Відео

I just stumbled upon your video. There is another UA-cam channel on Quantum Physics that I watch every now and then. It is called - Looking Glass Universe from a Cambridge graduate.

Mam may I get ur linkedin ?

The best exposition of the MWI and the mathematical underpinnings of the Heisenberg Picture that exists anywhere online or in any text. Well done! If I can speak for some others who have engineering degrees (so basic physics and very little quantum mechanics) they want to know more about exactly how you began. The qubit is a superposition of a 0 and 1. Yes. And the formalism is getting that across. But HOW exactly does it get it across? The very first slide might need more unpacking for some it seems. But then again, you do say this is for those with an introduction to quantum mechanics under their belt. But even with it, they only get the Schrödinger picture and so never even really cover qubits unless they “cover” quantum computation. Few do.

Thanks! I was having a hard time with the prev video. Having better audio quality made a huge difference.

this is very interesting

u r great... great contribution keep doing it, i had really enjoyed it this is very helpful

i want more video plz

great keep it up

Πολύ Ωραία !

many world goes like this, it is necessary to have the born rule to account for measurment outcomes, because the dependence on one experiment on the next, gives you information about what will happen next, and so if you just remove it and assume shrødinger evolution is all that is going on, then you actually lose predictive power in many cases, so they remove the measurment postulates, and then try to rederrive it within many worlds, which is just useless and gets you back to something equivalent to normal quantum mechanics with measurement postulates, that is supplemented by silly pictures that dont add anything.

you dont know from theory that there are superpositions, you know from experiment that superposition quantum states are different from no superposition states, and that difference can easily be accounted for by hidden variables with no reference to real superpositions of states of hidden variables, that argument is just incorrect, even incoherent.

nope, the main reason people dont like it, is because it is just an ad hock way to extend the theory and to add nothing of value. a quantum state you can prepare is an experimental setup in which you dont have everything controlled, you dont know whether there are more degrees of freedom than appears in the quantum state you use to describe it, and you end up with predictions with uncertainties in it. it is literally like giving up on explaining why a particular dice throw ended up as a 6, by stating that the distribution over all outcomes always is realized all at once in parallel. it is silly. quantum mechanics is an incomplete theory, there is no arguement left standing based on experiments that has been done that can refute hidden degrees of freedom being responsible for the uncertainties in experiments, so why would anyone buy into the idea that there are none, only every outcome happening in parallel without any actual mechanism for that happening. that is why people dont like it, it has nothing to do with it being strange, the alternatives are just better.

Watch the Enhanced Audio version of this discussion, available now here: ua-cam.com/video/kdd-tAvFdOI/v-deo.html

Sam mentioned a paper by David Wallace in which he explains magnetism using Everettian mechanics. Do you happen to have the reference?

it would be nice as an ending to ask the guests about further readings or recommendations for someone who wishes to enter into the field, or to ask them what they like/dislike about their fields. great job nonetheless it was very interesting!

Not Professionally presented Dr. Nick Ormrod's Handwriting is "Illegible". Please re-do this episode telling Dr Nick Ormrod to Write Clearly in a Legible Handwriting. It will be appreciated.

An experimenter wouldn't say I measured in 0/1 and +/- basis at the same time. She would say I measured in the given basis, say H/V, and my statistics is LU equivalent to the 45° polarised photons statistics. The LU invariance of statistics does not mean you measure in the "infinite number of bases"

I love these videos! You are both so smart

Who else is here from baking the bakery??

I love this❤

I enjoyed this video. But please install a wide screen at eye level so that you can work comfortably with good posture. Otherwise, in a few years you'll be slouching all the time. Slouching restricts breathing and reduces oxygen intake, which affects mood and cognitive ability. Been there, done that.

So around 20:00, people in Newton's time, and even before? and after were trying to solve the mystery with that removing the sun would instantly make Earth stop rotating around the sun. I wonder, how did they know this? Are there any kind of experiments that can show it?

HI! Thanks for doing this! At 4:55 Dr Vidal mentions Minute Physics, and the auto caption wrote it as minor physics. Which made it a bit harder to find the link in the description. So putting it here for others to find quickly: ua-cam.com/users/minutephysics

Nice poem amd performance, Maria! 👍👏

More day in the life please

women in science lol

Your journey as a physicist at Oxford, balancing quantum research with education at IBM Quantum, sounds incredibly inspiring! It's fascinating to get a glimpse into what your day looks like. Can't wait to see the insights and experiences you share-definitely a peek into the future of quantum computing!

Why don't you start teaching basics of Quantum computing, it would be amazing if you do so ,at first you can tell the viewers to learn the Mathematics whatever will be required for starting basics of QC (like linear algebra and complex numbers as a prerequisite) and python and then your role come into the picture ☺️☺️

We need more videos about quantum

Energy travels at the speed of light (or less). When at the speed of light, it’s always represented by transverse waves. (EM and GR, etc). QM entanglement doesn’t transmit energy. But nature uses it to send information (privately to us), at speeds >> c. This may be because QM uses longitudinal oscillations in some sub - quantum substrate.

0:57, the middle guy, second row, right below the intersection of the heart shape curve of the photo. His face looks half greyish, if I am wrong, I meant no offence to the guy, sorry :( Btw, hi from Singapore, studying CS here in Uni, currently doing my bachelors, searched up day in the life of physics student cause it always intrigues me to see how you guys work. Came across your channel, great content, keep it up :)

Balliol looks like Hogwarts omg.......

LMAO Academia is a complete joke nowadays.

I am wondering how much it costs per year to study for a PhD at Oxford

Can you please share what you're writing on? I noticed it while you were reviewing the arXiv papers.

Best ❤

Important Information

Yay I love seeing other women in physics :)

Ohh this is amazing

Quantum means "magic", and has nothing common with science.

Hello May I get suggested some book on quantum entanglement so that it explains mathematically everything? 37:19

It's David isn't it? (Photoshop) 😂

OMG, I loved it, thank you so much for sharing this, Oxford is indeed beautiful 😍

very Nice

Wow Very Nice

“Considering the non-local correlations observed in quantum entanglement, could there be a deeper underlying principle of the universe that we’re yet to understand, which allows for such phenomena without violating the speed of light constraint?”

bro this is insane

This is kinda dum how am i not in this group and she is

u r doing so awesome work! enjoy ur work and life

hey im a junior in high school rn and i gotta say your vlogs are def inspiring. im actually gonna start a research internship at a uni near me with smth related to quantum gates and whatnot using qiskit!