Kraig Info
Kraig Info
  • 46
  • 145 161
25 Datum with MMB LMB Datum Shift 2024
Is Datum Shift a bonus, how can we use datum shift for datum of FOS as well as surface? How to make the gage to verify the position tolerance if there is datum shift?
Переглядів: 173

Відео

9 Position tolerance and Linear Tolerance
Переглядів 172Місяць тому
There are must be some reasons you are not supposed to use plus/minus or linear tolerance to specify the position, even for angular, radius and chamfer tolerance, plus/minus tolerance is not recommended. This video will show you why. It's time to get rid of the old habits!
#27 Collection plane indicator
Переглядів 113Місяць тому
there are four Auxiliary Feature Indicators Intersection plane indicator Orientation plane indicator Direction Feature Indicator Collection plane indicator In this module, we explain how to use Collection plane indicator to specify the geometrical tolerance on 3D, especially on MBD application.
#31 General Tolerance ISO22081
Переглядів 159Місяць тому
Why we should not use general tolerance standard ISO2768-2? This video will explain the reason and also explains the updates of new ISO GPS standard of ISO22081-2021.
20 Orientation Tolerance of Datum Feature to Tolerance Stackup
Переглядів 1,7 тис.2 роки тому
20 Orientation Tolerance of Datum Feature to Tolerance Stackup Tolerance Stack-up Analysis of GD&T-From Beginners to Stars Total 34 Lectures (including 13 Exercises and Final Exam) Full Training videos at Udemy: www.udemy.com/course/tolerance-stack-up-analysis-of-gdt-from-beginners-to-stars/learn/lecture/25348616#overview
23 How to specify datum
Переглядів 9122 роки тому
23 How to specify datum GD&T ISO GPS Full Learning Bootcamp From Rookies To Stars Total 54 modules(11 hours, including 12 quizzes and answers) Full Training videos at Udemy www.udemy.com/course/gdt-iso-gps-full-learning-bootcamp-from-rookies-to-star/
6 Profile tolerance and linear tolerance
Переглядів 9192 роки тому
6 Profile tolerance and linear tolerance GD&T ISO GPS Full Learning Bootcamp From Rookies To Stars Total 54 modules(11 hours, including 12 quizzes and answers) Full Training videos at Udemy www.udemy.com/course/gdt-iso-gps-full-learning-bootcamp-from-rookies-to-star/
34 Position Tolerance
Переглядів 8272 роки тому
34 Position Tolerance GD&T ISO GPS Full Learning Bootcamp From Rookies To Stars Total 54 modules(11 hours, including 12 quizzes and answers) Full Training videos at Udemy www.udemy.com/course/gdt-iso-gps-full-learning-bootcamp-from-rookies-to-star/
3 Datum and Datum Selection
Переглядів 1,2 тис.2 роки тому
3 Datum and Datum Selection GD&T ISO GPS Full Learning Bootcamp From Rookies To Stars Total 54 modules(11 hours, including 12 quizzes and answers) Full Training videos at Udemy www.udemy.com/course/gdt-iso-gps-full-learning-bootcamp-from-rookies-to-star/
49 Profile tolerance Unequal Profile with U Circle and UZ
Переглядів 10 тис.2 роки тому
49 Profile tolerance Unequal Profile with U Circle and UZ GD&T ISO GPS Full Learning Bootcamp From Rookies To Stars Total 54 modules(11 hours, including 12 quizzes and answers) Full Training videos at Udemy www.udemy.com/course/gdt-iso-gps-full-learning-bootcamp-from-rookies-to-star/
10 Position tolerance with MMC Modifier
Переглядів 1 тис.2 роки тому
