- 274
- 63 798
CSI - Courtroom Sciences, Inc.
United States
Приєднався 7 січ 2015
Courtroom Sciences, Inc. (CSI) is a premier litigation support and consulting company offering solutions for Crisis Planning & Crisis Management, Early Case Assessment, Third-Party Records Retrieval, Court Reporting and Deposition Scheduling, Witness Training, Mock Trials, Jury Research, Trial Consulting & Jury Selection. Nationally recognized, CSI is proud to serve a wide-ranging and diverse client base that includes Fortune 500 businesses, insurance companies, and law firms of all sizes. The CSI team of industry-seasoned experts assist litigators, paralegals, claims personnel and in-house legal teams in all phases of the litigation process. The CSI UA-cam channel highlights how we help legal teams achieve superior outcomes in witness testimony performance, settlement and trial research, mock trials, jury selection and more.
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #240 - JFK Assassination Update
Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. is joined by JFK assassination expert, journalist, and author Jefferson Morley to discuss the latest updates on the still unreleased government documents associated with the JFK assassination. Jefferson provides an overview of where things stand currently with release of JFK assassination documents, particularly with regards to the active litigation around these records' release. Bill and Jefferson compare and contrast the JFK assassination to the assassination attempts on President Reagan and President Trump. They also talk about what people may not know or realize about the JFK assassination. Lastly, Bill and Jefferson talk about the state of journalism today.
Переглядів: 67
Відео
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #239 - Career Insights from a Panel of Defense Attorneys
Переглядів 1029 годин тому
Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. is joined by Associate Attorney Jeffrey Oates, Attorney Kristin Pettey, and Attorney Jason Preciphs from the law firm of Roberts, Carroll, Feldstein, and Peirce. Bill's guests describe the diverse types of cases their firm works on, how their firm attracts and retains associates, and how they provide growth opportunities for their attorneys while also growing the firm. ...
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #238 - The Art and Science of Voir Dire with Unique Questions
Переглядів 77День тому
Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. talks about unique voir dire questions, particularly around damages, to help attorneys improve their jury selection process and to set the stage for openings. Bill gives examples of topics to ask about during voir dire that help to indoctrinate jurors. Some of the topics for questions Bill discusses: social inflation, lawsuit abuse, justice for the defense, commenting o...
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #237 - No Trust, No Nothing - The First Meeting with a Witness
Переглядів 6814 днів тому
Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. talks about something all attorneys, but particularly early career attorneys, need to keep in mind when preparing witnesses for deposition. Sometimes witnesses come into deposition preparation with some trauma which could be related to the litigation, or from other sources, that may be triggered or further exacerbated by the litigation. It's important for the attorney t...
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #236 - Preparing for the Storm (i.e., Pre-Litigation Management)
Переглядів 6721 день тому
Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. talks about the critical importance of preparation for litigation, and particularly early preparation. Bill discusses the risks for the defense by not being prepared and the costs for not being prepared. Bill talks about steps to take before litigation even strikes: 1. Education: Identify people who will be involved in litigation and/or likely to get deposed in a future...
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #235 - Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) and Litigation
Переглядів 46Місяць тому
Jonathan Wohlwend, Associate Attorney at Bradley, joins Steve Wood, Ph.D. to talk about Name, Image, Likeness (NIL) and the legal implications around NIL. Jonathan provides background on what NIL is and is not, particularly within the context of college athletics, and describes how the process for NIL works for recruiting players. Jonathan defines what a collective is, the changes that have hap...
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #234 - The Danger With Witnesses Who Guess
Переглядів 74Місяць тому
Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. talks about the biggest mistake witnesses make during testimony: guessing. Bill describes why this happens, even in light of clear direction to not guess, and how to address it. Bill talks about the attention/behavior gap which is driven by the brain's native neurocognitive wiring and explains the two categories of reasons why witnesses guess: internal and external reas...
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #233 - Don't Let Your Witnesses Fight with a Professional Fighter
Переглядів 71Місяць тому
Steve Wood, Ph.D. talks about seeing more and more examples of witnesses who are fighting with opposing counsel in their deposition or at trial, motivated by a desire to get their story across. Steve covers several reasons why pivoting like this is a bad idea including: arguing with a professional arguer is foolish; jurors view witnesses who pivot or argue with opposing counsel as less credible...
