Відео

Sorkin omitted that the names read weren't just U.S. servicemen, but Vietnamese as well. It transformed this from being the brutal cost of an immoral war to 'support the troops'. He defanged the politics throughout.

To whom.

Umm severely triggered that u played the endgame scene and cut away right before he said assemble. I feel incomplete and thus; heard nothing else you said after.

what a crap video, an amazing film and u rant on about a few seconds of dialogue like a little gay boy

3:45 "we can fit exactly 10 bucky barnes in the frame" 😂😂😂

Miss u man

I think that’s your flaw. You thought Marla was the protagonist… she’s not she’s the antagonist. She’s the Jordan Belford of the movie and whether you can figure out they’re the bad guy of the film says a lot about the viewer.

😊

OK, I object strongly to that "Bucky is beloved because he's redeemable" line. He's not Darth Vader. He wasn't exercizing any kind of free will or autonomy when he killed those people. He was literally tortured to a point where he was left with irreversible brain damage. Tortured and brainwashed to such an extent that he couldn't remember his own name, and reduced to a state were he wasn't capable of doing anything except comply. That's relatable because despite what we might say *all* of us could break if we were tortured enough. We all have limits. He's beloved because he's a good person who was forced against his will to do awful things, but in spite of that is still trying to be good and not to hurt anyone: we know he's a moral person because he still feels guilt and shame over actions that he was forced to perform under duress and when not in control: which is something a villain would not do. He's beloved because he could have just given in to all the pain, abuse and torture and allowed himself to be corrupted by it- but instead he survived and tried to reclaim his humanity, his kindness and his protective nature. A lot of characters (looking at you Zemo) use their pain, loss and suffering as an excuse for their misdeeds and for doing harm to others: but Bucky doesn't. Instead he tries to be better, to rise above his suffering, to not do harm and to even do good if he can. He's beloved because he's probably endured more suffering than any other character in the MCU, and had no choice in almost anything that happened to him but when he does get to exercize his autonomy again, he chooses to try and do good and to help others. Despite all that he almost never puts himself first and doesn't become bitter or angry with the world. He's beloved because he's a survivor. That's why many abuse survivors and trauma victims love him. Someone below said that everything that happened to Bucky is a lot like a r*pe analogy. He didn't have a choice, he didn't even give consent to being given the super-soldier serum. He didn;t have bodily autonomy and was punished or tortured for any attempt to assert autonomy or refusal to comply. Instead of recognizing that he was a victim, most characters blame him and think he wanted it, or chose it.

So a few point. First of all, Bucky was held by HYDRA for 69 years, not 90 years. From January 1945 until 2014. I don't even know where they got the 90 years part from, I suspect its just a lazy oversight. Second, Sam's "advice" in Episode 5-6 is terrible. He bascially tells Bucky he has to "cure himself" of PTSD by "putting in the work". No mental health professional (which Sam is meant to be) would say that. He also dismisses and ignores clear symptoms of trauma and a nervous breakdown in John Walker as him being "crazy" and makes no effort to help or support him (instead siding with Lemar's killers). Note: many psychologists and therapists won't even allow the word "crazy" to be used in a mental health context. The way the show treats PTSD as basically magically disappearing by means of a person with the condition basically self-flagellating and taking the blame for actions they were forced to perfom under duress is actually vile. I would even go as far as to call it a step backwards in terms of mental health representation in the media. The fact that the other character with trauma (John) is villainized and casually brushed off makes it even worse. For goodness sake, writers, **please** put in the work. Do actual research on PTSD, mental health, therapy, and recovery before depicting it. By failing to do so, you are not helping the cause of representation or destigmatizing mental health, you are just perpetuating harmful stereptypes and misconceptions. The movies actually do a better job of portraying Bucky's PTSD than the series, probably because Sebastian Stan did his homework, researched PTSD at some length and reportedly even spoke to veterans.

Saving those pretty rocks from the Kobolds!

