Відео

Loved this presentation Adam! We can see the effort and care you put into making JavaRes and also explaining it so clearly to the rest of us. Thank you!

Hello Prof. I want know is there any limitations of automated theorem prover?

you'll also need to assert that (instance X Object) , (instance Y Object) , (instance Z Object) apologies for the omission

Now you’re responsible for me having a too-early flat white 😊 Nice set up - will need to negotiate some extra counter space at home.

Very interesting approach for introduction to ontology development.

Love this! Thank you Adam

3:04 propositional logic 9:44 description logic 12:44 first-order form 18:56 typed first-order form with arithmetic 24:09 typed higher-order form

You can get Eprover at github.com/eprover/eprover , Vampire at github.com/vprover/vampire and LEO-III at github.com/leoprover/Leo-III . Problems here are taken from www.tptp.org/

I was surprised to hear the claim that no large investment in formalizing knowledge and using theorem-proving had ever been attempted, because Doug Lenat's CYC was such a project for more than 20 years.

I did everyhting as in video but in the end stuck with BUILD FAILED /home/theuser/workspace/sigmakee/build.xml:42: The following error occurred while executing this line: Error reading project file /home/theuser/workspace/TPTP-ANTLR/build.xml: /home/theuser/workspace/TPTP-ANTLR/build.xml

sorry for the lack of audio, I need to redo this old video. Some useful visuals, showing higher order operators in the Sigma browser, begin at 2:30

Re "many Esquimaux terms for 'snow:'" The first European source who reported this, counted as separate terms universally-differentiated distinctions among physical referents in the Inuit languages: "This snow beside me," "The snowfall last year that you just mentioned..." are distinguished exactly as are "This gutting-blade I'm holding" versus "The consignment of gutting blades that you bought a while ago and are talking about." As you hinted: Counted rationally, professional European skiers have quite a lot more names for "actionably distinct kinds of snow" than do traditional Inuit. Source: MAK Halliday, University of Illinois lecture, 1976, on "Fallacies in 'Sapir-Whorf.'"

Thank you for this presentation, it has been very useful while going on my own journey of writing an ATP system based on PyRes

Is it possible to contribute to PyRes?

👍🇦🇷🌎

Thank you for a well rounded overview of the topic: neither oversimplistic nor overcomplicated!

hi, could you make a video on building sigmanlp? I am having some difficulties

p̲r̲o̲m̲o̲s̲m̲

Thank you for the video!

This is not Chad.

Hi Professor Adam, I have a question about the instances, can a ontology contain a lot of instances? And how can we connect those intances within a ontology? For example, we have thress persons, there belong to class "Person", but all of them have two hands, we have also a class "Hand" and 6 hand instances, e.g. hand1, hand2, hand3, hand4, hand5 and hand6, how can specify the connection of those instances within ontology? Person1 has hand1 and hand2 like that. Thanks and best regards. Ryan.

Which is the right order of the activities for the development of ontologies ? A. Specification , Formalisation, Conceptualisation, Implementation B. Specification , Conceptualisation, Formalisation ,Implementation C. Conceptualisation, Specification, Formalisation ,Implementation D. Formalisation ,Specification , Conceptualisation, Implementation

Activities such as ontology merging and ontology alignment is part of which step during the knowledge acquisition phase : A. Extraction B. Evaluation C. Integration D. Configuration Management

I think the term UnitTest is only use in java, not sure about the same name in Python, however we can do test in both.

Wonderful presentation, thank you. I'm studying operator theory for an internship, where I'm currently implementing a routine to check the truth value of a particularly involved equivalence relation. This is the first genuinely helpful video resource I've come across. I can't help but comment at 36:40, as I've never understood partisanship towards certain programming languages. No one is out there claiming Python wins on performance haha, especially against Java. They're different tools for different use cases.

Great video. Could you give an example of inference using this definition?

Awesome video!

Prof Benzmuller is amazing! He is so at ease discussing these complex concepts of and different branches in logic and with Clarity. It is a breeze what this interview. Thank you!

Indeed, this seems like a very sophisticated relation to formalise. Your two-part video on how to formalise this concept of shortage may conceivably be used as a comprehensive training material which covers the fundamental concepts which run across the 7 of the 11 modules in SUMO: Set/Class Theory, Numeric, Temporal, Measure, Processes, Objects and Quantities listed out in your book. facebook.com/Ontology-A-Practical-Guide-285988794762942

Thank you for walking us through the thinking and coding processes of how to formalise a "Relation" in SUMO. It is very helpful. Question 1: How do you distinguish between a scarcity and a shortage of a certain class of object. For example, I am thinking of a natural resource such as water. It is in some sense "free" goods. Is cost/price always necessary in this kind of goods?

Great demonstration, Adam!

I had a problem using the login page with Tomcat that I resolved by using the manager webapp and adding the sigma webapp

Very clear explanation, Adam! Thank you for sharing.