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #232 - Considerations for Selecting an Expert Witness
Переглядів 61Місяць тому
Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. talks about how to select experts for trial testimony. One option is to pick national experts and another approach is to choose an expert who is more local to the venue. Bill walks through some important considerations when selecting an expert witness: - How much time does the expert spend testifying professionally? - How much of their income comes from testifying as an...
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #231 - From the Trenches - Q3 2024
Переглядів 65Місяць тому
Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. and Ava Hernandez join host Steve Wood, Ph.D. for another edition of From the Trenches where they discuss recent observations and updates from jury research projects, witness trainings, and cases that the CSI team have been working on. First, they talk about how too many attorneys wait until close to trial to contact the CSI team for help with training witnesses for tri...
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #230 - Fact or Fiction?
Переглядів 802 місяці тому
Paul Motz, Shareholder and Trial Attorney, at Segal McCambridge Singer & Mahoney joins Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. to dispel several myths around litigation and talk about what's fact and what's fiction. Paul and Bill discuss whether jurors hate corporations, whether the person most knowledgeable should always serve as the corporate representative, whether someone who has been deposed many times b...
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #229 - Getting to Know Steve Wood, Ph.D.
Переглядів 792 місяці тому
Steve Wood, Ph.D. joins host Ava Hernandez to discuss his background and how he got into the litigation consulting business. Steve shares details on his education and his interest in how people make decisions which he applies to his role as a litigation consultant. Ava and Steve also talk about their fascination with how people behave and in particular how people's perspectives are influenced b...
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #228 - Managing Trial Stress
Переглядів 562 місяці тому
Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. talks about how to manage stress during trial. Bill shares the three areas to focus on: physical health, emotional health, and mental health. Physical health keys: 1. Protect your sleep - really important to get plenty of restful sleep. 2. Exercise - get your body moving, even if its just for a few minutes by taking a walk or a short run. 3. Eat right - you have to eat ...
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #227 - Talking About Memory with Dr. Elizabeth Loftus - Part 2
Переглядів 812 місяці тому
Nationally recognized and renowned memory expert Dr. Elizabeth Loftus joins Steve Wood, Ph.D. for the second part of their discussion about memory, where they talk about repressed memories. Dr. Loftus shares her experience working on cases where repressed memories were at the core of the case and the research she has done on repressed memories and false memories. Steve and Elizabeth discuss the...
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #226 - Listener Mail
Переглядів 573 місяці тому
Bill Kanasky, Jr., Ph.D. answers another round of podcast listener mail: - What is the best timing for witness training? - What is the best routine for the witness the morning of the deposition? - How do you deal with catastrophic injury and death cases every week? - How long should focus groups be? - Any updates on nuclear verdicts and how to prevent them?