10 Position tolerance with MMC Modifier GD&T ISO GPS Full Learning Bootcamp From Rookies To Stars Total 54 modules(11 hours, including 12 quizzes and answers) Full Training videos at Udemy www.udemy.com/course/gdt-iso-gps-full-learning-bootcamp-from-rookies-to-star/
Feature Control Frame, Tolerance Zone and TED
Переглядів 5832 роки тому
Feature Control Frame, Tolerance Zone and TED per ASME and ISO GPS GD&T ISO GPS Full Learning Bootcamp From Rookies To Stars Total 54 modules(11 hours, including 12 quizzes and answers) Full Training videos at Udemy www.udemy.com/course/gdt-iso-gps-full-learning-bootcamp-from-rookies-to-star/
[ 重磅] 神奇的未注公差标准ISO22081:2021刚刚发布, 老的掉渣的ISO2768-1/ISO2768-2: 1989终于废除
Переглядів 3,1 тис.3 роки тому
神奇的未注公差ISO22081:2021标准刚刚发布,时隔32年,老标准的未注公差ISO2768-1/2表格和判定原则终于废除,呼吁了十多年的徐老师也从未骄傲过! - 冰衡中国 Kraig China www.kraig.com.cn
How to use MMC or LMC modifier properly based on the function?
Переглядів 6 тис.3 роки тому
It's always confusing about the situation of MMC and LMC modifier applications in GD&T and ISO GPS, this video will teach how to use or not use these modifiers. Hope it's helpful. Michael XU Kraig Inc. GD&T ISO GPS Full Learning Bootcamp From Rookies To Stars Total 54 modules(11 hours, including 12 quizzes and answers) Full Training videos at Udemy www.udemy.com/course/gdt-iso-gps-full-learning...
How to use ISO GPS to specify the size tolerance properly
Переглядів 3,1 тис.3 роки тому
Size Tolerance should be based on the function, Manufacturing Cost and Quality. Envelope Requirements or Rule #1 may not be a cure-all solution. Size Tolerance may seems simple, but Not trivial. ISO GPS fully agree it with publishing a seperate standard: ISO GPS 14405-1 GD&T ISO GPS Full Learning Bootcamp From Rookies To Stars Total 54 modules(11 hours, including 12 quizzes and answers) Full Tr...
Tolerance stackup is ok but assembly is NOT ok, why?
Переглядів 3,2 тис.3 роки тому
Tolerance stackup is ok but assembly is NOT ok, why?
尺寸链和公差叠加计算 - 装配偏移公差叠加
Переглядів 4,2 тис.3 роки тому
尺寸链和公差叠加计算 - 装配偏移公差叠加
尺寸链和公差叠加 - 孔轴装配位置度公差计算
Переглядів 6 тис.3 роки тому
尺寸链和公差叠加 - 孔轴装配位置度公差计算
线性公差尺寸链计算
Переглядів 6 тис.3 роки тому
线性公差尺寸链计算
为什么尺寸链计算结果合格却无法装配?
Переглядів 1,7 тис.3 роки тому
为什么尺寸链计算结果合格却无法装配?
Tolerance Stackup - Hole Shaft Assembly
Переглядів 18 тис.3 роки тому
Tolerance Stackup - Hole Shaft Assembly
Assembly Shift Tolerance Stackup
Переглядів 16 тис.3 роки тому
Assembly Shift Tolerance Stackup
Linear Tolerance Stackup
Переглядів 10 тис.3 роки тому
Linear Tolerance Stackup
局部圆或局部曲面为什么不允许标注位置度
Переглядів 9153 роки тому
局部圆或局部曲面为什么不允许标注位置度
Why there is essentially no difference among Perpendicularity, Parallelism and Angularity?
Переглядів 9213 роки тому
Why there is essentially no difference among Perpendicularity, Parallelism and Angularity?
Simultaneous Requirements and Separate Requirements per ASME and ISO GPS
Переглядів 3 тис.3 роки тому
Simultaneous Requirements and Separate Requirements per ASME and ISO GPS
GD&T Rule #1 and Envelope Requirements of ISO GPS
Переглядів 4,8 тис.3 роки тому
GD&T Rule #1 and Envelope Requirements of ISO GPS
圆度和轮廓度有区别吗?
Переглядів 1,7 тис.3 роки тому
圆度和轮廓度有区别吗?
尺寸链计算需要考虑基准自身的位置度误差影响吗
Переглядів 1,6 тис.3 роки тому
尺寸链计算需要考虑基准自身的位置度误差影响吗
美国ASME的高级GD&T专家GDTP认证考题和技巧分享
Переглядів 8383 роки тому
美国ASME的高级GD&T专家GDTP认证考题和技巧分享

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @smartbikestv8827
    @smartbikestv8827 Місяць тому

    What is the function of a feature, which is specified by profil ISO 22081?

