Відео

Academics will speak like academics if you treat them like academics. He's here, at the end of it all saying "wrap it up, you are stupid" and not letting his opponent finish a sentence through out the debate without interrupting with some mumbling. Your ideas were useful in what we can call the 'Richard Dawkins era' and could be seen as a kind of 'revolution.' What Hashmi is doing is offering a counter-argument to new-age atheist myths, using historical, sociological, and philosophical perspectives to bridge the gap between those myths and the realities of the function of religious grouping that could be realized through Islam. He sees it as an evolving entity and views its operationalization through the ages mostly as a human creation, like any other world religion.

WRONG!! That same word for woman is used for killing babies in the river in the time of Moses.

Harris made me hear the, "fcuk u, fcuk u, fcuk u,.. " as in the Indian accent meme. The "four-horse-men" era of atheism is out dated bro. Well done Hashimi for trying to bring out a much deeper understanding of Islam 🍉🫒❤️

The key important points he made here I've not heard articulated before: - the isnad was a later invention - some narrators seemed to have suspicously long lives - hadiths had a rough cut off point for prophecies - hadiths reflected the changing times - you can measure the rate of variation using ICMA and conclude it is exactly like a 'game of telephone' - the hadiths contains storytelling tropes - there's an amnesiac disconnect between hadiths and the Quran

i cringe! really i cringe when i hear yasir qadhi speak

@1:50 you clearly started feeling the fires of Hell, right? 😄

Interesting, but does anyone really need a PhD to be sceptical about the hadith? They're just anecdotes about what was allegedly said or done in a specific period well before they were documented. They often contradict each other and are based on a chain of hearsay. They wouldn't past muster in any (Western) court of law to be admitted as evidence. Memory is fallible and people exaggerate. Then you've got to take into account that they were recounted and then compiled by believers, so there's a possible bias factor coming into play there. And how did Bukhari, e.g., collect these in the first place? Some Dawahgandists will claim that he memorised ~600k without writing anything (or very little) down. Thats literally impossible as it would amount to him having to memorise something like ~25m words, inc both matm and isnad. He also needed to mentally organise these, memorise them, analyse them and cross reference them to work out which contradicted each other and which ones contradicted the Quran - all in his head! Ludicrous.

it's like a pure water with drops of black ink, give it more time and the whole color will change without mixing it. give it more time and the image will change. this is just sad.

Dr how do you reconcile animal suffering with a compassionate god?

I actually think Daniel should be arrested

Daniel is the clown who once said " if you say yes to college for women , you are saying yes to your granddaughter on onlyfans " What an imbecilic individual he is

Shit job here Javid. You really didn't seem like You were interested in what he had to say. Very poor form

Religious pluralism doesn't mean that kafirs will not be in hell forever. They will.

Without the Quran there would have been no hadith....!! So, the Quran is the superior & hadith explain the Quran...

The Prophet peace be upon him followed the Quran. The Quran states that the age of maturity has to be reached for marriage. Children are not for marriage.

16:19 yes reports from liars like the rafida. no caliph burnt hadeeth books.

How do you verify the qira'aat and riwayaat of the Quran?

Until this day in Sudan, Doctors in the rural area guess the age when a birth certificate is needed in case of starting school for example .. Because mostly there are no records keeping in villages & the country sides. Islamophobes like this argument against Islam when they're cornered about the bible corruption.... Too bad for them we like our prophet & our holy Quran... Thanks God for Islam

You made Islam make so much sense to me. Alhamdulilah

Thank you very much very helpful and informative vedio

Thank you Dr Javad for doing this interview learned a lot .

It is good for muslims to revisit hadiths despite the authentic ones. Alot of works ...

Muslim&Non-Muslim Islamophobes aren't Islamic-Authorities: garethbryant.wordpress.com/2024/05/22/islamophobesarentauthorities/

Written with their own hands; TALMUD!!!!!

I have recently discovered your channel and i like your way of thinking. But if we cant trust hadith then how do we pray? How do I know how to pray?

It still amazes me that people think that this is the methodology a supposedly all-knowing Creator of an entire universe would use to convey a final message to one particular species on one particular planet. Relay a message via an angel to a supposedly illiterate man who will, in turn, pass that message onto his followers bit by bit. Some of them may hopefully take notes (scribes); others will just memorise the recitation..... oh, some of these key narrators have been dying in battle, let's collate everything into a book and then subsequently have disputes over the correct recitations, so Uthman has to order variant copies to be burned, but you still see textual variants now (Hafs vs Warsh va al-Bazzi).... and you can only understand the Quran by using the hadiths... but loads of those were fabricated after being collected by Bukahri and others just wandering around over several years and somehow working out their own grading systems.... but if you still have questions about Islam you also have to consult the Sunnah and the scholars..... and now academics like Dr Hashmi here are now saying those same scholars were wrong. You've only had 1400 years to sort out such an incoherent mess!

