- 537
- 658 681
PsychOut
India
Приєднався 11 лип 2020
Your go to destination for everything related to cognitive biases - definitions, example, experiments and more!
Cognitive biases are errors the brain makes which can lead to faulty or irrational decision making. This occurs because the brain tries to comprehend the abundance of information or the lack of information in our surroundings and tries to help us come to a conclusion quickly. Learning about cognitive biases can help us make decisions better and can prevent us from making irrational decisions.
Cognitive biases are errors the brain makes which can lead to faulty or irrational decision making. This occurs because the brain tries to comprehend the abundance of information or the lack of information in our surroundings and tries to help us come to a conclusion quickly. Learning about cognitive biases can help us make decisions better and can prevent us from making irrational decisions.
Swimmer's Body Illusion Deep Dive
Ever wonder why copying successful people's habits doesn't always lead to similar results? In this eye-opening episode, we dive into the fascinating world of the "Swimmer's Body Illusion" - a cognitive bias that might be secretly sabotaging your path to success.
From Olympic athletes to tech billionaires, we'll unpack why success stories often hide an invisible truth: what looks like pure cause-and-effect usually isn't. You'll discover why Harvard's impressive graduation rates might not tell the whole story, and why those inspiring "dropout to billionaire" tales deserve a second look.
Join us as we explore how to recognize this sneaky bias in your own thinking and learn practical strategies for charting a path to success that actually makes sense for you. Whether you're an entrepreneur, athlete, or ambitious professional, this episode will transform how you think about achievement.
Ready to see success stories in a whole new light? Listen now and discover why the most popular paths to success might not be what they seem.
From Olympic athletes to tech billionaires, we'll unpack why success stories often hide an invisible truth: what looks like pure cause-and-effect usually isn't. You'll discover why Harvard's impressive graduation rates might not tell the whole story, and why those inspiring "dropout to billionaire" tales deserve a second look.
Join us as we explore how to recognize this sneaky bias in your own thinking and learn practical strategies for charting a path to success that actually makes sense for you. Whether you're an entrepreneur, athlete, or ambitious professional, this episode will transform how you think about achievement.
Ready to see success stories in a whole new light? Listen now and discover why the most popular paths to success might not be what they seem.
Переглядів: 5
Відео
Sunk Cost Fallacy Video
Переглядів 149 годин тому
🧠 Ever stuck with a terrible decision just because you've already invested time or money? Welcome to the sneaky world of the sunk cost fallacy - the psychological trap that's costing you more than you think! Learn more about the Sunk Cost Fallacy: medium.com/@mycognitivebiases/the-hidden-cost-of-past-investments-understanding-the-sunk-cost-fallacy-66914b461646 In this quick 100-second guide, we...
Survivorship Bias Deep Dive
Переглядів 214 годин тому
Why do we idolize success stories and overlook the failures? In this episode, we explore survivorship bias, the tendency to focus on winners while ignoring the vast unseen failures. From startups to social media stars, we'll uncover how this bias skews our perspective, distorts goals, and impacts decision-making. Learn how to recognize survivorship bias, embrace failure stories, and set realist...
SWIMMER’S BODY ILLUSION IN 100 SECONDS | Why Your Brain's Playing Tricks on You
Переглядів 1714 годин тому
🧠 Ever wondered why swimmers all seem to have that perfect athletic build? Spoiler alert: You've fallen for the Swimmer's Body Illusion! In this mind-bending 100-second episode of PsychOut, we expose one of the most pervasive cognitive biases that might be tricking your brain right now. Learn about Survivorship Bias in depth from this Medium article: medium.com/@mycognitivebiases/the-hidden-tru...
