madhaza
madhaza
  • 42
  • 134 471
Dark Souls 3 - All DLC Bosses
A compilation of all the boss fights during my first playthrough of Dark Souls 3 (DLC)
Переглядів: 9 387

Відео

Dark Souls 3 - All Bosses
Переглядів 168Рік тому
A compilation of all the boss fights during my first playthrough of Dark Souls 3 (base game)
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 20: The Dark Soul
Переглядів 16Рік тому
Streamed on 09/11/2022
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 19: Dragon's Den
Переглядів 51Рік тому
Streamed on 07/11/2022
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 18: Show Humanity
Переглядів 18Рік тому
Streamed on 5/11/2022
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 17: Dreg Demons
Переглядів 12Рік тому
Streamed on 5/11/2022
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 16: Father and Sister
Переглядів 1Рік тому
Streamed on 02/09/2022
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 15: Not Real Trees
Переглядів 7Рік тому
Streamed on 02/09/2022
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 14: Hunting Havel
Переглядів 3Рік тому
Streamed on 02/09/2022
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 13: Plin Plin Plon
Переглядів 11Рік тому
Streamed on 30/08/2022
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 12: The Boys
Переглядів 2Рік тому
Streamed on 29/08/2022
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 11: The Last Dance
Переглядів 2Рік тому
Streamed on 29/08/2022
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 10: The Grab
Рік тому
Streamed on 25/08/2022
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 9: Anor Londo Again
Переглядів 5Рік тому
Streamed on 23/08/2022
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 7: Found Izalith
Переглядів 2Рік тому
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 7: Found Izalith
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 6: Another Poison Swamp
Переглядів 1Рік тому
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 6: Another Poison Swamp
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 5 - The Deep
Переглядів 1Рік тому
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 5 - The Deep
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 4: Giant Enemy Crab
Рік тому
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 4: Giant Enemy Crab
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 3: Hit the Balls
Переглядів 1Рік тому
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 3: Hit the Balls
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 2: Bad Connection Train
Переглядів 1Рік тому
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 2: Bad Connection Train
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 1: We Go Again
Переглядів 1Рік тому
Dark Souls 3 - Episode 1: We Go Again
Dark Souls 2 SOTFS - All Boss Fights
Переглядів 58Рік тому
Dark Souls 2 SOTFS - All Boss Fights
Dark Souls 2 - Episode 16: The Final Chapter
Переглядів 252 роки тому
Dark Souls 2 - Episode 16: The Final Chapter
Dark Souls 2 - Episode 15: Where We Dropping
Переглядів 72 роки тому
Dark Souls 2 - Episode 15: Where We Dropping
Dark Souls 2 - Episode 14: The Hardest Boss
Переглядів 92 роки тому
Dark Souls 2 - Episode 14: The Hardest Boss
Dark Souls 2 - Episode 13: Return of Havel
Переглядів 42 роки тому
Dark Souls 2 - Episode 13: Return of Havel
Dark Souls 2 - Episode 12: Pass the Pad
Переглядів 42 роки тому
Dark Souls 2 - Episode 12: Pass the Pad
Dark Souls 2: Episode 11 - Taking the Throne
Переглядів 62 роки тому
Dark Souls 2: Episode 11 - Taking the Throne
Dark Souls 2 - Episode 10: Giants and Dragons
Переглядів 62 роки тому
Dark Souls 2 - Episode 10: Giants and Dragons

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @Maza675
    @Maza675 6 днів тому

    To dive into any messaging from Kubrick, you first have to read the book it's based on, or at least its plotline and then see what he has added or skewed.

  • @jeffreyness355
    @jeffreyness355 4 місяці тому

    The movie is about power. Period.

  • @VincentTroia
    @VincentTroia 5 місяців тому

    god, this has got to be one of the funniest chapo episodes. i was in tears

  • @jdsartre9520
    @jdsartre9520 6 місяців тому

    thank you for right off mentioning the repeating Tom Cruise (is that acting?) On my one and only watching of this, I definitely noticed it right away. Why would Kubrick allow that? If it's intentional, then what could it mean? Made me wonder if this is just a tom cruise thing and that's what he does in his movies

  • @hashtagfilm
    @hashtagfilm 8 місяців тому

    Really enjoyed this. But sorry guys, this movie is absolutely about child sex trafficking. Kubrick was a master of telling you something without telling you. Why do you think they have to go home and fuck at the end? Because she needs to get pregnant in order to replace the daughter they just trafficked.

