Відео

She conveyed to Judaism to suit her man and now lives in an illegally occupied house!!

Very wonderful.What a gem of a video....

Entire monologue lacks rigour, no starting point , not sure where it's leading. Lack of preparation.😱

24:14 Uhm...ahh...

nice

left off at 33 minutes

Weinberg is great for conceptual and historical understanding, a bit discursive. Frampton is more theoretical and concise and mathematical-abstract. No surprise that Dr. Glimm likes this best. Peskin and Schroeder is more detailed and practical. Schroeder was Peskin's graduate student, and the book is a result of years of teaching QFT to graduate students at Stanford. Freeman Dyson was the first to broach the question of the mathematical properties of the QFT perturbation series. He had advanced mathematical training that few physicists had or have. Physics is good for the soul, but so is mathematics. The former brings you in contact with the "real world"; the latter brings you in contact with clarity and rigor :)

I wish her audio was not cutting out so much. Subtitles would have been a gift.

It's almost impossible to follow Gromov because of his way of speaking, some parts of his words are just mumbling. Or, am I the only one having this problem?

A new idea I have is that the hypergraph used in the Wolfram model allows for even further simplification. The nodes which Stephen called atoms of space can be made redundant by a hypergraph with only edges. The foundation of reality is then purely a web of relations.

The discussion on “space and numbers” at the end was missing the point. If you tell a mathematician to count a handful of oranges, they will count 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 But no two oranges are identical, and someone with expanded color vision, or the ability to assess the similarity of the oranges at a more coarse scope, might not conclude that the oranges are identical enough to be counted within the same set. It’s a fallacy of familiarity because as observers our summations of the physical world are abstracted according to where in the branch we are choosing to observe. If math is space and counting, then there is nothing within the constraints of space/time that equals more than 1 of itself(after all, two of the same thing cannot occupy the precise space at the same time); therefore math seems like a necessary abstraction on top of the nature of what IS, rather than a fact of nature itself.

So, the answer to Theseus' Ship is it's still a ship until the observer of the ship doesn't recognize it any more. Fascinating presentation.

Before this video I am following along with the Wolfram Physics project and am learning the Wolfram Language. Still my main struggle was the point of metamathematics !!! I struggled sincerely to see why this brilliant man was so invested in it. This video and a few others really helped me see the point of it. Thank you. Mr Wolfram I think has made the first really new breakthrough since the golden age of physics. My prediction is Mr Wolfram and his incredible team will win a nobel prize if they can show how their breakthrough in GR and QM applies to the standard model.

I’m a borderline mongoloid so take everything with a grain of salt, but the object that’s displayed at 36:27 looks similar to the object made by the Goldbach Conjecture. Some of the other “rewriting hyper graphs” look similar to genealogy trees, or even different factorization charts I’ve seen. Even if Steven’s points aren’t well received by the broader public, the similar properties of these mathematical objects to other mathematical objects, both natural and theoretical, is curious to say the least. I would even postulate that if Nick Bostrom is correct, the football(US)/eye-shaped object that Steven displays around the 20:00 minute mark could potentially be the geometric structure for visual perception. Basing that idea solely off the curvatures of the different plants that exist within that manifold/structure he displayed.

For Stephen Wolfram, Human Action by Ludwig von Mises Is the basis of Austrian economics and I think that’s what you were looking for as a resource.

Very lovely (and unusual) to see Wolfram so humble as he is in this video. Got some new insights from this video which seemed to stem from his wish to impress this audience (which he usually does not care about).

👏 😮 👏 😮 👏

очень интересно

1:02:08 to 1:02:48 ---- Even the students are getting tired of the topologist's heckling lmao

Good LORD! JDH has the patience of a saint. Great video.

The resident host is a disrespectful jerk. He should have drawn Gromov out; instead this show-off wasted a wonderful opportunity.

I want to express my deep gratitude for the person who filmed this. Although the video quality is not the best, it's an incredible resource. I've rarely seen someone talk about set theory in such an accessible manner. Thanks for that!

