Відео

Thanks for watching :) The first LUT I applied was an inbuilt LUT from Arri. I find the EVA 1 is rather flexible in the LUTs you want to use. Panasonic does tend to lean towards warm (red) so I am not surprised. That can be easily corrected though.

So far, unfortunately yes. There seems to be a bad connection between the xlr module and the camera. I notice others are also having that very same issue.

You are welcome. Thanks for watching :)

You are probably talking about the flash sync port, mate. For video it serves no purpose.

Well, I have used both cameras and in my experience the EVA 1 gives the C70 a real good run. Personally I would choose the EVA 1 for the ease of use, image quality and also affordable media. The C70 has a better lcd and better autofocus, but you will have to tweak the image profile coming out of the C70 to rival the EVA 1 straight out of the camera. Mind you, this was before Canon implemented raw internally so on paper the C70 is better but not unless you go through the step of working with raw files. The raw output of the EVA1 is probably one of the noisiest I have ever seen, so I quickly skipped that workflow :) Personally just straight out of the camera I would put the EVA 1 over the C70. Workflow wise, I do have issues playing the mov. files of the Panasonic, of any Panasonic actually, straight on my MAC, just for viewing rushes. I have never been able to figure out why, though. They are both easy to use, but I find the EVA 1 to configure easier than the C70 which needs a cage to work properly. In my opinion.

I am glad you found it useful. The EVA 1 truly is a great camera with a really great image and I don't think you will be disappointed by picking up one. But as I also state in my test the LCD is really bad, so please take that into consideration. We used the EVA 1 yesterday on a multicam shoot with the Sony FX6, Canon XF605 and JVC LS300. No problems at all. The Pyxis looks like a wonderful camera for sure, but no internal ND is basically just a headache if you are doing solo work. Also only recording in BM Raw basically locks you into Resolve. For me the EVA 1 is still a no- brainer in this class. The Fx6 is a nice camera as wel,l but I also have to give credit to my XF605 camera and C300MK3. They are really, really nice. Going forward I think Canon will release an update on the M3 with RF. They have already made this wonderful cinema glass for RF and my retailer tells me EF is basically out. But that opens up wonderful opportunities on the used market so...

Have you checked your output settings on the 1DX? I don't know that specific camera, but usually you can control what signal is sent out of the HDMI port of any camera. A 3G BM Assist recorder can only record up to 1080p60 however.

It was quite fun indeed :) They do have a rather distinct dialect though, but that is the fun part of Norway. Once you think you have figured the language out, you haven't....Different dialects all across this small but rather long country :)

Glad I could help :)

You are most welcome :)

Thanks for the feedback. Glad it could help :) They are great recorder/ monitors :) Subscriped as well and looking forward to your content.

Unfortunately not, and that is a bummer. However I am not sure how long EF, which is an older standard, is going to last. I expect Canon to release RF mount cameras going forward and so does my retailer. If you look at all their newer releases, including the new cine primes, they are all RF. Other than the EF- mount it is a highly versatile lens if changing camera brand, E- mount, MFT- mount, L- mount and RF- mount. And the optics are really, really nice.

No, only the normal zoom function was used :) Wide DR is one of the best in- built standard picture profiles on the market, in my opinion. Not much cooler grading is needed, bar a little black adjustment, perhaps. The XF605 is also really great in this regard. However one of my favorite picture profiles today is S- Cinetone from Sony.

I find that is the beauty of V- Log as well. Very easy to grade and the EVA 1 produces a wonderful image. The BM assist is also a great addition to the Eva 1, though shooting raw that way really stresses my system so mostly ending up shooting ProRes if need be.

Hei, så hyggelig. Tusen takk !

Glad you found this video helpful :) These lenses are truly great on the Canons :)

It is a great lens for sure. Sharp, a little on the heavy side, but with great range. One af a kind really for these Sony cameras :)

You are most welcome :)

Thanks, time permitting I am releasing a new video in the series this week :)

Mine fried as well right before the shooting begins. Even though it is under warranty, I have to pay for the replacement. From then on, I do not bother with Panasonic cameras.

Yes, absolutely. Tasted just as good as it looks :)

Thanks so much :)

Thank you very much 😊

Absolutely :) a brilliant camera all around

@cinematicjohn Thank you very much! Yes, there is loads more coming on my channel :)

The EVA 1 is still a lovely camera despite the newer ones coming out. How are you liking the S5iiX?

@@filmmakersrskilnand9172 huge improvement from my GH5 and GH5s, I use it for stills mainly, have not dug into its video potential yet. Still trying to acquire glass apart from adapting EF lenses.

@@dadbeatdead The S5iiX looks like a lovely blend of the GH5s and S1H :) The only downside for me with SLRs is the lack of internal NDs. I shot tons with the Gh5s in it's day :)

@@filmmakersrskilnand9172 Been using the S5iiX as my main camera, image is astounding with Blackmagic RAW and competes with heavy hitter cinema bodies in terms of IQ. Quality of life wise ND's would be really nice to have, but the weight and size makes up for it. Have some videos on my channel :)

@dadbeatdead I’m considering adding an EVA1 to a house of worship setup with 2 S5ii cameras. How does the EVA1 cut with the S5ii image?