  • @exzisd
    @exzisd 10 місяців тому

    Great podcast. Finally finished this movie tonight for the first time. Always passed out in the past but watched the movie all the way through tonight and liked it. I think there are some interesting layers from it from classism, families, relationship dynamics, friend networks, and a lot more. I think what makes it interesting is finding a layer that’s interesting to you at the moment and exploring or considering the movie from that perspective. At the end the mask on the bed was clearly a mask off moment and despite both of their ALMOST affairs, mental and real, they accepted each other and moved on. I still wouldn’t trust that rich guy. Also still interested in the rich guy in the pool room at the end who said it was all a play. I know masons and some other groups who use “plays” to demonstrate concepts to move through degrees. I don’t think this is a common ritual though. I hope not. What a depressing world. I’m sure there’s plenty of debauchery going on in the world but it’s funny how classless and hollow these presumed elites are. The girl who OD’d on Junk and speed probably wasn’t rich though so maybe it was just the men bc the women seemed totally subservient. That would lead me to believe it’s a fraternal organization like masonry but this is not masonry.

  • @SomethingImpromptu
    @SomethingImpromptu 11 місяців тому

    The ads on every major porn site are unironically infinitely more perverse & disturbing & raise more questions about the dark side of human nature than anything in this movie.

  • @SomethingImpromptu
    @SomethingImpromptu 11 місяців тому

    Arthur Schnitzel was really on one.

  • @Heathcliff_1600
    @Heathcliff_1600 11 місяців тому

    rip in piss

  • @worksbydandeprez
    @worksbydandeprez Рік тому

    Shot in 1997, not released until 1999.

  • @siege2218
    @siege2218 Рік тому

    31:25 Nick calling out Will for constantly saying “worst <insert thing> ever”

  • @glyndwr15
    @glyndwr15 Рік тому

    This video was garbage. What a waste of time.

  • @Kakekutter
    @Kakekutter Рік тому

    Greatest comedy review of a movie EVER!!!!

    • @osborn.illustration
      @osborn.illustration 10 місяців тому

      Seriously this was a hilarious episode!! I've come back to listen to it again a year later. So funny.

  • @coolestinternetperson
    @coolestinternetperson Рік тому

    That was a great opener 10/10

  • @Tyln93
    @Tyln93 Рік тому

    ua-cam.com/video/twWt37Y-UhA/v-deo.html 1:38 Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell featuring from the beggining of the scene till Alice goes to the toilet!!! Way toooooooo coincidential ain't it!!!

  • @jemimallah2591
    @jemimallah2591 Рік тому

    im gay actor javier bardem

  • @briansinger5258
    @briansinger5258 Рік тому

    Alice is already initiated. Bill is not. The first half of his story is him viewing things as a pleb, and then each scene is mirrored with him now initiated. Then their kid is given to some old dudes. OJ be like that sometimes.

  • @Johnconno
    @Johnconno Рік тому

    Imagine the gurning face of Tom Cruise trapped in Salo. Forever.

  • @darinsmith762
    @darinsmith762 Рік тому

    They really dropped the ball on this one

  • @jasonzcomedy
    @jasonzcomedy Рік тому

    I thought the mask on the pillow implied that one of the elites was sending a message

    • @osborn.illustration
      @osborn.illustration 10 місяців тому

      Yup, I thought the orgy cultists put the mask on the pillow as a threat. As a message saying: "We know where you live, we are surveilling you. We are top echelon. You could never touch us. We did not harm your family THIS time, but we could've! We will next time if you make us. We advise you to cease your inquiries!!" There are different ways fans interpret the mask on the pillow - some think Alice was one of the masked orgy ladies but I don't think that idea bears out in the film.

    • @Maza675
      @Maza675 6 днів тому

      I always saw it that way ​@@osborn.illustration

  • @lindafarnham8994
    @lindafarnham8994 Рік тому

    I can’t listen to this shit!

  • @lindafarnham8994
    @lindafarnham8994 Рік тому

    You are sickening talking about 8 year olds.

    • @MikeOcksmallClips
      @MikeOcksmallClips Рік тому

      You are a 🤡 people around you are using kids and you are blind to it

  • @TrillgataQ
    @TrillgataQ Рік тому

    "you gotta get out of here everyone's making fun of you for being a loser"

  • @LordJagd
    @LordJagd Рік тому

    Will goes from saying these cults and stuff aren’t real but “just fun to think about” to like half a minute later agreeing with Nick that there’s enough evidence that these things happen, lmao

  • @LordJagd
    @LordJagd Рік тому

    The movie was originally meant to be a comedy, but that changed as Kubrick worked on the script. It’s basically the opposite evolution of Dr Strangelove, which was originally meant to be serious but ended up a comedy.

