Відео

18:30 Steven Hayes 15:33 22:27 58:57 1:04:10

4:24

4:23

Just listened to this episode and I loved it! Such sensitivity, caring and compassion expressed when speaking about others. Such respect for those whom Wayne has photographed. I love his photos and will definitely follow his work in the future (just learned his name in the last month or so). Very meaningful and moving podcast - thank you! (And great interviewers too:)

I get sad from extreme winter and extreme summer

Dr. S is the best!

very good information ,enjoyed this podcast very much

Great show

What an insightful interview. Thank you!

Creative, unique! -----Like it so much! Increase your stats > Promo>SM !!

p̴r̴o̴m̴o̴s̴m̴ 🎶

Michael Losier happens to be the one whose teachings about the Law of attraction resonates with me. His book makes sense and works instantly better than all I have read on the topic.

Amazing. Thank you.

Great episode, hope you guys return soon :)

This episode helped me not only get the position I deserved but justify the salary I was worth :) Thanks fellas

So our timeline seems accelerated based on our techno-narrative driven way of life 🤔 Powerful People shouldn't be affected by the ratio of time already lived, each day must be lived out on its own merit with constant novelity 😌

Loved this interview, so glad you guys found Richard and connected, as well as discovering THW.

Always wonderful and amazing to hear from Bob. I really recommend his Tibet House Menla channel, and particularly the current teachings on the Flower Garland Sutra (the real sci fi). Cheers.

Very good interview qns and answers!

At 4:00 - "Why has my psyche autonomously withdrawn its approval and support from the places that I and my culture have invested all of my energies?" - That's the beginning of the second half of life. Wow.

Agree on the golf commentary 👌 👍

I can't rule out the possibility of rescuing those left behind.

The biggest point of contention in the workplace between the old regime and the new is leaving people behind. Under the old regime those who are willing to sink the ship and stay stuck in the past in a stage of grief even when all of their peers have moved on will be saved out of loyalty and family name and the deals that men make behind closed doors. But under the kind of leadership we need, these men and woman who cling out of stubbornness and not of mental illness have to be let go. This is especially difficult and possibly even unthinkable for the old style leadership when the stubborn people are highly skilled top performers in their own right.

So maybe what we are realizing is that their exists a distinction between male and female empathy where you are permitted to move on without the person/persons you are empathizing with, and where you are permitted to stay with them at the stage of grief they are at and wait and be patient and surrender and be powerless, but still use the perspective of the bigger picture and your vision of the future to lead person/persons out onto the next stage. Ultimately, from my experience combining my success with EMDR therapy and my leadership, I am overwhelmed with the power to see what stage we are at and even though I cannot convince my peers that they are in a particular stage, I can validate what they are feeling and reassure them of the timeline I foresee. I find that people want to work for me because they learn to trust me when they see things resolving on their own just like a predicted after i refuse their request and acknowledge their complaint that something needs to be fixed. As you can see, leadership becomes fortunetelling, and predicting the outcomes for those blinded by grief, and so many efforts by great leaders will be sabotaged by people who stop the process being predicted for their own gain. You lose some and you win some, I find. Ultimately, once your network gains awareness of your leadership there will appear allies who get hired less for their skills and more for their ability to facilitate the process by identifying and stopping whoever is selfishly trying to interfere with leadership. Leadership becomes something that should be considered as FRAGILE because at any moment people can interfere in either of 2 ways: they will call out the facilitators on their lack of skills, and weak performance, or they will give power to leadership in a way that shines light on the facilitators so that everyone including high performers see facilitators as being managers and having decision making power so that productivity of the workplace goes down making leadership fail. Leadership becomes a balance, that moves between fine and rough. What you need then is to identify the role that the high performers and most skilled employees can play which is to help them be allies to the facilitators. Once leadership achieves this you have the circle you need to manage balance of power between holding back everyone to a common stage of a process and asking everyone to be patient with the timeline and vision; and allowing certain people to push on to the next stage of the process leaving the group behind.

