Відео

YAWWNNNNNN

One of my favourite bridges of all time!! 😎❤️😎❤️😎

Good video! I've been interested in this topic for some time so it would be cool to have more scientific experiments on it. Not related to this video, but I'm curious to know your thoughts on servitude and serving others. I hear a lot of people talk about "serving others" being the meaning of our existence and I'm curious to see what other people think of that. Especially someone such as yourself that used to be a Anglican Priest. Might be an interesting video topic. Cheers!

Intelligent design is true. It seems that the creator can't be a corporeal entity like an alien.

loved it

7:35 whoa… I know she loves to interweave her songs and this makes me wonder if this is prefacing her song “I look in people’s windows” 😮

I’m of the opinion her live performances and acoustic sets are better than her studio versions. Love your reaction! I think you’d like her long pond studio performances

Im younger than most commenters here, Im 38, and a lot of what you said resonates with me. I like the vast amount of time Im free to do as I please, work on things in my house when I want, ride and work on my motorcycles, etc. I was a late bloomer when it came to dating and didnt have a serious girlfriend till I was 20. It lasted about 5 years but she ended up breaking my heart. Its never been the same since. I dated a few more people but it never lasted for more than 1.5 years. My guess is that I have a personality like yours in that Im not too tolerant of other peoples quirks. I also did not like that so many woman I dated withheld sex as a punishment until I did what they wanted. I do miss the sex and companionship, but I realize that at my age I likely wont ever love someone like I did in my 20s. I may continue dating here and there but I think without the desire for marriage and kids, it will all likely be short lived or not permanent. Thanks for the insight!

one of my fave! One of her best vocals too!

I appreciate Taylor, and thank you for doing this song and performance,

About the bandwagon: The majority of TS reactions (in my feed, at least) are touted as "first time hearing" types of reactions. Those are, indeed, fascinating for swifties but, in your case, you might aim at a different target. Instead of "first time" you could go for deeper/more thoughtful reactions with more philosophical undertones by picking songs that have captured your imagination. You would not be the only person doing that - and probably not the most "qualified" person to do that, from the standpoint of "swiftie experts" - but you would be among the most qualitied from a philosophical perspective. In any case, there is nothing wrong with a bandwagon if, overall, it is one that has a positive impact on the world. I say that Taylor has an overall positive impact on the world, as do most swifties and most pro-Taylor commentators (counterbalancing the Taylor-haters). As for your followers who have no interest in Taylor, they can skip those episodes or, in some cases, you could tie Taylor into a topic that they do care about. Perhaps put Taylor to work explaining/clarifying various ideas you want to explore.

So happy to have stumbled upon your channel. I've been a Swiftie since her Debut album because I formed my musical tastes by listening to the singer/songwriters of the 70s. That makes me all about the words; which inevitably makes me admire Taylor Swift, the queen of lyrics. Thank you for your thoughtful reaction. I truly enjoyed it.

well if you like it why not jump onto the bandwagon. she made you reach to my feed here in INDIA so have fun. So what if if everyone else is doing as long as you like her but if you don't like her then no need. YOUR CHOICE

Feel free to jump into the bandwagon of Taylor reactions, it's a fun time! It's such a nice performance isn't it? She has amazing piano pieces too, some intimate some in the middle of a stadium, ahhh so many great songs for you to hear

I’m a 58 year old grandmother and Taylor is my favorite!! ❤️

Not sure ibwant you back can be included

Too much waffle

👍🏻

👍🏻

good thinking phil

There is no God.. Life sucks.. and then U DIE!!!!! 😇 vs😈

This is an amazing song! Night 4 in Paris is a great night to watch as well. That is night 4 of the Eras tour. ttpd set is amazing. I watch every single live stream of the tour. So good❤

Love Taylor’s lyrics and her ability to connect with me and others through them. This performance is wonderful. Please review more TS. All the vids you’ve done on her are well worth watching.

A very good review, Taylor is quite the troubadour.

Loved your video!

BEAUTIFUL reaction 💜

I have never understood why people stand up and wave their atheist flag. Tomorrow, you can tell tell us all about your latest bowel motion. 😁Just kidding, peace out.✌😁

If the world is intelligently designed, then it can be argued the world is malevolently designed as well as evidenced by the plague, child cancer, cancer, mosquitoes, earthquakes, etc., etc., etc. Here's a somewhat relevant video. 75 - Evil Teachings of Jesus ua-cam.com/video/EF7EWtQ8bT4/v-deo.html

Be quiet, the Devs will notice

If intelligent design was true we'd have to rethink what the word intelligent means because i see nothing intelligent about anything i see, more haphazard emergent unnecessary complexity.