    • @893loses
      @893loses Рік тому

      all of his movies are comedies, wtf

    • @osborn.illustration
      @osborn.illustration 10 місяців тому

      Huh, that really does explain a lot about this movie!

  • @LordJagd
    @LordJagd Рік тому

    I’m glad they Will blew off Nick’s Summerton connection for a Die Hard Christmas joke

  • @RoshDroz
    @RoshDroz Рік тому

    Oh shit, I never listen to chapo but the one time I do Nick is on it. Incredible

  • @PittsburghSonido
    @PittsburghSonido 2 роки тому

    EWS will always be a film detailing infidelity and marriage. It's that simple. If you want to throw in "these are what rich people do! crazy sex orgies!" then fine. But so what? We already know they do crazy and illegal shit. It adds depth to the film, I'll admit. But I enjoy this film for its thematic narrative of marriage.

    • @LordJagd
      @LordJagd Рік тому

      The whole meat of the movie is the cult. You’d have to put blinders on if you think it’s only about infidelity and marriage, those are just two parts of many.

    • @KEIFERGR33N
      @KEIFERGR33N Рік тому

      @@LordJagd That's literally not true though. Maybe a sixth of the runtime is dedicated to the "cult" scene. Much more of the runtime is dedicated to infidelity and marriage either literally or figuratively. The "cult" imagery isn't literal; it's symbolic. The ritual scene depicts the party from the beginning of the film but portrayed honestly as the sexual ritual it is. To claim the "whole meat" of the movie is the cult, you're straight up ignoring most of the movie.

    • @LordJagd
      @LordJagd Рік тому

      @@KEIFERGR33N Everything after him finding Nick Nightingale is about the cult and him being stalked by them afterwards. The whole climax of the movie is Ziegler telling Hartford that the cult is too powerful to want to mess with. The film has a theme of infidelity through the whole thing, but the meat of the movie in terms of plot is the cult.

    • @osborn.illustration
      @osborn.illustration 10 місяців тому

      Much agreed, the marriage of the main characters is what the movie is about.

  • @FumblsTheSniper
    @FumblsTheSniper 2 роки тому

    Had to go watch it, actually found it fantastic. Can’t wait to finish the last hour of them talking about it because it was so dumb.

    • @LordJagd
      @LordJagd Рік тому

      What’s dumb?

    • @FumblsTheSniper
      @FumblsTheSniper Рік тому

      @@LordJagd the movie was exactly as ridiculous as they described it is all

    • @LordJagd
      @LordJagd Рік тому

      @@FumblsTheSniper Yeah very intentionally so, I think the whole thing is supposed to be both laughable and horrifying. Kubrick normally went for that layered mood to his films.

  • @tewodrosii2875
    @tewodrosii2875 2 роки тому

    21:46 this part was sampled by Frank Ocean for his song "Lovecrimes", such a good song

  • @pluckyduck11y
    @pluckyduck11y 2 роки тому

    I think there is something to the dream logic of communicating in echoes/questions

  • @synclloyd9270
    @synclloyd9270 2 роки тому

    Kubrick was tailing Nightingale

  • @garcalej
    @garcalej 2 роки тому

    I can’t remember laughing so hard 😂

  • @screenPhiles
    @screenPhiles 2 роки тому

    The word 'distraction' keeps being used to describe Kubrick and his films, as if everything he did was done to mask an even greater meaning and significance (which ironically is the same sort of thinking/reasoning that leads some to believe that that the moon landing was shot by Kubrick in a studio) and part of me wonders if it's less a question of distraction than Kubrick in some instances and situations being genuinely tone deaf. In other words I get the feeling people are reading more into the movie than is actually there and he isn't nearly as brilliant as he's being made out to be (and his obsessiveness was little more than sadism, because he could). In other words, he's capable of making not-so-good movies.

    • @azure5644
      @azure5644 2 роки тому

      You could maybe argue that for this movie (I haven’t seen it) but that’s not the case in The Shining. There are so many layers to it.

    • @screenPhiles
      @screenPhiles 2 роки тому

      @@azure5644 I have seen The Shining as well and I would argue that it's more a case of people bringing meaning to it than vice versa. For instance, the idea about Kubrick shoot the moon landing are mainly based on a sweater a character wore in the movie. It couldn't possibly have just been a little boy in a sweater because "Kubrick."

