Columbia Center for Contemporary Critical Thought
Columbia Center for Contemporary Critical Thought
  • 227
  • 492 929
Séminaire #10 : Colloque autours de *Surveiller et Punir* de Michel Foucault | 24 mai 2024
Colloque organisé par Florian Meier et Samu/elle Striewski sous l'égide du World Congress Foucault: 40 Years After et du séminaire de Bernard E. Harcourt, directeur d'études à l'EHESS, tenu le 24 mai 2024. Syllabus du séminaire : cooperism.law.columbia.edu/syllabus-du-seminaire-harcourt-2023-2024/
Colloque autours de Surveiller et punir
Date : vendredi 24 mai 2024
Heure : 14h00 à 18h30 (Paris GMT+1)
Lieu : Campus Condorcet - Centre de colloques, salle 50
Résumé :
Dans le contexte du World Congress Foucault et le groupe de recherche Graduate Research Colloquium in Contemporary Critical Thought (2023-2024), ce colloque organisé par Florian Meier et Samu/elle Striewski sera une occasion de relire Surveiller et punir et d’en discuter avec des présentations de doctorants :
“Panopticism’s Black Poché: Reading Foucault with Jefferson”
Dylan Lackey - Virginia Commonwealth University
« Cʼest entre les axes du discours que le non-discursif, désormais, apparaît et se constitue » Reading « Discipline and Punish » with Focault’s Theory of the non-discursive”
Marcus Döller - Max-Weber-Center, University of Erfurt
“Incising Constraints, Crafting Subjectiveness: An Ethnography of Bodily Conducts in a Residence for the Execution of Security Measures in Northern Italy”
Riccardo Girolimetto - University of Padova (FISPPA Department)
“Intellectual Vigilance - Foucault and the (post)foundations of critique”
Jonas Lang - Goethe Universität Frankfurt
“Foucault’s critique of ideology: l’« assujettissement » in Discipline and Punish”
Guillaume Rouleau - IRIS, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales (EHESS), Paris
Discussion avec Timothy O'Leary (UNSW), Florian Meier (EHESS), Samu/elle Striewski (Francfort) et Bernard E. Harcourt (EHESS)
À lire :
Michel Foucault, Surveiller et punir. Naissance de la prison (Gallimard, 1975)
Переглядів: 113

