![Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 108
- 81 470
Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
United States
Приєднався 20 лют 2008
The Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University offers J.D. and Masters of Law degrees in both Environmental and International Law, as well as a Doctor of Juridical Science (SJD) in Environmental Law. The school, housed on the University’s campus in White Plains, NY, opened its doors in 1976 and has over 9,000 alumni around the world. The school maintains a unique philosophy and approach to legal education that strikes an important balance between practice and theory. Haub Law launched its Environmental Law Program in 1978, and it has long been ranked among the world’s leading university programs, with a current #1 ranking by U.S. News & World Report.
Welcome to Dannat Hall at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Dannat Hall is located on the campus of the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University. This 104 unit residence hall is conveniently situated just steps from classes and campus activities, affording many benefits for law students.
Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
law.pace.edu
Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
law.pace.edu
Переглядів: 96
Відео
CNN: Professor Bennett Gershman Provides Expert Commentary on Hunter Biden - 6/11/24
Переглядів 722 місяці тому
Legal Expert Bennett Gershman, University Distinguished Professor of the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University, speaks with CNN anchor Jim Sciutto about Hunter Biden's conviction, saying "probation is very likely." June 11, 2024 Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University law.pace.edu
Professor Bennett Gershman on the Trump's Hush Money Trial | CNN: May 2, 2024
Переглядів 3,8 тис.3 місяці тому
Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University Professor Bennett Gershman is a guest on CNN discussing the latest developments in Donald Trump's Hush Money Trial. Aired May 2, 2024. Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University law.pace.edu
2024 Garrison Lecture on Environmental Law | Professor Bratspies: Mapping Injustice
Переглядів 504 місяці тому
2024 Lloyd K. Garrison Lecture on Environmental Law Tuesday, April 16th | Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University Mapping Injustice: Race, Place, and Environment in New York City Delivered by Rebecca Bratspies Professor and Director of Center for Urban Environmental Reform - CUNY Law law.pace.edu
2024 Blaine Sloan Lecture on International Law: Hon. Margaret M. deGuzman
Переглядів 1165 місяців тому
ELISABETH HAUB SCHOOL OF LAW AT PACE UNIVERSITY 2024 Blaine Sloan Lecture on International Law "The Promise and Perils of International Law" Wednesday, March 20, 2024 DELIVERED BY Hon. Margaret M. deGuzman James E. Beasley Professor of Law and Co-Director of the Institute for International Law and Public Policy, Temple Law School; Judge of the Residual Mechanism for International Criminal Tribu...
Scripps News: Professor Bennett L. Gershman on the Colorado's Ballot Disqualification Case
Переглядів 2705 місяців тому
Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University Professor Bennett L. Gershman spoke to Scripps News about the Supreme Court’s ruling allowing Donald Trump to remain on Colorado presidential primary ballot. Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University law.pace.edu
2023 Distinguished Dyson Lecture: Chris Rabb
Переглядів 499 місяців тому
Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University 2023 Dyson Distinguished Lecture Delivered by Chris Rabb "Navigating Identity, Belonging and Purpose in a Society of Flux" Wednesday, October 25, 2023 | 12:50 p.m.-2:30 p.m. law.pace.edu
2023 Elisabeth Haub Award for Environmental Law and Diplomact
Переглядів 1069 місяців тому
2023 Elisabeth Haub Award for Environmental Law and Diplomacy honoring Ambassador Marja Lehto of Finland and Former Ambassador Marie Jacobsson of Sweden for their pivotal roles advancing environmental law and policy to protect the environment in times of armed conflict. Monday, October 23, 2023 | 4:00 p.m. Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University law.pace.edu
2023 Kerlin Lecture: Professor Sam Kalen on the Future of the Environmental Administrative State
Переглядів 8510 місяців тому
Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University 2023 Gilbert and Sarah Kerlin Lecture on Environmental Law "The Supreme Court’s Approach Toward the Administrative State and Implications for Environmental Programs" Tuesday, October 3, 2023 Delivered by Professor Sam Kalen William T. Schwartz Distinguished Professor of Law and Associate Dean at the University of Wyoming College of Law Founder and...
Pace Women's Justice Center Walk In Legal Clinic Program Video (English/Spanish)
Переглядів 56Рік тому
Pace Women's Justice Center's Walk In Legal Clinic is a resource center for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and elder abuse. Clients have access to legal help when and where they need it most. Our services are available to everyone regardless of financial means, race, gender, sexual orientation or immigration status. All services are free and confidential; multilingual services av...