    • @azure5644
      @azure5644 2 роки тому

      @@screenPhiles ok but that’s only one theory, a theory that a lot of people who like to analyze The Shining disagree with. Kubrick was known for being meticulous and precise with his filmmaking. There are deeper meanings and many layers to his films.

    • @screenPhiles
      @screenPhiles 2 роки тому

      @@azure5644 I'm aware that that's one theory though you don't offer any. And how does being meticulous and precise with his filmmaking - which was never in question - change the likelihood that the viewer brings more to his movies that is actually there?

    • @azure5644
      @azure5644 2 роки тому

      @@screenPhiles I never disagreed that some people read too much into his movies.

  • @Garrett1240
    @Garrett1240 2 роки тому

    42:47

  • @gandalftheincontinent5252
    @gandalftheincontinent5252 2 роки тому

    This is the best of Chapo, w/Mullen, making mince meat of EWS; more entertaining than watching the film itself.

  • @osborn.illustration
    @osborn.illustration 2 роки тому

    Oh hell yes, so excited to hear them talk about this very strange and dreamlike movie! This movie is often misunderstood, possibly it's Kubrick's best film. Thanks for the upload!

    • @filmmakerdanielclements
      @filmmakerdanielclements 10 місяців тому

      Totally agree! Any disconnect with eyes wide shut often stems from folks who try to take the film literally. But, it's more like a dream. A nightmare. An expressionistic painting. The source novel "Traumnovelle" translates to "Dream Story".

    • @osborn.illustration
      @osborn.illustration 10 місяців тому

      @@filmmakerdanielclements Yes! That is a great way of putting it! The movie is not too literal, it's symbolic & surreal. It's cool you say it's based on a book called "Dream Story" because it does seem like a fever dream. It's like the Spanish genre of "magical realism" which includes some really awesome movies such as "Abre los Ojos" and "Pan's Labyrinth" and "El Orfanato". Those movies are in a similar style. If you loved "Eyes Wide Shut" you'd probably enjoy them. 👍

    • @filmmakerdanielclements
      @filmmakerdanielclements 10 місяців тому

      @@osborn.illustration Love Pans Labyrinth! And isn’t Vanilla Sky (which I also love) a remake of Abre los Ojos? Also in that Spanish sub-sub-genre is ‘The Skin I Live In’, I think? But I’ll definitely check out El Orfanato. The dreamlike approach to style is so haunting and curious in its fantastical unfolding. Like how the moonlight in EWS is not just blue; it’s impossibly unrealistically blue. People don’t act naturally, but they’re over the top and hyper-natural (like Jack in The Shining). It also gives me the abstract interpretable puzzle vibes of ‘Mulholland Drive’ and Bergman’s ‘Persona’.

  • @tvaddict6623
    @tvaddict6623 2 роки тому

    I’m dying listening to this!!!🤣🤣

  • @fattyjaybird7505
    @fattyjaybird7505 2 роки тому

    What,No more podcasts??

  • @Blake_.Dryden
    @Blake_.Dryden 2 роки тому

    All I want to eat is Dell Taco

  • @agentham
    @agentham 2 роки тому

    My best friend Nick really nailed it.

  • @bryanmckinney1098
    @bryanmckinney1098 2 роки тому

    In order to understand this movie. You have to understand the visual clues that Kubrick uses in other films. He uses recurring color themes (red n blue mostly) mannequin heads / Teddy Bears and all this stuff tells you things about the story. A lot of levels here. Too many to be accidental especially with how much of a perfectionist Kubrick was known to be. The kneeling cultists look like children. The shop keeper whores out his daughter for the right price. And the daughter (after picking up a teddy bear, a known tool of Kubrick's used to show child abuse) walks away with 2 men from Zeigler's party... C'mon guys it's right in your face.

    • @macklemorganfreeman8488
      @macklemorganfreeman8488 2 роки тому

      Those two old men were just extras.

    • @darinsmith762
      @darinsmith762 Рік тому

      Their eyes were wide shut on this one

    • @Kakekutter
      @Kakekutter Рік тому

      This a movie for smart people....dumb people enjoy low frequency commentary because they can not understand the complexity of a movie...So many plugged up to the matrix

    • @mabonman
      @mabonman Рік тому

      he doesn't use recurring themes of any sort, there's a really good interview with him saying so because he feels if he did it would get in the way of the best way to tell the story being told

  • @gaiusleviathan8110
    @gaiusleviathan8110 2 роки тому

    A weird thing I noticed about this movie is that at exactly 7:06 (what would be the 6 minute and 66 second mark) the first words are said by the Hungarian character named Sandor Szavost. (Possibly a LaVey reference?)

