- 58
- 92 342
Forever Scholars
United States
Приєднався 7 бер 2021
Welcome to Forever Scholars, a community of curious thinkers and lifelong learners dedicated to connecting you to college and university professors committed to advancing scholarly research and initiatives.
At Forever Scholars, you will have the opportunity to take short courses with faculty from colleges and universities across the globe with the ability to ask your questions and have engaging conversations with small groups during live classes. No matter where you are in the world, Forever Scholars will connect you to compelling topics, riveting research, and engaging conversations.
At Forever Scholars, you will have the opportunity to take short courses with faculty from colleges and universities across the globe with the ability to ask your questions and have engaging conversations with small groups during live classes. No matter where you are in the world, Forever Scholars will connect you to compelling topics, riveting research, and engaging conversations.
Strange Bedfellows: France, Spain, and the German States in the American Revolution
Mondays at 6:30 PM ET
September 9 - 30, 2024
$129
To register visit foreverscholars.com/courses/strange-bedfellows/
America’s peace commissioners signed the final version of the Treaty of Paris on September 3, 1783, in an upstairs room of a hotel on the Left Bank of the City of Lights. That treaty ended the Revolutionary War and confirmed the independence of the United States. As soon as the ink was dry that September morning, the king of France declared it a holiday, a day of thanksgiving for world peace. The king distributed great quantities of wine and sausages to the people of Paris and there was dancing in the streets.
In this four-part course, University of Maryland historian Richard Bell explores America’s founding conflict from the perspective of those celebrating Parisians and the tens of thousands of other men and women on the European mainland caught up in the War for Independence. These weekly sessions will examine one unique individual (Prussia’s Baron von Steuben, the hero of Valley Forge), and three broader groups of Europeans (the Hessians, the French, and the Spanish), all of whom played central roles in the war for independence.
The goal of this series is to set aside older notions of American exceptionalism and to embrace a larger and far more inclusive narrative that recognizes the impact wrought by the movement of goods, ideas, and multi-lingual people around the eighteenth-century Atlantic. In short, the great task before us is to imagine the American Revolution in post-exceptional terms; as a creation story in the making of our multi-cultural and interconnected modern world.
September 9 - 30, 2024
$129
To register visit foreverscholars.com/courses/strange-bedfellows/
America’s peace commissioners signed the final version of the Treaty of Paris on September 3, 1783, in an upstairs room of a hotel on the Left Bank of the City of Lights. That treaty ended the Revolutionary War and confirmed the independence of the United States. As soon as the ink was dry that September morning, the king of France declared it a holiday, a day of thanksgiving for world peace. The king distributed great quantities of wine and sausages to the people of Paris and there was dancing in the streets.
In this four-part course, University of Maryland historian Richard Bell explores America’s founding conflict from the perspective of those celebrating Parisians and the tens of thousands of other men and women on the European mainland caught up in the War for Independence. These weekly sessions will examine one unique individual (Prussia’s Baron von Steuben, the hero of Valley Forge), and three broader groups of Europeans (the Hessians, the French, and the Spanish), all of whom played central roles in the war for independence.
The goal of this series is to set aside older notions of American exceptionalism and to embrace a larger and far more inclusive narrative that recognizes the impact wrought by the movement of goods, ideas, and multi-lingual people around the eighteenth-century Atlantic. In short, the great task before us is to imagine the American Revolution in post-exceptional terms; as a creation story in the making of our multi-cultural and interconnected modern world.
Переглядів: 31
Відео
A Global History of World War II Course Trailer
Переглядів 244 місяці тому
ON-DEMAND COURSE $24.99 Learn more and register at: foreverscholars.com/courses/a-global-history-of-world-war-ii/ World War Two changed the world more than any other conflict in the 19th or 20th centuries. The bid by Nazi Germany and authoritarian Japan to create radically racist imperial spheres brought the old global empires of Western Europe to their knees. In its genocide and brutal occupat...
Embark on an Icelandic Journey!
Переглядів 55 місяців тому
To learn more and register, visit foreverscholars.com/icelandic-adventure/ Join us for a spectacular journey to Iceland, where stunning natural beauty meets rich cultural experiences. This four-day adventure is designed to immerse you in the wonders of this Nordic island, from its vibrant capital to its majestic landscapes. On this adventure, you’ll hunt for the Northern Lights, enjoy tradition...
