Відео

Thanks for posting... I got exactly the info I needed... 👍

Just got a 640 (3-9) taking it to zero, tomorrow. Thanks for posting.

Hey man mine looks like the before ones what did you do to correct it?

Excellent demo on the variations of density with fog using a thermal optic. To me, a good thermal is a game changer. The only drawback to thermal optics (imo) is the inability to see thru glass, where N.V. gives you that ability. And that's why you have BOTH!

I always enjoy a comparison that is not full of sponsored BS.

As i type this i just dropped my thor 4 384 1.25-5x in the fed ex drop box for the second time. But in your honest opinion would you buy the 640 over the 384 knowing what you know now?

Just found your review...nicely done. Have you purchased any newer models since this review ? If so, what is your opion of the device. What would you say would be a perfect magnification range.

A bit late here (obviously), but both those TIs kinda look like they suck big time. I guess one does have to spend thousands to get anything halfway decent.

Were these before and after an update? because the one I have looks just like the before, so maybe I need to do an update?

For the money, I was shocked to learn you had many problems. Especially after sending the scope back 3times. Wow.

How do you do the pixel correcting

Thank you! Im writing a book and this is helped me with a scene <3

4.5 power 384 will have about the same resolution as a 2x 640 when zoomed in 2x. 4.5 is not good for shooting close because of narrow field of view. If you're hunting yotes go higher mag, pigs lower mag.

There's a reason why nobody buys atn anymore...

Thanks for making that video

THEFOGISCOMING

This helped me a lot, thanks!

such an awesome comparison

Thank you for the comparison. It's nice to see a side by side comparison.

Both look like garbage compared to other options out there. A ton of great scopes for under $4500 today.

ChiCom 1 vs ChiCom 2

The questions I have been asking over a year....you answered it all. Thanks Man, appreciated.

Squatch huntin and cloaked ufo huntin....cant decide on this or the pulsar xm38

i bought a 640 2.5x25, its been repaired or replaced 7 times. you get what you pay for, if you buy these things your gonna get burned

I just got a thor 4 640 1-10. I cant see anything out of it. Its pretty terrible at times. The only thing that even slightly gives visibility is the rainbow setting. It has huge permanent dead pixels, at least 50 percent of it is dead pixels. Its god awful, i dont think it could make out a rabbit at 7 yards

ATN customer service is horrendous. Quality control is also just as bad

Fun stuff. Thanks. One thing I learned from doing my videos is remove reflective stuff off the dash🤣

Thanks for making and answering my questions on best camera for foggy conditions 😊

BTW fuck hunters and animal abusers

Thanks a lot for the information. Very helpful.

Good review. But how did it change from non-clear to clear images please? If that's because you sent it back and got a new one, it'd be horrible.

Man these atn thermals are amazing for the price

I was thinking of getting my hands on the 384 and one of the reviews I read said it ate through batteries. On a fresh set of AA batteries how much time have you been able to get out of it?

Thanks for the video! Looking for a thermal for pest control out to about 35 yards with a pcp air rifle. Do you think a new 384 would cut it?

Which would you recommend for 150 yard coyote shooting. 384 4-18 or 640 1-10

Is there an update to the Thor 4 384 ?

What do you all use to scan the area? Do you use the thor, or a handheld thermal?

I'll add this to anybody thinking of buying a ATN scope. The price on Amazon floats up and down like a bobber. If you look at this daily price chart you can see the price goes up and down. This might help you save a thousand on this type of scope. camelcamelcamel.com/product/B01DXXN228?active=summary&context=partner&ctx_prid=2&ctx_pid=58356563&ctx_cid=95686733&ctx_aid=396148639&ctx_pt=price_amazon&abt=at&abv=foundation&abid=eaf459bbfbb9fb0c3b6bb6b0eb47ec4142bb233904e3e23de66ff5d11dfff900&oelid=12X8V5T9F0R3Z7G095S&ctx_act=product&ctx_src=chart

what temperature was it out when you shot the video? thanks!

Wow the 640 is amazing

Thanks for making this. Did you purchase thr 384 new ? What did you do to improve the resolution ? Thanks

I was a cheap ass and bought the Thor LT 160. Don't waste your money; save up for the Thor 4 640. It's the plain Jane of the Thor Thermals. It's probably good for up to about 200 yards. The digital zoom is shit and doesn't go in increments like the other scopes.

Excellent comparison! Your commentary is spot on!

Thank you Sir... save me alot of money... after watch your video.....

How much?

I have one 384 1.5 the cheapest one but the image is super better than what you showing, that looks bad,i think that the factory problem some of the thermal expensive but it got poor image,someone it's cheap but nice image lol.

What was your distance to the animals? Thanx!

How comfortable are you with the field-of-view of each scope?

Nice to see an honest review/comparison. I've had a 384 for a couple years. Have been wondering how much better then 640 was and if it was anywhere close to a halo lr. Seems like it doesn't come close to a halo, but it's half the price. Do you regret not just spending the money that you spent on the 2 atns on an nvision or trijicon?

Do you think ATN customer service is up to par? I'm looking at the 384 4.5x pretty hard. Thanks