Відео

It was until the recent patch. Now it's unplayable with constant crashing and blue screens. You cannot play for 5 minutes anymore

I think this game will be like MHW....it will be played for....for yrs to come....

Gotta chill....lol...ya...no chilling n this game....

Gwyn lord of cinder was my favorite battle so far. I'm to poor for elden ring right now

Wow dude your super underated

Maliketh was suuuuper hard for me, hated that dog or whatever he is

What was you favorite battle? And this is your reminder to subscribe :)

I'm glad they made a setting for improving visuals the Gusts Of Wind, because of your points made and a minimap with the Ghost Of Tsushima styled map would've looked amazing.

wow 300 hours, thats not even much lol

I have 1300 hrs plus played on Bannerlord and I’m currently playing on a save game I’ve had going for about a yr, my starting character is retired and I’m playing as his heir. I’m playing on version 1.1.0 and employ 68 mods. Like I said before I have 1300 hrs plus in game but the difference in my campaign is the hrs spent off game on Nexus mods finding, testing, and implementing game changing mods. Everything from crafting armor to being able to command individual parties in my kingdom. Vanilla Bannerlord is very much a “game with so much potential” that does fall short but you can definitely fill in those gaps with mods, if you’re willing to put in the time.

The main issue of the game is that its 20% finished after like 10 or more years of development and will never be fully finished, well maybe in 10 more years or so.

Im at 1500 ish hours and i still enjoy the game

As much as I like the Witcher I didn't care for the grind. Gathering ingredients to make an oil to boost damage for one creature was no fun.

For me Outer Worlds (with both DLC`s included) is one of the best AAA singleplayer games i played in recent years. However,without the DLC`s its a bit short and not fleshed out enough.

I feel the exact same way . I got it on pc and ps5 . It’s the probably the best game ever but it is like devs just can’t be bothered and I also hear they are working on scifi game . I think they should stop that and get some dlc released for bannerlord to expand gameplay like hiring spy’s to blackmail or spread rumours and assassins to kill rivals and a rival system so you can have a nemesis. Diplomacy is definitely a needs adding . May be uniting all kingdoms through trade could be a viable end game option. Bannerlord is definitely fun for the first few play thoughs but after that what’s missing slap you in the face.

Massive Bannerlord Overhaul Mod That's Releasing This Year But There's A Problem ua-cam.com/video/Duuzc_9MsPI/v-deo.html&ab_channel=JackieFish

the japanese mod will spiece things up a bit

Gothic is still better than both of them combined. Case closed, no need to thank me.

i have 670h in Fallout new vegas would i like this game?

I just played through this game, and outside of the DLC Murder on Eridanos this game is meh. When it released, people tried to claim it was a new Fallout: New Vegas. I'd rather play Fallout 4 over this game, and Fallout 4 is considered "the worst" Fallout game in the series.

As mid as midfield

this game was dollar store brand Fallout copy. The game play was short, choices were limited and boring, writing is terrible..

This is one of the most boring game's I've ever played. I wouldn't even call it mid. It's functional like a communist apartment block.

I came across this randomly when it first came out years ago and grabbed it and was pleasantly surprised how much it made me laugh, and just how easily it tickled my Bethesda game spot. I still have it now and recommend it to anyone who is burnt out on their current RPG offerings. It is somewhat linear like you said, but you still get the exploration feeling, without realizing you are lost at some points like in a true sandbox. I also do like how it felt seamless with its load screens and animations, unlike Starfield. Suffice to say IMPO, a banger title for what it is. