Відео

Thank you for this video--The experience of silence is the most beautiful way to worship God- in the silence offered so generously in the Latin Mass, one’s heart can more easily contemplate the mysteries of the Mass and prepare to receive the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity in a most reverent manner. The silence is such an attraction to enter into intimacy with Jesus.

The final point again emphasizes the weaponized ambiguity used by our leaders to blur the messages and create chaos.

Is there a source I could quote from that shows Justinian trying to outlaw the silence of the canon? Thanks

M

I like this video a lot. It would be funny however if our lady of walsingham comes back but shes an anglican now,

I am in Love ❤ to be in the Traditional Church and no other, God's call to His Church 'first love' so we must hitch to His call immediately with bending knees and felling at His feet at the Altar and Tabernacle. Amen.

Oh why don't they face me me me...I'm my own little god! Let's ignore God and pray to me. I often have team meetings facing in the opposite direction to those I am addressing. In the new Mass I turn my back to the God who is out there....so I can grimace, contort my face, posture, and look ingenously genuine....

salves built that Abbey

wast of time and space

We all faced the Tabernacle together facing East.After Vatican II that changed, My shrine at home faces East Latin Mass sung is beautiful.

I know of someone else who didn't kneel before our blessed lord. ... But I would rather not mention him here...

Alleluia

Circa year 1530, King Henry VIII run into nuptual problems and had a tiff with the Pope at the time because the Pope would not grant King Henry VIII a divorce. In a huff, King Henry VIII enacted the Act of Supremacy circa year 1534 and the Church of England was founded as a result of the aforesaid tiff. However, some people in the Church of England would like to reverse the effect of King Henry VIII erratic (not erotic) behaviour resulting in the aforesaid nuptual problems, and bring the Church of England back into the Catholic fold, namely back into the true church.

So is it sacrilege when deacons or leader of a communion service distributes communion? Or should they touch it with a cloth?

I thought the priest faced the alter was for adoration of Christ.

The hand communion was the first and original one as St. John Chrystomos states in his treaty on church-life in the 4th century

On the tongue also prevents as best as possible the possbikity of the Eucharist being stolen and say used for satanic masses as it sometimes is. Granted I guess they could take it out of there mouth later but that probably doesn't happen. I'd think it would have dissolved or gotten soggy at that point. I go to Novus Ordo mass but am considering starting to receive on the tongue.

Is it more charitable in this COVID-era to receive the Most Holy Communion by the hand?

Ruega por nosotros Santa Mater Dei Nuestra Señora de Walsingham proteje a tu pueblo Santa Maria Ora Pro Nobis

In the United States in the Archdiocese of Los Angeles we "process" in a dignified manner .Fr. William Nichols has a You Tube explaining real life situations on receiving on the tongue and in the hand. Called "How Not To Receive" (I don't like the title but there it is). I doubt very much that the Latin Mass and receiving kneeling at an altar rail will overtake the Novus Ordo but I respect people that miss it. Personally, I remember as a youth that at the Latin Mass the congregation was less unified : some people saying rosary during mass, others distracted because they did not understand the language, others fumbling with their missals I'm just saying that there were some negative elements about the Latin Mass as well.

Live in the past if you will. Leave the rest of us alone.

They should change many other things in that religion.

Glorious and more of these pilgrimages are desperately needed with the state of the world. God Bless all who are able to go. Wish I could join them.

Communion on the knees and in our tongue, is more than just good "Etiquette" as some claim. It is a matter of respecting the first commandment. It is a matter of giving God all of our devotion and respect. It is about having a healthy fear and respect for our Lord Jesus. Present in the consecrated Host. Which after consecration by a validly ordained Catholic Priest, it then becomes the real Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ. To Him all the Honor and Glory, now and forever. AMEN.

1970 Vat 2 reforms simply demolished the preparatory practices of the principal points of our faith. Now there appears to be 2 Churches instead of one. It looks like there will never be a meeting point between the traditional ancient practices and contemporary. Today the modern Church is fragmented so to suit the interest of modernists. Very upsetting and confused.

¡Que lindo video!

I like it.

Hello brothers and sisters Jesus gave to Saint Bridget these prayers to be recited for twelve years www.theworkofgod.org/Devotns/bridget_12years.htm

<quote> In the early Church, the faithful stood when receiving into their hands the consecrated particle can hardly be questioned. . . . St. Dionysius of Alexandria, writing to one of the popes of his time, speaks emphatically of “one who has stood by the table and has extended his hand to receive the Holy Food” (Eusebius, Hist. Eccl., VII, ix). The custom of placing the Sacred Particle in the mouth, rather than in the hand of the communicant, dates in Rome from the sixth, and in Gaul from the ninth century (Van der Stappen, IV, 227; cf. St. Greg., Dial., I, III, c. iii).</quote> In the Gospels, Jesus says "take and eat" which means that Jesus wants his disciples to take in their hands and to eat the bread which he blessed and distributed to them. Since Jesus says, "I desire to celebrate this Passover with you" (Luke 22:15 and par.), it must be presumed that Jesus blessed and distributed (hand to hand) in accordance with Jewish usage during the Passover. If Jesus had placed the bread in the mouths of his disciples, this would have been a shocking deviation and would have been noted as such. The video above does a disservice to the Vatican II renewal of the Eucharistic theology and practice by regarding the imposing at all times and all places the supposed superiority of the practices of their youth. I, too, received communion on the tongue while kneeling with an altar cloth covering my hands [lest I touch the host]. Was I then more reverent than now when I "take and eat" and "take and drink" the Eucharist given to me? An Orthodox Byzantine priest discusses the various practices and concludes as follows: <quote> I don’t believe an argument can be made for one way being intrinsically superior to another. It is culturally relative to some extent, but ultimately comes down to the attitude in one’s heart: the interior disposition, leading to reverence or not, whatever our posture. [www.patheos.com/blogs/davearmstrong/2015/09/communion-in-the-hand-standing-norm-till-500-900-ad.html] </quote> This is the position that I would invite those who listen to this video to consider for themselves and for the renewal of their Church. Fraternally, Dr. Aaron Milavec