Відео

Séminaire #12 Harcourt EHESS #19 | 31 mai 2024 : Ann Stoler & Timothy O'Leary sur Nietzsche-Foucault
Переглядів 26514 днів тому
Séminaire no. 12 de Bernard E. Harcourt, directeur d'études à l'EHESS, du 31 mai 2024. Syllabus du séminaire et lectures en ligne ici : cooperism.law.columbia.edu/syllabus-du-seminaire-harcourt-2023-2024/ Séminaire # 12 : Lancement de la nouvelle édition du *Nietzsche* de Foucault (www.seuil.com/ouvrage/nietzsche-michel-foucault/9782021452853) Date : vendredi 31 mai 2024 Heure : 16h30 à 18h30 (...
Séminaire #11 Harcourt EHESS #19 | 28 mai 2024: Nouvelle théorie critique (Conclusion, Vergès, Weil)
Переглядів 8314 днів тому
Séminaire no. 11 de Bernard E. Harcourt, directeur d'études à l'EHESS, du 28 mai 2024. Syllabus de séminaire et lectures en ligne ici : cooperism.law.columbia.edu/syllabus-du-seminaire-harcourt-2023-2024/ UE751 - De nouvelles philosophies critiques de la praxis : penser après Adorno, Foucault, Butler, Said et Spivak, avec Angela Davis, Jack Halberstam, et d’autres contemporains, pour un renouvè...
Séminaire #9 Harcourt EHESS #19 | 21 mai 2024 : "Abolition et Coopération," au Collège de France
Переглядів 9721 день тому
Séminaire no. 9 de Bernard E. Harcourt, directeur d'études à l'EHESS, du 21 mai 2024. Syllabus du séminaire et lectures en ligne ici : cooperism.law.columbia.edu/syllabus-du-seminaire-harcourt-2023-2024/ UE751 - De nouvelles philosophies critiques de la praxis : penser après Adorno, Foucault, Butler, Said et Spivak, avec Angela Davis, Jack Halberstam, et d’autres contemporains, pour un renouvèl...
Séminaire #8 Harcourt EHESS #19 | 17 mai 2024 : Nouvelle théorie critique : Coopération et sa limite
Переглядів 229Місяць тому
Séminaire EHESS #19 : De nouvelles philosophies critiques de la praxis: penser après Adorno, Foucault, Butler et Spivak, avec Angela Davis et d’autres Syllabus du séminaire et lectures en ligne ici : cooperism.law.columbia.edu/syllabus-du-seminaire-harcourt-2023-2024/ UE751 - De nouvelles philosophies critiques de la praxis : penser après Adorno, Foucault, Butler, Said et Spivak, avec Angela Da...
Coöperism 13/13 | Imagining Coop Universities with Kali Akuno (May 1, 2024)
Переглядів 414Місяць тому
Kali Akuno @kaliakuno of Cooperation Jackson @cooperationjackson6932 joins us to brainstorm how to create a "cooperative university." All info here: cooperism.law.columbia.edu/13-13/ The university, as a collegium of scholars and students, is under threat across the globe and in the United States. State governments are interfering with academic freedom and knowledge, dictating what can and cann...
Coöperism 11/13 | Rescue at Sea: Theory and Praxis (March 6, 2024)
Переглядів 1762 місяці тому
Chloe Howe Haralambous, Miguel Duarte, Lorenzo Pezzani, Chiara Towne, and Bernard E. Harcourt discuss Rescue at Sea: Theory and Praxis for Coöperism 11/13 @ColumbiaLawSchool1. Read more here: cooperism.law.columbia.edu/11-13/ Wednesday, March 6, 2024 at Columbia University Information about Coöperism 13/13: cooperism.law.columbia.edu Information on the 13/13 series: cccct.law.columbia.edu/conte...
Séminaire #6 Harcourt EHESS | 12 mars 2024: Pour une nouvelle théorie critique (Black Panther Party)
Переглядів 2853 місяці тому
Séminaire no. 6 de Bernard E. Harcourt, directeur d'études à l'EHESS, du 12 mars 2024. Syllabus du séminaire et lectures en ligne ici : cooperism.law.columbia.edu/sy... UE751 - De nouvelles philosophies critiques de la praxis : penser après Adorno, Foucault, Butler, Said et Spivak, avec Angela Davis, Jack Halberstam, et d’autres contemporains, pour un renouvèlement du XXIe siècle Séminaire #6 :...
Coöperism 9/13 | Lorraine Daston: How Scientists Learned to Cooperate (Jan. 24, 2024)
Переглядів 2794 місяці тому
Lorraine Daston, William Deringer, Nicholas Lemann, and Alma Steingart read and discuss "Rivals: How Scientists Learned to Cooperate" for Coöperism 9/13 @CUJS. Read more here: cooperism.law.columbia.edu/9-13/ Wednesday, January 24, 2024 at Columbia University Information about Coöperism 13/13: cooperism.law.columbia.edu Information on the 13/13 series: cccct.law.columbia.edu/content/13-13 Lorra...
Séminaire #4 Harcourt EHESS | 22 déc. 2023 : Pour une nouvelle théorie critique (Angela Davis)
Переглядів 3005 місяців тому
