Відео

A new golden era

Climate change is not a USA challenge. The climate will change as it wlays has. The only health crisis we have is Big Pharma and the Health Care Industry driving health care premiums to the moon. All the while, the health care needs of the people are actually neglected. It's all about what the insurance pays. The message of the author of this video, is the same unpopular and outdated message that resulted in the red wave. Tragic.

Straight down the gurgler under corporate fascist rule.

Thanks for this. Very insightful.

I had only vaguely heard of Tagore. Thank you.

Story of my life

Well said. Even though many of us Huxley fans were thinking this, you've put it into words

They may not shock us to hate books, instead they drag us through 10-12 years of school which to most is torture that insures most will have PTSD around learning anything. I'm 55 and have only come across a few people in all those years who read non fiction. This of course is by design to insure people don't rise up and take what's theirs. They give us alcohol, gambling, sugar/salt/fat, porn and entertainment to keep us dumb and controllable.

Switching off the screen now.

It's better to be a happy slave than to be free and miserable. That's just a fact jack. 😏😏

I like comfort, but can't deal with the shallowness of modern North American society. I blocked YT, Twitter, IG and Reddit on my phone. I can only access it booting up my desk top computer. I can watch YT on my tv, but because I can't comment in the comment section, I am less inclined to linger on outrage videos.

Brave New World isn't that bad tbh. I'd choose it over 1984 anyday.

If you are depressed I feel horrible for you I was you once And I thank G-d I experienced as Yung's "Shaddow" MY SHADDOW OK with it I lkinda like the guy That is - was my problem I was on soma I was programmed Now please read slowly It is just words Adolf Hitler was going to be a victim like Brave New World His dad said do not think He went against it all Maybe ..it is ok to let go Let go in your mind Dream of sex with a pig Killing grandpa with a butcher knife Hating Gd that you can't let go ...... MINDFULNESS MINDFULNESS The ticket to you and your freedom ❤

Read it few times since a teenager and every time I do, I am just so amaze how so close Aldous Huxley predicted the future, i.e. :- " People are engineered, conditioned, and controlled to consume endlessly and remain happy through distractions, chilling vision of mass production, mindless consumerism, and societal control" but I never could envisage it would come about in my lifetime and to my great regret, I unknowingly helped it come into existence by being an IT Trainer.

Superb. You've captured the prescience of Huxley's novel well.

With Brave New World, the two great 20th Century works of fiction, in my opinion. The topic of this video is enormous, so I'll only address one aspect. Yes, we have evolved to become not only a bifurcated society... ...but one in which both "sides" now diminish - even dismiss - a third reality, objective, historically verifiable facts. The easiest one to presently explore is the build-up to the Ukrainian war and its multi-billion $ cost to the West & its people.

In other words, "Anything might happen." May I present a possible outcome? The mostly American US settlers want to return to their homes after a year away. Let's say they do. Then they'll be like sitting ducks for rocket attacks. Then what? 😨

Really great explanation of this miraculous, fascinating and dynamic country.

A very nice place to visit.

Ixrael is an artificial colonial state dumped into the Levant. It has no legitimacy according to the native population. Oct7 would never have happened if the Palestinians were peacefully content. Instead they are herded into a Concentration camp, where unemployment was common place, before the genocide started.

MOSAD PROPAGANDA

Land of diversity, indeed, the jewish Ethiopians who had their women literally castrated, because we mostly like white euro jews, Druz who are Golan heights occupied Syrians, Christians who get spit on in the streets, and Arab israe lis who are forced to live in ghettos with 0 government social spending, not to mention the 100 of humiliating checkpoints palaesti have to go through everyday just to buy groceries, the illegal settlements in the west bank and the forced evictions, tones of palest childrens in prisons and the gazillion of human right violations. truly a land for people, for people without morals.

Lebensraumics

Sounds like an undergraduate term paper.

Very much enjoyed this, though I felt something was missing. When reading Kafka, my overall impression is of a slow asphyxiation... ...the sense of which is difficult to relay in an analysis. You are hampered when perhaps a Film score might not be and I can unfortunately offer no solution, other than to say, "Good work".

Inner connectedness! For the hood of all people! Chan Fong Je!