So when you are talking about how leadership sometimes requires surrendering and sometimes remaining powerless, maybe you can be more specific by saying that leaders sometimes have to remain in a stage of grief with the group they are leading and push them using their leadership skills to the next stage of grief together. THis really resonates with the federal stage where we see voters unable to accept leaders who seemingly "show signs of weakness" like "remaining powerless" and "surrendering," and where we see our new leaders unable to work with their peers in established leadership. This explains how change in the country will happen.

I feel like this type of leadership will be invented in the private sector and in companies, and through supply and demand, we will see these solutions appearing in business sweep across the country before they are recruited and applied to political spheres.

My Mom was adopted, and I feel some signs that her birth parents were in New Jersey. I think everyone's common sense can resonate that we need to see a female president and we are ready, and we were ready when Clinton ran. Therefore, in some sense we all know what failure we are working on together to overcome. Yes, we are finding that it requires overcoming trauma and going through the 5 stages of grief. For the 1st time, and I think the murder of George Floyd brought it to light, we are discovering that we can go through the 5 stages of grief as a part of a group, and when we join a group(not merely through being empathetic towards peers in the group) that we cannot get through to the next stage until our peers in the group are also ready. We are starting realize that what is going on inside of us is part in part of the groups we choose to identify with and how our peers in our group are holding us back from getting through the 5 stages of grief. We have the choice to abandon our peers and move forward without them, but that is not the type of leadership we need anymore because the wool has been pulled from our eyes as we realize that our leaders cannot identify with us in the group once they leave our stage and go on to acceptance without us. Male leadership is not obsolete, but neither is female leadership, and in the future their will be no boundary between so that we can be both simultaneously.

"Radical tune brah!" -ai in robot voice

When we’re kids we are more physically active. There’s more to take in. As we age we also sit more, read, watch, TV, etc.

If grief is a universal for conscious life on earth, and it is like the discovery of gravity or of the sun being the center of our solar system, then we should see the sequence of emotions like the laws of physics everywhere we look. Could this be a "copernican revolution" occurring that we are on the cusp of, for this generation, or the next, or two generations away? Do you see what I mean? Are there are laws of physics that healing follows? We could see them in everything that appears in our daily meditation as well as the life events commonly associated with trauma. What if trauma is everywhere like gravity? What if we begin to see trauma everywhere?

I find it surprising that there is agreed upon sequence to the order of emotions that we experience in the healing process, yet we rarely help each other recognize what stage of the 5 stages we are in so that we can celebrate the stages that we progressed out of as much as we can have patience for the one we are in, and know what stages are still on the horizon.

I talk a lot about how EMDR psychotherapy helped me heal/process grief to my GF and one day she told me that her meditation mentor suggested that we grieve everyday and it as much about small traumas and cosmological traumas as it is about the most common types of events associated with loss. For example, we are losing time.

Are there any books?

The algorithms are making us bored NOT boring, in the attempts to predict our behaviors, the engineers are trying to make us predictable, it will never happen the way silicon valley, government/politicians, big business, and other media hopes it will, we are too complex to behave the way movers and the shakers would like us to, over time we get tired of the repetition, stop enjoying those things that become over used and mundane, then the dominoes start falling. Look at television, it took seventy years but it feel from our graces, and continues to fall because we could predict how the story lines will go, see the stereotypes and tropes being overused in the sitcoms, cop shows, doctors in love shows, and talk shows, so we start to turn away. The great migration is cascading for T.V. shows and it is happening for sports and Hollywood movies as well, and eventually we will turn away from youtube and facebook and twitter. I doubt I will live long enough to see the fall of social media, but it's fun watching the older stuff slowly die, watching it get louder with over the top visuals and sound, and more daring and outrageous content. Nobody wants that anymore, it's been done, we want... interesting.