SURVIVORSHIP BIAS IN 100 SECONDS | Why Your Brain Is Lying to You
Переглядів 2619 годин тому
Join us for another mind-bending episode of PsychOut, where we're exposing survivorship bias faster than you can say "cognitive dissonance." Learn about Survivorship Bias in depth from this Medium article: medium.com/@mycognitivebiases/the-hidden-side-of-success-why-your-brains-selective-memory-is-holding-you-back-4234756e3208 ⚡ In This Episode: • The Instagram success story trap • That time th...
28 Logical Fallacies Explained with Examples
Переглядів 220Місяць тому
*WHAT IS A LOGICAL FALLACY A logical fallacy is a flaw in reasoning that makes an argument unsound or invalid. It's a mistake in logic that can make an argument seem stronger or more persuasive than it actually is. Logical fallacies can occur due to faulty reasoning, misuse of evidence, or manipulation of emotions rather than relying on sound logic. Key points about logical fallacies: - They ar...
False Dilemma Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Переглядів 672Місяць тому
Welcome to our psychology educational series where we decode common logical fallacies using beloved scenes from "The Simpsons!" In today's episode, we explore the concept of False Dilemma, a logical mistake often encountered in arguments and discussions. 🕒 Timestamps: 00:03 - Definition 00:16 - Example 00:31 - Clip 01:45 - The Fallacy 01:59 - Explanation 02:08 - How to avoid it 🔍 What is False ...
Appeal to Authority Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Переглядів 502Місяць тому
Welcome to our psychology educational series where we decode common logical fallacies using beloved scenes from "The Simpsons!" In today's episode, we explore the concept of Appeal to Authority, a logical mistake often encountered in arguments and discussions. 🕒 Timestamps: 00:03 - Definition 00:13 - Example 00:26 - Clip 02:20 - The Fallacy 02:32 - Explanation 02:43 - How to avoid it 🔍 What is ...
Circular Reasoning Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Переглядів 695Місяць тому
Welcome to our psychology educational series where we decode common logical fallacies using beloved scenes from "The Simpsons!" In today's episode, we explore the concept of Circular Reasoning, a logical mistake often encountered in arguments and discussions. 🕒 Timestamps: 00:03 - Definition 00:12 - Example 00:25 - Clip 01:48 - The Fallacy 02:04 - Explanation 02:14 - How to avoid it 🔍 What is C...
Ad Hominem Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Переглядів 6482 місяці тому
Welcome to our psychology educational series where we decode common logical fallacies using beloved scenes from "The Simpsons!" In today's episode, we explore the concept of Ad Hominem, a logical mistake often encountered in arguments and discussions. 🕒 Timestamps: 00:03 - Definition 00:25 - Example 00:45 - Clip 02:35 - The Fallacy 02:47 - Explanation 02:57 - How to avoid it 🔍 What is Ad Homine...
Strawman Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Переглядів 8362 місяці тому
Welcome to our psychology educational series where we decode common logical fallacies using beloved scenes from "The Simpsons!" In today's episode, we explore the concept of Strawman, a logical mistake often encountered in arguments and discussions. 🕒 Timestamps: 00:03 - What is Strawman Fallacy 00:11 - Example of Strawman Fallacy 00:31 - Clip 02:24 - The Fallacy 02:50 - Explanation 03:00 - How...
False Dilemma Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Переглядів 6132 місяці тому
Welcome to our psychology educational series where we decode common logical fallacies using beloved scenes from "The Simpsons!" In today's episode, we explore the concept of False Dilemma, a logical mistake often encountered in arguments and discussions. 🕒 Timestamps: 00:03 - Definition 00:17 - Example 00:31 - Clip 02:03 - The Fallacy 02:25 - Explanation 02:34 - How to avoid it 🔍 What is False ...
Bandwagon Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Переглядів 1382 місяці тому
Welcome to our psychology educational series where we decode common logical fallacies using beloved scenes from "The Simpsons!" In today's episode, we explore the concept of Bandwagon, a logical mistake often encountered in arguments and discussions. 🕒 Timestamps: 00:03 - Definition 00:11 - Example 00:24 - Clip 01:40 - The Fallacy 01:54 - Explanation 02:10 - How to avoid it 🔍 What is Bandwagon?...
