Відео

Thank you

@@TangraFX Dude, I want to get my hands on it. I've waited for this moment for 4/5 years now ever since Blender got geonodes. Been wanting to use a node based physics sim framework for a while.

sure i will do with new TAngra Solver,

@@TheMinicartoon This is the full tutorial.

This is the full tutorial for snow, this is exactly that easy using TAngra in the blender, model I used a free model from the internet. i will do more in-depth tutorial soon

thank you

Its very intuitive to set up. Im not sure how you see this as "overcomplicated"?

It is emiter, collision and solver that's all, how can you do that with less ? is it even possible at all to do it without any of them? can you explain more?

@@omidghotbi I mean instead of using nodes, with molecular + , itwill be less complicated

@@MotionFlow_Official Proceduralism using nodes is significantly more powerful than using an interface such as Molecular+. Not to mention Molecular+ development is limited, as it cannot extend much further than what it already does. TangraFX already does what Molecular+ does, and so much more (see our other videos), such as different solvers and utilities. Any serious workflow for simulations are nearly always done with nodes. see; Houdini.

@@TangraFX But how you can extend a particle simulation much further, and saying any serious workflow is done with nodes like in Houdini is like saying a professional camera should have a long and a big lens