  • @smartbikestv8827
    @smartbikestv8827 Місяць тому

    Hole 8.4, 2x 5 and slot at „B“ (two integral features) are fits at the same time against primary A.

  • @smartbikestv8827
    @smartbikestv8827 Місяць тому

    2:05 I’m afraid the basic datum system A I B M I C doesn‘t follow function. The solution is A I B-C. MMC is not required.

  • @孙小圣-d8u
    @孙小圣-d8u Місяць тому

    希望冰衡中国继续上传教程!

  • @JulianMancera-b6k
    @JulianMancera-b6k Місяць тому

    thats a very dificult topic

  • @melvynfranchini5784
    @melvynfranchini5784 Місяць тому

    Thank very much for this video. But in standard ISO 22081 it states that the only general tolerance can be the geometric surface profile tolerance . It does not mention the position tolerance. So is it also possible to create general geometrical tolerances in the drawing that differ from the surface profile tolerances? For example for a transmission shaft, put a general circular run-out with referred to the main axis ? In this way it is possible to continue using size dimension ?

    • @kraiginfo6339
      @kraiginfo6339 Місяць тому

      Yes, it's allowed to put general surface profile tolerance as well as position tolerance in the drawing. For feature of size, it's possible to use size tolerance.

    • @kraiginfo6339
      @kraiginfo6339 Місяць тому

      by the way, it's pretty common practice in automotive that put profile, position, size tolerance in each drawing as general tolerance. Hope it helps. Michael

  • @Findmywa
    @Findmywa Місяць тому

    Welcome back bro

  • @francischan8263
    @francischan8263 2 місяці тому

    Hi, I am having a hard time understanding why surface profile is used but not flatness? can you elaborate more on this? Many Thanks ! I learnt alot from your videos !

    • @kraiginfo6339
      @kraiginfo6339 Місяць тому

      surface profile with datum is to control distance (or control surface position). Flatness can not control position (flatness can not have datum).

  • @stevechyn5691
    @stevechyn5691 3 місяці тому

    很多老闆/老師/設計者,都不了解幾何公差要先將特徵分成一般公差(沒有+-多少的那一種)及特註公差(有+-多少有基準等等),還要在藍圖右下角標示一般公差的要求(像 .X=+-0.5. /.XX=+-0.3. / .XXX=+-0.1),現在只能説大混戰,用嘴巴決定了品質,越混越回去

  • @fluffy_cake_123
    @fluffy_cake_123 4 місяці тому

    5:21 In this situation, instead of 0.3, what should be the value? 0.2 or 0.1 or 0.05?

    • @kraiginfo6339
      @kraiginfo6339 Місяць тому

      any value as long as it's smaller than 0.2

  • @ryanisbig
    @ryanisbig 4 місяці тому

    我以為第一行是指孔徑大小+/-0.2 而第二行是中心相對位置不可超越0.4mm, 第三行是軸心的平行不可偏差0.2

    • @kraiginfo6339
      @kraiginfo6339 Місяць тому

      position: 0.6, parallelism: 0.2, position related each other: 0.1

  • @paulbaird1351
    @paulbaird1351 7 місяців тому

    Best video on the basic topic Ive seen yet! Thank you so much. When do you apply geometric tolerance principles to this example, the next video?

    • @kraiginfo6339
      @kraiginfo6339 Місяць тому

      Let me post some examples then, soon...

  • @stevejones8660
    @stevejones8660 8 місяців тому

    This is ignorant of ASME Y14.5 Rule 1: Envelope Principle. 2.7.1 Variations of Form (Rule #1: Envelope Principle) The form of an individual regular feature of size is controlled by its limits of size to the extent prescribed in the following paragraphs and illustrated in Fig. 2-6. (a) The surface or surfaces of a regular feature of size shall not extend beyond a boundary (envelope) of per- fect form at MMC. This boundary is the true geometric form represented by the drawing. No variation in form is permitted if the regular feature of size is produced at its MMC limit of size unless a straightness or flatness tolerance is associated with the size dimension or the Independency symbol is applied per para. 2.7.3. See Fig. 2-7. In other words, it’s implied that full form MMC boundary needs to checked on simply features of size with no other modifiers specified. Two point check will lead to misreported false data. Please do not post more misinformation online. It adds to the confusion.

