Відео

Hritik’s performance in which film?

@ I really liked Hrithik performance in Fiza his second film that year after his debut it is a excellent offbeat film I absolutely loved his performance in Guzaarish a very underrated film he best acting performance

Haha I know. Which is why in the video said mine would be an unpopular opinion. Ddlj and Srk are definitely iconic. But I only compare acting performances - Aamir in rangeela felt better to me…but again, It makes sense why most people would give it to srk

It’s a hilariously horrible copy of snatch. I still can’t stop laughing about the fact that in snatch you have the Russian..and in fool n final you have arbaaz Khan play the role and his name is “Moscow chikna”

@@BantermanBhatt Yes true.in our national language we say sasta copy

I feel like jab we met is also inspired a bit by along came Polly

sangharsh was made by tanuja chandra, who is anupama chopra's sister. such an irony that the sister of one of India's top critics made a film which is a rip off.

damn i had no idea abour race nd mohra!

Thank you so much!! :) Sharing links to some similar videos on my channel that you may like: Jason Blum - The Horror Guy: ua-cam.com/video/tobyJf7RYSg/v-deo.html&ab_channel=BantermanBhatt Stars & Industries: ua-cam.com/video/gU8YlbeMHRc/v-deo.html&ab_channel=BantermanBhatt

Oh I didn’t know that. So you mean the Korean movie doesn’t have the religious elements?

@@BantermanBhatt Yeah, no religious elements, no backstory for the main character as seen with Emraan/Shriya flashbacks. No human trafficking angle for the Mrinalina Sharma character. The Korean movie has some excellent stylish fight choreography which Awarapan has tried to copy unsuccessfully. But in terms of plot depth and themes Awarapan is a much better movie.

@ oh that’s really interesting. I’ll definitely check out parts of the original. But yeah, awarapan is definitely one of emraan’s more underrated movies.

And rate race was a remake of that and dhamaal’s themes and treatment was very similar to rat race’s

I'd disagree there. the only difference between a copy and a remake is that in a remake you paid the rights for it. So I feel creatively they shouldn't be treated differently. Also, a huge part of movies made are based on books - so much so that you have a "Best Adapted Screenplay" category at the oscars. It's only fair to be inspired by an idea....what matters is how you visualise it, mould it and and present it to make it something unique enough that stands out.

Oh there’s numerous Bollywood remakes of south films. Most of priyadarshan’s, Rohit Shetty’s and David dhawan’s movies

@BantermanBhatt add Abbas-Mustan, Sanjay Gupta, Mahesh Bhatt, and Vikram Bhatt to the list

that list is never ending haha! Sanjay gupta and the Bhatts from Korean films, abbas mustan from Hollywood..

There's so many! I'm actually doing another video where I talk about Movies you had no idea were copies/inspired and I;ve got Munna Bhai and a few others in that.

True..There are so many such movies where the Hollywood movie itself is a remake of another Hollywood movie that came back in the day...somewhere in between Bollywood does a copy...and then people feel the new Hollywood movie is a copy of the Bollywood one. Case in point - Maine pyaar kyun kiya and Just Go With It...While Just Go With It itself is a remake of Cactus Flower which came out in 1969, with the same plot. Similarly Aashiqui 2 and A Star Is Born - So many people were like oh yeh movie toh Aashiqui 2 ki copy hai...While the reality is that A Star is Born has been remade 5 times in Hollywood, starting from 1937.

I’ve got to disagree there! Yes kaante had a lot going for it…but reservoir dogs still is in a league of its own. For starters, the lengthy dialogues and monologues work so well in reservoir dogs and it was something fresh to see in Hollywood at that time as well. Next what actually makes reservoir dogs a great film is its lack of scale. Staging 80% of a movie in a warehouse and still keeping the audience hooked is a feat if it’s own. Kaaante definitely used scale well, but I still feel reservoir dogs was in a league of its own.

@@BantermanBhatt I would definitely agree that Reservoir dogs is more raw and less filmy but don't know there is something cinematic in Kaante which weirdly even if it is more filmy and songs at regular intervals- it still works big time. And definitely more stylish and big budget than Reservoir dogs

@@karanprabhune6887 it definitely does. It was the first of its kind in Bollywood. I remember finding all the filmy elements so cool in it as a kid, and it’s aged well too.

Thanks a lot!! Appreciate it. Been a movie buff since a very young age, so trying to share what I know in an interesting and informative way!

South ke baare mein bhi aayega bhai..tum batao kuch movies. I’ll add it to my list. Till then subscribe to stay up to date and press the bell icon to get notified when the video comes out!

Darr came out in December 24, 1993 and fear came out in April 12 1996 , fear is a copy of darr

OverSmart Jokerrr

@@ReginaldLal True..I'm glad you brought this up. Yes, Fear is somewhat on the same lines. The difference being that in this Mark Wahlberg, who plays Shahrukh's character, actually hooks up with the actress and they date as well....Later they break up and he's obsessed with her...while in Darr it was always a one sided love track which no one else knew about. Also, the other actor in this is not her fiancee and those plot points are different too.

@@ReginaldLal Darr is copy of Cape fear (1991) Martin scorsese and Robert de niro, U r talking about Mark Whalberg's fear which has no relation to darr

​​@@karanprabhune6887yes MARK Welbergh's FEAR was copied into another bollywood movie called AETBAAR(2004) starring AMITABH BACHCHAN, BIPASHA BASU and JOHN ABRAHAM 😅😅

Srk in baazigar, darr, Swades, chak de no doubt. But in years where others had much more impressive performances and had worked much harder, it’s only fair to credit them. Fandom ek taraf aur fairness ek taraf.

