Відео

This is plain insulting, claiming we are burdens? Look in the mirror you hypocrites, you’re a burden to us, look at all you have done to us. Eugenics Movement not only morally wrong but continued even after being proven false. Your Willowbrook Scandal, the Judge Rottenberg Centre still shocking kids, the Nazi Holocaust, conversion therapy (ABA), the feminine boy project, your neuroleptic abuse towards us, your persistent hypocrisy not having the ability to keep your moral values, your obsession with conformity, your hatred towards harmless differences, your claim women are social parasites, your genocide towards the Tasmanian race, claiming homosexuality is a disorder. You hypocrites are great burdens to us then you place all the blame on us. You say 98% don’t test positive for Down Syndrome, are you blind? You’re wasting 98% of the money, no need to wonder why the world is in such great poverty. You are not just a burden to us, you are a burden to the entire world with your selfish desires. Even worse, it’s your frigging idea of destroying biodiversity that introduces diseases. The entire human is biological, meaning every disabled person is part of biodiversity, so by destroying us, you are intentionally destroying the world causing ecological disasters, extinction of wildlife, increase human suffering, increasing poverty, increasing depression through causing redundancy by doing this to us resulting in suicide, bombarding disabled people with the message they don’t have the right to live resulting in suicide, the list goes on and on of how much abuse and harm your non-existent human is causing. You’re bigger burdens to the world than all disabled people put together, you’re not just our burden, you’re your own burden with the consequences of what you’re doing to us.

Please share the notes

Thank u sir

Excellent talk 👏👏👏

I would urge the Prof (from the audience) speaking at around 47:00 to study the data before coming to his current conclusions. An example mentioned by the lecturer was TK who was brain dead. And this is not mere brain stem death - TK's brain had undergone liquefactive necrosis and he had NO BRAIN. Despite having no brain, TK survived for 20 years. He used nutrients from tube feedings, fought infection, maintained body temperature and underwent proportionate physical growth. In other words, TK's body continued to work as an integrated, unified whole. Is this the mark of a dead "organism?"

Prof Steinbock, what's important to consider is this implied premise that persons have the "liberty" to "harm" themselves i.e. to commit suicide or murder themselves. We must first consider the metaethical aspects of what liberty and harm entail, then come to your conclusion (37:59) that the alleged "religious/moral objections" of some should not limit the liberty of others. Also, what qualifies as "religious" objections? Does a worldview that requires comprehensive metaphysical doctrine qualify as one eg secularism or humanism? Most religions object to murder, so should we limit the liberty of others to murder? Please do not beg the question, Prof, with all due respect.

Introductions are extensive, Peter Singer starts talking 10mins in.

Something pro-life people always seem to assume is that everyone is grateful to be born. I assure you that although most people are glad to have been born there are lots of people who wish they'd never been created. I have a very privileged life but with the depression and anxiety that runs in my family I truly wish I had never been forced to exist. Now that I'm here I do my best to make this a better world but I'm absolutely an anti-natalist. I think abstinence is a great option but not everyone chooses that so I think abortion is the more moral choice over having children. Embryos and young fetuses aren't sentient (until week 17) so they have no self-interest. I think abortion should be done before 17 weeks but in that time period I think it's the best choice. As far as religion, I'm a Cathar. We believe the greatest sin is procreation. I guarantee ensoulment doesn't happen at conception because identical twins form sometime in the 1st 2 weeks and twins don't share a soul.

Watching this now in 2022…oh how far back the US 🇺🇸 has put itself in terms of women’s rights.

The things that's common between the king and prince is royalty, the thing that's common between fetus and adult is humanity. These are just entities that exist at different stages of development.

If contraception fails and she falls pregnant and I as the man am not ready to be a dad and suggest an abortion. If she decides to keep the baby and i walk out then don't ask me for child support money.

Pre: 54:10: Moral status of Foetus and different views. 54:35: Moving on - "Women, in essence, serving as a life support system

It seems to be that the most potent positions on either “side” are the FLO theory and Interest based positions like Bonnie’s. Time to go on ResearchGate and see some critiques on either position.

I'm very excited about the amazing results of the herbal medicine i ordered from dr momoh on youtube channel, I'm now free from herpes virus , thanks Dr MOMOH😊

Love how only philosophies from atheological vantage points and backgrounds are allowed into these discussions. A kind of purist intellectual eugenics takes place. Granted I'm only 10 minutes in.

This is an excellent lecture by Professor Singer. His arguments are strong and accessible.

Excellent lecture! thank you so much for the information.

Are there any Bonnie steinbock bioethics videos on cloning?stem cell research?

These videos are very good. I hope there’s more of them?

Does Bonnie steinbock have videos on artificial intelligence and big data?

These lectures are excellent and very well done!😊

Bonnie is an excellent speaker and academic. She seriously knows her subject area. She explains it very well.gives excellent examples and then goes back to the central point again. She’s very clear and thorough.😊

These videos are excellent and very informative!😊

I was concerned about taking TOEFL Now I am so dead confident that I will pass after hearing those students.

Isn’t there potential sentience and the genetic correlates of sentience in the DNA code? Wouldn’t the unique nature of this potential sentience relate to an interest in manifesting and developing it not just for the persons interest but also for society’s interests in the unique contribution of that individual? This wouldn’t relate to a biological identity argument rather both embodied and biological.

I do not consent... does this mean I have to live on a mountain somewhere? How do we escape the Herd Mentality?

Covid1984, Eugenics, Agenda21~ "Josef Mengele also known as the Angel of Death..." We do not Consent!

27-28: "In a society where organ harvesting from legal prisoners is allowed" and then he realized he was talking to a group of sensitive audience and then her quickly rephrased. I love his idea! hahaha.

What ever happened to having a lectrum?

BRILLIANT!!!!!! Thank you for posting. I don't even know how to verbalize how much I enjoyed this lecture.

Thank you very much for these lectures. I have learned so much from them. I am immensely grateful to have the greatest opportunity to have access to the leading bioethicists of our generation. Bonnie steinbock is very impressive, logical and spontaneous.

Bonnie Steinbock is one of the best I have ever seen.

These lectures have been immensely helpful and enlightened my moral philosophy path. Thank you profoundly for sharing this with the public.

Thank you very much for the logically well throughout ethics. I admire how she managed to respond in the way that she did, given being put on the spot.

Thank you very much. Very intelligible and engaging. Watching these videos to prepare for my next trimester.I love moral philosophy.

21:50 he’s voice shaking 😂

Holy shit the mic quality is crap

Thank you for posting this! I was ill on the day and could not attend, but glad that I did not end up missing such an amazing lecture.

I love these videos on Bio Ethics. Great professors, lectures, and over all getting the point across!

He is notorious for criticizing the research ethics in India and China. Such a racist could not be a professor in Hong Kong www.nytimes.com/2015/06/30/science/a-scientific-ethical-divide-between-china-and-west.html?_r=0

This 45 years Korean guy does not speak proper English, poor presentation skills,knows very little about bioethics, as the director. He was still so proud of himself and thought that his bad jokes were funny........................... He probably escaped to China from the compulsory military services in Korea. www.thegully.com/essays/asia/030306_lgbt_korea_huso_yi.html