Uncover Ancient Rome's Secrets Today! Enroll Now!
Переглядів 216 місяців тому
On-Demand Course $24.99 Discover the secrets of Ancient Rome with our course "Daily Life, Society and Technology in Ancient Roman Times." In five exciting lessons, you will explore the fascinating world of the Romans, including their beauty rituals, fashion trends, and entertainment preferences. Learn about the different types of buildings used for various games the Romans loved, from the Colos...
Unveiling the Secrets of the Colosseum's Glorious Past
Переглядів 106 місяців тому
$1.99 On-Demand Course foreverscholars.com/courses/a-day-at-the-colosseum/ Probably one of the best-known monuments in the world, the Colosseum still tells us many amazing stories. The seminar aims to explore in depth the AMPHITEATRUM NOVUM, as it was called in ancient sources, the largest ever built in the Roman Empire, designed to entertain spectators with violent games involving men’s fights...
Unmasking America's Segregation Secrets
Переглядів 117 місяців тому
$9.99 On-Demand Course foreverscholars.com/courses/dividing-lines-us-history-of-residential-segregation-2/ This two-session course will explore one of the most visible yet least well understood aspects of racial segregation in the United States: the color line in housing. While some Americans do live in racially diverse communities, by and large, the housing landscape in the US remains remarkab...
Uncover Victorian England's Intriguing Secrets Now!
Переглядів 387 місяців тому
$24.99 On-Demand Course foreverscholars.com/courses/victorias-secrets/ Queen Victoria, Charles Dickens, Jack the Ripper, Oscar Wilde, and Charles Darwin-all of them were “Victorian” yet just what did that word mean and what values did it encompass? This course will examine the social and cultural life of England from 1830 to 1900, from the worlds of the elite upper classes to the slums of Londo...
A Day At The Colosseum | Upcoming Free Lecture
Переглядів 22Рік тому
A Day At The Colosseum | Upcoming Free Lecture
Unlock Global Learning with Forever Scholars Travel
Переглядів 89Рік тому
Unlock Global Learning with Forever Scholars Travel
The Battle of Antietam: A Civil War Watershed?
Переглядів 10 тис.Рік тому
The Battle of Antietam: A Civil War Watershed?
“Double V” for Victory: Black Americans, World War II, and the Civil Rights Movement
Переглядів 619Рік тому
“Double V” for Victory: Black Americans, World War II, and the Civil Rights Movement
Europe’s Interwar Crises and Rise of the 3rd Reich
Переглядів 4752 роки тому
Europe’s Interwar Crises and Rise of the 3rd Reich
Scandal and Crime in Victorian Britain
Переглядів 1,4 тис.2 роки тому
Scandal and Crime in Victorian Britain
Scandals & Secrets in Victorian Era England (Upcoming Course Trailer)
Переглядів 562 роки тому
Scandals & Secrets in Victorian Era England (Upcoming Course Trailer)
Scandal and Crime in Victorian Britain
Переглядів 612 роки тому
Scandal and Crime in Victorian Britain
Top 10 Things To Do in Cassis, France
Переглядів 2,3 тис.2 роки тому
Top 10 Things To Do in Cassis, France
Public Executions and Persecutions of Pirates
Переглядів 2142 роки тому
Public Executions and Persecutions of Pirates
The History of Public Executions and Persecutions of Pirates
Переглядів 2 тис.2 роки тому
The History of Public Executions and Persecutions of Pirates
The American Revolution and the British Empire
Переглядів 7 тис.3 роки тому
The American Revolution and the British Empire
Understanding Gettysburg in 2021: The Civil War’s Largest Battle in History and Popular Memory
Переглядів 44 тис.3 роки тому
Understanding Gettysburg in 2021: The Civil War’s Largest Battle in History and Popular Memory
Ancestral Pueblo Civilization and the “Chaco Phenomenon”
Переглядів 6613 роки тому
Ancestral Pueblo Civilization and the “Chaco Phenomenon”
Very good as always Prof. Galleger is brilliant.