What a polite response. Forgive me for being taken aback, I expected the usual misrepresentations and lies you get from the left, but you gave an honest, rational, reasoned reply. My points were simplistic because I was writing a response to a UA-cam, not a history of slavery. They were factually correct and successfully got my point across. I should have mentioned your presentation was well done; I just disagree with its implications. Jane Austen was a product of her time, some of her older relatives had profited from the slave trade, but three of her six brothers were actively against it. The late 18th and early 19th centuries were a classic time of moral and social change, with the young as is common in history, being the most idealistic and motivated. We do not know if Jane Austen would have been as strongly against slavery as her 3 anti-slavery brothers were, but there is a letter where she expresses admiration for the abolitionist Thomas Clarkson. Perhaps we would know more clearly what her beliefs on the matter were if she had enjoyed better health and had lived longer. She didn’t, so we don’t.

You must be a woke leftist, to make the woke leftist view of Jane Austen dictated to you by the loathsome hypocrites of contemporary academia. You need to know some history. It is true that the British and the United States indulged in slavery. John Lok was the first Englishman to have taken enslaved people from Africa in 1555. The slave trade in the British Empire was abolished 1807 slaves in the colonies being freed in 1838. In the U.S. the 13th Amendment of 1865 abolished slavery in the United States. British and U.S. slavery combined lasted 310 years. It was a pre-existing trade they got into, stayed for three centuries, were disgusted by it and got out. Africa, the ancient world, the Islamic world into modern times, Asia and pre-Columbian civilizations of the Americas all had slavery for thousands of years. Why doesn't the woke left write scathing criticism about that? It doesn't suit the woke leftist narrative. Then British sent the Royal Navy out to arrest slave ships and free slaves. This cost the lives of British sailors. The British were willing to spend blood and treasure to free people from slavery from another race. It had never been done before. You were not told that at university. It doesn't suit the woke leftist narrative. The British slave traders bought their African slaves from other Africans who had been making war on and capturing their fellow African men, women and children as slaves for thousands of years. African slave traders also kept selling African slaves to the Muslim world well into the 20th century after the Royal Navy stopped the trans-Atlantic slave shipments in the early 19th. You were not told that at university. It doesn't suit the woke leftist narrative. There is still Africans being held as slaves by Africans today. You were not told that at university. It doesn't suit the woke leftist narrative. The United States fought the Civil War to free the slaves. They were the 2nd people willing to spend blood and treasure to free people from slavery from another race. You were not told that at university. It doesn't suit the woke leftist narrative. You had a huge cry over the injustice of Jane Austen not mentioning African, or other races in her novels. It might shock you to learn that her culture, and the people she saw in it were Anglo-Celtic, not Bantu speaking Swahili's. You were not told that at university. It doesn't suit the woke leftist narrative. Did you know Jane Austen had non-white predecessors? You were not told that at university. It doesn't suit the woke leftist narrative. The Tale of Genji is a classic work of Japanese literature written by the noblewoman, poet, and lady-in-waiting Murasaki Shikibu around the peak of the Heian period, in the early 11th century. Shockingly there are no Bantu speaking Swahili in it. All court Japanese I'm afraid. So why don't you have a real cry over that? What, no sharp criticism of Murasaki Shikibu? That would make you a hypocrite, except you're a woke leftist- and hypocrite and woke leftist are the same thing. Then there are the pre-Jane Austen Chinese novels. The Romance of the Three Kingdoms, Water Margin, Journey to the West, The Plum in the Golden Vase (of the Ming dynasty), Dream of the Red Chamber (The Story of the Stone), and The Scholars (of the Qing dynasty). Shockingly not a single one has a Bantu speaking Swahili in it. All Han Chinese people. What, no raging criticism over their lack of racial diversity? But of course, you're a woke leftist- and hypocrite and woke leftist are the same thing. Saudi Arabia abolished the legal status of slavery in November 1962, only 62 years ago. Muhammad Husayn Haykal's novel Zaynab is in Arabic and was published in 1913. The story deals with a beautiful young peasant girl named Zaynab and the three men who strive for her affections: Hamid, the plantation owner's oldest son; Ibrahim, the young peasant foreman with whom she falls in love; and Hassan, a slightly more well-to-do peasant who enters into an unhappy arranged marriage with her. An early liberal critique of arranged marriage, the veil and enforced seclusion of women. But there is no racial diversity in it, and no condemnation of slavery that still existed in the Arab world at the time. Make a post condemning the work for its lack of diversity and deafening silence about slavery and I'll admit you are not a hypocrite. But you won't. So you are.

