Відео

That 1/2 is a number and numbers are dimensionless I think.?

Two not funny jokes before the intro. Im not watching bye

I'm subscribing, and will be going through your old videos, as learning new things, having a better understanding is a good thing. I hope this channel grows, it's very evident that Good science education and communication is needed, and not everyone learns the same way. So the more doing it, and in different ways, the better.

I also criticize creation

lmao

I really appreciate your efforts! I have a quick question: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). What's the best way to send them to Binance?

thank u so much!

Thank youuuu❤

That's why we always use a [constant] to make an equation.

Amazing video, you are a great teacher and this was very well paces. As a non-mathematics student, I got this immediately. Thank you for this upload 😬

Suppose to be -1

This 16 minutes was enough to help me understand what my teacher has been trying to explain for 4 hours. I couldn't understand my teacher's explaination for weeks but this video was super easy for me to learn from!! Thank you!! ❤❤

I saw this late anyway , but it helps

Thank you so much for this video , However do you have any video with calculating indices of dimensionless

Very nice teaching, thanks

Thank you.... patience 😊

Seriously couldn't have said this topic easier than this! Thank you so much sir! Much appreciated

Thank you so much for the amazing video, I finally know how to calculate drift velocity

But what if you are given force

Thank you sir you are the best

my friend missed half of our unit for chem because he was out of the country and our disgrace of a teacher is making him take a test tomorrow on this .. he randomly found your video and is actually watching it as we speak 😭 hopefully these comments are true, wish him luck lmao

my class watched this video to learn

I’ve been watching dimensional analysis videos for hours and this is the first one that made sense. ❤

This is so helpful thank you❤

Your Ota appears to have slight pinched optics, and mine has unfixable, severe pinched optics. I cannot agree with your recommendation nor would I make one.

Wow this is shit

Garrison, you helped me decide. I sold the AT 80 and was on the fence on this scope. Looks like your review has convinced me it will do just what I want. I might not even used filters at first. But maybe a filter wheel in time. Backfocus should be much easier to deal with in this type of design.

Excellent video. Thanks. I have one of these. Very happy with it.

first

Amazing video

The Poynting vector has a problem in the nearfield of a dipole source. It can be shown that by setting the wave equation equal to a oscillating charge, that the transverse electric field component is generated outside the source at about 1/4 wavelength and launches waves both toward and away from the source, whereas the other components: longitudinal electric field and transverse magnetic field.are created at the source and propagate away from the source. The problem with using the Poynting vector in the nearfield is that it hides the fact that some of the energy is going back into the source and some is propagating away from the source, which cancel, creating no net energy flow in the nearfield, but energy flow in the farfield. Whereas in reality there is energy flow in the nearfield if one isolates each the individual field component terms, which can be done with a suitable dectector. Analyzing the individual field terms shows that the speed of the fields are instantaneous in the nearfield and reduces to about the speed of light in the farfield, at about 1 wavelength from the source. This corresponds to the phase speed, group speed, and information spees. Since the energy is proportional to the square of the field, then the energy is propagating at the group speed, which as I mentioned is instantaneous in the nearfield and reduces to about the speed of light in the farfield, at about 1/4 wavelength from the source. For more information see my paper: arxiv.org/abs/physics/0603240 The consequences of these results are discussed in my UA-cam video presentation, and the paper it is based on: *UA-cam presentation: ua-cam.com/video/sePdJ7vSQvQ/v-deo.html *Based on this paper: vixra.org/abs/2309.0145 Here is our most recent paper which experimentally demonstrates an EM pulse propagates instantaneously in the nearfield: *Electromagnetic pulse experiment paper: www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170862178.82175798/v1

thank you king

noice

There are two mistakes; the two unit vectors are incorrect on the electric and magnetic fields. The electric field should have a j unit vector and the magnetic field should have a k unit vector in this particular example.

Byiza cyane

this was some heat 💯🔥🔥🗣🗣🗣🗣

might have to put a supercharger in that car so we can get it to 3000N and get 6 m/s^2

Great explanation!

Garrison Turner, I subscribed because your videos are super cool!

Well explained 👍

Firstly Thank you for all your lectures sir they're really helpful,and i have one question sir where is the 10 coming from at g wich is Gravity why not use 9.80 are they the same?

Wow 😲😳. God bless you sir. I really needed this ❤

This was so helpful, on a topic I was really struggling with. You sir are the goat, may your pillow always be cold on both sides.

thank you for your lectures they've really helped me alot, thank you once again and I love you sir........

How come it only has 190 views? Amazing video, thank you so much!

Wish my physic tutor was you. Well explained...thank you and may GOD bless your carrier.

Thanks

Thank you sir this really helped me in revising for my test

Thanks alot for your physics videos am from Ghana Africa and you have really help me alot

Thank you sir.