![Borg Soundlab](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 58
- 238 050
Borg Soundlab
Приєднався 29 жов 2013
Joe Candido @ Borg Soundlab
Check Playlists for the best online resources.
Musicians, Composers, and Audio Technology in four different languages:
Eng, Ita, Spa & Por
Check Playlists for the best online resources.
Musicians, Composers, and Audio Technology in four different languages:
Eng, Ita, Spa & Por
Відео
Mixer Analogici
Переглядів 1927 років тому
Livio Argentini Master in Ingegneria del Suono Tor Vergata University Rome
I Microfoni
Переглядів 697 років тому
Funky Junk Master in Ingegneria del Suono Universita' Tor Vergata Rome
Feiyu Summon action camera first images
Переглядів 6377 років тому
Feiyu Summon action camera first images
Recording Afro Jazz @ Borg Soundlab - Helsinki
Переглядів 2688 років тому
Recording Afro Jazz @ Borg Soundlab - Helsinki
Nebula Audio and Volterra kernel based sampling - Giancarlo del Sordo
Переглядів 1,4 тис.8 років тому
Giancarlo del Sordo for AES-UK channel Nebula is the only plugin able to reproduce properly hardware units... Hope one day to have a computer able to handle only Nebula plugs.
Musical Composition - Bach's Method
Переглядів 24 тис.8 років тому
Musical Composition - Bach's Method
Curtis Roads Part 2 Getting Granular
Переглядів 10 тис.9 років тому
Curtis Roads Part 2 Getting Granular
John Chowning Origins of FM Synthesis
Переглядів 37010 років тому
John Chowning Origins of FM Synthesis
Karlheinz Stockhausen - Mikrophonie 1
Переглядів 22310 років тому
Karlheinz Stockhausen - Mikrophonie 1
Salvatore Sciarrino - l'invenzione di un mondo sonoro
Переглядів 9110 років тому
Salvatore Sciarrino - l'invenzione di un mondo sonoro
Mastering with FabFilter Pro plugins Eq and Compression
Переглядів 92810 років тому
Mastering with FabFilter Pro plugins Eq and Compression
Mastering with FabFilter Pro Plugins Eq
Переглядів 26010 років тому
Mastering with FabFilter Pro Plugins Eq
Electronics Capacitors 1965 US Air Force Training Film
Переглядів 24910 років тому
Electronics Capacitors 1965 US Air Force Training Film
Electronics Transformers 1965 Air Force Training Film
Переглядів 42710 років тому
Electronics Transformers 1965 Air Force Training Film
What a load of gobbledygook. “It bugs me when people try to analyze jazz as an intellectual theorem. It’s not. It’s feeling.” - Bill Evans. Substitute 'jazz' for 'music'. It's a feeling.
Anyone coming here please do not take this video as an example of the greatness of Bach. This is probably the worst video on YT on Bach. You are better off picking any other video at random than this claptrap. I see one right now Vision Video, the life of JS Bach. You will learn more and probably be inspired to buy recordings of Bach or start playing an instrument. This video is empty intellectual nonsense with bad musicians playing the quartet, out of tune with terrible bowing.
This is such bullshit. She thinks she is talking about the music but she manages to say very close to nothing meaningful about it. The philosophical sidetracks are complete nonsense. She seems to think she is giving helpful insights, but literally just looking at the score for 30 seconds tells me more about it than this whole video. I don't want to be cruel, but I think she is seriously confused.
This is associated with a crackpot political group Larouche PAC, dedicated to the teachings of Lyndon Larouche
As as 40 year professor of music and classical pianist I can firmly state that this is such a load of pretentious nonsense that I must run to the.. .
I know right? I have been playing Bach on the viola and piano for 50 years and this seems like nonsense from a non-musician. Bach has nothing to do with Kepler and Cuza. This is a misguided PhD thesis that might fool non musicians but if presented in a music school she would fail her dissertation defense. There are a few guys on YT that do a far superior analysis of Bach's music and make perfect sense and have the respect for Bach without that added layer of nonsense.
Yes, yes, that's all well and good....but can she actually play Stairway to Heaven ?
Excruciatingly bad audio examples.