A famous topologist heckling a famous set theorist. this is a treat.

It is disrespectful for that person upfront to keep interrupting

This is quite a nice talk but gets really derailed by one particular member of the audience. In fact it's the chair of the seminar.

☺👍

👌☺

Dr Gromov needs to take a course called "How to speak clear English"

I wish that guy up front would shut up and let Prof Gromov teach for goodness sakes.

1 which is equal to 1 root 1 2 which is equal to 1.4142135623731 root 0.5 3 which is equal to 1.4422495703074 root 0.33333333333333 4 which is equal to 1.4142135623731 root 0.25 5 which is equal to 1.3797296614612 root 0.2 6 which is equal to 1.3480061545973 root 0.16666666666667 7 which is equal to 1.3204692477561 root 0.14285714285714 8 which is equal to 1.296839554651 root 0.125 9 which is equal to 1.2765180070092 root 0.11111111111111 10 which is equal to 1.2589254117942 root 0.1 11 which is equal to 1.2435752279124 root 0.090909090909091 12 which is equal to 1.230075505578 root 0.083333333333333 13 which is equal to 1.2181140435608 root 0.076923076923077 14 which is equal to 1.2074420274184 root 0.071428571428571 15 which is equal to 1.1978600582696 root 0.066666666666667 16 which is equal to 1.1892071150027 root 0.0625 17 which is equal to 1.1813520746255 root 0.058823529411765 18 which is equal to 1.1741872530997 root 0.055555555555556 19 which is equal to 1.1676234836961 root 0.052631578947368 20 which is equal to 1.1615863496415 root 0.05 21 which is equal to 1.1560132810008 root 0.047619047619048 22 which is equal to 1.1508513003583 root 0.045454545454545 23 which is equal to 1.1460552582235 root 0.043478260869565 24 which is equal to 1.1415864406322 root 0.041666666666667 25 which is equal to 1.137411461756 root 0.04 26 which is equal to 1.1335013764587 root 0.038461538461538 27 which is equal to 1.1298309639098 root 0.037037037037037 28 which is equal to 1.1263781452509 root 0.035714285714286 29 which is equal to 1.1231235070918 root 0.03448275862069 30 which is equal to 1.1200499091502 root 0.033333333333333 31 which is equal to 1.1171421592505 root 0.032258064516129 32 which is equal to 1.1143867425959 root 0.03125 33 which is equal to 1.1117715950432 root 0.03030303030303 34 which is equal to 1.109285912263 root 0.029411764705882 35 which is equal to 1.1069199883327 root 0.028571428571429 36 which is equal to 1.1046650785975 root 0.027777777777778 37 which is equal to 1.1025132826456 root 0.027027027027027 38 which is equal to 1.1004574440337 root 0.026315789473684 39 which is equal to 1.0984910640281 root 0.025641025641026 40 which is equal to 1.0966082271244 root 0.025 41 which is equal to 1.0948035365073 root 0.024390243902439 42 which is equal to 1.0930720579348 root 0.023809523809524 43 which is equal to 1.0914092707865 root 0.023255813953488 44 which is equal to 1.0898110252299 root 0.022727272727273 45 which is equal to 1.0882735046282 root 0.022222222222222 46 which is equal to 1.0867931924542 root 0.021739130434783 47 which is equal to 1.0853668430905 root 0.021276595744681 48 which is equal to 1.0839914559924 root 0.020833333333333 49 which is equal to 1.0826642527685 root 0.020408163265306 50 which is equal to 1.0813826568003 root 0.02 51 which is equal to 1.0801442750783 root 0.019607843137255 52 which is equal to 1.0789468819763 root 0.019230769230769 53 which is equal to 1.0777884047267 root 0.018867924528302 54 which is equal to 1.0766669103916 root 0.018518518518519 55 which is equal to 1.0755805941518 root 0.018181818181818 56 which