I really enjoyed this interview with Dr. Hanscom. You both let him speak which was great! So many times I’ve seen interviews with him, and the interviewer constantly interrupts him, and then I miss out on what he was trying to say. Thank you for this, and thank you for getting the word out on chronic pain. I am a chronic pain sufferer for years (spinal arthritis in my lower back), and Dr. Hanscom is extremely knowledgeable and has helped me find my way out. Thank you again!!

John Philip Newell has been my George McCloud for 15 years

Subscribed! Skimmed thru your videos and there’s so many other great people you’ve interviewed. I need to watch. 😄

I’m so tired of these “IG cultures” as Lisa put it…I got so much crap for co-sleeping with my children. That it was going to make them “spoiled” and hard to get them to sleep in their own bed. But in my personal experience, none of that was the case! Transitioning them to their own room was actually easier than when I let my older children “cry it out” when they were babies.

Your book came to me at such a perfect time, Lisa. I’m 33 with 4 children and #5 on the way. I can see my evolution as a Mother through my children. For so long I felt inadequate as a Mom. Like I failed my oldest 2 kids because I was so young when I had them. (For context I was 15yrs old when I had my 1st child & 21 with my second)…I felt like my last 2 kids got the “good mom” and now baby #5 will have an even better mom. I carried SO. Much. Guilt. over that. For so long I wished I could go back to be the mom they deserved. Your book has opened my eyes to things I never would have seen otherwise. I’m grateful my life coach recommended your book because it helped me confront & integrate the shadows of motherhood that I battled with for so many years. ❤️

We can’t be alive unless we can grieve. Wow. Everything has a cost. 🤯 definitely not something we think about! 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

I’m so excited to listen to this!! Just got her book a few months ago and I’m still in chapter 1. And wow. So deep. Having a tough time with the questions on page 33 🥴 so I’m hoping to get some clarity with this interview. 🙏🏽

Thanks for the great interview! Dr Hanscom’s talk was full of info I needed to hear. I have been suffering from a botched back surgery since 1998. My only relief has come through opioid medications. I am off to buy the good doctor’s book “Back in Control: A surgeon’s roadmap out of chronic pain” on Amazon. I am tired of being an invalid and want my life back! 😊

It's becoming clearer that with all the brain and consciousness theories out there, the proof will be in the pudding. By this I mean, can any particular theory be used to create a human adult level conscious machine. My bet is on the late Gerald Edelman's Extended Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. The lead group in robotics based on this theory is the Neurorobotics Lab at UC at Irvine. Dr. Edelman distinguished between primary consciousness, which came first in evolution, and that humans share with other conscious animals, and higher order consciousness, which came to only humans with the acquisition of language. A machine with primary consciousness will probably have to come first. The thing I find special about the TNGS is the Darwin series of automata created at the Neurosciences Institute by Dr. Edelman and his colleagues in the 1990's and 2000's. These machines perform in the real world, not in a restricted simulated world, and display convincing physical behavior indicative of higher psychological functions necessary for consciousness, such as perceptual categorization, memory, and learning. They are based on realistic models of the parts of the biological brain that the theory claims subserve these functions. The extended TNGS allows for the emergence of consciousness based only on further evolutionary development of the brain areas responsible for these functions, in a parsimonious way. No other research I've encountered is anywhere near as convincing. I post because on almost every video and article about the brain and consciousness that I encounter, the attitude seems to be that we still know next to nothing about how the brain and consciousness work; that there's lots of data but no unifying theory. I believe the extended TNGS is that theory. My motivation is to keep that theory in front of the public. And obviously, I consider it the route to a truly conscious machine, primary and higher-order. Dr. Edelman's roadmap to a conscious machine is at arxiv.org/abs/2105.10461