Johnson Lisa Gonzalez Shirley Hall Anthony
White Maria Williams Christopher Jones Donald
Harris Thomas Davis Kimberly Lopez George
Martin Joseph Johnson Jason Thompson Sharon
Wilson Thomas Robinson Timothy Harris Ruth
Taylor Christopher Young Jeffrey Lee Thomas
Thomas Melissa Thompson Brian White Dorothy
To act like the British fought this war for the colonies is a joke.
Saw this video on May 29th!
Here's an intriguing secret--if my independent research results, conducted over a 15 year period, are correct, then Charles Dickens plagiarized "A Christmas Carol" from an American couple named Mathew and Abby Whittier.
55" is only 4-1/2 ft. That's nothing in NY.
The plane went down in the Ocean. Something happened with the Blackbox making tracing near impossible. Apparently they are going to continue the search later this year in 2024, or try. We will see what happens.
Antietam has always fascinated me possibly more than any other battle
I am always learning something new about Gettysburg. It involved so many people it stands to reason there are so many stories. Whether it’s Chamberlain holding on to Little Round Top or the last minutes on earth of Amos Humiston as he held a photo of his children. It is interesting and many of the actions thought provoking.(like Pickett’s Charge) Then there is our greatest president’s 272 word address. His words mean so much and will for many decades to come.
CRT is BS, cease and desist the "woke" agenda and cover real "history" not conjecture! 1690 project is a farce!
Graphics suck,, level of detail too broad...kindergarten level;; pompous:; volume too low; some UK big mouth; should have got Fred Anderson. Other than that ...,,,,?...not bad, haha
Not all the French left. But a great documentary despite the Anglo bias.
Gallagher mouths silliness, but this is the state of civil war "scholarship." Maryland was, in fact, "held to the Union against its will." Lincoln threw how many of its legislators in prison? He occupied the State capitol and Baltimore with troops. Turned the State into a military district. And the crap about what Gallagher thinks Lee "hoped." Pure crap. If Lee "hoped" anything he hoped his decimated, ragged, shoeless and starving army might somehow possibly survive the movement indirectly to the Valley.
micro climate with cold water. During heatwave, it is fresh in Cassis
Forever!howdy?. Thanks- you shared superb ,✋
On Thomas' question about Lee getting tepid support in the slave state of Maryland: according to the 1860 census, Maryland had approximately 687,000 citizens. 84,000 were free African-Americans while 87,000 were slaves. That leaves a white population of 516,000 of which only 14,000, or less than 3%, owned slaves. Most of these were concentrated in the southern counties and the Eastern Shore of Maryland. Yet, Lee invaded through two of the western counties where there was very strong pro-Union sentiment. According to Dennis Frye, a renowned Park Ranger and Civil War historian, Lee had no intention whatsoever of staying in Maryland to recruit or fight at Sharpsburg. He was headed fo Pennsylvania to gather supplies from the rich central Pennsylvania farm country, do as much other mischief as possible and, most importantly, lure the Army of the Potomac to ground of his choosing on which to give battle. Lee's miscalculations were thinking the Harpers Ferry garrison could be captured in about two days, leaving him plenty of time to cross the Mason-Dixon line, and thinking McClellan would not move west as fast as he did. Perhaps youi can tell I'm a proud son of Maryland and deeply interested in our Civil War.
I think you could possibly be very knowledgeable about this real insurrection
Gary contradicts himself…if the south was a different country as he he claims in multiple other videos-then, the emancipation had no bearing on the south as it was a different country and not bound by US law
That is true... however, any territory captured by Union troops would then fall under the Emancipation Proclamation. What that did internationally was say to the British and French (who were considering recognizing the Confederacy, and possibly opening trade negotiations and then disrupting the US blockade) "if you support the Confederate States of America, you will be supporting slavery. Stay out if the conflict, and as we advance, we will free the slaves held in those lands."
Gary argues that the CSA did formally constitute a nation, which has no bearing on the fact that it was formed illegally and that its territory and people were subject to the laws of the United States, which had the right to issue the Emancipation Proclamation to undermine the economy of traitorous rebels.
Order 191 has always fascinated me. My view is it was not a "lost" order, but rather a ruse concocted by Gens. Lee and Jackson. Lee needed to take Harper's Ferry to keep an escape route open to the Shenandoah where he could rest his depleted army after 2d Manassas. The Order kept McClellan from advancing to HF, enticing him to Sharpsburg, which was a perfect shorter, tighter battle line. McClellan did just that.