Love your videos keep them up

Thanks for the video I’m a big fan of inside number nine can’t get enough of it

One highly theorized reason Bucky sleeps on the floor is because he was possible SAd as a result of Hydra. It’s not uncommon, it happened in the Red Room a lot, but it’s certainly a possibility considering SA is used as a power move over victims, and one huge side effect of victims is that they sleep on the floor or other unconventional places because beds remind them of their assault.

When you see everything through the apophenic and misandric feminist ideological lens, you don't see reality. You see a fictional world that only exists in your mind. You can find misogyny in the air we breathe and the water we drink. For you, everything is male oppression, and all women are victims of the patriarchy. Your review of the series was an exhausting and tedious woke exercise of Where's Waldo, or in this case, where's the patriarchy. Your "analysis" revealed nothing about the series but laid bare your contemptuous feminist insecurities. I learned nothing about the series but a lot about you and your woke ideology.

PTSD is Nothing to Snear at, I've been dealing with it for Years, anyone who has it needs Support and Not Aggravation, because it could be Disasterous to Everyone involved

Is this confirmed? because it seems like a bit of a stretch to assume because he is in a shadow, it is therefore an intentional nod at Jung's idea of "the shadow" Also, the shadow in Jung's philosophy isn't necessarily the "unknown". It refers more to one's darker side of the unconscious. It is true that the shadow can possess unknown or repressed negative traits which influence us, but those things can be equally "known" but simply not addressed, so i don't think the unknown is an apt description. But in regards to the film, his dim lighting to represent a million things; Jung's the shadow isn't high on the list in my opinion

I think he had more than just PTSD, but that's my opinion. Or rather, he probably already had PTSD in the 1940s, because the poor man was already being experimented on by HYDRA when Steve rescued from from that facility. My guess is he might've had some neurological damage from the electric shocks they kept giving him to "wipe" his memory as well. I mean that wasn't like electroconvulsive therapy- because the shocks were clearly a lot stronger than that, since he was screaming in agony from them. Personally, I wasn't too keen on how they handled the PTSD in the series. They seem to have forgotten about it after Episode 2 and devoted more time to the other storylines then just added a few seconds as an afterthought in the final episide with him confessing what he did to Yumi's son. We needed *way* more time for that. Was that therapist deliberately trying to trigger him as well? She kept doing that thing with the pen and notebook?

your take and all of your commenters are so off-base

Mr. Hitcock you are a master of the screen, your approach is a thinker of art. I understand you come from Cuba but your bio says you are of Irish decent attended St. Ignocio but you know the ghost writers want to put the charm. I notice your lips are mimicking prickly behavior. And, you died of unknown causes-but your work moves on to today's writing. In other words, you are ahead of the times, timelines.United States v. Patrick, 513 Fed. Appx. 882, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 5469, 90 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. (Callaghan) 1301, 2013 WL 1150144

There is nothing profound about this film other than how bad it is! You've been consuming child-fantasy themed movies for too many years. This isn't intellectually challenging unless you're already challenged. I paid for the Blu-ray, and tried to enjoy it. Everything was recycled! Everything! The music, the scenes. What was with the love scene? It was so sad! A 50-year old single mother with a disapproving daughter fantasy? The love interest was superfluous! She didn't matter because she contributed nothing. Unlike the love interest of the first movie. She was Maverick's instructor, and it was their little secret that she admired him enough to let him, a reckless youth, into her personal life. He was always looking for thrills, and the tragedy of his friend's death grounded him. She challenged him at that point. Played against his sense of responsibility and his ego to get him back into service. He had his character arch. In this new production, it's just a bunch of nonsense. Think about it... the impossible mission could have been accomplished by a small team with a drone. And it wasn't impossible at all. No casualties! They all survived, unscathed. Not even loading up their pants, coming close to death or anything. It's not like Maverick was going down. He's the point of the entire film. But the other pilots could have been taken out. So it was basically summer camp with a video game. Their equipment fails mid mission and they still get the "impossible" job done. Maverick pilots an inferior plane, gets the drop on one enemy jet, but him overcoming the last one except that he ran out of missiles? What is this nonsense? And you want to invest so much of your spirit into something so lame. Look back to better movies. You'll find plenty to talk about. This is like getting excited over a badly put together ritz cracker sandwich. It's not worthy. Eventually, the same kind of people who loved J.J. Abram's take on "Star Trek" and "Star Wars" will come around as they've done before. They'll say... this wasn't that good. Some will even dare to say... this was bad, all except the action which at least had some thrills. But that's it. Shake your head. You're under some kind of spell.

