Відео

i am a ex jw hi 👋🏻 and i love jesus christ so very much

Glad I found this channel. Great video. My best friend is conservative and I’m liberal. We get along great though.

My message to the Norwegian government and people: Norwegians... you are good, cultured and sensible people We ask you to deport the person whose name is called: Silwan Mumika Sweden expelled him because he caused doctrinal problems and burned other peoples' holy books! This matter caused the cooling of relations between Sweden and us! Just one please Do not grant this criminal residency in your lands He doesn't deserve it

Thanks so much for your endless support, www.sarahsenator.org

Hello Lawyer here. Adequate provocation is only a defense to 1st degree. You would still be convicted 2nd degree ( intentional homicide) and the language of 2nd degree includes a provision that states if charged with 1st degree but the state is unable to refute the the 4 mitigating circumstances the then the defendant is convicted of 2nd degree (look at the Rittenhouse Jury Instructions count 4 for an example of this). You are mistaken on the 2nd degree distinction. The listed items the prosecution must prove were not present for 1st degree are (a) Adequate provocation; 940.01(2)(b)(b) Unnecessary defensive force; (c) Prevention of felony. ; and(d) Coercion; necessity. The Second item Unnecessary defensive force is often referred to as imperfect self defense in other states and take the crime from murder to intentional manslaughter or in Wisconsin to intentional 2nd degree homicide. Imperfect self defense is where I believe I am in danger but my belief is not reasonable.

sorry, the first 10 minutes and the conservative side is only spouting bullshit.

I thought you were somethingelseYT

I think you voted for Trump

Context dude!

I like this format. This is my inlet to world news and I learn a little from each podcast.

Ryan make sure to do Tommy’s take as the new mediator. Now Ryan’s recap? I always liked the 3rd point of view/ wrap up.

I can see why Josh felt like he was being accused of being “racist & sexist”… because he was absolutely defending racism by immediately claiming that the story was completely fake, are further being sexist by dismissing this female athlete and calling her a liar. Then he drops the N word 2 minutes later! It doesn’t matter if you’re quoting her, you don’t get a pass to say the N word in that moment.

Happy fun poopy time is my all time favorite quote from Josh

p̶r̶o̶m̶o̶s̶m̶

Very interesting format. My take on the question of ROP being too woke ... I would say that IF Amazon holds to the assertion that ROP is Tolkien authentic in spirit and lore ... then I would include myself in thinking it is too woke ( and hazard the guess that were he alive to review these first three episodes, that he would not like them at all. Admittedly, this is a guess, but one rooted in his letters underscoring his distaste for liberal interpretation of his works, notably in regards to movies or television. I think that while Amazon has the legal right to make changes (in accordance with the agreed upon limits to reference material) ... I think it in poor taste to do it in the manner they did - to obtain the rights after Tolkien could not object. Based on his interviews and personal letters that were released by the Tolkien estate ... I could easily see him take up the rally cry that his loyal fans repeated in protest and drive the point home with ... To paraphrase one of my creations ... "The Shadow that bred them can only mock, it cannot make: not real new things of its own ... it only ruins and twists ..." A complete fabrication of course, but I would put money that I got the outrage and offense taken.

Does the mainstream media have a liberal bias I guess it could be answered in just one conclusive sentence does howdy doody have wooden balls

I'm pretty sure at some point I remember Josh saying he prefers communism...

I can see the point of dismissing expertise all together, but there is also the other side of the coin that some "Experts" have a mentality that because they have gone to school and have degrees in their fields that I shouldn't have the right to question what they say. Isn't questioning the basis for science? Isn't asking questions how we advance?

You're not defending property with a gun. You're bodyguarding the property and guarding your body with the gun. Rittenhouse wasn't provoking anybody. He had the gun out as a warning. His attackers failed to heed the warning. One more thing. It wasn't a protest anymore. It was a riot. I agree that Rittenhouse was foolish to be there. The fact that he put himself in the middle of a riot did not justify the actions of his attackers. So were the rioters. Something else. Rittenhouse was legally privileged to carry that gun. You don't know the law.

Jarred was upset that police shot an unarmed black man. The RIOTERS were the vigilantes. THEY took the law into their own hands.

CRT is a propaganda tool for a nationwide movement blaming their troubles on an entire race. Decades ago it was called sensitivity training. Decades before that it was called nazi propaganda. Is it a big deal?

There is no “gender pay gap”

Ryan, can you explain how the pay gap increased when controlling for Education? Is it possible that Men are more likely to work while going to school so that would account for the increase?

Good Episode. What do you guys think about the following? 1. What is the main goal of the majority of Media Outlets? I think it is to make money. To that point would it make sense for them to be biased which in turn creates traffic for them which makes them more money.

Australian comedian Jim Jeffries (Liberal Jokes*) on Gun Control: ua-cam.com/video/0rR9IaXH1M0/v-deo.html :)!