Відео

If it is a project for a University course then a discussion is very relevant and beneficial for the students to learn about the value of user testing.

Might be true but the level of delight the user and tester experienced has to be worth it somehow 😭💙 I had fun just watching. Lol

@@amabonsu6493 Totally agree, it was really fun to watch!

It reminded me of early Michel Gondry films.

Thank you for your comment! In these exercises, people have the opportunity to explore and experiment with different ways of paper prototyping, similar to how experiments are conducted to learn and improve. This applies to personal projects or any commercial ones. The process of prototyping is an experimental one, where design teams implement ideas into tangible forms to test and iterate on them. It's essential for individuals to engage in these exercises to enhance their skills and understanding of prototyping, whether it's for personal or commercial projects. The goal is to encourage learning and improvement through experimentation, play and exploration.

Many companies have UX Programmers work on large or multiple projects at a time and therefore dedicated UI/UX designers work independently and get the idea approved early on before handing it over to the graphics artist and the programmer. A brainstorming session in a team with pen and paper will take an hour or two and they can get the boss/clients approval early on. Where are they wasting time? Ultimately, the medium does not matter than getting ideas across to the client, testing the interface with a new user and address clarity issues early on. This has been a preferred method for years, obviously they are all not stupid to not just use JS if like you say is faster lol

S Solomon This method might been working in the past but let’s face it - it looks ridiculous, even they are giggling during the process, mistaking screens, and preparation is certainly more time consuming than a prototyped wireframe in software. I mean this puppet show loading bar is just a waste of time. Let’s evolve and make work more efficient, that’s all that I am trying to say.

​@@Flick037 Sorry ,it's not "evolution" if you aren't fixing anything significant. Know that majority of time being used for prototyping is to make decisions on the menu, layout, contents , interactions etc. There is no way around it no matter what process you use. The actual presentation , pen n paper or digital is secondary , pen n paper is just as quick as any wireframe tool , if not quicker. There is no reason to be overcritical of a process that works for them or nitpicking on their mistakes. If it works, it works.

It is much easier for a user to critizise and understand layout when it is just a piece of paper, rather than a screen. Unless the user is a developer.

Greetings from London

Для нас однозначно глупо, однако в их среде это обычный экзамен. Действительно смешно)

Vladimir Kirilyuk nah yo it cool

no, you do

its coz u dont know what UX is