is equal to 1.0745277687604 root 0.017857142857143 57 which is equal to 1.0735068550283 root 0.017543859649123 58 which is equal to 1.072516373224 root 0.017241379310345 59 which is equal to 1.0715549352872 root 0.016949152542373 60 which is equal to 1.070621237767 root 0.016666666666667 61 which is equal to 1.0697140554075 root 0.016393442622951 62 which is equal to 1.0688322353119 root 0.016129032258065 63 which is equal to 1.0679746916241 root 0.015873015873016 64 which is equal to 1.0671404006768 root 0.015625 65 which is equal to 1.0663283965568 root 0.015384615384615 66 which is equal to 1.0655377670471 root 0.015151515151515 67 which is equal to 1.0647676499091 root 0.014925373134328 68 which is equal to 1.0640172294704 root 0.014705882352941 69 which is equal to 1.0632857334919 root 0.014492753623188 70 which is equal to 1.0625724302841 root 0.014285714285714 71 which is equal to 1.0618766260536 root 0.014084507042254 72 which is equal to 1.0611976624554 root 0.013888888888889 73 which is equal to 1.0605349143339 root 0.013698630136986 74 which is equal to 1.0598877876365 root 0.013513513513514 75 which is equal to 1.0592557174825 root 0.013333333333333 76 which is equal to 1.0586381663759 root 0.013157894736842 77 which is equal to 1.0580346225485 root 0.012987012987013 78 which is equal to 1.057444598423 root 0.012820512820513 79 which is equal to 1.0568676291852 root 0.012658227848101 80 which is equal to 1.0563032714575 root 0.0125 81 which is equal to 1.0557511020639 root 0.012345679012346 82 which is equal to 1.0552107168811 root 0.01219512195122 83 which is equal to 1.0546817297663 root 0.012048192771084 84 which is equal to 1.0541637715582 root 0.011904761904762 85 which is equal to 1.0536564891441 root 0.011764705882353 86 which is equal to 1.0531595445876 root 0.011627906976744 87 which is equal to 1.0526726143139 root 0.011494252873563 88 which is equal to 1.0521953883466 root 0.011363636363636 89 which is equal to 1.0517275695936 root 0.01123595505618 90 which is equal to 1.0512688731775 root 0.011111111111111 91 which is equal to 1.0508190258076 root 0.010989010989011 92 which is equal to 1.0503777651907 root 0.010869565217391 93 which is equal to 1.0499448394776 root 0.010752688172043 94 which is equal to 1.0495200067432 root 0.01063829787234 95 which is equal to 1.0491030344968 root 0.010526315789474 96 which is equal to 1.0486936992226 root 0.010416666666667 97 which is equal to 1.0482917859456 root 0.010309278350515 98 which is equal to 1.0478970878236 root 0.010204081632653 99 which is equal to 1.047509405762 root 0.01010101010101 100 which is equal to 1.0471285480509 root 0.01 101 which is equal to 1.0467543300221 root 0.0099009900990099 102 which is equal to 1.0463865737253 root 0.0098039215686275 103 which is equal to 1.0460251076224 root 0.0097087378640777 104 which is equal to 1.0456697662981 root 0.0096153846153846 105 which is equal to 1.0453203901862 root 0.0095238095238095 106 which is equal to 1.044976825311 root 0.0094339622641509 107 which is equal to 1.0446389230416 root 0.0093457943925234 108 which is equal to 1.0443065398599 root 0.0092592592592593 109 which is equal to 1.04397953714 root 0.0091743119266055 110 which is equal to 1.0436577809399 root 0.0090909090909091 111 which is equal to 1.0433411418026 root 0.009009009009009 ....

bitbucket.org/okechoby/the-100-100-grid

The wand. (the, his- a)

~U 0:1 |&|| 1:0 ~•

Why not just use combinaisons of numbers in specific caractéristics occurrences of the meaning of the pursued word?

bit.ly/2bYVbCP