Séminaire no. 4 de Bernard E. Harcourt, directeur d'études à l'EHESS, du 22 décembre 2023. Syllabus du séminaire et lectures en ligne ici : cooperism.law.columbia.edu/sy... UE751 - De nouvelles philosophies critiques de la praxis : penser après Adorno, Foucault, Butler, Said et Spivak, avec Angela Davis, Jack Halberstam, et d’autres contemporains, pour un renouvèlement du XXIe siècle Séminaire ...
Séminaire #3 Harcourt EHESS | 19 déc. 2023 : Pour une nouvelle théorie critique (Michel Foucault)
Переглядів 4195 місяців тому
Séminaire no. 3 de Bernard E. Harcourt, directeur d'études à l'EHESS, du 19 décembre 2023. Syllabus du séminaire et lectures en ligne ici : cooperism.law.columbia.edu/syllabus-du-seminaire-harcourt-2023-2024/ UE751 - De nouvelles philosophies critiques de la praxis : penser après Adorno, Foucault, Butler, Said et Spivak, avec Angela Davis, Jack Halberstam, et d’autres contemporains, pour un ren...
Bernard E. Harcourt, "The 'Counter-' Concept," Political Concepts Conference (December 3, 2016)
Переглядів 7086 місяців тому
Bernard E. Harcourt presents his essay on the concept of "counter- / contre-" at the Balibar Edition of the Political Concepts Conference at Brown University on December 3, 2016. The essay can be accessed here: cooperism.law.columbia.edu/files/2023/12/Harcourt-Contre-Uncorrected-Proofs.pdf Chair - Timothy Bewes (Brown University) Video of full panel here: ua-cam.com/video/5tzvgAqVmBE/v-deo.html...
Séminaire #2 Harcourt EHESS #19 | 15 déc. 2023 : Pour une nouvelle théorie critique (Canguilhem)
Переглядів 3946 місяців тому
Séminaire no. 2 de Bernard E. Harcourt, directeur d'études à l'EHESS, du 15 décembre 2023. Syllabus du séminaire et lectures en ligne ici : cooperism.law.columbia.edu/sy... UE751 - De nouvelles philosophies critiques de la praxis : penser après Adorno, Foucault, Butler, Said et Spivak, avec Angela Davis, Jack Halberstam, et d’autres contemporains, pour un renouvèlement du XXIe siècle Séminaire ...
Séminaire #1 Harcourt EHESS #19 | 12 déc. 2023 : Pour une nouvelle théorie critique (Weil, Adorno)
Переглядів 5346 місяців тому
Séminaire #1 Harcourt EHESS #19 | 12 déc. 2023 : Pour une nouvelle théorie critique (Weil, Adorno)
Coöperism 7.1/13 | "Édouard Glissant’s Right to Opacity in Practice" (Nov. 29, 2023)
Переглядів 3666 місяців тому
Coöperism 7.1/13 | "Édouard Glissant’s Right to Opacity in Practice" (Nov. 29, 2023)
Coöperism 5/13 Film Screening and Talkback with Étienne Balibar on "Les Lip" (Oct. 23, 2023)
Переглядів 1767 місяців тому
Coöperism 5/13 Film Screening and Talkback with Étienne Balibar on "Les Lip" (Oct. 23, 2023)
Public Service Loan Forgiveness Training with Jane Fox at Columbia Law
Переглядів 1199 місяців тому
Public Service Loan Forgiveness Training with Jane Fox at Columbia Law
Séminaire #12 de Bernard E. Harcourt (EHESS) : 6 juin 2023
Переглядів 274Рік тому
Séminaire #12 de Bernard E. Harcourt (EHESS) : 6 juin 2023
Séminaire #11 de Bernard E. Harcourt (EHESS) : 30 mai 2023
Переглядів 160Рік тому
Séminaire #11 de Bernard E. Harcourt (EHESS) : 30 mai 2023
Nietzsche 7/13 | Sarah Kofman
Переглядів 444Рік тому
Nietzsche 7/13 | Sarah Kofman
Séminaire #10 de Bernard E. Harcourt (EHESS) : 23 mai 2023
Переглядів 178Рік тому
Séminaire #10 de Bernard E. Harcourt (EHESS) : 23 mai 2023
Séminaire #9 de Bernard E. Harcourt (EHESS) : 16 mai 2023
Переглядів 217Рік тому
Séminaire #9 de Bernard E. Harcourt (EHESS) : 16 mai 2023
Cornel West discusses Cooperation: A Political, Economic, and Social Theory by Bernard E. Harcourt
Переглядів 494Рік тому
Cornel West discusses Cooperation: A Political, Economic, and Social Theory by Bernard E. Harcourt
Cornel West on Cooperation
Переглядів 288Рік тому
Cornel West on Cooperation
Utopia 11/13
Переглядів 536Рік тому
Utopia 11/13
Discipline & Punish by Michel Foucault | Bernard E. Harcourt Lecture
Переглядів 2,1 тис.Рік тому
Discipline & Punish by Michel Foucault | Bernard E. Harcourt Lecture
Séminaire #7 de Bernard E. Harcourt (EHESS) : 14 mars 2023
Переглядів 455Рік тому
Séminaire #7 de Bernard E. Harcourt (EHESS) : 14 mars 2023
Utopia 10/13 | Critical Theory and Utopian Thought with Rahel Jaeggi and Martin Saar
Переглядів 1,8 тис.Рік тому
Utopia 10/13 | Critical Theory and Utopian Thought with Rahel Jaeggi and Martin Saar
Replenishing the Struggle, Embracing the Contradictions: Bernard E. Harcourt at Utopia 13/13
Переглядів 134Рік тому
Replenishing the Struggle, Embracing the Contradictions: Bernard E. Harcourt at Utopia 13/13
Fred Moten at Utopia 13/13
Переглядів 316Рік тому
Fred Moten at Utopia 13/13