CNN This Morning: Professor Randolph McLaughlin on SCOTUS Affirmative Action Decision
Переглядів 4,1 тис.Рік тому
Professor Randolph McLaughlin is featured on CNN This Morning discussing the recent Affirmative Action decision by the Supreme Court. Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University law.pace.edu
Scripps News: Professor Leslie Tenzer on Financial Disclosures from Supreme Court Justices
Переглядів 343Рік тому
Professor Leslie Tenzer is featured on Scripps News Morning Rush Show discussing the issue of Clarence Thomas' request for a 90-day extension to file his financial disclosure. Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University law.pace.edu
Haub Law LLM Program Interview with Alum Belen Odelid Medina Barrenechea (Spanish)
Переглядів 56Рік тому
Recent LLM grad, Belen Odelid Medina Barrenechea, discusses her experiences at Haub Law and the joint degree during an interview on Peruvian national television. Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University htps://law.pace.edu
Scripps News: Professor Leslie Tenzer on Smartmatic's defamation suit against Fox News
Переглядів 348Рік тому
Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University law.pace.edu
Scripps News: Professor Randolph McLaughlin on the expulsion of two Tennessee lawmakers & more
Переглядів 1,5 тис.Рік тому
Professor Randolph McLaughlin discusses breaking news topics with Scripps News, providing his expert opinion on the recent Supreme Court ruling against West Virginia allowing a transgender student to compete on a girls track team and the controversy over two black Democratic lawmakers in Tennessee who were expelled from their seats. Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University law.pace.edu
2023 Access to Justice Workshop: Voting, Democracy, and the Law
Переглядів 26Рік тому
2023 Access to Justice Workshop: Voting, Democracy, and the Law
2023 Equity and Justice Forum: Marcia Sells, CDO, Metropolitan Opera
Переглядів 87Рік тому
2023 Equity and Justice Forum: Marcia Sells, CDO, Metropolitan Opera
Scripps News: Professor Alexander K.A. Greenawalt Discusses ICC Arrest Warrant on Putin 3/20/23
Переглядів 828Рік тому
Scripps News: Professor Alexander K.A. Greenawalt Discusses ICC Arrest Warrant on Putin 3/20/23
2023 Philip B Blank Memorial Lecture on Attorney Ethics: Professor Andrea Kupfer Schneider
Переглядів 104Рік тому
2023 Philip B Blank Memorial Lecture on Attorney Ethics: Professor Andrea Kupfer Schneider
Location Matters | Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Переглядів 216Рік тому
Location Matters | Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Student Experience | Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Переглядів 351Рік тому
Student Experience | Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Clinics & Externships | Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Переглядів 236Рік тому
Clinics & Externships | Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Graduate Programs | Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Переглядів 189Рік тому
Graduate Programs | Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Student Success | Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Переглядів 114Рік тому
Student Success | Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Faculty Mentors | Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Переглядів 120Рік тому
Faculty Mentors | Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Paths to Practice | Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Переглядів 248Рік тому
Paths to Practice | Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
A Welcome Message from Dean Horace Anderson
Переглядів 1,2 тис.Рік тому
A Welcome Message from Dean Horace Anderson
2022 Environmental Law and Policy Hack Competition
Переглядів 108Рік тому
2022 Environmental Law and Policy Hack Competition
Trial Advocacy | Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Переглядів 429Рік тому
Trial Advocacy | Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University
Honestly, I LoLed pretty hard at a lot of this. Mixed in with all the straight-faced videos, this worked really well.
What conspiracy ??
I believe in michael he had the proof I believe all the witnesses I don't believe donald trump donald trump should testify
Your professional very doubtful
Cohen has more evidence it’s about to really blow up
Defense has proven noting prosecutors hv already proven there case hope nothing goes wrong
They keep talking about cohen there several witnesses who confirmed trump was involved. The evidence is strong enough with all the other witnesses
They keep saying president trump he’s not president stop it already wow
Simple deflection by the Democratic party to turn the public's attention away from Crooked Joe Biden.
