Відео

Not everyone on earth has to learn a language in order for it to be considered alive or thriving. There are already thousands of Anglishers, I see no reason this couldn't become millions.

You'll see that Mandarin is the language with the least amount of English loanwords. There's like sanminzhi (sandwich) and basi (bus) but for the most part they're doing really well!!

@Rolando_Cueva I think it also has to do with the type of language that Mandarin is, as there already set rules/characters for each word and how to create words. The best thing that Mandarin can do is borrow words through sounds. But what about the languages concentrated in that area? Which languages has Mandarin borrowed from through the ages that it has been in existence? Let's not forget that there are many languages spoken in China and I even think that standard Mandarin is comprised of those many languages, don't quote me on that. What argument I'm trying to make is that it is close to impossible to keep a language pure, as history has demonstrated that cultures and languages have been borrowing from each ever since like forever, especially the neighboring regions. In fact I believe that the more words a language borrows and "makes it its own", the more complex, sophisticated, influential, and powerful it becomes, and I believe English has been one of the few to do this successfully. If I say, I have explained it to you ad nauseam, it makes me sound snobbish all of a sudden, versus if I just say, I'm sick and tired if explaining it to you. However there is something very beautiful and sophisticated about Anglish and how it sounds, based on some samples this user has created for us.

Thanks for watching, Theedish Man in Vinland.

Indeed. The far hearer in my land mostly talks about what's going on at home. :( This helps me keep up.

Most Anglishers allow Latin borrowed words from before 1066, so it' not hard to find. Words like "line", "candle", "kitchen", and so forth. Later Latin borrowings likely still would have happened even if the Norman overlordship never did, so I think it's a fair thing to wonder about.

Excuse me, wrong Button ( in german Knopf , related to Knob?). In many germannic languages ,royal' is Königlich, kunniglik ... , the words for king and a lich/lik so royal should be in Brittain replaced with kinglic. Guard: Also in german language Garde is known ( french culture was also in HRE and into 19th century important), but Leibwache ( unit) and Leibwächter ( a single man) exists also. Now german Leib means body, but Leib could be somehow related to Leben ( life). In Sweden guard units name starts with Liv. Am not sure, but have heared, in Sweden IS a collection with former Personal weapons/ armour of swedish kings called Livrustkammeren, in german surely Leibrüstkammer. So guard/ Bodyguards should be replaced with a word , beginning with life. And ward/ warden is in german Wart/ Wärter (both dated). Watch in german Wacht, see Imperial song : Die Wacht am Rhein.Wstchman, in german Wachmann or more common Wächter (See norwegian vägtere). So a Bodyguard/ Guardsoldier could be a lifewatchman or Lifewarden.In german words with Tele have a german counterpart with fern. Television - Fernseher ( farseer), Telescope- Fernrohr ( farpipe), Telephone - Fernsprecher ( farspeaker, but this word was never realy popular, but official term in Telephone cell era). Then Beef is in german Rindfleisch, pork is Schweinefleisch ( swine, sow/ Schwein, Sau), veal is in german Kalbfleisch ( Kalb/ calf). A sidenote: Mett is raweaten pork.

