Відео

There is no doubt that Catherine and Arthur never consummated their marriage. The belief in God, Heaven, and Hell was more real in those days than contemporary people can easily understand. Katharine swore on her immortal soul that she came to Henry as a virgin. Her belief in the reality of Heaven and Hell was absolute. She was keenly aware that life is short and that eternity is forever. She would never have lied about this.

Is it accurate (as I vaguely remember) that King George V said that his son was "bound to ruin himself somehow in the end" (or words to that effect)? i.e. not necessarily relating to a scandal with a woman, but a more general character flaw that he was selfish and irresponsible and that he would put his personal comfort ahead of the concept of duty. If not Wallace Simpson (or other woman), , it might have been a financial scandal or political entanglements.

51:49 "Precedence"? When I did A-Level Politics, one quote we had was "The Constitution is what happens" (Prof. J.A.G. Griffith)

7:49 Anniversaries? It has just occurred to me that Edward VIII had the same birthday as the diver Freddie Woodward, who is the most gorgeous man in the world

Both interesting and informative. Thank you for taking the time to research and to share this information with us! Take care.

Aww... I started watching this - but the background (foreground...) music became increasingly intrusive, so I'm afraid I gave up 😔 ETA: the abdication crisis is a perennial area of fascination for me - so, any new content on this is something I appreciate and will devour 😊

I think P.L. is unprofessional and not credible. She doesn’t behave like an historian, she behaves like a fangirl. Her biases prejudice everything she does and frankly, she comes across as unhinged when she moons over Richard III. She was devastated when his remains showed signs of scoliosis, for example. She had convinced herself that the evil Shakespeare had made up his deformity to villainise him. She is convinced Richard was saintly and that isn’t balanced or fair and it certainly isn’t likely, based on evidence.

So these guys are critical that researchers might dismiss documents etc that they might think are not relevant to the subject they are investigating ? What a stupid comment !

Loved listening in on your interesting conversation

Really looking forward to this! Everything Catherine touches turns to gold!

I bet at their “R3 is great” meetings they break to talk of how the earth is flat.😊

That's creepy & pedophilic. I was 18 when I had my 1st & it hurt like hell. I cannot imagine having a baby at 13, 14, 15, or even a 16. Ugh.

I enjoyed this video. I definitely think that, overall, Richard III has been demonized pretty throughly over the centuries without doing any research or keeping Richard III in the context of his own time. That being said, whether or not he had the princes killed is really irrelevant. It certainly wasn’t the first the throne was usurped. It certainly wasn’t the first time contenders were killed. It certainly wasn’t the first time children were not killed in similar circumstances. Ruthlessness was part and parcel with kingship.

I am from the year 2024 and have finished watching the Serpent Queen. It was also on STARZ. That show got weird. But I wanted to learn more so I bought the biography that it was based on. It was interesting but it was a little too long.

Hey. I remember coming across you channel a while ago when I was really into Philippa Gregory. I know that you talk a lot about the Tudor period but do you like other time periods of royal history as well? I have recently read and reviewed a book about King George VI and his wife Elizabeth. It was very good. It is on my channel. I am trying to read lighter books in order to get more subs. But my favorite narrator was reading it so I got the book on audible.

Very informative video I love itttt

I can’t see how the King will stay King of Australia or other country of Commonwealth if England gets rid of him. It will have consequences. Although the fact that they have constitutional agreements, they are linked. Him alone, It will not work. So being King of England is the foundation of being the King of any Commonwealth country.

Just found your channel- ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

Didn't Harry reimburse the money spent on the renovation of Frogmore.Cottage, but continued to pay the rent to keep the house available for whenever the Sussexes were in England? In that regard, evicting Harry is of dubious legality.

"Blindsided the queen." A phrase designed to turn sympathy against the Sussexes.

Doors would have opened for Harry, but perhaps less quickly if he did not have a title. But once the doors were opened, he would have had to prove himself, or the doors would have been shut in double quick time.