References to things mentioned - E prover - eprover.org leanCoP - www.leancop.de/ Gradient boosted trees - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient_boosting Mizar - mizar.org/ Fermat's last theorem - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat%27s_Last_Theorem Kepler Conjecture , solved by Toth and Hales - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler_conjecture Cezary Kaliszyk - cl-informatik.uibk.ac.at/users/cek/ Stephan Schulz - wwwlehre.dhbw-stuttgart.de/~sschulz/DHBW_Stephan_Schulz/Stephan_Schulz.html arity - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arity De Morgan's Law - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Morgan%27s_laws Tribolet - ??? Office of Naval Research - www.onr.navy.mil/ Dana Scott continuous Lattices - www.cs.ox.ac.uk/files/3229/PRG07.pdf first order logic - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-order_logic set theory - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_theory TPTP - tptp.org Christian Szegedy - scholar.google.com/citations?user=3QeF7mAAAAAJ&hl=en System 1 and 2 - suebehaviouraldesign.com/kahneman-fast-slow-thinking/ Roger Penrose - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Penrose Srinivasa Ramanujan - blog.sciencemuseum.org.uk/instinct-intuition-and-mathematics-the-divine-genius-of-srinivasa-ramanujan/ Max Planck - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Planck John Harrison - www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~jrh13/ Byron Cooke ? DARPA - www.darpa.mil/ Mike Douglas - scgp.stonybrook.edu/people/faculty/bios/michael-r-douglas Bacon System ? Kryštof Hoder - www.linkedin.com/in/krystof/ SInE - SUMO Inference Engine - www.cs.man.ac.uk/~hoderk/sine/

References for this and later parts of the interview - E prover - eprover.org Our ENIGMA 70% improvement: doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2019.34 ATP Proofs of 74% of Mizar (thanks mainly to ENIGMA): github.com/ai4reason/ATP_Proofs/blob/master/README.md leanCoP - www.leancop.de/ Gradient boosted trees - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient_boosting Our “AlphaZero” for leanCop (rlCoP): papers.nips.cc/paper/8098-reinforcement-learning-of-theorem-proving Mizar - mizar.org/ Fermat's last theorem - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat%27s_Last_Theorem Kepler Conjecture, proved by Hales and Ferguson, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kepler_conjecture#Hales'_proof Cezary Kaliszyk - cl-informatik.uibk.ac.at/users/cek/ Stephan Schulz - wwwlehre.dhbw-stuttgart.de/~sschulz/DHBW_Stephan_Schulz/Stephan_Schulz.html arity - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arity De Morgan's Law - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Morgan%27s_laws Andrzej Trybulec - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrzej_Trybulec Office of Naval Research - www.onr.navy.mil/ Dana Scott continuous Lattices - the book formalized in Mizar is www.amazon.com/Compendium-Continuous-Lattices-G-Gierz/dp/3642676804 first order logic - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-order_logic set theory - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_theory TPTP - tptp.org Christian Szegedy - scholar.google.com/citations?user=3QeF7mAAAAAJ&hl=en System 1 and 2 - suebehaviouraldesign.com/kahneman-fast-slow-thinking/ Roger Penrose - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Penrose Srinivasa Ramanujan - blog.sciencemuseum.org.uk/instinct-intuition-and-mathematics-the-divine-genius-of-srinivasa-ramanujan/ Max Planck - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Planck John Harrison - www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~jrh13/ Byron Cooke - www0.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/b.cook/ DARPA - www.darpa.mil/ Mike Douglas - scgp.stonybrook.edu/people/faculty/bios/michael-r-douglas Bacon System - dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1624861.1624976 , link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-12405-5_10 Kryštof Hoder - www.linkedin.com/in/krystof/ SInE - SUMO Inference Engine - www.cs.man.ac.uk/~hoderk/sine/

pardon the error at about 8:00 - 9pm is 21:00 hours on a 24-hour clock

Onward! - Into the Adjacent Possible!

AI Index report mentioned in the interview - aiindex.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2021-AI-Index-Report_Master.pdf

Thank you.

Notes and references are available at www.articulatesoftware.com/UA-cam/SchulzNotes.pdf

Exciting!

Thanks, Adam! Ai should be explainable, but that doesn't mean dumping all of the guts of an AI application on the user. Thoughtful HCI is an important component of AI implementation.

A video that includes discussion of how to use a truth table to prove the validity of a logic transformation is ua-cam.com/video/icmisWuM4GY/v-deo.html&ab_channel=AdamPease

A transcript and study guide for parts 1 and 2 of this short series is at www.adampease.org/OP/paraphrasingLogic.pdf . Part 1 is at ua-cam.com/video/KlWjcuCP9Fo/v-deo.html

A document with much of the content of the video is at www.adampease.org/OP/paraphrasingLogic.pdf

Hello Mr. Pease. I am attempting to email you at adam.pease@infosys.com, but infosys informs me that this email is unavailable. Can I reach you at another address?

Part 1 of this series is ua-cam.com/video/AtYIdR7wXzk/v-deo.html

Thanks Adam. I didn’t realize Ontology could be applied to AB tests as well. If possible, please do more of ontology application videos as they really help folks not closely related to the field understand the use cases.

I have often informally made the 'variable substitution' argument to point out that a lot of what we see as intelligent behavior in a formal system is really just parasitic on the meanings 'in our head', but this is the first time I see it laid out so well in a presentation!

What SUMO files are used besides the current file with the particular axioms from the example?