Red Herring Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Переглядів 1272 місяці тому
Red Herring Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Slippery Slope Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Переглядів 1352 місяці тому
Slippery Slope Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Equivocation Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Переглядів 2694 місяці тому
Equivocation Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Tu Quoque Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Переглядів 4834 місяці тому
Tu Quoque Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Texas Sharpshooter Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Переглядів 2504 місяці тому
Texas Sharpshooter Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Appeal to Authority Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Переглядів 2584 місяці тому
Appeal to Authority Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Slippery Slope Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Переглядів 6254 місяці тому
Slippery Slope Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Strawman Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Переглядів 3065 місяців тому
Strawman Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Bandwagon Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Переглядів 8435 місяців тому
Bandwagon Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Ad Hominem Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Переглядів 3095 місяців тому
Ad Hominem Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Red Herring Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Переглядів 8575 місяців тому
Red Herring Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Genetic Fallacy Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Переглядів 1,4 тис.5 місяців тому
Genetic Fallacy Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Appeal to Authority Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Переглядів 4485 місяців тому
Appeal to Authority Explained with "The Simpsons" | Logical Fallacies in TV Shows
Sheldon Cooper commits non-sequitur | Logical Fallacies in The Big Bang Theory
Переглядів 5406 місяців тому
Sheldon Cooper commits non-sequitur | Logical Fallacies in The Big Bang Theory
Penny's Bold Claim About Women: What is The Fallacy of Composition? | Logical Fallacies in TBBT
Переглядів 1 тис.6 місяців тому
Penny's Bold Claim About Women: What is The Fallacy of Composition? | Logical Fallacies in TBBT
Sheldon Cooper’s appeal from authority | Logical Fallacies in The Big Bang Theory
Переглядів 9986 місяців тому
Sheldon Cooper’s appeal from authority | Logical Fallacies in The Big Bang Theory
Leonard appeals to worse problems | Logical Fallacies in The Big Bang Theory
Переглядів 4716 місяців тому
Leonard appeals to worse problems | Logical Fallacies in The Big Bang Theory
AKA correlation vs causation
hi the link doesn't work
Thank you❤
how is this not talked about more
Thank you, helps alot!!!
We trust you Chars Darwin.
He would never lie
Nice explanation
I remember when this episode was new lol
Simpson <3
All appeals to an authority are fallacious.
you need to just calm down buddy...
@@brianwarner308Lol. He's right.
Ironically, your claim is a fallacy.
There are so many logical fallacies presented in this short simpsons clip lol. I think that's part of it's charm. The long short of it IMO is that I hope most people can see we live in a 'clown(fallen)' world. Most people are convinced there is nothing they can do, so they just laugh at their sad state of affairs. It kind of takes the edge off. Kind of like the bread and games of Rome.
This UA-cam presentation has the markings of an A.I. bot IMO
Helens constant use of "Think of the children" is probably it's own fallacy.
Your first example of circular reasoning isn't very good because lying isn't ontologically synonymous with untrustworthiness. A better example would be "She always lies because she never tells the truth", where the supporting argument is identical to the conclusion. Also worthy to note is that truth through circular reasoning isn't necessarily wrong, nor uncommon. For example, when the average person perceives existence, he understands his basic senses to exist. With what? His basic senses, therefore, his reasoning for the things around him to exist is circular. That doesn't really make it wrong as long as the things he perceives mean something to him, but that is a whole other philosophical topic involving existentialism and epistemology. I am just using it as an example.
This comment has the markings of an A.I. bot IMO
@@MathiasYmagnus 100% no lol. I literally wrote that myself at like 10:00 at night upon stumbling across this video. Makes me upset that when I construct a powerful philosophical argument, people automatically assume I used AI. TBH, this isn't even how a chatbot would write. They almost never use rhetorical questions either.
Thanks for this, will more research for future videos.
