Відео

Mop schuldet mir noch 5 Euro

16:44 it makes sense since no one gonna actually talk in it...but with the modularity of such language it will be easy to program a human speech :)

wait, stacks aren't turing complete?!

as someone who recently started learning uiua i very much enjoyed this video

You’ll never use the phonemes /ʘ/ or /l/ because U+00-U+1F aren't printable

gogigi

avian bird language

How do you deal with accessing function parameters beyond the first 26?

I'm not panicking, I'm exited

7:28 just like mario 64...

I started dying of laughter in a bus during the Uiua part. Congratulations!

Thats pretty cool

Never would I have expected to see a CCC submission here. This was always just the Picknick-Song channel for me.

You can vote now! Vote Here: www.nguh.org/ccc/vote Vote announcement: ua-cam.com/video/xw7P26p627k/v-deo.html Playlist of all entries: ua-cam.com/play/PLZI8zCShyGT9f8NoRznDAnIcPkKYXucvt.html

I love this immensely.

It's Jeffrey Henning's Fith, version 2.0.

i will panic

I completely lost it when I saw the import statement.

very good

This is horribly nonsensical, i love it

Im at 11:50 right now, what if the modifer function has over 26 variables using a chain of implies-B How do you apply exists/forall for variable beyond that? Or are you limited to just exist-a and exist-b? Also at 13:08, shouldn't we have (x≠y => not (x loves y)) ^ (x loves x) Which gives (x=y v not (x loves y)) ^ (x loves x). Am i missing something here. Also how does =AB work, does it add a new element on the stack? Or does it modify the top element and adds an ^ clause?

Is it just me or this sounds like the language from Hollow Knight?

i started dive into stack based tacit languages with uiua a few months ago. this is a brilliant linguistic take on it (:

1:10 undertale dialogue

THIS IS ABSOLUTELY INSANE AND I LOVE IT

ɢɔ̰ɡɨɡɨ ! As a French speaker the fact it kinda sounds like Chinese spoken by a drunk Frenchman kinda terrifies me.

I've never heard of UIUA before, but this video does make me fear it. I applaud your efforts. Have you considered putting together a text to speech program of some sort, which could produce the spoken version of these texts? It would need to be able to combine a consonant and vowel sound, presumably from the IPA reference samples or from home-recorded ones. The only thing that could make this more cursed is having the spoken text be fluent. Alternately, add additional stacks referenceable by tone.

Thanks, I hate it <3

It looks like FORTH

Impressive, *_very_* impressive!

I also had a similar idea while messing around with the Uiua programming language but never tried because I'm not good enough at linguistics. Cool language

this is completely fucking unpronouncable what

Man sounds like he’s in so much pain reading the translation 😭😭😭

1:07 😘

It sounds like chinese quagmire throwing up.

"gogigi" will forever haunt my dreams.

Weirdly enough, this isn't the first time I've encountered the premise of stack-based grammar. I don't remember where I saw it first, though, and I'm also pretty sure it was just a thought experiment and not a full-fledged language.

You made a language inspired by APL and yet didn't include ⍝?

12:37 And then you proceed to use a symbol showing the wrong diagonal. Excellent

"sometimes it is necessary to import a library into the context" imagine you're talking to your bro and he casually imports numpy into the conversation 😭

I expected there to be an escape character but I guess you can always just stop talking and walk away.

10/10 absolutely horrifying

26:32

Gogigi!

in my dialect invoke would always invoke the topmost element to the second topmost. [alice, bob, love] x invoke becomes [alice, bob loves], where the top of the stack is a function "bob loves" which takes the love object as argument. to get the meaning "bob loves alice" invoke must be applied twice. so: push alice, push bob, push love, invoke, invoke. verbs that can take indirect object would need three invokes: push book, push alice, push bob, push give, invoke, invoke, invoke.

8:10 ooo, generics!

The fact this is easy for me to understand and it is turing complete is weirdly funny

"No pronouns" Musk liked this hahaha

I have made a reference document for the glyphs which are defined for now: github.com/Tychology/AHL/blob/main/glyph_reference.md

I suggest using the big yus for importing external (“alien”) libraries, as opposed to standard ones. :3