  • @gaiusleviathan8110
    @gaiusleviathan8110 2 роки тому

    Another weird thing I noticed about this movie and the Hartfords weird relationship with their child is that in the first scene Nicole Kidman says to Tom Cruise “Did You give the babysitter the phony pager number?” Why on earth would you Give your babysitter fake contact info?

    • @nignamedmutt7270
      @nignamedmutt7270 2 роки тому

      I'm almost positive you misheard her(and she spoke kinda poorly because I watched this last night and literally rewound that same line being baffled by it too). She says "the phone & pager number" and just says it so quickly it sounds like she says "phoney".

    • @gaiusleviathan8110
      @gaiusleviathan8110 2 роки тому

      @@nignamedmutt7270 ah! Quite Possible

  • @tonywords6713
    @tonywords6713 2 роки тому

    Did you know he originally wanted to do it as a low budget black and white comedy? First with Woody Allen then Steve Martin

    • @gaiusleviathan8110
      @gaiusleviathan8110 2 роки тому

      This would have been so interesting

    • @Ash-nh6li
      @Ash-nh6li 10 місяців тому

      I wouldn't even watch it if one of those aholes were in it

  • @coreygolphenee9633
    @coreygolphenee9633 2 роки тому

    God help us all because that will be the highest turnout we get until whatever revolution comes out way

  • @drewfleming5584
    @drewfleming5584 3 роки тому

    There have never been a bigger group of miserable nerds who think they're cool. The one cat sounds like he has a tongue the size of a king size Laffy Taffy but somehow blatantly believes he's a smooth operator.

    • @neomcdoom
      @neomcdoom 2 роки тому

      Everything you just said is correct but they are also really funny

  • @Kano622
    @Kano622 3 роки тому

    This film was released in 1999.

  • @trenttalley924
    @trenttalley924 3 роки тому

    When Hartford talks Curran out of an OD with nothing but his voice I believe that was a satirization of Cruise's own medical philosophies... I truly believe when you compare Cruise and Kidman's performances to the rest of the actors in the movie that it is apparent that the writing as well as the directing were working against both of them; or rather exposing them. Kidman over acted and Cruise under acted. They proved how little chemistry they had in their own relationship, how artificial they could appear in certain scenarios, and that they were so disconnected from the reality of how they were coming off in their performance that they went on with it and accepted Kubrick's style of directing, no matter how ridiculous.

    • @tonywords6713
      @tonywords6713 2 роки тому

      interesting but kubrick does that in all his movies so... Also cruise is legitimately great in Magnolia, as is Kidman in Birth

    • @trenttalley924
      @trenttalley924 2 роки тому

      @@tonywords6713 does what?

    • @macnsteez3938
      @macnsteez3938 2 роки тому

      @@trenttalley924 I'm guessing he means fucking with the stars of his films to get these bizarre performances out of them

  • @zehsackett6132
    @zehsackett6132 3 роки тому

    Just finished the movie. Very fun time. They kept playing this horror music on the piano that makes me think squidward is telling the story of the hash slinging slasher. The cult orgy was hilarious. The way everyone repeats what someone else says as a question is constant and hilarious. It's genuinely very ominous while seeming like it's kinda starship troopers satire. The end is ambiguous to where you don't know which it is.. Highly recommend if you liked Get Out or the Shining.

    • @tonywords6713
      @tonywords6713 2 роки тому

      well no shit sherlock the same filmmaker made the shining lmao

    • @zehsackett6132
      @zehsackett6132 2 роки тому

      @@tonywords6713 Still bears little resemblance to 2001 or full metal jacket.

    • @johnnyquantum8125
      @johnnyquantum8125 Рік тому

      @@zehsackett6132 or the shining or clockwork orange

    • @osborn.illustration
      @osborn.illustration 10 місяців тому

      Agreed! This movie is genuinely artful yet strangely funny. This movie is about so much more than audiences were ready for at the time. This movie is about so much more than it was advertised to be because Kubrick passed away before they did the marketing for the film. This movie was sadly very underappreciated when it came out, I remember everyone making fun of it. It was ahead of it's time. I'm happy that lots of people are reappraising it now. I love "The Shining" but "Eyes Wide Shut" was low key the best Kubrick movie.