Відео

@@RoxanneLatronica it sure is ❤️ 🌒 🙌

@@rockliquor1329 love you to the moon and back equally too!! Lol

@@RoxanneLatronica thank you ❤️🌘

Always your very welcome thank you too 💖

🌖MOON🌒 🙌 👆

@rockliquor1329 π (moon) PIE! = 3:14 π

@@jesusquintero6334 as I’m sure you know, metal content is a small part of it, brecciation, clastic distribution, spherules, melt glass and other evidence of impact shock are also important, at least with lunars. This one is on the high side for metal when it comes to lunar. Have you got a video of it?

@@Watchingtowatch4036 Hello David, its been a while, hope all is well with you👍 I don’t know if you remember but you’ve seen this one before, I believe you were one of the first to address it in its first posting. I think your assessment was almost identical then as it is now, which makes sense. Of course this was way before the notion of lunar origin had been suggested, I can’t remember if I had even got to the level of an achondrite yet? I believe so, I believe I was saying it looked a lot like a ureilite to me.. seems like a lifetime ago lol. The main reasons you gave were -it looked like granites, gabbros, diorites, and a variety of other Igneous mafic rock types, and indeed it did upon looking at them. I think I responded with it looks like these chondrites as well, which it did. Yourself and others said meteorites don’t have such variety of rock types or lithologies to them, true the vast majority don’t. Meteorites don’t contain quartz. Also very true, and the metal flecks, aggregates and micro veins I was using as a key factor were probably just magnetites quite common in these rock types. So I set out to confirm these likely conclusions, the best way to confirm quartz was with MOHS hardness test, so I found a piece of hardened glass that could not scratch the quartz crystal I had which is a 7 and could scratch or be scratched by stainless steel knife or nail. When I put to the pieces I had polished the quartz point easily scratched every lithology, the hardened glass scratched every lithology and the steel scratched almost every lithology with the exception of some of the greenish silicates, which were probably olivine, but what everyone was saying was quartz was scratching from stainless steel which is a 6 and with much effort nothing could scratch the quartz point. This showed it contained no quartz, it also dashed the ureilite hypothesis because ureilite are notoriously hard as you had mentioned. Next I addressed the metal, the best way to distinguish between metallic iron and magnetite was also a hardness test, using a stainless steel knife if cut into the metal leaving raised edges and a deep furrow indicating ductility, to be sure I took a piece of neodymium the size of a grain of rice on a thread and saw the metal did pull towards the metal, to be doubly sure I took my multimeter set to ohms and with the bigger aggregates and grains determined electrical conductivity with next to no resistance confirming that it is indeed not magnetite, using full neodymium magnets on the recovered powder did not yield black sand further reinforcing the metallic iron theory. There were many more tests and learning processes to get to where we are now . A conversation for the next time. I’d like to hear the reasons you may have for the conclusions you’ve suggested? Until then David, cheers 🍻 💥☄️🌖

@@wesleymccravy901 what makes you think that? Nickel is always found alloyed with iron

awe thanks sweetie <3

@rockliquor1329 your welcome love

thanks bro! things must be going good for you, I haven't seen any videos from you for a while :) hit me up on facebook: "Jim Hemenway" or email me at july11jimmy@gmail.com =D rock on dude!

This is the one! I thought ureilte for a long time until I submitted pictures into Google lens! My jaw hit the floor! It came back with 75% lunars! I hadn't even considered the possibility! I knew nothing about lunars, but all the little things that didn't quite fit with ureilites suddenly fit! Soon we will know! Impactite for sure! 100% sure of that just from the polymict nature, multiple lithologies and the melt domains. Confidence is high but i still haven't quit my job yet! 😆 made it to the point where NEMS will accept a sample, and thats a pretty good thing! Feels like a dream 🙂 . 🚁 🏦 🌒.. . 🕳

Too high of metallic iron for Martians except for Martian basalt as was recently pointed out to me.. and actually the density is an exact match for Martian basalt! I ain't saying shit hahah! From ureilite to lunar to black beauty?! 😆 as if! What's next? Interstellar? ☄

Most martian Meteorites are not magnetic, except for a few such as one type of chassignite and NWA 1950 and a few others. What I'm suggesting, if it is martian, is that it is a sample of the holy grail of meteorites, a sample of the renowned martian magnetic anomaly! Are you familiar with it?

My next move is to message this guy, he's quite brilliant and at the top of his field ua-cam.com/video/-wt4GwzC1Oo/v-deo.html

You need to see the full detailed posting on this one 👍

@@rockliquor1329 no, I guess not..

Lots of minerals grow in patterns similar to Widmanstätten, like pyrite, magnetite, sylvanite, rutile, titanium and many more, but will they conduct electricity? Will they be extremely attracted to a magnet? Will they scratch under a steel blade? Will they show ductility? And most importantly, do they need acid treatment to be visible? Only meteoric nickel iron will acid etch because it's a slight difference in nickel content between kamacite and taenite that makes one just a bit harder which the acid exploits to give the pattern.. again you need to see the detailed posting, which we will get to 👍

LoL sure thing 👍