WHY DONT YOU TALK ABOUT THE SO MANY GOST COMPANIES JOE AND SON ESTABLISH TO COLLECT MONEY FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD BY SELLING THE BI:DEN BRAND
DREAM ON GRANDPAS
Here's the real crime...GET TRUMP NO MATTER WHAT EVEN IF THERE IS NO CRIME. Andy McCarthy, a brilliant lawyer has stated that there is no actual crime.
Trump is not in court to defend his crimes…. He is guilty…. Everyone in the world knows that - even Trump! Trump is in court to fight for his right to be a criminal!!!! Trump is a grifter! A conman!
Professor Gershman is the best!
Go home you left something there
It just makes me sick that some Asian people think black people that get into these institutions are not smart, or didn't work hard to achieve that accomplishment.
Oh destroyed that news school bull crap!
Puckers!
Can I have my grant money back Mistro thief's?
Good thing Fox has $2.7 Bn to hand over to Smartmatic!! Ha ha ha 💰💰💰💰💰👮♂️💰💩🐀
Thank you, Professor Gershman!
Thomas is damaged after Anita Hill and have gone after the Black community.
Lies on top of lies Black peoples make 1600 on SATS. ITS White folk who blocking your admissions BIT who are you a one thing test score sees you as a shoe In. Asians will not get a white card give it up. You shouldn’t want it. It’s blood stained
I'm so sorry that this discussion has left out the underlying assumption of nullifying 'affirmative action: THAT BY DOING SO YOU END UP HAVING AN EQUAL LEVEL PLAYING FIELD. Just this outrageous suggestion that WHITES are SOLELY allowed in on MERITS, can easily be proven wrong. For it contradicts the STATISTICS: NATIONAL and INTERNATIONAL.
Could there just be more scholarships available for students who need extra help to attend a good college, university. However marks must be the first requirement
Oh Iunderstand how Ketanji Brown Jackson made it to the Supreme Court, now! 😂
Well, they're just gonna have to work harder, for God's sake! smh
This video talks about this a bit better. ua-cam.com/video/_8skJ6F5NIA/v-deo.html
Why no Asian representation here
Does affirmative action prove african Americans are cant achieve without massa helping hand, because blacks from the Caribbean are high achievers despite being descendants of slaves
Katanga (?) Doesn't know the difference between a boy and a girl. Does she know the difference between blacks and Asians?
Different Levels of Racism (1) Structural Racism in the U.S. is the normalization and legitimization of an array of dynamics--historical, cultural, institutional and interpersonal--that routinely advantage whites while producing cumulative and chronic adverse outcomes for people of color. Structural racism encompasses the entire system of white domination, diffused and infused in all aspects of society, including its history, culture, politics, economics and entire social fabric. Structural racism is more difficult to locate in a particular institution because it involves the reinforcing effects of multiple institutions and cultural norms, past and present, continually reproducing old, and producing new forms of racism. Structural racism is the most profound and pervasive form of racism-all other forms of racism emerge from structural racism. (2) Institutional Racism-unequal impacts and outcomes based on race, produced by key societal institutions such as the health care and housing systems, and education and employment systems. These institutions are racist when the impact of their policies, practices and power is to advantage and disadvantage whole groups of people along racial lines. When an individual acts within the context of an institution, and help to perpetuate these racial inequities, these actions are no longer just interpersonal actions, but rather institutional actions. (Thus, when a police officer treats a member of the public with racial bias--such as giving white people the benefit of the doubt while presuming people of color are guilty-- this action is institutional racism since the police officer is acting as a representative of a law enforcement institution.) Unequal impacts based on race are the measure of institutional racism, regardless of whether or not the disproportionate and discriminatory effects are intentional. Institutional racism is not just carried out by white people but also by people of color acting in institutional capacities, "just doing their jobs" and implementing decisions that have a negative effect on people of color. (3) Individual/Internalized Racism-personal and private attitudes and beliefs about race influenced by the dominant culture. Manifestations include: race-based xenophobia (based on fear and ignorance of people unlike yourself), internalized oppression (acceptance of negative stereotypes and deflated images about yourself and those in your racial group), and internalized white privilege (a well-developed sense of entitlement; or acceptance of inflated or superior images of yourself and those in your racial group). Definition of “Racial Justice”: •Racial Justice is the proactive reinforcement of policies, practices, attitudes and actions that produce equitable power, opportunities, treatment, impacts and outcomes for all. Equitable impacts and outcome across race is the key indicator of racial justice. • Racial Justice is not the same as racial diversity. There can be diversity without equity. Integration is certainly