A tough one. While I'd hardly disagree with most of the post-Colonial critique, my reply would be, "So what?". Austen was of her time, oblivious to - possibly, unable or unwilling to grasp - the hypocrisies and inhumanities of her era. Can we consume any media of any time created within a colonial era that has not been similarly tainted? Should we stop binge-watching the later series of the sitcom, BATMAN [1966-1968], because of its lack of commentary upon the carnage of the US-led war in Vietnam [arguably 1954-1975]? Should we stop listening to any of Rock'n'Roll's golden era [1955-1985] because of its [virtually complete] lack of ecological awareness? A small seam of elite scientists presently believe we stand on the precipice of an Insect Apocalypse that may see global food chains not only disrupted but entirely destroyed, with billions threatened by famine. Should we abandon all contemporary Art because of its lack of Awareness of this existential threat? Hardly. As I wrote of Austen; she was of her time. Let her remain so.

A good introduction. I'd have liked a little commentary upon the Church and the Reformation, though to bump the video up to 10 mins.

Is Nova Scotia new Scotland? Did Scottish people emigrate to the North American Continent?

Hmmm. This is a tough one, because your argument is based upon academic thought and theory, of which I have no experience. So, I don't feel "qualified" to comment. My reaction to Peterson is more visceral; I hadn't heard of him until my twenty something son asked me to view one of Peterson's videos. After getting over P's irritating whine, I found it easy to counter his glib arguments, as he makes so many sweeping statements about History and Society; with many of them glaringly incorrect. However, one has to isolate each assumption from his diatribes, unravel his many interconnections... ...and that can be both tiring and irritating. After doing that a few times, I gave up. Why bother? His whine is a selling tool; a wounded "look at me" that seeks to find other bro-s in a dimmed down hood. "Agree with me," he demands of the gang and unfortunately, some do.

Exaggeration fuels conflict. Peterson knows that he, himself, is flawed beyond what he understands and so is the west, obviously. Otherwise we would not constantly be flirting with the idea of collectivism - collectivism is easier (not better), as it centralises all decision-making-processes, thereby enabling group-think and a total atomisation of the individual. Your way of thinking seems, to me, to be a bit on the utopian side of things, as it would seem your value of an idea is embedded to the person, and not the idea itself. The collectivist viewpoint imagines a utopia wherein everybody is the same - and everything has equal value. It is a society bereft of any form of discriminating or exclusion, and aims to make everybody, despite of individuality, the same part of everything.

Selecting the RP British accent and cranking up the "Attenborough" level on the AI voice generator is a cheap way to sound like an authority on a suject

Is anyone else enjoying the irony of all the newspeak in this Ministry of Truth video telling us 2+2=5?

J Peterson isant misusing G Orwell s legacy he is reminding us to re examine G Orwell We all take Secular yet Christian heritage democratic values for granted at our peril Study historian D Starkey s examination of how T Blair with 2 Tier starmers helo have undone 1000 years of British Constiturion in just 20 years in the dissolution of the Separation of the 3 Powers which were the Checks and Balances of any one person or one party to hold all the power K Starmer and T Blair were both young communists in their priviledged student days just like thr Cambridgr Spies during the 1940s and 2950s I think it might be you who are really exploiting and re interpreting G Orwells legacy to suit a far woke adgenda ? Re read G Orwells masterwork Homage to Catolina about his experiances and conclusions during the ideoligical Civil War in Spain in the late 1930s ?

It is unbelievable that the ones which Orwell criticized are now portraying him as their hero. Also it is unbelievable that the new right-wing, stupid, untrue, backward, capitalist dog eat dog philosophies perpetrated by people like Jordan Peterson are accepted by so many people

horrible ai images

Well argued. Subscribed.

Pseudo-intellectual nonsense. Downvoted

🌞😂

Karl Marx held few jobs and was essentially a moocher. He was supported a great deal by Friedrich Engels, a businessman. Otherwise, Marx depended on capitalism to allow him the opportunity to condemn it.

Yes Indeed "Innovation" is the Biggest trick of the devil. Peace Next

Thus channel has smart twice in the title yet the title of this video was written by someone who has obvious mental difficulties . Two compare these two men is to ask " WHAT MAKES A BETTER SANDWICH ANY TYPE OF FOOD OR POISON" 44 subscribers is 44 more than thus channel suould have.

nice

Excellent, a creative work merits appreciation.

This theory has been proven wrong time and time again.

Fuck this Is for the poor and dumb

The United States' lust for dominance is the historical catalyst for it all.