I just think u just shatt ur down undies... lol.

If intelligent design were true, we would expect to see distinctive evidence of it. What we see instead is the kind of emergent complexity that we would expect from thermodynamics. What we don't see are departures from the expected, such as organized violations of thermodynamic processes. But whether we could necessarily recognize evidence of design is a separate consideration. If EVERYTHING were designed, we'd have no undesigned thing to compare against. In other words, we'd have no distinctive evidence that we could point to. Therefore, in such a case WE WOULD NOT BE JUSTIFIED in inferring that everything was designed. But in fact we seem to be very good at distinguishing evidence of human design from natural processes. And we're also very good at distinguishing structures built by agents from structures which arise from basic chemistry or geology or physics. For example, the uniformity and symmetry of a honeycomb and the uniformity and symmetry of a snowflake appear superficially similar, but closer study reveals artifacts of construction by some agent (bees, but we never have to actually see a bee to make this determination) in the honeycomb, but only simple principles of chemistry and physics in the snowflake. Our ability to reliably make such distinctions and later to confirm them should give us some justifiable confidence in being able to detect other evidence of design in our environment which comes from no identified agent or process. Historically, these have been matters of intense scientific interest. And, while they have all been given a completely natural explanation when investigated, there are probably more to be found which are not yet explained. Nevertheless it would be a fallacious Argument from Ignorance to infer from "we don't know" to "therefore it must have been an intelligent agent."

if it where designed intelligently , i wouldn't have to be pissed off for my entire life , that the other members of my own species ... are as dumb as a rock and NOBODY SEEMS TO CARE , not even about the >>> children <<< OF my own species ...

❤️

I enjoyed this a lot, thanks. Subbed

ID is not in any way true, and it would change very little if it were. Proving ID would require introducing the entire population of the world to this designer whereupon we could all ask, "why'd you screw things up so bad". Evolution would still be the same. The world would just keep spinning as though nothing happened.

If intelligent design were, in fact, true, then why do you need eyeglasses? :)

Why ponder something as boring as that? Let's talk genies instead. But as an observation: Designers rely on plans, their work comes from plans, plans can be replicated and used by others to re-create so, if intelligent design was proved it would prove gods don't exist as their work is not unique just part of a replication process.

Even if could prove true and was a 'god' the next dilemma is which god, as none can be bothered to show themselves it becomes an impossible task.

Well simple answer. It isn't so we need not concern ourselves about it.

If intelligent design is true, we are just robots, and there's no need for a heaven or hell. Something created cannot be the creator's friend it cannot understand its creator's thoughts and feelings

If ID were true it proves there is no god because anyone could design humans and other animals so much better

It's not.

If intelligent design turned out to be true, you'd still need to demonstrate a God did it.

If intelligent design was proven to be true, to a degree that no one could dispute it, then that would make intelligent design true. It’s not complicated. It would not prove there was a single entity (God) that designed it, it would just prove that something, or someone, designed it. Religious people would still claim it was God, athiests would accept intelligent design was true, but that they did not know who or what did it. The worrying thing would be that if Evolution was proven to be true, and there was no Creator, religious people would STILL believe in God. Religion only needs them to have FAITH in God. They do not care about no evidence, or even evidence against it, they will believe no matter what.

I have researched this topic my whole life and you have brought me four or five new ways to think about the question in the first three minutes. Nice!

You lost me at “ what if”. What if you are a complete lunatic?

It isn't .

God is everything, the universe is everything. There is only one God because there is only one Universe. They are two words for the same exact thing, the debate is whether or not that is a conscious entity or if it is lifeless chaos. Intelligent design DOES exist. Whether or not it was evolved through chaos, the chaos still "designed" these advanced biomechanics. The human neocortex is a bunch of cells working together to create order. The human civilization is a bunch of humans working together to create order. The entire universe is a bunch of particals working together to create order. Is it not possible that if we are able to develop a "free will and consciousness" from the amalgamation of cells, is the universe able to develop its own form of "consciousness" from the amalgamation of thinking lifeforms all with their own conscious brains?

please show me an example of a single other animal in nature that is able to starve itself (not for the betterment of its colony but on its own accord) you cant because animals dont have free will, only humans do. Our free will disproves darwinism outright.