Відео

probably the light but color is gold

Unfortunately, no longer provided by ICAO. As it is copyrighted material it is not easy to pass along

glad it helped!

This comment is very cringe

based opinion

I did one coat and I am not so good painting so had some paint run as it as too thick. One coat will be OK if done properly

What colour did you use as a ground coat @@antoniolocandro

@@patocallaghan3648 didn’t add any ground coat on this project

I think you can use any brand and no plugin is required as the pen is just replacing the mouse really

Should be possible, I guess you buffer first rivers the points collect into a single layer and dissolve as needed. Would be interested to know if you solved it

Is everything in the same coordinate system?

If I remember correctly select all layers and use spacebar?

Absolutely no pre configuration, you just need to drag n drop into the main canvas. What version of AIXM are you exporting to?

Great that it helped out

Thanks for liking the video, are you referring on extracting the border from a GIS file and then pushing it in the corresponding AIXM geoborder tag?

@@antoniolocandro this one. (Geoborder for Airspace Border Skip to end of metadata Created by Wolfgang SCHEUCHER (Solitec), last modified by WOLFGANG SCHEUCHER on 22 Nov 2018). (Geoborder for airspace border) Could you please open this link by copying paste in google. I want you to please make a video out of it by solving the issue mentioned in the document through the two solutions already written in the document

thanks for the comment

It would be better if you did a script or processing modeling to be able to achieve what you want, getting the Z for the ceiling and floor is not the issue but being able to construct the walls of the 3D volumes

@@antoniolocandro could you clarify a bit what you wrote? I'm totally new to this. Where would I use this processing? In Qgis? Maybe there's better software like some CADs to achieve what I want?

docs.qgis.org/3.22/en/docs/user_manual/processing/index.html; don’t think any other software will give you advantages. The minute the floor is not the ground you will need someway to calculate the walls of the 3D volume. When the floor is the ground you can calculate the ceiling and extrude to the floor.

Good afternoon Antonio! I ve been checking your youtube tutorial from to time for guidance. I have a query, Do you have demo for the reverse workflow? Meaning, Generating AIXM 5.1 file from the layer feature? Coz what ive been currently doing is for each feature type, i generateed aixm:members and combined them in notepad++ which is very archaic and time-consuming. It's been on my list for quite sometime, i believe it needs python coding which i have little knowledge of but for purposes of laying groundworks for such approach. It would be nice for us QGIS users belonging to aeronautical information domain to know the possibility of generating such xml on the feature level. Tks in advance

Glad it helped! I definitely struggled to use it until I understood the principles on it. I haven’t checked the current official documentation but may I should to see if it can be improved

If you use streamdeck they have their own app which you can program the hot keys and macros which are then passed to the device. I would like a physical board but it’s considerably more expensive

I will try this on the next video I eventually upload, can't re upload videos unfortunately without loosing the views

I will take into consideration is just that the zoom part is more editing time but you are right! I do have a 24 inch monitor so I maybe am missing the fact other people have smaller ones

Thanks! Really there are a lot of things that we can start doing little by little and over time improve our skills. Automation specially the boring tasks should be one of the first steps

Little by little improving skills and making things more automated is the goal, I’m my own Project Manager so that helps for sure

Glad it was useful

What version of QGIS are you using and which OS?

Check your expression "is selected ()" Don't forget for ")"

The expression must be in black, not red colored

great that you found this useful!

Most tools in QGIS only work correctly with a projected coordinate system (PCS), I suspect this is the case with the trim/extend tool.

@@antoniolocandro So I've been using this tool a lot for a while and I can't figure out how to chop off the dangles/overshoots. I do a lot of topological editing and the extend feature is really convenient. To trim I just use the vertex selecting tool and highlight the node of the overshoot and just delete it. I'm also working usually in NAD83 UTM 17N or 18N, so as to the projected system, it hasn't made a difference for me. I have found that snapping becomes a real issue if you have your project in one coordinate system and your data is in another or the wrong one (e.g. the project is in 18N but the geopackage for your lines was set to 17N.) Edit: Messing around a bit, I did get the trim tool to work, but I had to have a line that intersected the other without a node at their intersection. I usually run a smooth on my lines (for maps), then v.clean and fix geometries to take care of the majority of the topological errors. In the snapping tool bar I always keep toplogical editing turned on which will create a node when snapping a line to another. However, QGIS will see a dangle at that intersection until you split the line at that intersection. v.clean or fix geometries will usually either create a node at a dangle or split it, so the trim tool can't work on something like that.

No CD on the laptop, but good to know that is an option maybe for others

There are many videos already here on those topics which you can watch, this is just the specific application of reading AIXM 5.1 but will take into consideration

Thanks! I think it would be possible but could you provide me an example to see the final expected result. I think in principle you could draw the polygon and intersect the rings, that would give you a snapshot and if you wanted some more dynamic you could do the same using geometry generator options

@@antoniolocandro thanks for the suggestion, I'll definitely try! My problem is that my study areas are often mountain and border areas. Accessibility is therefore often naturally constrained only in a few directions. I overlap the isodistance rings with the road isochronous areas, but I don't need the whole isodistance ring (... which crosses the mountains), just the "fan" in the direction of the isochronous towards the valley.

@@danielerinaldi3123 if I understand correctly do you want just the blue line like here ibb.co/GHVxKFL

Awesome!

updated the description of the video to include the expression used in the video, good idea!

Agree, well done. The other minor suggestion is to zoom on the expresion box if possible. Is hard to read on small screens.

@@Refreshment01 Zoom in is on the list of things to improve, it just requires extra editing which is more time ;)

You should use more QGIS then! It has improved quite a bit lately. I work also with aeronautical charting. Great that your team provides the actual data instead of just paper or PDF

@@antoniolocandro In GeoPdf

@@antoniolocandro and too WMS WFS I send URL tomorrow

@@josebiscaia670 please do!

@@antoniolocandro WFS

I actually have a few more videos already up you can go check out