    • @kraiginfo6339
      @kraiginfo6339 Місяць тому

      Thanks for your feedback. This video clearly says how to use ISO GPS (NOT ASME Y14.5) to specify the size tolerance, not GD&T per ASME Y14.5. You may need to check the differences of size definition between ASME and ISO GPS.

    • @kraiginfo6339
      @kraiginfo6339 Місяць тому

      by the way, I have posted video about Rule #1 3 years ago on UA-cam: ua-cam.com/video/8LSPSEOJ3wU/v-deo.html. Welcome to watch famous Rule #1 video. :)

  • @hoanhaoduong8803
    @hoanhaoduong8803 8 місяців тому

    love your video. thanks so much.

  • @stevechyn5691
    @stevechyn5691 8 місяців тому

    各位年輕人,幾何公差用在工廠,用心在工廠的工作再看幾何公差的資料才會有心得

  • @stevechyn5691
    @stevechyn5691 8 місяців тому

    幾何公差有很多基本觀念,以下請思考: 幾何公差在製造中的角色?到底是作甚麼用的?誰最該懂幾何公差? 幾何公差是在製造零件(detail part)時,為保證後續組裝的順利,加諸於最低層零件的外形尺寸限制,也是機製件完工後,進入機工檢驗站品檢員放行零件的依據;你可以發現,幾何公差主要用於機工件,而且是最低層的零件,sheet metal 件,膠合件等幾何公差就少很多,因為這些零件不能算是剛體,也就是這些零件用幾何公差去控制零件尺寸是作不到的;如果你是老闆一定要注意幾何公差會大大的影嚮製造成本,尤其產品圖是你自己設計的,設計員不懂的幾何公差,加工成本會增加,設計員濫標幾何公差,操機員會造反,不懂裝配的方法,最終成品會一直出不來,設計員茫然不知是他的藍圖有問題,所以設計員是最該懂幾何公差而且要負責後續組裝的程序,當老闆一定要知道組織的功能,安排正确的人在正確位置上,賦與正確的組織功能,製造才能順利,不要一直駡人,算東算西,操弄人性搞政治 最後提一下組裝,在組裝時,有 I 件 R 件的概念,I件就是直接裝配,I 件上所有的尺寸都是作到直接裝配的狀態,不再有任何加工動作,像飛機發動機零件,幾乎是 I 件,R件就會有鑽孔/加大孔徑/修邊的加工動作,像有些人在飛彈或飛機蒙皮上直接標示 final size的孔徑,這就很明顯的嫩或混;幾何公差不是不好,但要懂它,不要濫用它;要懂裝配,因為機製件作出來是為了裝配,幾何公差是一種限制,老闆要怕它,設計員要懂它,不要濫用(像基本尺寸),尤其要負責藍圖上的東西,包括次組合的裝配都是你的責任,不要推說只要按 3D就沒問題了,大家知道嗎? 3D在CAD/CAM上可以準到小數下22位左右,而且沒有幾何公差

  • @陳深-w5n
    @陳深-w5n 8 місяців тому

    怎麼透過判斷是同向還是反向去套用增減環?如果同向比較少 反向比較多 那哪個是增環哪個是減環 如果增減環反過來填寫出來的值會是 -16.5

  • @Findmywa
    @Findmywa Рік тому

    Yeah, we usually forget orientation in stackup tolerance

  • @Findmywa
    @Findmywa Рік тому

    There are some videos without sub, I can not understand fully. Hope you give us more videos in feature. Really like them, thank you

  • @Findmywa
    @Findmywa Рік тому

    Your videos are really practical and informative

  • @vivekanandbhamare2138
    @vivekanandbhamare2138 Рік тому

    Wonderful. Simple but effective teaching. Thank you so much for spreading knowledge. Keep it up. 😊

  • @sharathb5836
    @sharathb5836 Рік тому

    Can any one please clarify my doubt if all the dimension are in positive tolerance that means 27+17+16+20 then the sum of all will be 80 but the over all length is 74.5+/- 1.5 only that means 76