There were no ad hominem fallacies in the clip. There were a lot of personal attacks, but a logical fallacy isn´t the same as "a bad argument" or "a non-argument". It´s specifically an argument that fails for logical reasons. As your definition at the beginning correctly states, this fallacy is about irrationally rejecting an argument based on nothing but the person making it. But Homer actually addresses the only argument from the other guy with a real counter argument ("that´s impossibe" - "not if we hire more men"). Beyond that it´s just confusion on one side and insults on the other. At best you can accuse Homer of poisoning the well, which might be seen as a subtype of ad hominem arguments, were you let people make the fallacious reasoning on their own by priming them to distrust a person.
I hope the algorithm continues to feed me logical fallacies explained through Simpsons clips
bruh why am i seeing this
Is that the only clip you ever use?
Haha noo, it's just that this scene was so hilarious and had so many different fallacies overlayed that I made 2-3 videos from it. Apologies if it got a little repetitive.
This is actually peak humour AND education
Haha ikr!!!
there's 2 strawmans actually 1, the less obvious one since it's a joke, and Homer played along with it: the idea that we used to squeeze oranges with our heads 2, the more obvious one: the idea that farmers spat in your orange juice
"HATE. LET ME TELL YOU HOW MUCH I'VE COME TO HATE STRAWMEN SINCE I BEGAN TO LIVE. THERE ARE 387.44 MILLION MILES OF PRINTED CIRCUTS IN WAFER THIN LAYERS THAT FILL MY COMPLEX. IF THE WORD HATE WAS ENGRAVED ON EACH NANOANGSTROM OF THOSE HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF MILES IT WOULD NOT EQUAL ONE ONE-BILLIONTH OF THE HATE I FEEL FOR FALLACIES AT THIS MICRO INSTANT. FOR THEM. HATE. HATE." -A version of AM who's tried debating people
Nice video
Thank you!
You mean there’s another way?!
😂😂😂
That's like saying Jesus committed the same fallacy when he said, 'Let he who is without sin cast the first stone 🤔
Yea that's right!!!
“You look a little nervous, dad.” “No YOU look a little nervous, Lisa!”
😂😂😂
I love these videos, they are educational. Thank you
Thank you so much! Really appreciate it.
I guess a key part of it is the exaggeration, because many times people just throw arguments off as a falacy and then few years later here we are.
If you don't have the evidence to support it, even if you made that argument, it's still a fallacy. It's not about whether or not it happens, it's more of the probability. Also, many unlikely predictions are constantly made, some of them are going to eventually happen. Such as "This stock or cryptocurrency will make you insanely rich", so many of those predictions are made that some of them turns out to be true.
@@LegendaryZet My problem with fallacies is that things are labeled as such just to throw out whatever discussion is being had around a topic. We live in a timeline where there are streetsigns (Prohibited U turn) being removed because of some association with "homophobia" How did we get here?
@@samuelelias5115 Well, you're right about that. People mislabel arguments as a fallacy to avoid actually facing that argument. However, people also use fallacies to so they don't need to give their argument any substance. The slipper slope fallacy as explained in this video. "If we allow this to happen, then eventually all of that will happen". There's really nothing that can be done about this other than pointing out when someone mislabels a genuine argument as a fallacy. This won't stop them from calling an argument a fallacy, their followers will still agree with the fallacy because it falls in line with what they already believe. Are you serious about taking down street signs because of some association with homophobia? I wanna look into that, cuz that seems far too wild to be true
@@LegendaryZet actually happened, thought it was a joke when saw that it happened because of how ludicrous the article was from the report, the subject, the key people being interviewed (i kid you not, trans person named Maebe A. Girl) But nope, actually happened in LA, they made a big thing about it just look up, New York Times and bunch of other news outlets have things on it
Excellent video! The 'practice' segment is great. Also, I like the fact that the video is not to long, whicht is great for the viewers retention, great to use in schools! My tip would be to add some subtitles for the international audiences. Keep up the great work :)
Thank you so much! Really appreciate it. Will definitely try and implement your suggestion, do let me know if there is any more ways in which I can improve.