Yes!! Soon!

I think you should apply for Filmfare’s judging panel.

Nahi yaar. I definitely didn’t feel that. Stree 2 was much better. Constantly funny. Humor was much better in Stree 2

Are you saying he deserved an award for any of these?

Yup so true. It was based more on how big a hit the movie was more than the acting performance. Growing up filmfare still had some charm. Now it’s literally dead. It’s a joke. I remember a phase where after a.r. Rahman won the Oscar, for a solid 5 years only he won best composer. While a lot of what he had composed was very average. On the other hand pritam and Vishal shekhar were composing some great stuff then but just lost out.

Thank you!! Yes I’m definitely thinking of!

He also says it in such a matter of fact way. Someone else could’ve really stressed on it. But just the way he delivers it works so well

On paper, I can’t really blame him. It was a meaty role. Known writer, big actress. But hope he can salvage something of off this

@@BantermanBhatt he is a good actor but he has taken hasty decisions especially if u see his shows after kuch rang ..all those projects failed even on Star plus.

The mistake he did on TV can be costly in Bollywood..he should be judicious enough to know whats he is signing up for.

@@rider4745 hmm. I haven’t really seen any of his shows so can’t comment on his acting range. But hope he can make good choices and scale up from here!

W for skipping the Werewolfes houl😂😂

Yea big let down!

Seriously!

Tanvi’s character also could’ve been so much better written

Hahaha. Even if you go in with the lowest expectations possible, it’ll still manage to disappoint. And more than a filmmaking problem it’s got to do with a marketing problem. Had to movie been portrayed for what it was things could’ve been different.

You watched the correct joker movie! 😁

Fr

I Strongly Disagree.

@@mfliminal That joke he tells Murray right before shooting him reads like something a 14 year-old would've written.

@@andytrevino4077does it matter what he said, the point was to have a punchline which resulted in his death, u MUST be 14 years old the way you nitpick cinema

@@Punkfemboy Being 14 would arguably mean thinking this is the greatest film in the history of forever. The dialogue is needlessly melodramatic and whiny, and REALLY makes me think Todd basically just watched TDK and scrolled through Joker graphics on Pinterest for an hour afterwards before writing the script. So yes, it does matter what he said considering dialogue makes up at least 50% of storytelling.

He definitely did come up with that one! I felt the script for this one was pretty good. It might not stand out as much compared to the other elements but very good on its own. I know after the 2nd part people started to see it in a different way…but I feel this movie was great in itself. Great build up, journey and character arc

It’s also so weird that Joaquim’s brother did end up dying on the sidewalk. And that too despite being famous 😅

⁠@@TheTenaciousDogthat’s probably why Joaquin added it

@@TheTenaciousDog I had no idea about this. Just read up. Crazy…

How does the sequel ruin this?

@@gaynarchist because now people are hating on the original movie more

Just ignore the sequel and treat it as not canon, that's what I do

“and it’s fucking weird” im dead 😭😭💀

This definitely hit hard the first time I saw it but there were moments even when I was drafting this script to screen when I was like damn..this is built up well. I didn’t remember this

It actually started off very well with the animation and visuals and everything. Definitely added to the creepy feel and set the stage up. But a huge surprise as to how they treated it post that

@@BantermanBhattI just don’t like how they kill off Arthur. It kind of defeats the whole point of the character. It’s like you might as well call this movie the origin story of the man who inspired the Joker if he was never actually Joker to begin with.

@@MrClean21 yup. That was the nail in the coffin for sure. A huge anti climatic moment. Such a great stage set with part 1 only for this to be a very underwhelming arc..it felt like they didn’t get the memo whatsoever about what the excitement for part 2 was about

​​@@BantermanBhatt it's made even dumber because they suggest that the man who killed Arthur goes on to be Heath Ledgers joker . . . Even though when the first movie was made, Todd Philips spicificly expressed this movie being it's own self contained thing and not part of any other universe

@@saggyshaggy well there’s really no end to interpretations there. They’ll probably have another movie having us expect that only for him to die too and another joker pop out 😂

It was definitely a great high point for the climax. Great way to complete the character arc

I mean what else is the audience supposed to be doing in a movie theater? Crying throughout?

​@@thisisbs9775 my point is that the theater was utterly mesmerized, enthralled, and immersed - but I figure you knew what I meant and just wanted to make a sarcastic comment.

I know they spent quite a bit of time filming this scene, they probably changed little pieces of it each take and then edited together the most impactful ones

So typically, any dialogue improvisation - is obviously them going off script Then there are chunks where lines are skipped. This could happen typically when - 1) the actor skips the line 2) the co actor says his/her line early and it flows well as a reaction and the director decides to keep rolling and not calll cut. Often also hoping something interesting will come out from it he/she could use in the edit 3) the editor cuts out lines and dialogues to make the scene tighter The way to tell mainly is if a dialogue is changed mid-sentence compared to the script. If a scene is edited in a wide and then they cut to a close of one of the characters - the editor probably cut a line there. If there’s no other motivation to go closer on that character. Lots of permutations and combinations! But hope this helps!

Phoenix is known for his method acting and going off-script (Look at the scene where he imitates Gary after killing Randall)

I feel going off script works well only if you’re fully immersed into your character. As a director myself I get very frustrated when actors try and improvise for the sake of it rather than logically improvising on what their character would do. But when an actor is truly immersed, you get some beautiful moments out of the improvisations.