  • @comics255
    @comics255 Рік тому

    買老師的課程有問題可以請教老師嗎

  • @comics255
    @comics255 Рік тому

    老師講得蠻好的,增減環和公差是以中心值加減公差,最後經過計算可以得到

  • @孙小圣-d8u
    @孙小圣-d8u Рік тому

    请徐老师继续上传视频。

  • @wangtony5971
    @wangtony5971 Рік тому

    Nb

  • @emadou5353
    @emadou5353 Рік тому

    Hi Kraig. Great information. Thank you. I am familiar with the use of UZ modifier when it comes to Line Profile or Surface Profile. But how about with a True Position? In my company we use an ISO standard and we see more and more True Position with UZ called out on prints. For instance: TP of a plane |0.1 UZ +0.05|E (Plane datum E). I understand the theory behind it but I cant find a way to program it in our Zeiss CMM using Calypso. Any help is highly appreciate.

    • @kraiginfo6339
      @kraiginfo6339 Місяць тому

      if toleranced feature is plane, then this Tolerance of Position has the same meaning as Profile Tolerance, it's allowed, and UZ allowed. if toleranced feature is Hole, then Tolerance of Position with UZ is not allowed.

  • @QwertyCanada
    @QwertyCanada Рік тому

    Thanks

  • @rooneyzuo7046
    @rooneyzuo7046 Рік тому

    看懂了吗?

  • @Jianlin_Zeng
    @Jianlin_Zeng Рік тому

    Good job

  • @QwertyCanada
    @QwertyCanada Рік тому

    Come backkkk

  • @eedalamadhavareddy116
    @eedalamadhavareddy116 2 роки тому

    In the tolerance stackup table, there is mistake. In tolerance column there should be +/-0.2mm but you kept +/-0.4mm.

  • @ShashiKumar-nk7pd
    @ShashiKumar-nk7pd 2 роки тому

    Hai sir i have one doubt in case for uz value will be negative means how could we calculate, Eg: uz - 0.1

    • @kraiginfo6339
      @kraiginfo6339 Місяць тому

      for example, 0.2 uz -0.1 means: from 0 to -0.2.

  • @孙小圣-d8u
    @孙小圣-d8u 2 роки тому

    请上传更多视频!

  • @midaswu4609
    @midaswu4609 2 роки тому

    請教 Page 8, 答案是 "存在干涉" 是嗎?

    • @kraiginfo6339
      @kraiginfo6339 2 роки тому

      是的,第八页案例有干涉。孔的内边界是: 4.8-0.5=4.3 , 轴的外边界是: 4+0.5=4.5, 轴的外边界超过了孔的内边界,所以干涉了。希望有帮助。 Michael

  • @jakoat
    @jakoat 2 роки тому

    Great video. Example needed. How will tolerance be modified by B hole and C slot both at MMC.

    • @kraiginfo6339
      @kraiginfo6339 2 роки тому

      I think you are asking Datum Shift (datum with MMC), which is affected by multiple factors, including datum feature size as well as datum feature geometric tolerance. I have some videos on Udemy about these if needed. www.udemy.com/course/gdt-iso-gps-full-learning-bootcamp-from-rookies-to-star/learn/lecture/25054722#overview Michael

  • @老鱼-j2l
    @老鱼-j2l 2 роки тому

    老师有一个疑问麻烦指点一下:如果测量带方向的话,最下层这个0.1体现在两个圆心相对位置是±0.05还是±0.1?

    • @michaelxu9541
      @michaelxu9541 2 роки тому

      由于两个孔都有位置度0.1, 所有错位距离最多可达0.1 (这么理解,两个孔轴线在公差带0.1里面,所以允许轴线距离不同轴可达0.1)

    • @老鱼-j2l
      @老鱼-j2l 2 роки тому

      @@michaelxu9541 感谢老师回复!我学习三维公差分析软件(3DCS),遇到复合公差也是难点,课件解释软件的运行逻辑和您解释的差不多; 软件解释:认为两个孔轴线公差0.1(独立),所以两轴线距离6σ为0.141,实际软件检测两圆心谁在上或下都可以,所以两圆心距离为±1.0(2.0),所以设置1.414放大倍数(1.414*1.141≈2.0)

    • @Lucy-bg1js
      @Lucy-bg1js 2 роки тому

      老师第三行可以按同轴度检测吗?