I'm not diminishing the general intent of the message, and I think most, if not all people who listen to this would affirm the humanity of everyone in the conflict, regardless of religion or lack thereof. But I did get uncomfortable when you mentioned atheists as being a major force behind Zionism. Not that I think your statement isn't correct but I do think it can be weaponized by people who might quote mine you against non believers, especially with them being minorities in many countries.

The Quran refers to the Torah and the Gospel as they were sent down, not the corruption that the Jews and the Christians have added into them. The Bible is not corrupted but a compilation of the sacred texts of the Christians and the Jews that include parts of the previous scriptures as well. Imagine if Muslims decided to combine all the Islamic texts such as the Quran, the hadith, and the seerah into one volume and gave it a single name, that would be what Bible is to the Christians and the Jews. No Muslim would refer to that book as the Quran. Similarly, the Bible is not the same as the Torah, Injil, and Zabur, the Bible contains parts of those scriptures. So we use the Quran as a criterion when reading the texts of the People of the book. And also, "with them" doesn't mean that everything they have with them is correct.

Very smart man

Hadith is collected and sorted into into various reliability categories. I don't think that there could be an issue with that process. The question which may be raised is if the prophet really said them. From person-to-person transmission errors, and the transmitters failing memories, to malicious transmitters, they may be compromised. That may be so, but still they could be significant if the transmitters are known to be non-malicious. So if they do not negate Quran, or each other, or the common sense, or contradicted by well known facts, their may be partially true. In those cases, one needs to take them into consideration. Aisha was 5 or 6 or 7 etc. for example, is one of those case where one should not rely on them. However, that her age may be wrong, does not mean that, the rest of the story is wrong.

The Age of `Ai'shah bint-`Abdillah (May Allah be pleased with them) and Muhammad ibn-`Abdillah (Peace be upon them) is well documented. garethbryant.wordpress.com/2013/11/17/thechildmarriageissue/ garethbryant.wordpress.com/2020/10/29/judeochristianislamophobia/

"Abrahamic" is a Mythos/Pseudo-Narrative...the 1st Muslim-Human was Adam (Peace be upon them): the Progenitor/Patriarch-Of-Humanity. (Noble-Qur'an: Chpt.2, V.30-36) garethbryant.wordpress.com/2022/01/30/abrahamicfallacy/

This-Video is Islamophobia by default/definition via al-Qur'aniyyah/Qur'anism. garethbryant.wordpress.com/2013/08/17/quranandsunnahjointly/ garethbryant.wordpress.com/2019/11/13/quranism/

The Quran doesn’t confirm the bible in the sense that people think. When the Quran points to what is revealed there in, it doesn’t mean it endorses everything in the bible between the 2 covers, including the writings of Paul. The bible and its contents have changed many times

You’re an expert in saying a lot without really saying anything clearly. And the Quran is not endorsing the bible. Even Christian’s don’t claim the whole bible is revelation. except conservative evangelicals who believe the earth is 6000 years old.

Look how Muslims treat women and gay people so I do believe he married a child

Shouting, raising your voice and being argumentative does not mean that you are right. It's suppose to be a dialogue, give Dr Javad a chance to speak.

Hadiths = Talmud

ua-cam.com/video/5W1Ez_XNZb0/v-deo.htmlsi=qVb1L0Yz9oZ4SHjZ

Dr Anthony, Islamic website has the same rock inscription. They have translated line 8 as BUILT while you have translated it as REBUILT. Who is right?