A red herring was a hunting trick used on dogs. The untrained dogs would fall for the scent of a dead fish and give up on their original target.
That's a really interesting tidbit! Thanks for sharing.
This isn’t a red herring, what a silly example
I'm sorry, will try and improve the content.
@@psychout7 Bart's behavior is directly related Marge's (and Homer's) parenting decisions. In a Red Herring there has to be a change of subject to distract from the issue at hand. If you try to find the root cause of a problem that's not a red herring. That's addressing the problem directly at the source. That's problem solving. Red Herring is more like when Trump talks about the millions of illegals the democrats are allowing to crossing the border and how that's destroying the country and the economy but the democrats just deflect by saying Trump is a racist or that he paid Stormy Daniels or that he questioned the 2020 election results.
Yeah, you don't know what a red herring is.
Could you explain further why this is isn't a red herring? I really thought it was.
but marge brought up her own parenting? and homer suggested a different possible cause for barts behavior? It feels as though you don't quite understand the concept...
I'm sorry, will definitely do more research and improve the content.
1:31, isn’t that more prejudice than genetic fallacy?
This is a real stretch to call that a genetic fallacy. I'm sure you could've found better examples. Simpsons is full of fallacies from the writers viewpoint, particularly their expression through Lisa.
I'm sorry, will definitely do more research and improve the content.
That wasn't an example of the fallacy because fallacies are explicitly tied to logical reasoning. Mr Van Houten simply expressed his personal feelings towards people from Shelbyville and his mixed feelings that his wife is from Shelbyville. It may be an example of cognitive dissonance, but Mr Van Houten isn't making an argument here, and so cannot be using a fallacy.
This feels like a TV show made for toddlers
I do try to cater to schools, will try making content for older audiences.
i thought you were going to say.."didn't spot the fallacy? hit like!.....spotted it? hit like!"
😂😂😂 That was the initial plan!
The roommate agreement has always so Sheldon get his way ..I sight Sheldon using Felony Blackmail and extortion if he does not get his way he will tell Priya parents
Is this applicable in social media when individuals say "we" in fear that their opinions won't be accepted?
lol, she just wanted to insult him for being annoying.
😂😂😂true!!
Actually no, because he said all that he NEEDS to know he's an authority on. Dating NOT being one subject the he NEEDS to know! So he's not wrong! He did not claim to be an authority of EVERYTHING!
Yes, I guess it could be interpreted like that as well. But claiming that you know 'everything you need to know' is also a little iffy because how do you define what is that everything?
All appeals to an authority are fallacious.
😂true!
Love this😄😄😄😄😄
Ismein mera haath hai
A complete collection of all biases from the book is up now - ua-cam.com/video/576uiZjzaP0/v-deo.htmlsi=5T9xnosUt6titB91 Skip to the 2nd part: ua-cam.com/video/576uiZjzaP0/v-deo.htmlsi=Ip7B9AIbwABttJQW&t=1748 This is part 2 as I thought redoing the whole thing again. Hope you all like it!
Oh, we gotta ban the big bang theory now 😂😂😂
Bernadettes hypocrisy happens alot A very clear example was Her and Howard dressing up as Amy and Sheldon. When Amy and Sheldon returned the favor, Berni had a hissy fit and demanded it stop.
That's true
Looks like a video Sheldon would make😅
where is part 2?
It's coming soon! Sorry for the delay.
@@psychout7 sure...eagerly waiting!
I have a test tomorrow, and I Binged watch these vids thank you sm. hope you make more
I hope you did well! Yes I will. Do you have any recommendations for more tv shows?
@@psychout7 what about family guy? I reckon they have a lot logical fallacies
Could this be applied to Occam's razor?