It's becoming clearer that with all the brain and consciousness theories out there, the proof will be in the pudding. By this I mean, can any particular theory be used to create a human adult level conscious machine. My bet is on the late Gerald Edelman's Extended Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. The lead group in robotics based on this theory is the Neurorobotics Lab at UC at Irvine. Dr. Edelman distinguished between primary consciousness, which came first in evolution, and that humans share with other conscious animals, and higher order consciousness, which came to only humans with the acquisition of language. A machine with primary consciousness will probably have to come first. The thing I find special about the TNGS is the Darwin series of automata created at the Neurosciences Institute by Dr. Edelman and his colleagues in the 1990's and 2000's. These machines perform in the real world, not in a restricted simulated world, and display convincing physical behavior indicative of higher psychological functions necessary for consciousness, such as perceptual categorization, memory, and learning. They are based on realistic models of the parts of the biological brain that the theory claims subserve these functions. The extended TNGS allows for the emergence of consciousness based only on further evolutionary development of the brain areas responsible for these functions, in a parsimonious way. No other research I've encountered is anywhere near as convincing. I post because on almost every video and article about the brain and consciousness that I encounter, the attitude seems to be that we still know next to nothing about how the brain and consciousness work; that there's lots of data but no unifying theory. I believe the extended TNGS is that theory. My motivation is to keep that theory in front of the public. And obviously, I consider it the route to a truly conscious machine, primary and higher-order. Dr. Edelman's roadmap to a conscious machine is at arxiv.org/abs/2105.10461

Now this is good discussions

Once upon a not so long-ago time published, peer reviewed consensus included: phlogiston, caloric, luminiferous ether, spontaneous generation, water filled Martian canals, plane Vulcan, medical humors, four elements of matter, cold fusion........ And they all turned up empty. I'm publishing my perspective outside the good-old-boy box. As Sun Tzu observed, let your opponent set the rules of engagement, time and ground for battle and you will lose. Simply 'splain how/why I am wrong? 1) Without the atmos/albedo the earth becomes much like the moon which contradicts greenhouse theory. Yes or no? 2) Where do the GHGs get the warming energy that they trap/absorb/intercept/delay and re-emit? I have demonstrated they can't get it from the surface upwelling as a BB, so, what's your explanation?

Marginalizing and demonizing the skeptics is not science. Answer my two points. The earth is cooler with the atmosphere/albedo not warmer. The “extra” warming energy downwelling from the GHGs originates with the surface upwelling that “extra” energy as a BB. As demonstrated by experiment, that is not possible. principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/ If either of these points stands, greenhouse theory fails and man caused climate change collapses.

Good discussion. Sea level rise is natural. It is only rising 1-2 millimeters a year. It was 400 feet lower during the last ice age, and it could easily go up another 20-30 feet based on the past Interglacial Warming Period. The problem is people fail to study earth history and plan for these natural changes. Global warming is making the oceans great again -- and the fish are just thrilled. In the meantime, John Kerry has a plan. Go to NewTube and view "The Millimeter Tidal Wave" video.

1) By reflecting away 30% of ISR the albedo, which would not exist w/o the atmosphere/GHGs, makes the earth cooler than it would be without that atmosphere like that reflective panel set behind the windshield. Remove the atmosphere/GHGs and the earth would become much like the Moon and Mercury, a barren rock with a 0.1 albedo, 20% more kJ/h, hot^3 on the lit side, cold^3 on the dark. Nikolov, Kramm (U of AK) and UCLA Diviner mission all tacitly agree. 2) the GHG up/down welling, “trapping”/”back” radiating/delaying/intercepting, 100 % efficient, perpetual warming loop requires "extra" energy which according to RGHE theory comes from 3) the terrestrial surface radiating that "extra" energy as a LWIR ideal black body which 4) cannot happen because of the non-radiative heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmospheric molecules and as demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science: principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/ 1+2+3+4 = 0 Greenhouse Effect + 0 Greenhouse gas warming + 0 man caused climate change. Version 2.0 040121

Krauss knows a huge amount about climate science , but energy production is not his field. Renewables can't save us. Too little and way too late. The people who come after us are DOOMED.