Відео

Thank you for sharing your perspectives, so rich!

Policy briefs are usually 2 to 4 pages long. Policy makers and key stakeholders are not interested in reading long papers. They are just interested mainly in the problem and the solutions basically the recommendations.

Interesting, studie Political Ecology.

Which paper of watts?

This video is not capturing anyone's interest either.

love it. great work

Professor Kallis is wolf is sheeps clothing! Brutal! : )

a wonderful and useful talk which has a lot of elements of interest and learning. I stand educated. thanks Dr Farrell

bruh, go to 20:19 , and tell me what name you think you hear...

She seems to operate on two brain cells. Did someone genuinely pay her for this? The funny thing is that you know she had to think hard to turn the obvious things into some nonsense. She is so smug about putting everyone in a political box too. This is stupidity pretending to be revolutionary. Just disastrous.

beautiful!!!

Such a brilliant presentation but cannot see the examples on the screen

ecologiapoliticaamazonia.blogspot.com/

Interesting lecture. I understand the pinciples discussed but admit I am confused why the term "political ecology" is used, in the literature it gets confused with conventional ecological work with a political lens. Would something like "subversive ecology" not be more appropriate? Also cannot hear the student questions, can the lecturer repeat them in the fututre as he/she will have a microphone.

Ecologi@Politic@Amazoni@ Amazon political ecology, Ecologia politica amazonica

this is an excellent lecture, very helpful! a lot of key issues covered in research design. thank you!

Thought provoking discussion. I will need to read the book to get the full scope of the arguments being forwarded. To build on some points made, I think it is important that we critique the "consumption driven economic growth" paradigm irregardless of whether it emanates from neo-classical capitalist or state-sponsored capitalist (communism as we've seen it so far) economics. The idea that all consumption is valid regardless of the destruction it unleashes on communities and ecosystems is fundamentally wrong and ultimately suicidal. The concept of "throw away culture" is actually a recent phenomenon that began to gain traction only in the 1950s and became global by the 1980s. Prior to the throw away mindset was the old wisdom of "a stitch in time saves nine", "waste not want not" etc. With the emergence of the "throw away culture" came built in obsolescence, market segmentation and incessant marketing that no longer had anything to do with meeting our "needs" but more to do with creating "wants". And these wants need to be pursued even if it leads to the end of the planet because that is what fuels economic growth measured by GDP. One could make the argument that since the throw away culture is a recent phenomenon, that we could actually undo it through the renewal of old values, promotion of new ecocentric values and adoption of significant regulation in sectors that are most polluting. Maybe this could be the entry point for discussing "degrowth" or "economic contraction".

Very bad acoustics. The heavy accent doesn't help either. Can you add subtitles?

16:10 31 - 35

Perfect, thanks for valuable time.

Paul Robbins.. Awesome.

Awesome presentations! Thanks so much!

Can you upload the proposal this lecture references?

I need help kindly let me know that how discourse analysis influencing postmodern research

Can anyone tell me the name ofthe paper which she mentions about how to structure an interview?

Tiu fie neur a mirionede

I enjoyed your second lecture (the modern and post modern conceptions of the Discourse Analysis in Social Studies) Prof. Katherine N. Farrell. Thank you

Felicitaciones y gracias por publicar las conferencias. Sería posible consultar temas a Hugo (perdón pero no sé su apellido), el tercer panelista y a Beatriz. Inicié estudios en el campo de Ecología política en Ecuador. Mi afán es lograr mejorar la vida en nuestras comunas de terrenos secanos, donde la problemática , a mi parecer, es realmente difícil. Mi correo es cenvet2002@gmail.com. Gracias.

What is the title of the research project that she presented as her example at the end of her presentation?

Sorry, I'm just not buying it. There are some good points here, but New York is not a natural environment, and that has nothing to do with political position. The city requires massive inputs of human resources to maintain its configuration: natural environments don't. That is essentially the difference, and waving it away by calling human activity "natural" is pointless tautology.

Hoover dam is not 100's of miles away. Hoover damn is about 30 miles away from Las Vegas.

Who decides what constitutes a good urban environment?, you ask. The market decides. People and businesses "vote with their wallets".