Interesting thought
But the order accurately described the confederate troop locations. I think Lee would have put a lot more men at the South Mountain gaps, and sent fewer to Hagerstown.
@@kevin6293 Kevin needs to _read_ the Order. It does not, in fact, "accurately" describe the Confederate troop locations. And Dressage's interesting thought comes from reading _Special Order 191: Ruse of War._
@@joeryanstrialbook2005 are you going to say which part of the order was inaccurate, or just make groundless assertions?
@@kevin6293 Hey, It's for you to _read_ the English written, not for me to explain it to you.
Always a treast to hear Dr. Gallagher's views and perspective.
The civil war was cool
Nothing cool about over 750,000 casualties.
The families of killed and wounded did not think it was cool... The soldiers who were maimed, lost limbs, etc. to struggle the rest of their lives with their disabilities, did not think that anything about it was cool. Much suffering was endured during that war and antibiotics had not been invented yet, and sterile surgical techniques had yet to be realized. Nothing about any of the communicable diseases that spread in camps which affected too many soldiers and killed them, was Far from being Cool!!! The Civil War was miserable in so many different ways, and definitely NOT COOL!!!!
@@ritahelengregory5337 More soldiers died in illnessess as in battles about 5:3 !
The reasons Gettysburg is indeed the turning point of the war- 1. It was the first and last major battle fought on Northern soil. 2. It was the first major defeat for the Army of Northern Virginia which had been on an almost unbelievable run of victory after victory, up to that point. 3. The failure of Pettigrew and Trimble's divisions to advance on Cemetery Ridge and instead turning tail and running back to Seminary Ridge-leaving Pickett's men to do most of the fighting and dying the third day of the fighting-caused a rift across the entire Army of Northern Virginia that would never quite be healed.
Excellent. Appreciate your work....
I kept waiting for him to tell us what the turning point was, but he never did. What was it?
well presented pards *LIKED* and going to re-listen to this in the car
great presentation pards *LIKED* and *SUBSCRIBED* I'll be saving this video to audiobook to listen to on way to both 160th Gettysburg reenactments this summer.
USA Today, National Geographic, BBC and Time are not empirical news sources and don't mean much to some people. Also, Chamberlain isn't shit and Ken Burns sucks balls. Truth hurts.
Great job! Great presentation
Kudos for getting Prof. Gallagher. He is a treasure: an independent thinker who always strives to keep events in the perspective of the times rather than our present.
Gettysburg denied victory to the confederates and denied defeat to the Union. That's important. But what really happened is that the Union decided to pay the price for victory and really went to war only in 1864 under Ullysses Grant. With that decision to press the war, the confederate fate was sealed.
Gary Gallagher is a wonderful commentator and his extensive knowledge is evident. I haven't been able to discover, though, what may be his own experience in uniform. It seems that it might color his interpretation of military actions.
Lots of scholar's seem to have mental health issues these days 😕
Academia is a haven for those who can’t do actual work or are drawn to an environment that rationalizes mental illness
Gee, the US was populated by genocidal murderers even then . Has continued up to the current time.
In my opinion, you disproved your premise with 2 comments. First, after the War, Southerners said they lost it there, and when Europe bowed out because of Gettysburg.
I started out with Bruce Catton.
Me too
Me too
Thanx
Thank you for your usually excellent presentation. I think had Lee seen the topography Ewell was confronted with he might have been less critical of him. I also don’t think the unimaginable pressure Meade was under to protect Washington while plunged in the midst of battle, loss of generals he most depended on and could trust, Sickles almost devastating insubordination and subordinates like his chief of staff that almost worked against him in this tiny temporal crucible are given their due. There is an excellent series on what happened after he got to Virginia. And Meade not knowing how destructive Pickett’s charge had been described Lee as the greatest counterpuncher he knew of as he worked hard at the end of the third day to reorganize his necessarily tangled units as they had been terribly mixed in the battle. With this in mind I think his efforts at pursuit are uderestimated
This person has some form of strange "outrage"against the narrative of the Union. Strange.
Indeed..
Wasn’t the largest battle. It was the bloodiest
What was larger?