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @tedbailey3673
    @tedbailey3673 9 днів тому

    Lord Almighty

  • @naturphilosophie1
    @naturphilosophie1 28 днів тому

    Stiegler’s reading of Nietzsche isn’t that controversial. It’s worth remembering that Deleuze doesn’t adopt Nietzsche without qualification. The eternal recurrence “is univocity of being, the effective realization of univocity”. Its not simply Nietzsche nor is it Spinoza without qualification. Univocity in eternal recurrence, for D, implies identity and sameness but only the same of that which is different.

  • @HeavenBull91
    @HeavenBull91 Місяць тому

    Need the damn articles

  • @benb6527
    @benb6527 Місяць тому

    These people are so derivative, carbon copies of their distorted interpretation of a great man, one of my heroes, Derrida, and Algerian Jew, a man between worlds. Please stop this damage to his legacy. Intellectual laggards!

  • @benb6527
    @benb6527 Місяць тому

    These people need real careers. Enough imagination work, as a Literature Major from Oberlin College. Go freaking do something for the world. Your work is fake.

  • @benb6527
    @benb6527 Місяць тому

    Shame on Gayatri for bastardizing Derrida's work. She is a ethnofascist misusing his work to make up leaning full hell into false narrativization. It's her life.

  • @AI-Hallucination
    @AI-Hallucination Місяць тому

    Interesting debate

  • @stavroskarageorgis4804
    @stavroskarageorgis4804 Місяць тому

    Read "Keynes" and "Hayek" 2:22:19

  • @tiodeleve
    @tiodeleve 2 місяці тому

    Besides KOOLHAAS, what other architect Vidler mentions?

  • @ParentingIsPlanning
    @ParentingIsPlanning 2 місяці тому

    When I discovered Ali Shariati in 1980, I was able to connect the Islamic Revolution with other world revolutions and liberation movements. The collaboration with Frantz Fanon during WW II and thereafter made me feel that we are all connected as we seek justuce and truth.

  • @augustomonterorazo6482
    @augustomonterorazo6482 4 місяці тому

    Like si vienes por la clase de Harold

  • @maximbutin2833
    @maximbutin2833 4 місяці тому

    Да уж! Какая банальная и никчёмная публицистка эта Ханна Арендт.

  • @apank21
    @apank21 4 місяці тому

    Jesus Velasco was a little hard to understand for me ?

  • @brevenbell
    @brevenbell 5 місяців тому

    thank you guys

  • @jamessheffield4173
    @jamessheffield4173 5 місяців тому

    Stephen Hicks is best known for his documentary and book, Nietzsche and the Nazis, which is an examination of the ideological and philosophical roots of Nazism, particularly how Friedrich Nietzsche's ideas were used and misused by Adolf Hitler and the Nazis to justify their beliefs and practices Bing search

  • @reneefarber7806
    @reneefarber7806 5 місяців тому

    the marxist density here is quite .. demanding

  • @paultoro2921
    @paultoro2921 5 місяців тому

    The host is insufferable.

  • @ElaynaLovesIt
    @ElaynaLovesIt 6 місяців тому

    great to see this video! i had been finding this a provocative read to bring up with family and friends and there's so many sick perspectives here to meditate and reflect on. thank u all for sharing! x