@DanTheViddyman Thanks for watching. I have been where you are now wit the exact same choices. Glad I never went with the Ursa, great image, but demands a certain workflow and also heavier to carry around. The C200 was or still is a great camera, but it eats memory cards and hard drives real fast :) Great autofocus but noisy image if underexposed in raw or LOG . Those two reasons made me sell it. The EVA 1 truly is a great camera with a really great image and I don't think you will be disappointed by picking up a used one. But as I also state in my test the LCD is really bad, so please take that into consideration. We are shooting a feature doc right now and have made the transition from the C200 to the EVA 1 with some shots on the Canon XF605. The 605 excels when working fast on my own, but that lovely image out of the EVA 1, never miss my C200 anymore.

You are welcome. Thanks for watching. I think it is important not to get hung up on the latest tech, while there is still older technology that can do the job.

The stock monitor is horrible but its a great little camera with a lovely image. Have a pair, one converted to PL and use with CN20 & other in EF for use with stills lenses for wildife Perfect lightweight complement to Varicam LT or RED

Thank you for watching! For low light a bigger sensor is always going to be beneficial. Personally, however, I still would choose the Eva 1 for a few reasons over the Lumix S5iix. The EVA 1 image is really lovely, it has proper NDs built in, xlrs on the body itself and long lasting batteries. And it records to cheap SDXC cards as well. When you add those peripheral things to an SLR with a cage, things quickly become bulky and the costs add up. The cost of a camera is no longer just the cost of a camera. The Eva1 has dual ISOs and that also helps. However, I would not choose it specifically for low light shooting, but no camera, really is built for that, bar the Fx3/ A7S3 cameras. They are really lovely in low light conditions if you want to catch the ambient surroundings. But that is my experience from shooting with cameras where you can't control the light.

You are welcome :) It really is a lovely camera and comparing it to the Sony FX6, the LCD mount is more or less the same. That had me thinking! Also those inbuilt XLRs are huge compared to the FX6. If the Eva 1 had had that wonderful autofocus and better LCD, I would definitely think twice about ever purchasing a newer FX6. I think that says a lot in itself !

This was shot using the Panasonic GH5s and Panasonic 12-35 MKii. One of the absolute cleanest images out there :).

Hi Mario. I haven't seen any vignetting at all so far. At least not on the sensors I have used it on, which are the F3 and Canon C300. The Canon cameras have a slightly larger sensor and it covers those as well. It is small, portable and sharp. It does need some light to shine though. I do think the sweet spot is from 5.6 till 8, which is where these images were shot at. I bought it from Visual Products in the US. If you are interested in vintage lenses check out this video as well: ua-cam.com/video/DW-FyklybJY/v-deo.html

@@filmmakersrskilnand9172 cheers for the fast answer. Really appreciate that!

Hi Mad Monkey Studio. I got mine from Mika Tapa at www.lensadaptor.com in the UK. I think also Duclos lenses in the US sell their own version.

And it was amazing being there witnessing it all :)

Thanks very much. This is a feature film I worked on as location manager, so I can at least take credit for the surroundings 🙂

Hi David. Thanks for reaching out! The cage is so nice and light weight. Sure fixes a few issues with the C70. I did own an Atomos Ninja V which in many ways is similar to the Shinobi, screen wise. I never did find the Atomos line up good enough in sunlight myself. But they do have a hefty marketing strategy pulling you in. is 1000 nits, yes. The BM assist beats it hands down in every way, also build wise. But especially in nits. 2500 is really, really nice. I think Swit has a 3000 nits monitor as well, albeit a bit larger at 7". The BM assist has been a game changer for me. So nice to shoot and edit in ProRes. No, the cold shoe is built in on the opposite side. Putting it on an angle helps keep the microphone away from the monitor. That was my reasoning anyway.

Tusen takk for det, Snorre. Det var litt vanskeligere enn jeg trodde, men noen utfordringer må vi filmskapere ha :) Når det er sagt så er adapterne fra Mike Tapa utrolig solide.

Tusen takk for det, Snorre! Så lenge man tar det litt med ro og er forsiktig med skruer etc så går det egentlig nokså greit. Det er viktig å ha et godt skrujern dog.

Thanks Jason. I believe the 605 is one of the top cameras to get when looking for a great and compact camera that can do it all. Haven´t tried it myself yet, though. Lately I have been shooting with an A7S3/ PZ 28-135 combo and I am truly impressed with the results. The musical is actually a comedy sketch of various featurettes from the local community. It was quite hilarious yes, thanks for noticing :) And the stage performance and the 705 low light settings are the cleanest I have ever seen. I have tried both the Sony Z280 and CX350 by Panasonic. The Canon blows them both out of the water in low light situations.

Thanks for your kind words Manson Studios. The Fujinon MK is by far the best cine lens I have ever used. And also quite versatile considering you can use it for L- mount. MFT- mount- E mount, X- mount and now RF- mount.

Hi Jan. Thanks for your kind comments and thanks for watching. Glad you found it helpful :)

Hi Lucky Marz. I got mine from Mika Tapa at www.lensadaptor.com in the UK. I think also Duclos lenses in the US sell their own version.