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #225 - Talking About Memory with Dr. Elizabeth Loftus - Part 1
Переглядів 853 місяці тому
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #225 - Talking About Memory with Dr. Elizabeth Loftus - Part 1
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #224 - Managing the Trial Process
Переглядів 1043 місяці тому
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #224 - Managing the Trial Process
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #223 - The Future of Legal with Jordan Furlong
Переглядів 653 місяці тому
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #223 - The Future of Legal with Jordan Furlong
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #222 - Opening Statements Part 2 - What To Do
Переглядів 1234 місяці тому
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #222 - Opening Statements Part 2 - What To Do
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #221 - Terror Management Theory & Civil Litigation
Переглядів 804 місяці тому
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #221 - Terror Management Theory & Civil Litigation
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #220 - Opening Statements Part 1 - What Not To Do
Переглядів 1414 місяці тому
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #220 - Opening Statements Part 1 - What Not To Do
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #219 - Analyzing Contributors to Inflated Settlements & Verdicts
Переглядів 895 місяців тому
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #219 - Analyzing Contributors to Inflated Settlements & Verdicts
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #218 - Getting to Know Ava Hernandez
Переглядів 455 місяців тому
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #218 - Getting to Know Ava Hernandez
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #217 - Cross-Examining Expert Witnesses
Переглядів 1335 місяців тому
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #217 - Cross-Examining Expert Witnesses
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #216 - Insights from a Trial Attorney on Managing Litigation
Переглядів 1025 місяців тому
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #216 - Insights from a Trial Attorney on Managing Litigation
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #215 - Med Mal Litigation Part 9 - Medical Malpractice Trial Prep
Переглядів 366 місяців тому
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #215 - Med Mal Litigation Part 9 - Medical Malpractice Trial Prep
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #214 - Preparing Witnesses for Testimony at Trial
Переглядів 806 місяців тому
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #214 - Preparing Witnesses for Testimony at Trial
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #213 - Med Mal Litigation Part 8 - Expert Witnesses in Med Mal
Переглядів 846 місяців тому
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #213 - Med Mal Litigation Part 8 - Expert Witnesses in Med Mal
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #212 - Report from the Trenches - Q1 2024
Переглядів 1656 місяців тому
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #212 - Report from the Trenches - Q1 2024
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #211 - Med Mal Litigation Part 7 - Litigation Timeline
Переглядів 957 місяців тому
The Litigation Psychology Podcast #211 - Med Mal Litigation Part 7 - Litigation Timeline
I still believe that Oswald was the only shooter. There is only one other theory that I consider to be plausible & that is the one where the Secret Service Agent who was in a car behind JFK's car whose gun went off accidentally in reaction to hearing shots fired from the Book Depository. That would be the only thing that would cause me to believe that the government is "hiding something" from the American people. It would be extremely embarrassing for the Secret Service if in fact the fatal shot was fired accidentally by a Secret Service Agent. I've heard every theory there is from James Files/James Sutton claiming that he was part of the plot & one of the shooters on the grassy knoll, to Jacqueline actually shooting JFK, to the Secret Service agent who was in the same car turning & shooting JFK, to someone shooting JFK from the storm drain. Conspiracy sells books, movies & documentaries. There would have to be too many people involved to keep a conspiracy of such a grand scale secretive for this long of a time. 61 years later & there is still no definitive answer other than the obvious. Lee Harvey Oswald & shall we say that it was a "Conspiracy of One."
0:23
Babushka lady was identified as being Mrs Zapruder.
Stone took a hell of a beating
Stone made a movie that was 99.9% fictional - he even said himself that he never claimed it was true.
This interview is worthless
How do you account for personal biases and racism when giving verdicts
Identifying biases has to be part of the jury selection process. A solid voir dire approach can identify jurors with biases that may be unfavorable for your case.
@@CSICourtroomSciencesInc lol
Thanks for the video
Thanks for Sharing!!!
I was told by a doctor that it takes 19 hours to get the caffeine out of the humans body from one cup of coffee. No wonder people have sleeping and other problems because of too much caffeine. People today call a cup something more in the size of a 2 cup mug or larger. I drink coffee. I stopped drinking coffee for 25 years and statrted again by drinking percolated coffee. I have at least two benefits; the aroma from the percolated coffee and the super charging of the caffeine. People need to take care of themselves. The younger generation does so much better than we do. Take care.
Oswald didn't shoot anyone that day
A mountain of credible evidence says otherwise.
@@aaronz7056 another CIA asset
@@aaronz7056 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The family had the remains of the brain buried with JFK
Nice❤❤❤❤❤❤
Some law firms are professional and collegiate while others are nasty and scream at employees. Partners at Orlando like to scream at employees who make very little money. Better law firms to work for than this.
Out of the FBI, Secret Service or CIA, nobody lost their job....oh thats right a Black man Abraham Bouldin for helping uncover a plot in Chicago Chicago while the good old Boys drank beer and chased skirts!
Dont hear anyone mentioning the corrupt Dallas police and the manipulation of evidence or their inability to place LHO to 6th floor or the Tippett murder scene without moving the time frame😂😅
Hi from Ireland.. very informative discussion.I have a question can a litigation process continue for sometmes months? Possibly a witness could be under a level of stress over a considerable amount of time.