  • @hossorisakura6591
    @hossorisakura6591 6 місяців тому

    what is the matter with this comment section, what a bunch of blowhards

  • @garaznisokak4295
    @garaznisokak4295 7 місяців тому

    🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:00 🎥 *The video discusses the concept of revolution and its complexities.* 04:47 📚 *Marx's "The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon" and Koselleck's concept of historical semantics are discussed as key texts.* 15:24 🔍 *Marx's view on the repetition of history in revolutions and the idea of revolution drawing inspiration from the future.* 26:18 📆 *The discussion touches on the relevance of historical context and conjuncture in interpreting revolution and semantics.* 30:56 🔄 *The idea that the concept of counter-revolution may have outlived the concept of revolution itself is explored.* 31:47 🌍 *Revolution in the modern era has lost some of its explanatory and emancipatory power due to the dominance of counter-revolutionary forces.* 35:13 📚 *Conceptual history, as proposed by Kozelek, suggests that modernity reshaped the meanings of terms like freedom, democracy, and revolution, leading to significant social and political changes.* 43:03 🔄 *Critics argue that modern revolutions, despite their progressive goals, can exhibit totalitarian tendencies, turning the revolution into a constant state of exception with the need to eliminate internal enemies.* 50:54 🔍 *There isn't a single model of revolution; history has witnessed various revolutions, some marked by freedom and participation, challenging the notion of a singular revolutionary tradition.* 56:39 🧠 *Identity politics can be a double-edged sword, both acknowledging privilege and identity while potentially limiting our ability to think imaginatively about those who differ from us.* 01:06:52 🔄 *Marx and Engels in the 1872 edition of the Communist Manifesto acknowledged that the first parts of the manifesto about revolutions had become outdated, relating to the question of national liberation not being a revolution.* 01:10:24 🤔 *Marx's view of proletarian revolution is that it cannot happen through human agency but is driven by the situation itself, drawing on Hegel's concept of dialectics.* 01:12:50 📜 *Marx's choice of emphasizing content over form in discussing revolution highlights the difficulty of providing a purely formal definition of revolution.* 01:14:52 🌍 *The concept of revolution should encompass more than just formal definitions, incorporating content-wise understanding and addressing issues like gender revolution and subaltern struggles.* 01:17:39 💬 *Marx's idea of creating poetry and drama in revolutionary discourse suggests the importance of creativity and the impossibility of a purely formal definition of revolution.* 01:33:13 🔄 *The concept of revolution can be expressed through various terms and not limited to a singular definition.* 01:37:10 📜 *Marx intertwines politics and poetry, suggesting a complex relationship between them in his writings.* 01:42:15 🤔 *Revolutions often carry a tragic dimension due to radical confrontations and potential failures.* 01:45:06 🌍 *Revolutions may not be entirely contemporary, and their imaginations often touch upon different forms of poetry and literature.* 02:01:07 🌐 *The concept of identity as a basis for revolution may have limitations, as it can be manipulated and misinterpreted.* Uprisings are *seen as moments of pure negation and resistance, whereas revolutions may fail due to internal contradictions.* The question *of how war and armed rebellion play a role in contemporary capitalism is crucial and requires further exploration.* The distinction *between national liberation and revolution is complex, and it's important to consider their historical contexts and potential outcomes.* Intersectionality and *essentialism can coexist, but it depends on how they are applied and the context in which they are used.* The debate *on the concept of revolution and its relevance in the modern world is ongoing, with some suggesting that uprisings may have replaced traditional revolutions.* Made with HARPA AI

  • @garaznisokak4295
    @garaznisokak4295 7 місяців тому

    🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:00 📜 *Andrew Arato discusses the recent case of Doyle Hamm's execution and how he walked out alive.* 02:23 🌍 *The discussion is centered around exploring anti-imperialism, national independence, and contemporary uprisings in Latin and South America.* 15:10 🔄 *Andrew Arato discusses the logic of revolution and the representation of the whole by a vanguard, highlighting Lenin's role in introducing anti-imperialism into revolutionary discourse.* 21:22 🔀 *He discusses the post-transition models of political transformation that have achieved change without the typical consequences of revolutionary upheavals.* 28:20 📜 *Arato mentions the importance of constitutionalization and cites examples from Germany and South Africa as alternatives to traditional revolutionary approaches.* 28:59 🔍 *Autonomy, self-determination, and anti-imperialism are interconnected concepts in the context of resistance movements.* 41:29 🌍 *Movements of occupation represent not only spatial but also temporal interruptions and alternative temporalities.* 49:03 💼 *Resistance movements are opening spaces for alternative social and economic relations but may not yet present a fully radical alternative to capitalism.* 55:00 🇪🇺 *European autonomy movements from the 60s and 70s highlight the generalization of capitalism and the blurring of boundaries between labor and life.* 55:52 🇮🇹 *Italian autonomy movements emphasized the concept of leaving labor outside the factory, expanding the idea of labor beyond wage labor.* 56:19 🌐 *Autonomy in a biopolitical setting and its Latin American genealogy, including anti-imperialist movements and Neo-Zapatistas.* 57:22 💡 *Autonomy has existed within imperial politics and colonial dynamics, offering spaces for colonized subject populations.* 58:02 🤝 *Autonomy, self-possession, self-determination, and self-defense concepts have a liberal origin but can be adapted to non-liberal or socialist contexts.* 59:13 🌍 *Emergence of autonomous movements globally, but fragmentation and articulation between these movements pose challenges.* 01:02:59 🔄 *Considering alternatives and the role of time and temporality in revolutionary movements.* 01:22:09 🌐 *Anti-imperialism remains relevant, but there are various forms of imperialism, including financial and territorial.* 01:38:26 🔄 *Revolution should still be affirmed, but it should evolve beyond the traditional Leninist approach.* 01:44:11 💧 *Issues of land, water, and small communities are still at the heart of revolutionary struggles in places like Mexico.* 01:45:34 🏞️ *The 1917 Mexican Constitution, which considered land and water as belonging to the nation, represented a form of socialism.* 01:46:27 🌎 *Anti-imperialism in Mexico involves both international extractive forces and domestic issues with indigenous communities and the state.* 01:47:23 🌍 *Discussion on the rejection of private property as a source of societal problems in revolutionary thought.* 01:48:28 📚 *Revolutions led by poets and artists, such as the Sandinista revolution, have historical significance.* 01:49:35 🏛️ *Lack of a political vocabulary to discuss the changing global landscape, especially the decline of the nation-state.* 01:51:20 💥 *Political violence has constrained political projects in the global south.* 01:52:58 💰 *Global right-wing regimes promise to control the rapid speed of financial capital through authoritarianism.* 02:14:09 🌍 *Moments of occupation, like the Arab Spring, brought domestic and political aspects together in resistance movements, particularly in the women's movement, linking personal issues to capital and labor.* 02:15:32 🌐 *Financialization and digital capital are not inherently more anti-revolutionary than industrial capital, but the fragmentation on the ground and complex articulation between resistance moments pose challenges.* 02:16:42 🔄 *Revolutions don't always need to align with past genealogies; sometimes they symbolize a complete break from the past, as seen in the French Revolution.* 02:17:27 💼 *Neoliberalism as a term can be misleading, as it encompasses diverse economic systems and policies, from social democracies to more market-oriented regimes.* 02:19:27 💡 *Instead of focusing solely on revolution, exploring alternatives within capitalism and making it more livable for people can be a fruitful approach.* Made with HARPA AI