beneficial, but not sufficient to produce equity. For example, in 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court ordered the integration of all public schools. Yet our schools remain highly unequal. Even fully and partially integrated schools, experience racial “achievement gaps” and other disparities across race. A “diversity” focus primarily addresses the symptoms of racism--with the goal of minimizing racial tensions and maximizing people’s ability to tolerate difference and get along. A “racial justice focus primarily addresses the causes of inequality and the solutions and strategies for producing equity. • Racial Justice is not the same as multi-culturalism. Culture is only one aspect of race. Another, even more significant aspect of race, is power. Race is a social construct that stems from differences in power--imbalances and abuses of power that underlie the categories of race and the culture of racism. Efforts to promote cultural awareness, sensitivity and inclusiveness are important steps towards, but are not the same as, racial justice. If one ignores the dynamics of power and simply treats race as a cultural phenomenon, racism will be perpetuated, even if things appear to be more multi-cultural. • Racial Justice is not simply equality. Things can be equal, but still not fair. For example, schools with the highest concentrations of students of color, often have a disproportionate number of students who need subsidized meals, special education services and bilingual education services. These schools require more funding than schools that have more wealthy and white students. Rather than each school receive the same--or equal--funding, schools should receive fair--or equitable--funding, based on need. Diversity = Variety Equality = Sameness Equity = Fairness, Justice
Techniques for nonviolently REVEALING racism: 1. Naming: explicitly mentioning race by name--using words such as “racism,” “racial inequality,” “racial discrimination,” “racial bias,” etc. --so that racism gets acknowledged and addressed. 2. Framing: using a racial frame to describe an issue--e.g. “racial profiling,” “environmental racism,” “transit racism,” “racial redlining,” "real estate racism," etc.--so that institutional accountability and policy change becomes a central focus of the debate. 3. Explaining: making the existence of racism easily understandable and believable by: •Using concrete evidence, •Pointing out patterns, connections and causes •Placing the focus of attention on institutional targets, •Appealing to people’s core values of fairness, •Borrowing legitimacy and moral authority from respected sources, • Using irrefutable personal stories to illustrate systemic patterns, etc.
Beware of these Top 10 Techniques used to CONCEAL the system of white supremacy racism: 1. Denying: totally ignoring racism or simply asserting that racism does not exist. 2. Deflecting: insisting that any inequality is based on class, culture, ethnicity, family values… anything, but race. Or using words like “diversity” or “ethnicity” when you’re really talking about race -- because any acknowledgement of race may be an admission that there’s racism. 3. Coding: using certain words, symbols and images to evoke racial fears--but not explicitly mentioning race--so as not to appear racist. (Words such as “gang member,” “illegal alien,” and “welfare queen”--all frequently associated with images of people of color--are routinely and strategically inserted into policy debates. Political ads--such as President Bush Sr.’s use of the Willie Horton ad to conjure up white fears of black men, or former California Governor Pete Wilson’s ads of undocumented immigrants--were racist tools used to win elections.) 4. Confusing: cleverly appointing token Black people to positions to act as spokespersons or leaders to promote and justify racist measures or deny that something is racist. 5. Personalizing: blaming individuals, instead of institutions, for anything that may seem unequal or racist. 6. Exceptionalizing: acknowledging that there may be an extremist or “bad apple” responsible for a racist act, but never conceding that there is any institutional accountability or systemic inequality. 7. Scapegoating: holding people who are adversely affected by racism responsible for their own plight, blaming things on their “pathological” value and lifestyles, such as laziness, promiscuity or lack of “personal responsibility.” 8. Mythologizing: appealing to the great American myths: anyone who tries can succeed (myth of meritocracy); everyone/everything is equal (myth of the level playing field), or race is irrelevant (colorblind myth), etc. 9. Decontextualizing: ignoring the context of racism so that things appear to be isolated incidents, rather than part of a pattern or bigger picture. The evening television news is notorious for this, portraying, for example, a violent crime in a black neighborhood without any examination of the causes or.context. Similarly, when white people raise charges of so-called “reverse racism,” it ignores history, white privilege and the ongoing existence of a very uneven playing field. 10. Lying: simply asserting that racism doesn’t exist even when you know it does. It’s easier to lie since telling the truth might mean having to admit responsibility. In fact, sometimes the bigger the lie, the more people believe it.