Hello Javad I am a Islamic traditionalist I just want to give a few points of criticism First the idea that traditionalist Muslims were not rationalist is simply an absurd idea example asharis (the majortiy of sunnis) It is said that in the early period, Ash'arites followed a method that combined reason and revelation. This is in contrast to the assertions by some Ash'arites that those who believe without thinking (mukallid) cannot be true believers.This view indicates that believing in religion without using reason and thought is considered invalid according to them. The later period some Ash'arites prioritized reason and relegated revelation to a secondary position, stating that revelation could never contradict reason. Examples of these include al-Juwayni, al-Ghazali, Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, and Qadi Baydawi. The majority of the Ash'arites went further, stating that only reason provides certain knowledge, while revelation is merely a matter of conjecture and cannot provide knowledge or certainty.(you can find the sources in wikipedia) As for the flat earth their are list of muslim scholars who did not believe it and some even said their was conseuses (Ibn hazm ibn tayimyah ibn jawzi fahkr al din razi al juwayni and al ghazali as examples of scholars who said the world was round) As for arab superortiy all the sources are salafi and if you read the rest of ibn tayimyah you find him saying However, the people of theological rhetoric are of the view that there is no excellence or preference of one race over another, and this is the view of Abu Bakr Ibn Al-Tayyib and others. This is also the doctrine of 'Ash-Shu'ubiyah' (a group who hate and oppose the Arabs) so majortiy of muslims (asharis and maturdis) do not have this view and we have clear hadith and quran verse saying that everyone is equal on them being pious As for slave women dress even seculer historians disagree with you pernila myre says in her essay slaves for purchase says that most jurist do require slaves to cover themselves up in the hanfi school Abu Hanifa and al-Shaybani stated that a concubine's chastity should be protected and she should be established inside the home According to Ibn Abidin, most Hanafi scholars did not allow a female slave's chest, breasts or back to be exposed for the maliki school they use prove form the people of Medina here is what they say Ibn Jurayj (150 AH/767 CE) reported that it had reached him from some of the sheikhs of the people of Medina that slave women wear the khimar (it is big enough to cover the chest) when they begin to menstruate, but they do not wear the jilbab. in the hanbail school kuwait encyclopedia of fiqh says that The Hanbali scholars said the nakedness of a maidservant is like the nakedness of a free woman. It is not permissible to look at her except with what is permissible to see in regards to a free woman. The zahrir were know to also say that their awrah is the same as a free women also they could not just be bare chested in the middle of the pubic evidence for this is It is not permissible for a man to look at a slave woman other than his own Muhammad ibn al-Hassan al-Shaybani (d. 189 AH/804 CE). Al-Mabsut, vol. 3, p. 47 If you want more information of the topic i reccomed reading the essay Status Distinctions and Sartorial Difference: Slavery, Sexual Ethics, and the Social Logic of Veiling in Islamic Law it clear that this was done when there was no fitna as stated As for what has been reported about the jurists of the garrison towns (fuqahāʾ al-amṣār), who permit a woman to expose her face and hands, this is restricted to [cases in which] there is no fear of temptation (fitna). Where can such a well-behaved society-in which a person is safe from the fear of temptation when women go about unveiled-be found? zāhid al-kawtharī (d. 1371/1951) As for enuchs and boy love this is clear haram if you just read the Quran and hadith remember the scholars are not infalible. There is more but these are my main problems and sorry for my bad English hope to hear a response and salam.

Since no one can reconcile evolution and the islamic concept of Adam and eve; I present my hypothesis. 1. Explanation of Adam and Eve as first humans; Adam was the first mutated Homo sapiens originating from within a neanderthal community. This means that he was the first Homo sapiens. Similarly Eve was also the first female Homo sapiens. God says that Adam is a messenger. This means a community was present for the message to be delivered to. The above mentioned neanderthal community could be the recipient of his message. 2. Who did the sons of Adam marry? They married the neanderthal females. They would have the dominant genes for them to produce Homo sapiens offspring from the neanderthal females.

Christian comes from the name Christ , SO HOW CAN JESUS BE CHRISTIAN? RELIGION CAME AFTER JESUS CHRIST.

This great why don't Muslims present this perspective when doing dawah. I would like to communicate a hypothesis how the three Abrahamic religions are one structural unit

Muslims don’t realize that by canonizing “Hadith” they just turn themselves into Mushrikeen.

I'm an ex-Christian and I think it is fascinating that back then we start to see Muslims try to get Christians to be, well, Christians by appealing to their book (though still asking to also appeal to the Quran). And I always thought it was weird that many Muslims don't quote the Torah despite the Quran having a high reverence for it. But it is certainly surprising to me that the Quran appeals to the Gospels. But I notice it doesn't mention them by name, merely saying the Gospels, which I think would include MORE than just the 4 gospels Christians currently hold.

Excellent, but too fast. You need to go a bit slower and let the information sink in the mind of the listener.

Qur'an 71:17 ‘And God has caused you to grow from earth like a plant (in a mode of growth particular to you) The verse alludes to the first origin of the father of humanity from the elements of the earth - soil, air, and water - and also the material origin of every human being, which are the same elements that are made into particular biological entities in human body. As Hamdi Yazır points out, the word nabātan, which comes at the end of the verse as an adverbial complement to "grow," denotes the particular way of human creation and growth. So, the verse allows no room for any inclination toward the Darwinian Theory of Evolution.

Javed, Habibur Rahman Kandhalwi had reached conclusions similar to those of Joshua in the early 90s. Pls check his research book, available pdf online, Omar e Ayesha par Tahqiqi Nazar. I hope you can read Urdu, being a Pakistani. عمر عائشہ پر تحقیقی نظر، حبیب الرحمن کاندھلوی. Carry on your great work!

Ex-Muslim Culture bears 0-Merit: garethbryant.wordpress.com/2023/02/05/exmuslimculture/