  • @holgerhn6244
    @holgerhn6244 8 місяців тому

    Some mixup here between serial music, John Cage and minimal music. Infelicitous.

  • @frederickanderson1860
    @frederickanderson1860 8 місяців тому

    Thesis and anti-thesis male and female, or female and male.

  • @frederickanderson1860
    @frederickanderson1860 8 місяців тому

    We never find the dasein or what is the true man of these philosophers. Like authors of any non fictional or historical writings, we can never know what influences or biased reasoning they had in their own concepts.

  • @frederickanderson1860
    @frederickanderson1860 8 місяців тому

    These guys just don't see how language in any format has limits to describe or define God or the God of the Greek logos.

  • @frederickanderson1860
    @frederickanderson1860 8 місяців тому

    I think the Hebrew bible that the creator God put eternity in his heart.

  • @frederickanderson1860
    @frederickanderson1860 8 місяців тому

    Blanchot like doestevesky experience similar experience of a firing squad that had a tremendous effect on his mind, doestevesky reacted opposite to Blanchot.

  • @frederickanderson1860
    @frederickanderson1860 8 місяців тому

    We forget how the the generations that experienced 2 world wars and the Spanish flu after, we can't relate too these experiences, language can't express the horror these generations had. Also you can't use definitions to describe the horrorrs of the holocaust or the atomic bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. These philosophical people struggle to use definitions without the use of the written word or spoken.

  • @maisam50
    @maisam50 9 місяців тому

    WHat are these lesser known texts of Nietzsche on mass media ?

    • @angwantibo
      @angwantibo 8 місяців тому

      I think she's talking about some of the posthumous fragments, which is not really a coherent text. There's a text by Stiegler titled 'On the Future of Our Incorporations: Nietzsche, Media, Events' in which she assembles these fragments into a body that requires organs in order to open itself up to and to be able to incorporate the Dionysian flux. As she points out herself, this is quite a tendentious, polemic reading of Nietzsche, a political reassamblage of the posthumous fragments against the Deleuzian Nietzsche of the 60s.

