Відео

🙌

Yay thank you and praise God! Pretty sure he’s chuckling at our use of the internet to involve the laity more

That's for Deacons and I think priests concelebrating

@ at least in the Traditional Latin Mass priests have to wear the stole crossed right side over the left. Idk if that’s the same with the novus ordo

you said But you know that Protestant canon is based on Catholic canon? Martin Luther just removed some books, and it spread further to Protestant communities. The canon of the Bible began creation in the Nicean Council and later continued in the Council of Carthage. By contesting the Catholic canon, you are also contesting Protestant canon

​ @Xytryn *Romans 3:1-2 does prove Christians have the correct number of Books. Jews till this day use OT 39 books. Not OT 46 books of Rome. Rome added 7 books. Original OT was written in Hebrews. Not Greek. Greek LXX was merely a translation of OT Hebrew. OT Hebrew did not contain Apo 7 books. So why would a Greek translation called LXX contain Apo 7 books. Rome clearly added those 7 books.* you said Romans 3:1-2 doesn't prove anything about the canon. In the times of Jesus, Jews had more books. Afterwards they removed books that were written in Greek instead of Hebrew. ​ @Xytryn *ROme was not Christian. Let alone "Christian traditions". Roman canon was just one of many local canons (fixed by a local council called Council of Rome). Local canons and local councils had zero authority. Only a Universal Canon via an Ecumenical Council fixed by bishops of all churches have authority. No such Ecumenical Council ever existed. Council of Rome was just a council of a local church called Church of Rome (in modern days you called yourself Roman Catholic Church). Local church did not have any authority making decision for the whole of CHristendom. Only the Church/Universal Church (referring to the sum of all local churches) have such authority.* you said Christian tradition uses canon, which was used during Jesus' lifetime. Who decided which books are canonical and which are not? Catholic Church did. There are plenty of books from that time which were not included in the canon, like apocrypha

​ @Xytryn *Romans 3:1-2 does prove Christians have the correct number of Books. Jews till this day use OT 39 books. Not OT 46 books of Rome. Rome added 7 books. Original OT was written in Hebrews. Not Greek. Greek LXX was merely a translation of OT Hebrew. OT Hebrew did not contain Apo 7 books. So why would a Greek translation called LXX contain Apo 7 books. Rome clearly added those 7 books.* you said Romans 3:1-2 doesn't prove anything about the canon. In the times of Jesus, Jews had more books. Afterwards they removed books that were written in Greek instead of Hebrew. ​ @Xytryn *ROme was not Christian. Let alone "Christian traditions". Roman canon was just one of many local canons (fixed by a local council called Council of Rome). Local canons and local councils had zero authority. Only a Universal Canon via an Ecumenical Council fixed by bishops of all churches have authority. No such Ecumenical Council ever existed. Council of Rome was just a council of a local church called Church of Rome (in modern days you called yourself Roman Catholic Church). Local church did not have any authority making decision for the whole of CHristendom. Only the Church/Universal Church (referring to the sum of all local churches) have such authority.* you said Christian tradition uses canon, which was used during Jesus' lifetime. Who decided which books are canonical and which are not? Catholic Church did. There are plenty of books from that time which were not included in the canon, like apocrypha

​ @Xytryn *Romans 3:1-2 does prove Christians have the correct number of Books. Jews till this day use OT 39 books. Not OT 46 books of Rome. Rome added 7 books. Original OT was written in Hebrews. Not Greek. Greek LXX was merely a translation of OT Hebrew. OT Hebrew did not contain Apo 7 books. So why would a Greek translation called LXX contain Apo 7 books. Rome clearly added those 7 books.* you said Romans 3:1-2 doesn't prove anything about the canon. In the times of Jesus, Jews had more books. Afterwards they removed books that were written in Greek instead of Hebrew. ​ @Xytryn *ROme was not Christian. Let alone "Christian traditions". Roman canon was just one of many local canons (fixed by a local council called Council of Rome). Local canons and local councils had zero authority. Only a Universal Canon via an Ecumenical Council fixed by bishops of all churches have authority. No such Ecumenical Council ever existed. Council of Rome was just a council of a local church called Church of Rome (in modern days you called yourself Roman Catholic Church). Local church did not have any authority making decision for the whole of CHristendom. Only the Church/Universal Church (referring to the sum of all local churches) have such authority.* you said Christian tradition uses canon, which was used during Jesus' lifetime. Who decided which books are canonical and which are not? Catholic Church did. There are plenty of books from that time which were not included in the canon, like apocrypha

Romans 3 does not say how many books are in the Old Testament. The Jewish scholars disagreed on how many books were part of what we call the Old Testament. The Catholic canon is taken in the first few centuries from the the Septuagint, which was used by Jews, although not by all. These books became to be adopted as Sacred Scripture over time, and the books excluded from protestant bibles were quoted often by the early Church Fathers. Indeed they are even referenced in the New Testament, for example Tobit is quoted in Revelation, 2 Macabees is quoted in 1 Corinthians.

@beatricec9238 *Why? Bible does not teach Roman Mass (sacrificing Jesus on a Roman altar back to God). Bible teaches Communion/The Lord's Supper (commemorating Jesus' Coming till He comes).* you said You should make a video about the traditional Latin mass celebrated in Singapore 😊

We’ve not been able to have filming access yet. But perhaps in the future? :)

Thank you! God bless you too ❤️‍🔥

Scripture doesn’t prescribe a specific kind of dress for priests of the New Covenant, but does that mean there shouldn’t be one? It doesn’t forbid it, and as the priest in the video explains, these clothes took on meaning over time. They should remind all who see it to put on the “armor of God.” Each piece, and indeed the priest himself, should remind us to be humble, innocent, chaste, just, and gentle. That’s biblical.

@ *You totally do not sound intelligent. Bible says clergy priesthood was already obsolete. Heb 7,9,10. There was no clergy priesthood in NT Church. So why would there be “vestments” for priests? You are just demonstrating you do not read the Bible. 😆* @ *You are talkingns. Armour of God has nothing to Roman p priest or vestments. 😆*

So, you are saying that the early church is already unbiblical.

Jesus and the Apostles also did not wear jeans and shirts. So your pastor is unbiblical because they wear jeans and shirts.

@@maxellton *I am pretty sure you cannot read. NT CHurch of the bible was biblical. The latter deviations were unbiblical.* you said So, you are saying that the early church is already unbiblical.

Guess the order’s abbreviation is an interesting conversation starter in today’s context!

So did I 😂😂😂

For me "on the spectrum" means on the Autism spectrum. OCD in Psychiatry means obsessive compulsive. Which is a separate disorder entirely. You don't need to have OCD when on the spectrum and vice versa. The autism spectrum has neurological causes OCD is now believed to be caused to have neurological caused as well. Which I find confusing because I knew people who were cured who stopped having OCD. I don't have either. But I do feel it is important to understand what it is we are talking about as we tend to treat ppl according to our expectations.

I was an aspirant of the OCD (Discalced Carmelites) and also was diagnosed with OCD🤣 funny irony

Praise God, that’s so wonderful! Thank you for sending your boys to Catholic education!

Praise God! Anyway, me too! I used to think that St Thomas Aquinas was a stuffy bookish old fella. Didn't know that he was such a cool dude until I had to research about him for this video.

They are 30 mins before each mass ☺️