Recollections may be distorted to suit an agenda.

racist always got a "BUT"...

Two horrible people

I blame them both Harry is a idiot

I had hoped that this podcas would’ve been a little more unbiased than it seemed to come across. At the end of the day it still sounds like Harry and Meghan are being blamed for making a decision that was safe for their family. He is the second son he didn’t have the same obligations as William if he felt that this was the right thing to do for him and his family Then so be it. They couldn’t win! Either they couldn’t take money from the royal family if they weren’t working for them, but then they were looked down at for making their own money. I’m sure there were shortcomings on both sides. I just wish there would’ve been a little bit more on this podcast about where the Royal family or the firm failed Harry and Meghan as well.

Yes, recollections of the truth & liars recollections do vary greatly.

Messy took advantage of Harry’s stupidity

They are not receiving you taxpayer money. They are engaging in a very American way to generate money, it's called "WORK". Something your free loading welfare RF knows nothing about.

So RHG, is it OK for capitalists to sell out their family's or companies' secrets to others for money and personal gain?

Harry and meghan didn't trash the royal family, they stated what had really happened to them instead of letting the palace and the uk media trash them by saying this is what had happened. They stood up for themselves and I'm proud of harry and Meghan!!

What Charles used to desire is not important. If the first two mixed race children of the family are deprived of titles they were potentially up for, it looks awful. Optics matter, my sweet summer children. These people are too stupid to rule. That’s the problem with Royals. Merit has nothing to do with it, and these people are stuoid.

Oh. We’re still pretending the Oprah interview was shocking? That a family we knew was racist behaved like racists? How cute.

People in the UK can buy pseudo-tiles. People in American can buy various college degrees. Both types are no different than people who wear military honors without earning them in real military service. Fake titles; fake degrees; fake military service.

You’re basically describing a society too immature, as late as 2020, to handle a man moving for his wife. And it’s not actually much more complicated than that.

I’m commenting as things are said: Dan Wootten was given the news that they wanted to leave (likely by his KP contacts, briefing against Harry - check out Byline Times) and was going to publish. That forced their hand.

I find the contention Harry and Meghan have “doors open” for being Royal is funny. Most Royals are not A-listers. HE IS THE SON OF THE MOST FAMOUS WOMAN WHO EVER LIVED. He will always have a platform BECAUSE OF HIS MOTHER, not the Royals. No one cares about the Remoaner Royals who don’t have a Diana connection. They are boring, unimportant. DIANA is the source of Harry’s prominence.

“Recollections may vary” Best Line Ever

Give the world a break with those traitors

She curtesy’s in Suits so Yes she did know how to!

Facts matter, opinions are just that.

He was illegitimate he was son of an archer in 1441 while the KING was away fighting.

How was Buckingham Margaret Beaufort's nephew? I thought she was an only child.

I was disappointed in her conclusions. She only provided evidence that supported her love of Richard III. She dismissed or ignored evidence to the contrary.

Plebs should not publish books on ideas Above Their Stations and leave history to the Proper People. Theoretical thought should only be provided by the Betters with proper educational credentials pushing the pre-approved subject matter carefully chosen to keep the Betters. 🤡

Its literally butchering somebody's character

Henry 7th is the main suspect, in my opinion

I strongly believe that Richard kill then I don’t believe she or her son had anything to do with it but i can understand why people believe that in a way but 100% Richard did something to them there is a small chance they died from sickness but why did Richard not say anything if that was the case sadly not many children survived to adulthood it would be tragic but not a shocked hopefully we get answers how they died I do believe they need the king permission to examine their bodies I believe idk I could be wrong great video tho lol

5:25

There's a new portrait of Richard III being displayed at the National Portrait Gallery. The curators there believe that although it is not contemporary it is based on a contemporary portrait. And in that portrait you can really see that Richard and Edward look like brothers.