Відео

lol this dude took 3 philosophy classes so he thinks he can act like he’s morally and intellectually superior. So disingenuous, red hat kid is clearly well read but lacking actual intelligence and ability to do debate/socratic discussion

Parker is the male version of Kamala… which isn’t a compliment. Both seem to stray away from the debate question and don’t answer it 😂

adjective adjective: potential having or showing the capacity to become or develop into something in the future. "a two-pronged campaign to woo potential customers" h Similar: possible likely prospective future probable budding in the making latent embryonic developing dormant inherent unrealized undeveloped noun noun: potential; plural noun: potentials 1. latent qualities or abilities that may be developed and lead to future success or usefulness. "a young broadcaster with great potential" Don't skip grade 3 or Google before giving your definitions on the internet.

Its unbelievable to see the amount of red herrings and interruptions. The problem is: Parker is very low IQ and he thinks he’s smart, these are the most leech-type people. For instance, he would not address the point that other states can fuck the GDP with bad policies. He runs away from ideas that defeat his, and yet he rather “sound” like he’s winning then admit his mistakes and fix them. Dumb people don’t fix their mistakes, they double-down.

Parker thinks talking fast and using every syllable possible makes him smart. He just talks in circles trying to confuse people. And when they lose focus on Parker’s circle talking; he uses that as a “gotcha” moment for a clip. I’ve never watched a debate where Parker “wins” Parker saying “you are wrong” or “you’re dumb” makes people want to smack his smug, awful hairline off his condescending scalp

Parker is such a walking L I love that this dude wouldn’t let Parker dictate the conversation I can’t wait til people stop believing Parker is smart

Somethings with Andrew I don’t agree with from a moral standpoint. But I agree with everything about Andrew from an objective standpoint

Andrew Wilson making one argument the entire debate, and trying to ignore 999 arguments because “that’s not addressing my argument” and then talking about Red Herrings is hilarious, do you guys think he sees the irony in this?

This kid makes me regret naming my son Parker

Every time I've heard this person Argue He insults and acts as if he's on some higher Moral grounds than everyone else Reminds me Of the moron destiny It's sad that we've got people who think That that is a Good Debater It's ridiculous how insulting he is as well

i am so happy i ran into this channel, this is pure entertainment right here.

This kid Parker does the same thing everytime and thinks he can debate......he blabbers and deflects and always responds with "let me ask you a question" and then gets to name calling

dean sounds like a pseudo intellectual lol

If you can’t agree on the basic definitions of words there’s no conversation to ever have ever .dude needs a dictionary before he has a conversation

1:04 ad hominem

This is called "moving the goal post" or "pivoting". It's true brain rot and it's common in all leftist political arguement tactics. It's very slippery and is also probably the same reason your groceries are super expensive, gas is high, and property value is unaffordable. These political Tiktok debates move the goal post of what is intrinsically important to the lower/middle class and justify these claims by moving problems toward problems that don't matter or contribute to a solution to the underlying premise of a question. You have to learn how to fight a claim. Defensive critical thinking is misunderstood within many leftist social media political commentators because all they know how to do is talk. This is a great video to show how the Left tries to convince the right their talking points, but then they proceed to mute you when they start to lose. You don't win by moving a goal post or pivoting. That's just bad critical thinking. Parker and Dean are highly overrated debaters in this regard and when the light shines more on them. The more flawed they become in their argument tactics. Hence why videos like these are becoming more popular on them. This is the same party that was fully convinced that Kamala Harris was going to win. Guess what, she didn't. What does that say about the overall opinion on these stances they argue for? Clearly, the American people overall do not agree. Otherwise, Kamala would be the next president? I highly suggest if you found this video. Question every opposition and read up on 1 debate point.