    • @maisam50
      @maisam50 8 місяців тому

      @@angwantibo thanks

  • @arunjetli7909
    @arunjetli7909 9 місяців тому

    Did my PhD on Adorno in 1981 . Effected heavily by Horkheimer and Adorno I was enamored by The negative dialectic . My title. “ The Role of the critic and the logic of criticism in Hegel, Bruno Baruta and The Frankfurt School “ that was my dissertation from The American University . I gave up philosophy to pursue a successful career as a tennis teacher , keeping critical thinking as the lode star . In this pursuit I became very successful as a tennis teacher , but I ruined my ability to have. Areal understanding of philosophy as an ontological reduction . In my life I did not understand the negativity in the dialectic as always a positive . I rejected the import of practical due diligence in favor of theory as alienated , and stressed that my children stay away from instrumental mistake , not realizing that the entire schemata of negative dialects is a misappropriation of the dialectic imported from The Indic civilization without without understanding that the unity of theory and practice are already coexisting. The miseffects of The Frankfurt school and its charm has permeated into the likes of. Derrida and Foucault . Now it has turned into woke philosophy. Reduction of philosophy to pure critical criticism ala Bruno Bauer is too much a part of Adorno. I supported Adorno over Heidegger but now I believe I was in my youthful error , where Heidegger and Adorno needed to be understood as two poles of the dialectic. Adorno is quite narcissistic in isolating the German fascism as a unique event in history . My life was very effected with my non critical approach to the very presupposing the veridicality of “ critical thinking”. This flaw comes from Hegel’ s misunderstanding of the dialectic as a pure negativity or struggle. I now understand that the very designation of the dialectic as always as a struggle is the atavistic urge to be theological , in a world of evil . The Frankfurt school Ned’s a reevaluation where negativity is to be understood as a positive. Science is not different from art in two aspects, one that due diligence is essential to both,secondly a pleasure one gets from a passion to to be dispassionate . I am reworking the uncritically established premises of critical theory , in my real life. Yielding to Heidegger in infringing the first person I think it is necessary to see the human being as an ontological reality confronting the world as a possibility.In other words back to Parmenides , and bypassing Aristotle , something that the phenomenologists are not able to do. They too have a theological respect for Aristotle who ruined philosophy forever , never giving relevance to mind experiments , that are essential to philosophy. Adorno and Athens Frankfurt school need to be sublated . Any suggestions?

    • @boptillyouflop
      @boptillyouflop 6 місяців тому

      You know 100x more than me about this, so perhaps I have nothing to bring here, but here's an idea. One of the key ideas of the Frankfurt School is that we should abandon ideas which, when applied, result in a worse outcome on what they're trying to achieve in the first place, which they called "Immanent Critique" I think? And one of the major goal of the Frankfurt School was to move politics towards progressivism. And now, some of the highly critical ideas from the Frankfurt School - especially the ones that consider mainstream discourse as irremediably coopted by money and power and deeply tainted - are making it into the broad zeitgeist, and it's a disaster. It comes out as a kind of shrill moralism that denounces all and everything as patriarchal, colonialist and homophobic, to the point that it's putting off a lot of people from the very progressivism it's trying to promote, and there's no shortage of people who loathe billionaire rule but join pro-corporate conservative movements because they hate self-flagellation and permanent self-guilt-tripping. It's also totally failing at its goal of reducing the level of cooption of progressive movements by money and power, and there's no shortage of totally cynical corporate diversity and inclusion drives that use the ideas of the Frankfurt School but do nothing to reduce the rapaciousness of the overall system. If anything, self-criticality in the world of ideas seem to just result in an disoriented ideological mash that leaves the rich even more powerful. It's almost as if we were doing Vladimir Putin-style "White Noise Propaganda" on ourselves. Adorno would be horrified at seeing his ideas used to prop up the very system of corporate domination he spent his whole life trying to fight. In short, we need to go back to the culture of Enlightenment and Modernity and strict logic and truth, not because it was perfect or impervious to slides towards Fascism, but because we tried alternatives with less defined truth and high cognizance of the sources of bias due to power, and they just don't work in practice.

    • @Lard_Indulgence999
      @Lard_Indulgence999 5 місяців тому

      How does Adorno isolate German Fascism as a unique event in history? If anything, in Minima Moralia, one of his main goals is warning against the increase of man-made horrors. "Auschwitz cannot be brought into analogy with the destruction of the Greek city-states as a mere gradual increase in horror, before which one can preserve tranquility of mind." pg.249. The advice falls on deaf ears but this is not his doing.

