Відео

It’s easy to get, use the windows snipped screen word extractor …

love it... can you share what is your right path ?

At some point (if quantum does not arrive first at higher scale ) we need to optimize everything

Appreciate it!

Your note is accurate, brother. That was the biggest mistake of my entire career, but I'm fixing it. It's better late than never.

Glad you enjoyed it!

Thanks for the comment. The video was based on other people's (from reddit ) feelings, I never shared my personal thoughts, i actually ended discussing the good stuff of Rust, so you did not see the video LOL

@@ccorrales Yes, sorry I did not watch all of it. The beginning depressed me to much.

I really appreciate your thoughts here ... I believe there are a lot of benefits to building your own game engine, but I'm not so sure about whether a newbie is starting on that path; it also seems to be the least financially feasible way... but what are your thoughts here?

​@@ccorrales It's less about money and more about whether you have the knowledge to do it at all. It only really takes 1-2 good programmers, depending on what kind of visual and technical requirement your game has. There are 3 components to this: graphical fidelity of the game engine on a technical level, some algorithmic innovation in the game engine and expensive beautiful art assets (which the game engine has to be able to accommodate). The last one is just straight up off limits to indie devs. Some examples: Reflex Arena is a Quake clone and was made by 1 man from scratch, looks ok, but the important part is that it has flawless netcode and mapping tools which you can use collaboratively with other players within a multiplayer match. Teardown was made by one man, looks ok but has unparalleled destruction. Animal Well is a 2D pixel platformer, made by one guy, uses some interesting shaders, otherwise really basic, but it's exactly what the project needed and nothing more. The RTX mod for Quake 2 was made by one guy, makes for a neat little remaster. This is upgrading the technical graphical fidelity of the engine. Shadow Warrior 2 had a custom engine, was made by a team. On a technical level, the game engine was graphically very advanced for its time, but ironically the art assets weren't high enough quality. It also had nice sword cutting boolean operations for dismemberment. This right here is what people expect AAA devs to do, with the addition of pretty art assets, because only they have the resources to do that. The marriage of expensive graphics and innovative systems. Deep Rock Galactic, runs on modified Unreal Engine 4 (or 5?), the programmers were able to implement real-time boolean operations for map geometry ("Constructive Solid Geometry"). It's the kind of engine modification that's just barely simple enough to give the game an innovative gimmick for destruction, that's not too expensive to compute. Here you would think "why not use Chaos? it's built-in! It has to be workable!" Well, turns out it's computationally too expensive for a completely dynamic environment and is used mostly to bake animations for cinematics or specific scripted events. It's a custom solution for a highly specific use-case. AAA game devs should have no problem hiring smart programmers for their project, but ironically this is exactly where the budget cuts or creative conflicts happen, like in your video). Lastly there are devs who don't have the technical knowledge, but still want to develop a videogame. They will use Unity. It is tailored specifically for them, unlike UE, which is tailored for AAA studios. I'm working with 1 other guy on a game and we half-regret choosing UE. I mean it doesn't even have a pre-built system for a basic menu UI. Even linking 1 menu item to another menu is something you have to code yourself. In Unity you just get a tool for this. UE5 has full locomotion with distance matching and motion warping, which is something you don't get in Unity, but if you're indie-dev, you don't have the resources to make use of this anyways!

@@ccorrales I guess I could throw Hydrophobia Prophecy in there as an example of what happens when a small team with not enough resources takes way too big of a bite. It's a 3rd person action game with (at the time) relatively good graphics and revolutionary real-time fluid dynamics which are incorporated into the gameplay as well. Alas, it was too big a project for such a small team and it ended up being just a 4h long experience.

@@1InVader1 , impressive response, thank you... I think this topic is imperative for a video :) ....

Bro, what are you talking about? You have a lot of time to hate on the internet without doing any easy research.

wait until 2025

in hard mode is hard man :)

yupe

love it

@@klemenkovacic9109 si true

Yes, never out the market 🤩, I allocated the main trading capital in a house, I get less return but family is happy 😃… but this is another type of issues that I think is valid to talk about in a different video , when to trade or why to trade?… what do you like the most of all those ideas 💡? Can you share ?

​@@ccorrales just rewatched the video to give you a good answer :) I liked the point about biases influencing your trading. When searching for an edge/system it's important to realize that even though it worked for n trades, it does not mean it will work for the next n. The winning trades could very well be attributed to variance, and you need to be aware of that. Also it's probably a good idea to keep refining a working system, because it will probably stop working at some point if you don't. "Choosing your input carefully" is something I think about often, but also too less. If someone wants to sell you something, there's a high chance that the content is oversimplified or wrong, because the goal is not to teach, but to sell. That's my main filter for content. Also, I'm going to read "Systematic Trading", because it was so influential for you. I'm curious what quant traders on X you find share their knowledge, and what you have learned from them. I follow some, but most give a very incomplete picture about what they do. E.g. they show what levels they are watching, but not why. Or what I struggle the most: What strategies there are, when you want to enter. You obviously want to enter very early, but what are the profitable traders thinking when they enter a trade at a specific point. Once a move is confirmed, the R/R is garbage. At least for me. I found some success when looking at lower time frames, but find it difficult to understand the probability that it will be valid for the higher time frame. "Maximizing returns correlates with minimizing stupidity". I can relate to that sentence so much. Having a trading journal really helps with that.

That is Totally true, but not because is working now will work in the future, The past is not the future, so it's essential to keep researching "alpha" to get better in the models/systems you are trading

Same here. After I started to track my trades I very quickly found that I need to follow my stop loss religiously with my trading strategy. Funny enough, this made me more relaxed because I realized that my setup really is invalidated once it hits my stop loss. It's not arbitrary. I'm still not profitable with my day trades, though.

that's a good question, i have use many of them if not all, switching between them back and forward, i just use OneNote, i choose simplicity over anything else...

So you listen to the WH? 😂

Thanks for your response

I am not going to watch this video, but I hope his ideas are "first impressions" and not baseless thoughts to gain views

Nice comment, thanks for it 👍

See the video … thanks for the comment

I believe is more about interest, anyone can understand anything when don’t putting excuses 😏

C++ isn't complex. It just has alot of crap you don't need. If anything we need a language like C, with maybe a borrow checker, closures, and a few other simple things to shorthand the verboseness of that language. I love C, but I hate C++.

@ Ok maybe I should have been specific and said complicated instead of complex.

@@sacredgeometry I agree.

It has the modernity of a 50 year old language in what sense? If that's true, what older languages are similar? The only other language I know that includes uniqueness is Clean.

Excelente comment

What does this mean??

@@RustIsWinning your profile is what it means

@@emmanuelgoldstein3682 I guess I'm too young to understand this boomer phrase where animals of farmers run away or something

You must be joking

@@osagie6862 He's not. I had the same experience

@@desigamee.2014 awesome 👏 thanks for the tip

No dont do this. Noise cancellation or gating both make the audio almost always unbearably shit. Just wear headphones/ a single earbud whilst recording. And not send the audio to your speakers.

This one could probably solve different issues and guess how rapid the development will be.

Yes I feel like the end comparison was comparing apples and oranges. There’s a time and place for different things and I think any decent engineer is smart enough to evaluate and prioritise different implementations. I might have missed the bigger picture though Still a good article to get you thinking.

@@Gooptergoo4848 totally agree, it’s just a different perspective…

thanks Leo

Noon cap 🤣💀