What is the name of the series?
it's a tonal inversion...but there's also an augmented version in the 2nd violin
All gobbledygook. Can't stand people who waffle and don't come to the point. Get ON with it! I doubt that Bach would have had any idea what she was talking about either with her references to de Kusa and Keplar and "the mind". Bach was a working musician and he had no time for "dry mathematical stuff" (CPE Bach). He had a job to do and he got on with it, for which we can only be eternally grateful. And what was the point of the three sacks of potatoes sitting next to her? Some kind of silent human counterpoint?
This is hands down the greatest video I have ever watched. This is the fourth time I have watched it with rapt attention, which, by the way, is the equally great example this video presents us with. The way this brilliant speaker is LISTENED to is the best example of human behavior. I wish this video would be shown to all young students in school so they can see humanity at its best. Bach is the genius that makes this possible. The level of philosophy that this presentation elucidates is human thought at its loftiest accomplishment. Thank you! You have raised me to a level of my possible nature that I had not done on my own. A true giving experience of the highest possible ethical and intelligent interaction. Mind!
I believe that Mozart would literally copy Bachs works in order to study them, something we sometimes do today in order to scrutinize what exactly is happening in the music. I love how we are not much different today. The idea of setting organ fugees to strings id a great idea since it is often even a challenge to hear all the parts on a piano. Strings, with more easily discernible voicings, really allow you to hear/experience all the nuance that i think would be harder on an organ, which would just hit you in the face lol. And for the salon studio, would be practically less violent lol. Very interesting breakdown here, would like to see more.
This is ridiculous! AKA claptrap.
what the actual feck?
Dave is the man,
The written statement in the beginning couldn't be more arrogant. There's multiple ways to appreciate and relate to music, many of them happening simultaneously. Eurocentric fuckery in a nutshell.
I've never heard anybody allege that prince hits women
probably haven't looked or listened hard enough. it's important not to idolize people. They are humans at the end of the day.
@@gengraded I still think Prince was batshit crazy in a number of other ways. Just has never heard of him being physically abusive except in the movie Purple Rain (which he didn't write). But I went digging and I guess Sinead O' Connor said they had a serious pillow fight that escalated into him chasing her around his driveway.
The overall explanation of Bach's method was ok I guess... but a 'man' would have done a much better job.... obviously.... I think that this dingy broad needs to grab her flute and hurry back to band camp....
yeah rip and shit
Steve Albini was incredibly genuine in an industry that often celebrates phonies and mediocrity. So sad he's no longer with us but I'm grateful for all the wonderful music & wisdom he gave us. RIP
Very interesting
What is she talking about??
Nobody cares about Hollywood. Nobody cares about major labels. Nobody cares about mainstream radio crap. Steve was the real deal and knew the score. Hollywood is over. Thank the Lord.
Loads of people care about that shit. And yeah Steve is the man!
Most people care about mainstream music/film (by definition)
@@JB-hy1clTotally. Just like most people are average by definition.
Great assessment of How It Was vs. How It Is. Excruciating to listen to, because he's reading a prepared text word-for-word -- I finally had to skip ahead a few minutes -- but he's right, in that musicians are better off today than under the Label Regime. They still don't make much money, but for different reasons, and all the BS in the middle is pretty much gone. Maybe that's good!
It actually sounds more natural if you listen at 1.5X speed.
''lol, this s*cks''
RIP.
most labels = scam
legend rip
This is a very nice lecture, but I’m not a fan of how Bach’s genius here is presented as omnipotent or unachievable. He learned composition through the study of basso continuo/partimento with his brother. He then took this knowledge and later expanded upon it.
"We're going to be looking at Ba...HCQUE"
Any idea who that presenter is?
Grandiloquence
Bach's music is very simply explained: it's the holy divine geometry in music.
the amount of nonsense from the lady is outstanding!! YES, mathematics is everywhere, but that does not mean KEPLER has ANYTHING to do with music harmony, music experience, etc, etc. It is OUTRAGEOUS to have someone distorting history so shamelessly. BACH did not START anything. Music is a continuum. Counterpoint was not invented by JSBACH. Thinking music in terms of independent voices was not invented by JSBACH either. It was a process. There is no BACH if there is no Machaut. There is no Machaut if there are not early medieval composers. BACH did not invent the FUGUE technique. It is mediocre and IGNORANT to think that Bach is the beginning of anything.