    • @kraiginfo6339
      @kraiginfo6339 2 роки тому

      不可以按同轴度测量。同轴度必须把一个作为基准(也就是一个当做基准,没有公差带,另外一个是被刺要素,有公差带),而图纸第三行是指两个孔相对位置,不需要把一个作为基准,两个孔都是被测要素,都有公差带。

    • @Lucy-bg1js
      @Lucy-bg1js Рік тому

      老师,视频里说最后的检测销是检测两个孔的同轴呀?

  • @lelouchparanoid
    @lelouchparanoid 2 роки тому

    Thank you, this is extremely helpful.

  • @zainishafie7441
    @zainishafie7441 2 роки тому

    Good presentation. Easy to understand. 👍

  • @harikumar4757
    @harikumar4757 2 роки тому

    Thanks Kraig, suppose while manufacturing these two hole and shaft , regarding hole AME chart and Shaft AME Chart which one is correct combination ,if it is bolt means need little clearance , If both are at MMC chance to meet interference . could you any clarification.

    • @kraiginfo6339
      @kraiginfo6339 2 роки тому

      Hi Hari, considering the random distribution in the manufacturing process, both components reach MMC has very chances. Hope it clarifies. Michael

  • @范偉芳
    @范偉芳 2 роки тому

    請說中文,謝謝您

  • @richardlee9701
    @richardlee9701 2 роки тому

    照圖例看起來,輪廓度跟圓度差了上下0.5? 這樣輪廓度並不包含圓度吧? 不過輪廓度比圓度更嚴格倒是真的

  • @najibahmadi7705
    @najibahmadi7705 2 роки тому

    Thanks for well described

  • @Rockstar07799
    @Rockstar07799 2 роки тому

    Great content! 🙌 I would appreciate more knowledge like this, thank you!!

  • @harikumar4757
    @harikumar4757 2 роки тому

    Thank you sir, very interesting. While using positional tolerance attached with MMC(M), suppose the part is produced at MMC , means there is no departure to LMC ,not permitting bonus ,so in that condition how will be the function of fit effecting at assembly with mating part. Is there clearance fit or transition fit. Also how to mention location clearance fit (H7/h6) and Push fit (H7/k6) with dimensions. kindly reply.

    • @kraiginfo6339
      @kraiginfo6339 2 роки тому

      Hi Hari, fit standard(like H7/G6)) is only for size tolerance, not for position tolerance. We use worst case boundary to judge the assembly fit, which is always MMC - TOP (hole) or MMC + TOP (shaft).

    • @harikumar4757
      @harikumar4757 2 роки тому

      Hai, thank you

  • @Antuan2911
    @Antuan2911 2 роки тому

    Thank you for this video. Very useful.

  • @niteshdn6045
    @niteshdn6045 2 роки тому

    I can't understand the phrase to choose 8.8 dia?

    • @Japan_Thamizhan
      @Japan_Thamizhan 2 роки тому

      It’s very simple. For the hole smallest size is worst condition boundary . For shaft biggest size is worst condition boundary

  • @harikumar4757
    @harikumar4757 2 роки тому

    Kindly a request , could you do this lesson in English. Very interesting.

    • @kraiginfo6339
      @kraiginfo6339 2 роки тому

      Hi Hari, here is the English version of this video: ua-cam.com/video/6AFUWUX6MWY/v-deo.html Michael

    • @harikumar4757
      @harikumar4757 2 роки тому

      Thank you too much to reply for my comment , regarding FCF,TED.

  • @rakeshsahoo712
    @rakeshsahoo712 2 роки тому

    Not clear sir

    • @hmata3
      @hmata3 2 роки тому

      You must complete a loop starting at one side. Assign a positive and a negative direction. Right is positive, left is negative. Starting at the end of B, going right, (so positive) you'll add 15, 16.5. Then you turn around, go left (negative) 75. And finally return to A. So plus 26. The sum of all these values is the nominal dimension of AB. The tolerances just get added straight down.

  • @yogeshbobde4503
    @yogeshbobde4503 2 роки тому

    Can't find the excel sheet in comment section