Also, what ever happened to the Supreme Court Abortion leak. The FBI cannot find the person as well as the Ashley Biden diary, the FBI raided O'Keefe's with mid morning swat and then no one mentioned it again. What was that about. Also, now I bet the Secret Service does not find out who hid the cocaine in the WH.
Hey CNN, what do you have to say about the video that Dr. Gal Luft put out re, he is a Biden whistle blower in hiding. No mention from the fake press about that huge espose' video Luft put out yesterday. No, lets trash Trump. Dr. Gal Luft, first revealed the Chinese, Biden collusion prior to the 2020 presidential election and because of his whistleblowing, the FBI went after him as an arms agent against the U.S. Luft is in hiding, fearing for his life and the U.S. DOJ, who has covered up Luft's information. Wake up America. We have such a corrupt main stream video and DOJ. This stuff is scary.
Plenty of room for black and Hispanic students - just get rid of legacy admissions
The glaring hole in Thomas' response about AA in 2007 is WHO was discounting his Yale degree? It wasn't black people. He was looking for approval from white people and they were telling him he didn't deserve it and he bought into their lies. Maybe if he wasn't attempting to get the approval of white bigots he wouldn't think so little of himself.
The normal, level headed Americans MUST take their country back from the hateful, corrupt, sociopathic “Christian” “Republicans” before they go any further down this destructive! Death cults be deathing after all!
“Embarrassment to the state”??? It was the disruptive actions of these two legislators, and nothing else, that constituted an embarrassment to the state. A full trial of the two wasn’t needed. The offenses were committed right in front, and in the plain view, of the legislators who ultimately voted to exclude the two. KKK has nothing to do with anything that happened in the Tenn legislature. Sir, you are a race-baiter. You should not be teaching anyone law 😅
Fake expert. Russian is not a member of Rome Statues
International "Criminal" Court* You guys are a HOOT !!!! What is this, 'Comedy Hour' ? Id**ts !!
Nonsense. Arrest Bush and Obama look what they did in Iraq Libya Syria Afghanistan and more...
😂😂😂😂😂😂funny ICC 🎉🎉😂😂😂
Try to stop putin u will have war 3
New low is an understatement. Suggests partisanship is an understatement. The Court is now obstructing justice, andThomas is a co-conspirator in crime.
But the Justices could not care less what the lowly plebes think of them.
They have ethics?
Some of them do…3 of the 7. The rest are Republican/Federalist Society, also known as the Deep State, treasonous monsters 3 of whom should be null a void due to being appointed by an Insurrectionist president with the intent of using them to hold power.
The next step will be what was done by Hitler in Germany where the normal judicial system coexisted with the arbitrary power of Hitler and the police. In 1933, police power became independent of judicial controls. Protective custody meant the arrest-without judicial review- of real and potential opponents of the regime. In Protective custody" prisoners were not confined within the normal prison system but in concentration camps under the exclusive authority of the SS. the normal judicial system coexisted with the arbitrary power of Hitler and the police. The normal judicial system coexisted with the arbitrary power of Hitler and the police. After the Nazi rise to power in 1933, the German system of justice underwent "coordination" (alignment with Nazi goals). All professional associations involved with the administration of justice were merged into the National Socialist League of German Jurists. To make a long systematic story short, In April 1933, Hitler passed one of the earliest antisemitic laws, purging Jewish and also Socialist judges, lawyers, and other court officers from their professions. Carl Schmitt, advocated the nazification of German law, cleansing it of "Jewish influence." Judges were enjoined to let "healthy folk sentiment" (gesundes Volksempfinden) guide them in their decisions. Judges were enjoined to let "healthy folk sentiment". The worst came Under Roland Freisler, Hitler chief executioner, the People's Court became part of the Nazi system of terror, condemning tens of thousands of people as "Volk Vermin" and thousands more to death for "Volk Treason." The American courts have already been weaponized by Trump and if the GOP continue to make advances in the house and the Senate, the complete transformation to an American FASCIST POLICE STATE will become a reality!
It seems this radical right winger court is running amok. If there is true check and balance, so who checks unethical and illegal behavior of supreme court justices.