Відео

Thanks

Collier Road

Ive imput my pixel dimensions as 543x570, but it keeps coming out as 679x713. Why is this happening

Thank you for the great explanation. This is the video I've been looking for since 2 years. Many times when I was changing the layer CRS, it was disappearing and displayed in an unwanted place. Sir, do you have any comprehensive tutorial on QGIS whether on UA-cam or any other platform?

Thank you for the great explanation. I've learned a lot and solved the confusion with reprojections and different use of CRSs. Looking forward to learning more.

Thank you thankyou 🫂🫂🫂

Where is this GPS sold?

Thank you for this video! you've just saved my life mate, hope you doing well.

Would you please tell what is the meaning of the shaded region around the rarefaction curve? thank you!

Thank you so much for this tutorial! You absolutely saved my life in my ecology class 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

Hello! How could I save the style in my file so my coworker can open it in Arcgis?

Thank you very much free software and free advice - really appreciated

Thank you!!!

the video is outstanding in knowledge and explanation about the index. Please make videos on other ecological indices like Sorensen index etc.

Does not state whether it is georeferenced and can be used in apps like Avenza.

Great video. It is straight to the point and exactly what i needed!

thank you so much for this

Thank You !!!

The explanation is very clear and helpful. Thanks

thank you for the video. I want to have species diversity on x-axis and no. of sampling units on y-axis. will that be possible???

Hey bro, thanks!!!

Hello! Thank you for this tutorial. Is there any data that shows confidence that enough samples have been collected at each site for the infrequency data? would this be when SC> 0.95. I am trying to see if a sight has been visited enough to have seen all of the species statistically.

thanks for the video unfortunatly my points always land in the Guld of Guinea haha what could be the cause?

Thanks lot for this video. It's really helpful for me

Thank you very much for the excellent tutorial. I was able to use a lot of it as a handrail for working with the package in R. I have noticed that the R package returns some ridiculous estimates for Shannon/Simpson. For example, in my first grouping, where I had an observed sp rich of 22, the observed Shannon score was 16.8, which is ridiculous/wrong. And that is for an observed value, not inter/extrapolated. Have I missed something or is there a problem with the back-end calculation in the function? Thanks again heaps!

This is a brilliant tutorial thank you 😊

problem with bigger data with online plots. I had to use R, yet still trying to learn how to handle plots (modify text size etc)

How can i change axis label after i download the figure??

They scared each other 🤣

Nice thank you very much! Great help!

How much

Wow

Has this service being terminated? I can only access OpenStreetsMap

how to retrieve deleted gpx file in garmen etrex

I can not select my sites together, I copy pasted my data from excel

really good explanations for these statistics operations,, although our difference in language as iam arabic doctor , i understand ur explanation. thanks

THANKS FOR YOUR CLEAR EXPLANATION !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thank you for this, I've been looking all over the place trying to find out how to do species accumulation curves using PAST, SPSS and R, but this is so straightforward and well-explained.

Sir, how did you create the waypoint data before and how did you prepare the file on the track? It would be better if you could make a video

Thank you so much for your video! really! :)

I prefer to make sure accuracy is around 2 meters. Also for area marking with waypoints having a unit that can do averaging is best.

Does it make sense to do this for equal sample sizes of N=40 in let's say 3 groups?

We still have places for a September start!

Then how to know the land area from those coordinated trackings?

Thank you for this video, it helped me very much. Of course much thanks as well to the great team that made this online software work. i have one question though: When i put the data for three different sites the first graph seemed very logical. But the completness one i didnt understand. it was showing me that a site with less species was more complete than the ones with more species. If anyone knows what might be the problem please let me know.

Awesome thank you !

Best learning to be for all

Best learning to be for all

What is the price?

You really helped me thank you so much.