What a load of fancy dress nonsense! Get real. We live in 2019 and these people are living in the Dark Ages. Spare us from these fools who are delusional

Not sure how something's specific character is retained by removing fundamental parts of it

Saint Margaret Clithero suffered terribly, a wonderful good soul who put Jesus first. Patron of the Catholics Women's League and forever in our hearts with all our blessed Marty's x

Our Lady of Walsingham Pray for Us x O Pia Dulcis Virgo Maria xxx

Which Kyrie setting is used at the beginning of this video? It's so beautiful!

Antiphon. O all ye saints of England come ye unto the Holy Place of Walsingham and bless ye the Lord. ℣. Pray for us, thou Virgin of Walsingham; ℟. That we may be worthy of the Promises of Christ. Almighty Father, whose holy Son Jesus Christ was born of a pure and Sinless Virgin, grant that like as we do pray once more for the renewal and conversion of England, so may she whose dowry England is, provide her intercession with your son, our Lord Jesus Christ, who lives and reigns with you in the unity of the Holy Ghost, ever one God, world without end. ℟. Amen.

I go to the Ordinary Form, have been to the Latin Mass but honestly I just prefer Mass in English and I hope some day for the return of the ad-orientem posture in our vernacular Masses.

Yall should do a video on the new rite of Ordination & Consecration.

As a revert , I crave the traditional mass that I remember as a small boy, somehow communion in the hand doesn't seem to show the reverence I desire to show , I'm not sure I understand the closing comments of the video , is it saying it just doesn't matter

But the still laity faces the east. So why all this hang up if the priest does that during all of the mass too? If one believe that Christ will comes from the east facing the west then he will face the laity and since the priest acts in persona christi then it is perfectly logic that he faces the west when fulfilling his priestly duty.

Do you all properly fast after Midnight for Holy Commnion?

Receiving Holy Eucharist in the hand is Sacraledge.

The problem was the restoration to "suit modern times." That there is the Greenlight to gut all Octaves and Foreseasons. This is why many Latins will to go East where committees and overtinkering is frowned or even outright Forbidden. The Latin Rite, been the biggest Rite, and rite of the Pope, has always been Target No1 by the Devil and foes of the Church to mince and unhallow since time immemorial.

The sacred direction in ancient Judaism was towards Jerusalem, towards the Presence of the transcendent God - "shekinah" - in the Holy of Holies, as seen in Daniel 6:10. Even after the destruction of the holy Temple, the custom of turning toward Jerusalem was kept. This was how the Israelites expressed their hope for the coming of the Messiah - the Christ, for the rebuilding of the Temple, and the gathering of the People of God from the dispersion. After the First Coming of the Christ, His life, death, Resurrection, and Ascension unto the Father, Christians no longer turned towards the earthly Jerusalem, but toward the new, heavenly Jerusalem. It was their firm belief, in keeping with the same hope for the First Coming, that when the Risen Christ would come again in glory, he would gather his faithful to make up this heavenly city. So in imitation of Jesus Christ, the Good Shepherd, a good priest, being a pastor of souls, leads his flock towards that heavenly Jerusalem. In the unbloody Sacrifice of Christ, from the road of the early Jerusalem, to the Cross, to the tomb of the Resurrection, unto the Heavenly Jerusalem, the August Sacrifice of the Mass is facing always East. "For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. For wheresoever the carcase is, there will the eagles be gathered together." Matthew 24:27-28 "Now when Daniel knew this, that is to say, that the law was made, he went into his house: and opening the windows in his upper chamber towards Jerusalem, he knelt down three times a day, and adored, and gave thanks before his God, as he had been accustomed to do before." Daniel 6:10 "For from the rising of the sun even to the going down, my name is great among the Gentiles, and in every place there is sacrifice, and there is offered to my name a clean oblation: for my name is great among the Gentiles, saith the Lord of hosts." Mal. 1:11

The term extraordinary form is a modernists invention. The nee mass is completely made up and a load of mud.

That is quite right... for the most part. In the Ordinary form, the priest can also face the east, and celebrate "ad orientem". In fact, there are rubrics of the actual missal who explain when the priest has to turn towards the people, and when he turns towards the altar. If the norm was the celebration "versus populum", these rubrics would be useless.

I don't know how people who read the actual words of Jesus Christ could ever turn communion into the dog and pony show it has become. It just seems over the top and ritualistic compared to the simplicity Jesus did it with. I encourage everyone to study the history of the Catholic Church and how communion was practiced before they got so much power and started burning men women and children at the stake.

I'm going on this pilgrimage tomorrow and can't wait. Out Lady of Walsingham Ora Pro Nobis St. Christopher Ora Pro Nobis English Mayters Ora Pro Nobis.

Thank God the Orthodox and most Eastern Catholics have kept ad orientem.

eastern church...so byzantines do this

Restored in the Ordinariates.