord and melody generators, etc.

I don't get any flags when I used Suno music in UA-cam. It's one of the best things about it

I appreciate the comment. I also appreciate the point of view. Yes, the law loves lawyers 😂

Thanks for that. Wish I could take all the credit. I had to laugh though

That is fantastic! I love the idea of combining different tech to make something. Awesome work.

Going into this, I totally knew that people would feel that way and I understand that. I don't agree though. I spend a lot of time thinking of the sorts of people I want to create for. For sure, I use GPT to help with lyrics. But then I do a hell of a lot of rework to try to really bring home what I'm trying to say. Then, I spend a lot of time going through the music options and filtering out the stuff that doesn't work. I know for sure that a lot of people aren't going to be turned around on this. But except for a couple songs that I put out as an exercise in figuring out the process, I'm pretty proud of what was produced.

@@AiDIYTECH you didn't produce anything... musicians that AI companies stole the data from did... muppet. Have you thought of a long term consequences of the AI you are glorifying? I hope your family and friends loose their jobs to AI, see how that feels.

@@AiDIYTECH strictly speaking, it's not music creation. You haven't spent any time with a physical or digital instrument, not even opened a DAW to produce anything. I think it is more fair to just call it music generation or maybe just audio. I like Adam Neely's latest video where he distinguishes the activity of creating music from the output of music, and phrases it in the context of a musical turing test.

@@strangnet I can't totally disagree or agree with what you're saying. I'm not sure myself how I feel. I played trumpet from 6 years old until I was 20. I listen to music night and day. I totally understand that people want to protect it. I want to protect it as well. So much so that I had an idea that would have pumped out thousands of songs every day with the hope of generating enough to make an income. But I won't do that because that's too far. Other than 2 songs that I did just as a case study to show if I could do it, I only release stuff that I think is good in some way. Time will tell how this all goes. My prediction is that we'll have a lot of ai stuff and it will get better and better. But my computer can't go into a pub with a few friends and play live.

Thanks Rob I really think that's true. The tech will get better and I'll get better at producing this stuff. In the future, I might even do another video that drills down further to make it even more yours. I really appreciate the watch and the comment.

Hi, thanks for the question. Yes, I do have ChatGpt4 and it is a paid version. But you can try other free generation tools. Midjourney is great but you need to use it through their Discord.

@@AiDIYTECH Thanks for your reply, can I ask for Royalties if my song is sing by an AI , but the lyrics are mine?

It's such a grey area right now. The legislation was really focused on image creation when it comes to what is considered "yours". But it doesn't limit it to just image creation. It broadly says something like "If no human interaction in your art". But other than this song, I've done things to more than just the lyrics. I've done some audio editing and enhancements. So even though the music is sung by and the instruments are played by ai, there's still a lot of involvement on my part. Spotify and the music publishers don't ask and don't seem to care if ai have a hand in your production. So go ahead and ask for payments. It takes a long time to build up a payment though. Fractions of a cent on every play.

@@AiDIYTECH the reason they let you is so they can later sue you for a lot of money. spotify doesnt care if your music is legal or not as its not them at risk. you wont get royalties please check out Top music Attorneys youtube channel to see that you are giving out the wrong information.

@@rifsz you can get royalties if you wrote the lyrics. you will get the writers proportion of the royalties but you will not get any for the singer portion as you are not the singer. if the singer is A.I then nobody gets the singers portion of the royalties.

I'm sooo open to trying new stuff like that. Might even do a video on it. Thanks for the tip!!

True, but if you write the lyrics they are copyrighted.

@@zvoidx the lyrics were AI was well and there is already a case where and artist combined work with AI and the government wouldn’t allow the copyright. What he is telling people to do is not taking the proper measures to protect your music and trying to make a quick buck. He in his examples did not write the lyrics or the music he’s misleading people.

@@RetroReprise I wasn't aware of that case. I was thinking that they would have to copy the music and change the lyrics but I could be wrong.

@@zvoidx Tech is moving too fast for the laws to keep up. You can copyright your lyrics true, but the combination of AI and human-made hasn't been breached yet. I'm working on a project that I'm writing and using AI so I've been keeping a close eye on this. What this guy is suggesting is reckless and could cause problems down the line. He's not the first one to think all he has to do is let the computer write it for him and he can just cash in. But the case I'm referring to was with a piece of visual art that was both AI and human. Top music attorney's channel covered it I think. She's been doing deeper dives into the legal ramifications of AI since there's also a concern as to who this music is using to model itself after.

I've been looking at the rulings and there's a lot of grey space around this. Off the top of my head, it says something like "If created with no human interaction". But as soon as a human prompts the ai, you have human interaction. Not only that, but in my case, normally when I produce a song, I do a lot of work on the lyrics after I get my initial results.

It might look that way but the only affiliate program I actually even belong to at the moment is Heygen and I did my Heygen video prior to the affiliate program. Thanks for watching though

They don't have to.

😂 Yes. But some of it is pretty awesome.

You don't HAVE To listen to anything on Spotify, you choose what you like to listen to....