    • @williamwells5263
      @williamwells5263 4 місяці тому

      i would love it if you uploaded a video expanding on this

    • @boptillyouflop
      @boptillyouflop 4 місяці тому

      @@williamwells5263If I ended up doing a video on this it would come out as a hit job. ^^;

    • @arunjetli7909
      @arunjetli7909 3 місяці тому

      @@williamwells5263 great debate here.the error is inherent in western philosophy that describes veridicality as entirely objective.This was the error the phenomenologists wanted to eliminate, but failed because by reintroducing relativism they forgot that any truth derived at is relatively true from the objective standard , but quasi absolutely true from the perspective of the subject. Frankfurt as cool is too reductive on objective categories to understand the subject Here is an example .Al Ghazzali and Kierkegaard both understood the importance of the living of the believing subject , thus Christ or Mohammad as real historical figures are not important but Christianity and Islam are . What they do not realize is that they support an immanent God , but erroneously believe in the sanctity of the Koran or the Bible , and that is why they become dangerous philosophers . Jordan Oetrson is such a dangerous philodpher effecting us

  • @lalaboards
    @lalaboards 10 місяців тому

    What kind of dressing comes with the word salad ?

  • @Mari-kc9ek
    @Mari-kc9ek 10 місяців тому

    Can someone please provide the site for project emancipation?

  • @LethalBubbles
    @LethalBubbles 11 місяців тому

    if care isn't taken to keep the demiurge dead, the result is conservative fundamentalism, which due to the death of god, is a bit of a post-modernist political pholosophy that is unaware that it is. it thinks its reconstructed myths, which have more to do with mccarthyism than the bible, its kinda gnostic when you think about it.

  • @gabygoedert4546
    @gabygoedert4546 Рік тому

    Félicitations pour votre fils prof raoult 👍🏼

  • @AeolisticFury
    @AeolisticFury Рік тому

    old commie blabbering on. Just read Nietzsche yourself. most people do not.

  • @clumsydad7158
    @clumsydad7158 Рік тому

    fascinating insights into Arabic currents of Nietzsche, thank you !!

  • @clumsydad7158
    @clumsydad7158 Рік тому

    very insightful and educational for me on Cixous

  • @clumsydad7158
    @clumsydad7158 Рік тому

    Fanon, and the great work elucidating him by Louis Gordon

  • @clumsydad7158
    @clumsydad7158 Рік тому

    the fascism is here

  • @clumsydad7158
    @clumsydad7158 Рік тому

    The points by Annelies were very helpful. I see this as connecting to a pre-language part of the brain, the old primitive nature, direct thoughts, flow ... all of this we are barely yet understand as our perceptions of ourselves and reality is very much influenced by the categorizations and flaws in our language. It aids in large, complex projects but it creates confusion in us because it's another layer in us with strange representation and social meaning, yet covering over deeper and more natural, intuitive reflective states, etc.

  • @clumsydad7158
    @clumsydad7158 Рік тому

    'detumescence' ... man needs a state of play - if not propelled and invigorated toward the good, the cesspool of rot will creep in and we will follow any belligerently toxic fool

  • @clumsydad7158
    @clumsydad7158 Рік тому

    Bataille, Nietzsche, and Heidegger ... I'm there !!!

  • @blairhakamies4132
    @blairhakamies4132 Рік тому

    Fabulous 🎉

  • @jefftist9625
    @jefftist9625 Рік тому

    Marx & Arendt. 30:00 - Arendt's criticism of Marx's theory of labor". 32:15 - Work vs Labor & technology. 1:13:15 - 1:16:25

  • @victorm3054
    @victorm3054 Рік тому

    15:56

  • @kurj235
    @kurj235 Рік тому

    lol is that a decorative pomegranate sitting there?

  • @deadman746
    @deadman746 Рік тому

    I do like the sampling metaphor.

  • @patrickbertlein4626
    @patrickbertlein4626 Рік тому

    Why is he pronouncing it like "niche"?! That irritates me so badly! I just looked up more sources despite having a German mother and asking others/the internet how to pronounce it a hundred times before, just to make sure I wasn't being a dumbass again, and no!! It is NOT pronounced like how Bernard says it, at all!

    • @patrickbertlein4626
      @patrickbertlein4626 Рік тому

      She did it too!!!! WHY??!!! Okay done with this I have plenty to read on him as it is. Everything is absurd!

    • @LethalBubbles
      @LethalBubbles 11 місяців тому

      french pronoucian I think. Kinda like how you can say the name of the car, 'Porche' as "Portia" or "Porsh"

  • @ashgiri94
    @ashgiri94 Рік тому

    1:18:05 Amazing quote from Derrida

  •  Рік тому

    Last night, Daniel Defert died. I was very fortunate because I knew him a month ago at his home in Paris, when he was very very ill. He was happy because two psychoanalysts were there, remembering Michel. I am very sad. He was a charming man who was very worried about Michel Foucault's work were forgotten. I wanted to share this with you