@@davidbowman4259 Fredericksburg and Chancellorsville involved more troops. Maybe a few others. I think Lee’s army was at its biggest at Gettysburg (70-75,000) but the Army of the Potomac was only 90-100,000 there, vs. as high as 130,000+ in other engagements.
@@davidclark3588 Thanks for that! We think of so many battles only in terms of casualties. Interestingly, I think Stones River had the highest percentage of casualties on both sides. Franklin had the highest number of Confederate generals killed. Antietam was the single bloodiest day of the war: Sept. 17, 1862. So many very sanguinary affairs. So appalling.
@@davidbowman4259 great points.
“The coming apocalypse and the evil influence of Twitter.” Hilarious!!! But ih so true.
Very Important stuff. Thank you. People dont understand. Weimerica is here.
Rather than concentrating on the left flank of the Union army and moving Johnson's Division to seek to concentrate the initiative on Culp's Hill, Picket's charge would have likely been successful. Can you imagine having Confederate artillery on Culp's hill? It could have concentrated on the Union Center and been far more effective than the barrage on the morning of July 3. If the Confederates would have defeated the Union Troops at Gettysburg, and head towards Washington DC, how would have that effected Lincoln's chances of winning the oncoming election? The Democrats would have likely defeated Lincoln and sued for peace- which was really Lee's goal- to weaken the North's resolve to continue on with a very bloody and costly war. I also disagree with Gallagher's critique of Meade. In the annals of recorded history, there has never been a “high-end combat” battle that lasted more than 96 hours - that is simply the limit of human endurance. Absent fresh reserves to commit - and reserves who know what they are doing rather than anyone quickly thrown into the fray - it is almost impossible to transition from the defense to the offense and pursuit at the end of a battle like this one. A perfect example is Napoleon’s failure at Austerlitz to pursue beyond Stara Posta at the end of the day. Even his hardened forces of the Grand Armée of 1805 simply could not muster the energy to pursue after the climactic battle itself..Meade had lost important command structure like the loss of Renolds and had to regroup his corps command. Now Lincoln did admonish Meade as was presented in the lecture, but he never actually sent the letter to Meade. What would be the point to criticize the command leader after the victory? It was a war of attrition and Lee lost a large number of his force which could not be replaced. Meade had no way of knowing the remaining strength of Lee's army and to go on the offensive with an exhausted army would have been a very risky proposition. We can say in retrospect Lee had a severely depleted force, but Meade had no way of knowing the extent of his victory. The Union was looking at a significant number of soldiers finishing up the term of their service, so of course they had to look to enlist and seek to re-enlist soldiers to continue the fight- and that will take time to re-strengthen their force. In summary, I think the critique of Meade not to pursue Lee's army lacks context.
True - I agree with your well thought out comment so maybe you could offer a thought - seeing as how what you put down did not happen how could Gen Lee still send those men into imminent slaughter where even if they had broke through they were in no way able to continue to DC - the only thing that saved them was the withdrawal - retreat and regroup - we often hear about how these Generals consider every contingent - what happened?? IMO - the Civil War was the Worst thing that ever happened to America other than the buying and selling of our fellow Humans tho the practice is as old as sin itself -
@@sergepetrov7973 Thank you for your feedback. I agree Gabe. Other than slavery, the Civil War was as bad as it gets in American history: Friends killing friends, brothers killing brothers.
Washington state 2022
Vicksburg was more important. It divided the South in half and denied the Confederates the free flow of needed supplies and reinforcements. It gave the Union complete control of the Mississippi River.
If the Union won at Vicksburg and lost Gettysburg, that would have been much better for the Confederacy in terms of recognition by Britain, and Lee could have continued north and gained more supplies, territory and the morale of the Union would have been far more affected.
@@ITILII I tend to agree. It really was both victories which gave the North further resolve to defeat Lee's Army of the Virginia. If there was a victory for Lee at Gettysburg, Lee would have continued up the Baltimore Pike towards Washington DC which in turn would have increased pressure on Lincoln to sue for peace. I would add it was the number of casualties (51,000 by some estimates) that provided the historical precedence over the Vicksburg campaign.
@@ITILII Great Britain had pledged, along with the United States, to stop the slave trade. They were never going to ally with the Confederate States of America.