My biggest question is how they made the sound like what they did to the whale call and how they did it

True , I lived a situation similar to this

I think inside no.9 video explanations are underwhelmingly underrated :<

Well done. I’ve been binge-watching Lupin and was interested to find some content on racism which has been so subtly yet consistently portrayed in it. Your video is perhaps the only relevant one that I could find to talk about it in a meticulous manner. It’s strange that there are hardly any other commentary about the same.

I'm just here trying to understand the winter soldier jokes so I can laugh at them

It ended up looking great. That clean/grimey look is just so hard to recreate. Very few films have I seen that give me that same vibe from the visual side.

Amazing

This movie is one of my favorites. Johnny Depp's performance is just superb. The cinematography was on point, and I loved their use of colors and score to enrich each scene.

Great job Robert!!! Keep it coming 👍

We got to knock it off with selling this trope of the male gaze. People watch movies to escape. People want to see beautiful characters. What do you call a movie like Thor. They take every chance they can to remove his shirt. To show his six-pack abs and muscles. So is Thor written by the female gaze?? There was even a scene in Thor when they snap their fingers in all his clothes came off. Now imagine if that was a woman's character. Stop overanalyzing.

We do not need any more forced representation. The Queens Gambit is fiction. Which is fine. But the advertisement was set up to lead people to believe that it was true. Which it is not a true story

fantastic analysis of a favorite movie of mine!! I hope more people see this

🤣🤣🤣 dude Robert this is awesome! Can't wait to see the full video man! It's been too long! Would love to get everyone chatting again on the discord 👌👍 all the best man

If you take suggestions, would you ever be able to do a video like this for the first episode? Would really be interested in that

Plot twist then misdirection then plot twist, this seems the key to many of the best episodes of Inside No 9 if you had to say it as a forumla. 12 days of Christine, Bernie Cliftons dressing Room, A quiet Night in (in a way), Misdrection.

Brilliant analysis

This is another UNDERATED Fight Club VIDEO

Love this! Great seeing all of your work, best wishes from the Gaffer at pinewood :)

Holy shit. I'll have what he's having! Which I assume is the new LSD Beavertown? This is awesome, did you venture into animation? What did you use to create it? Its fantastic!

Really good job on this video :)

This video didn't really offer anything in terms of improving your plot twists. It's just a loose breakdown of an episode of inside no 9. Title > Substance.

Sigh. Director inserts comedy into a scene where the lead character learns something. Characters talk in a coded manner apt to the time period. 90 years later some bright spark notices that people back then were sexist compared to the 2020s and makes a video.

How do you not have more subs

This was interesting. Would Tyler just kill off Jack himself by starvation and stuff? Would Tyler inadvertently kill Himself as well?

Great video!

Shes walking around scantly clad, from the male perspective this doesn't ring any alarm bells. Fair enough if that male wasn't watching the Queen's Gambit. however, in the show's context, it is a double fire alarm. The problem is confusing characters with real people and movies with reality. Both are simulacrums, not the tangible reality we live through. If movies didn't have a gaze they would be unbearable to watch, like news footage without editing.

Well…”The 39 Steps” was made in Britain, not the USA, so the Hays Code did NOT apply to it. You can clearly see a variety of things in 1930s British movies which would’ve been prohibited in American movies at this time, and that’s because there was no similar national censorship. (I’m thinking of the lyrics to some George Formby songs as just one example.) Hitchcock made this film for his home market and its release in the US was only a secondary consideration, so saying this particular scene was to defy the Hays Code is a big stretch. It was just Hitchcock being naughty and suggestive the way he always wanted to be.

I’m only 3 seasons deep, and I really enjoyed Tom and gerri, but I think the 2 standouts by far, are the call centre episode, and the crossword episode. Both of those had me shook.

Fantastic video Rob! Can’t wait to see more. What was the slider rig you used out of interest?