Great question. Absolutely, a witness can be under stress for long periods of time. Litigation can last for months; typically, it takes years! A named party (plaintiff or defendant) with personal stake in the lawsuit often experiences more significant/chronic stress than other witnesses who are only involved at one or two points in the case--although there can be plenty of stress for them too. It's worthwhile to assess if the ongoing nature of a lawsuit is a factor underlying stress and act accordingly (e.g. offering ongoing mental health check-ins, facilitating long-term therapeutic treatment, teaching cognitive-behavioral skills, to name a few).
I don’t know who this guy is, but he doesn’t know the facts.
The implication that the CIA or other Government Agency created self-incriminating files is absurd, even more absurd would be the notion they're afraid to shred those documents if they did have them.
Morley is telling another Conspiracy Myth. Tague had nothing to do with the WC concluding one bullet went thru JFK & Connally. The Single Bullet Fact came from the Parkland Doctors looking at the Z-Film, when they showed what frames it had to be for Connally to sustain his wounds it was obvious that it was right when JFK was hit.......I reiterate Tague's wound had nothing to do with The Single Bullet Fact.
Morley is not an assassination expert, he's a Conspiracy Cultist but I'll give him a little credit for not lying about the discredited acoustic evidence and admitting it's problematic.
CIA
The expert in this video has probably never studied the Warren Commission Report.
...If a microphone is open, it does not transmit. The microphone needs to be closed for the transmitter to work....
I guess anybody can call themselves an expert. Dictabelt was disproven by National Academy of Sciences and by the police officer who had the dictabelt on his bike. McLellan was wrong since he didn’t examine the head…JFK was lying on his back thus obscuring the back of his head. Eyewitness testimony is the most notoriously unreliable kind of evidence which is why it’s not reliable in court cases. The autopsy shows the head wound was from a bullet from the rear. Hard evidence wins
When insurance companies only approve low billable rates, cut legal bills and overwork defense attorneys, your not going to attract the best legal talent for trials. I guess saving on legal costs is more important then the probability of nuclear verdicts.
He paid off his hefty tax debt with a payment for making the hit on Oswald. He hid the money in the safe he bought that week. Instructed his lawyer to pay the debt.
At least six shots fired three from book bldg and three from other direction But it sounds like three from grassy knol area probably had silencers as one slug dug from grass coming from grassy knol as were entry wound in neck and right side of head now drs still alive have confessed they were threatened to lie and say wounds from behind that means oswald innocent
Corn pop was a bad dude 🎉
spent too much time identifying who coined the term "Grassy Knoll" who cares?? nothing to do with the assassination NOTHING, filling in air time.
They can't release them because if they do it will reveal the CIA Conspiracy to overthrow the Government and to Protect LBJ at all cost.
Very helpful! I think I do this inadvertently during IME’s: Oh I have kids too (nonverbal smiling)! We are going there on vacation! What did you do there? Tell me all about your hiking trip and how you were able to spend all day walking around Disneyworld without any complaints (nonverbal nodding)…Now where were we? Oh yeah… the MVA that has left you unable to drive or complete ADL’s
Great podcast
You are presumably addressing lawyers, for whom time is precious. I'm at minute 4 and all you're talking about is the Chicago Bears and people you see at the gym. Really, stop wasting time. I doubt I'll stay on much longer since you're distracted, unfocused and unprofessional so far, at 6 minutes.
Please -- cut the silly sports talk. It diminishes your professional image.
1. meeting common witnesses to fact , setting meetings with clients, figuring out court room setting and structure 2. jury selection - give them a questionnaire to fill, take interviews, mock group discussions, in all of them dig deep into their emotions, attitudes, etc. Make sure the mental health of the jury is balanced and questionnaire is best way to do that to see which jury members have psychological disorders ( 11:00 ) Mock trials and group discussions are called voir dire
The worst is when you receive bad/rude service and TIP is still expected somehow :)
Nonsense
"Taking some liberties..." Oliver Stone packs more than 80 highly relevant and demonstrable lies into his movie, lets Kennedy's murderer off the hook and falsely paints a lot of innocent people as being guilty, which is nothing less than obscene.