Bach was the beginning of Bach. And Kepler did, in fact, study the harmonics of the planets, documented it well.
I know right? This sounded to me like someone had to write a PhD thesis and came up with this convoluted theory that makes no sense. Plus, hire a quartet that can play in tune.
I saw the far right wing organization "Larouche PAC" on the screen in the background and immediately stopped. I already know a minute in that they are going to make sweeping universal claims about art and how "today's society is not a sophisticated as yesterday's." or liken common people or pop music to something that is dumbing down the masses. I'm done with this elitist bullshit in classical music. This is Classical music's struggle to stay relevant, Classical musicians and educators need to stop aligning ourselves with these charlatans that know nothing about the history of this music, and live in a world where we realize that art and culture are varied and that there is no objective truth in pleasing patterns that differ from culture to culture.
I thought that guy looked familiar. Larouche doesn't deserve to be in the same room as the music of Bach.
why does this string quartet sound horribly out of tune?
What is this a recording of? I wish there was more information about who these people are and when this was recorded.
Larouche PAC by Lyndon LaRouche.
Well.... actually a pretty good presentation....
Didn’t LaRouch run for president a bunch of times?
Amazing instrument and sound. I wish I could hear the cello version, and also a whole ensemble.
this is very disappointing and frankly incoherent, don’t bother listening. the speaker doesn’t seem to understand music history at all; Bach’s methods were similar to his contemporaries and had nothing to do with “Kuza” (whoever that is) or Kepler. Also, a lot of music then WAS composed starting with a melody above a figured bass. And her fugue “analysis” is ponderous and unenlightening. i’m (seriously!) a big fan of pretentious overly intellectual analysis of fugues but this explanation goes nowhere
I have been playing Bach for 50 years, this talk was incoherent like you said.
3:00 complete and utter nonsense. Music hjad nothing to do with it. Especially western Music. The "discoveries" were the result of the translation movement directly preceding from Arabic.
Solid State electronics are very vulnerable to radiation. Vacuum tabes are not. That gives them a use.
What she says around 20:40 is simply false. She says the theme is compressed to just for notes, we alledgedly hear just the four notes of the head of the theme and our mind adds the rest of the theme to the whole of it. But actually the theme is always complete, it's just the entrances of the theme following each other in shorter distances, what is called "Engführung" or a stretto. Our mind doesn't have to add the "missing" notes of the theme, they are actually being played. My problem with the whole lecture is that she is presenting an analysis of this fugue that has already been analyzed multiple times for decades as if she was presenting some revolutionary thoughts, but she's not.
I absolutely hate the recording of Bach's fugue with this aweful, utterly unmusical string quartet. It's a lesson about how to butcher music.
To me it sounds like a midi file played by string-samples, slightly out of tune
It's a midi file. It's just neutral straight notes. You can do a lot worse than that....
Not a midi file, it is real musicians playing very badly. I can hear a few times the violins correct the out of tune note quickly sliding the finger. I also hear very uneven bowing from all the musicians, I can't see any of them yet being accepted to a music school. She might have loaded samples from their so called performance into a computer so she could play each of the 4 voices at different times. I could pick the last stand string player from any of the orchestras I was in and it would be 100% better than who she hired.
My mind literally exploded
Sounds out of tune
Yes, the tuning does sound ‘off’; especially the the violins.
inspiring
Thank you Andy, excellent work, great graphics, especially the recap.Thanks for the thorough *harmonic and rhythmic analysis. December 12th 2023
This analysis of music of Bach is completely removed from the integrative approaches he had to music, despite the complexity of all of the means of his compositional devices. That is how music of Bach had been routinely distorted from its primary purpose that Bach himself outlined very clearly - to serve as the vessel for expression of emotional feelings. Many Bach scholars forget about this because since childhood everyone had been required to withhold emotions in his music for rather irrelevant reason - to replicate his time’s dominant harpsichord and clavichord. And biological facts abut his using Pianofort had been hidden from most textbooks, fooling generations of musicians into mechanical approach to the music that is emotionally complex and satisfying as well as intellectually