Is parker a small child

bro Parker's definition of engaging in conversation is spurging all over the other person's point (consistent interruption). I have never seen him debate without constantly interrupting the person he's debating. Thank you brother for exposing his incompetence.

i mean as much as parker could have acknowledged the growth in the midwest, doesn’t that leave andrew to agree that the tax cut was not a good investment overall? or does andrew wants a president that helps grow the midwest and fucks up everyone else?

hate to say it...but your the asshat for muted the guy and not letting him talk...

3:56 listen buddy, the only one triggered here is you

the child said "definitions are subjective"

In not gonna lie this guy is just yapping and Parker sucks too but this guy is a fucking idiot as well lol

You need to be able to let your invitees speak. Extremely rude host. And yes, I am pro life.

Trees and plants are a live and they aren’t sentient so do I have rights to burn plants ?

This guy Parker is an intellectual asshole!! His intellect is worldly, brutish and foolish. This is why dems lost the election!! 😂😂😂😂

parker dont kno anything about females in general lmaoo

The problem wth all of parkers "data" is its all studies dn by activists and politicized individuals and entities.

Most people don’t remember being newborns and up to two or three year olds. By his logic, we can unalive newborns and toddlers.

heyy

Parker needs to grow up. He just talks faster and louder, which makes him think he won the debate. So annoying, this kid

I hate Parker, but I think this guy should let him ask the question. He was doing fine up until then. Otherwise I’d hate to admit, Parker is right and now they are bother childish.

I’m going to leave! You want me to leave? I will leave! Ahhhhhh I’m a childdddddd! I need my safe space! 😂😂😂😂😂 I have an intuition that he’s a white educated liberal vote 😂😂😂😂 aka 🤥🥴

"The way you're going to distinct that." Pseudo intellectual detected. Imagine Hitchens using the word "distinct" instead of "distinguish".

lol I don't understand parker was totally winning, the random mofo couldn't even keep up 😂 On a serious note though, obviously abortion should be legal, if its illegal you are restricing the freedom of women, whoever brought the argument "oh the unborn baby should have a say" politely stfu that baby is just one of 300 million sperm cells it has virtually no value. But yeah your body my choice ig cause im a man and that automatically makes me superior to women according to the radical right (which is probably who you are if you're watching these videos)

Holy shit, this kid is a retard and hes just repeating his talking points.

Music to my ears

I muted u because your microphone is messed up 😂😂

Andrew, do you genuinely think this is any beneficial? This dude is a clueless, annoying, Karen little kid. Why the f would this guy even be considered someone who has any idea what the hell he’s talking about

Psychobabble circular talking to justify murder

Did he really accuse him of gas lighting then attempted to gas light in 2 scenarios just minutes after

I disagree with Parker on everything but dude, you not letting him ask his question amidst your interrogation made me hate agreeing with your points.

The faculty of knowing or understanding something without reasoning or proof. That is the actual definition of intuition. He is using words he can't even come close to defining. What a buffoon.

But "intuit?" I'm pretty sure that doesn't have anything to do with "desire." Unless that's a philosophical definition? Am I wrong? I thought it meant what you are able to perceive or perform through your particular gifts?

dam parker got ruined

I know Parker probably won't read this but um according to google the definition of intuition is the ability to understand something immediately, without the need for conscious reasoning. It actually has nothing to do with desires at all. Merriam webster say intuition is the power or faculty of attaining to direct knowledge or cognition without evident rational thought and inference, which if my reading comprehension is working is a fancier way of saying what google said it. Parker doesn't know what intuition is, it seems.

There's no way 200 people (dislikes) think that Parker is actually winning this argument by gishgalloping and throwing ad-homs and getting angry like a child while this guy, juztkojo, is calmly debating in HIS own debate.

Both of these guys are stupid

This wasn’t even a debate.

I have no idea who either of these people are, but honestly, this whole "debate" was worthless. Just a bunch of social posturing and needlessly long-winded meaningless drivel. The purpose of debates are to get closer to understanding the truth. I don't think either side here really was interested in spreading the truth, even if the guy hosting the debate did act in better faith in the whole.