More or less, yes. For reading it works better. But with spoken language, in practice, not so much. Most English speaking folk, at least here in the states, aren't very analytical. If you take a second to think about what was said in the example, about 80% of it is immediately understandable. Most people however, won't apply the mental effort to figure out the other 20% percent, and they will reject the entire phrase and look at you as if you had two heads. I've been there. "I don't get you" is the main reply. I used to like challenging people a little, but I've mostly given up on it. Farseer makes sense -- it's a calque for television -- but most people don't know how to break down words, Latin words even less, and Greek words like telos and vision even less, so I don't think most would catch this. Nameknown makes perfect sense but is supremely unusual. It sounds beautiful and poetic like old tales. Most folks reject being spoken to like olden times though. Showplayer also makes sense but feels very vague. I'm not sure what it refers to here. Lifewarden is extremely confusing. Lifeguard is much more understandable and normal even if the spelling looks more Latin. It feels like it refers to something here other than what it normally means so I don't understand. Is it a civil guard, a nurse, or a surf rescuer like normal? -lic (or really -like) is not used nearly as much as the reduced -ly. In some British English they still use -like but it is not used almost at all in American English. It's not actually very different but it comes off almost as stiff as Latin does. Being more exposed to British English I've definitely confused people using the -like form before. Kingly everyone understands. Kinglike still works to the eye, but Kinglic is archaic. Hereshow I don't understand at all. If it's here as in army, that term is not used in modern English at all. It belongs to the "common tongue" words in English -- those words it has or had in common with it's sister languages -- but a great many have dropped out completely in the modern tongue, or taken on a very specialized meaning instead of the more general one -- like the word deer referring specifically to a hart or an elk, instead of any wild creature -- which is nearly as bad. It's all good English and the most of the words are common, but the combinations are so outlandish to most folks that it strikes them as confusing and thus "wrong". I want to say that these people are kind of stupid. More generously normal folks aren't used to wordplay. They like stiff predictable phrases. Colocations is the scientific word for this. To them, the words and their pairings should not be used freely and they see free mixing of words as incorrect. People are extremely sensitive to out of the ordinary things for them. It shouldn't matter but it does. It confuses them. People don't like to be confused. If you are a foreigner they can forgive you for speaking understandably, but strangely. Coming from a native though it seems bizarre and unlikable to them.

@@Rainbow_Oracle : The sentence would be in english: In TV i didn't watched a famous english actor, but Royal Guard on parade. In german : Im Fernseher sah ich keinen berühmten englischen Schauspieler, aber eine Parade ( archaic Heerschau) der königlichen Leibwache. In german words containing Tele ( Television/ Teleskop/ Telefon) are Fernseher, Fernrohr ( farpipe), Fernsprecher ( farspesker, but to be fair, this word of Telephone cell era was mostly used only in official context), for Ruhm ( not Rum!!!)/ fame i don' t know a germannic english word. When Germany/ Austria was Monarchy, french words had been used alot, know it from my childhood /youth in 1960s/70s. But after Napoleonic wars, many french words had been replaced by german words, sometimes by this ones, being replaced by french ones in late 17th century ( for example the Sergeant became again the Feldwebel), so Royal or Imperial was in Germany/ Austria not so much a thing ( so königlich or kaiserlich, also Continental germannic countries call their kings König similar to German , and königlich is for example kunniglik. The german word for Parade , Heerschau, is today very rare, but German Army ( the ground forces!) are the Heer still today. Life is Leben, and Body is Leib, i ( NO scientist!) assume Leben und Leib are somehow related , and in sweden the name of Guard unit starts with Liv..... Now english watchman is in german Wachmann or Wächter ( in Norway vägtere) and ward/ warden is in german Wart/ Wärter (both dated). So you perhaps understand my thougts.

@@Rainbow_Oracle : Forgotten: Tier is german umbrella word for annimal. Was , when learning english from 1976 to 1982, rather surprised, when i heared Barn is english word for Scheune ( dated Scheuer). In my german dialect, Barn means upper part of a Scheuer, in Standard German Barn doesn' t appear.

Thanks! I always encourage others to make Anglish content as well. There more folks making things in Anglish the more it becomes a living tongue.

I think it is right to brook those names as it is folk names also brooking theedish is just as rightly as theedly since -ish ekes the meaning "of the folk"

Thanks, that's what I go for.

I think it would be a bit too wildering to switch shortenings like that. It might make it too hard to understand.

Silence germanoid ed get civilized by le superior anglese norman language

@@claromale per le superior Norman language

@@claromaleGermanic culture is the superior culture. I would have thought that was clear after the creation of France by a Germanic tribe and its multiple defeats and overshadowing by the German nation.

@@Valencetheshireman927 id's entirely false ed obviously germanoid propaganda

@@claromale They’re all facts friend. Everyone can see where the Franks came from and all the various French defeats to Germany.

Vive l'Angleterre NORMANDE 🔥🔥🔥

French is just badly pronounced Latin words, Greek words, Dutch words, Italian words, other West Germanic words, Middle Eastern words (Persian, Aramaic, Arabic)

@@Itube100 nah, it’s perfectly pronounced. Cry baby

@@ludoviciusmagnus5125 imagine skipping 70% of all your consonants in speech

@@Galaxy-tm5ev Imagine have been colonized by francese elite 😎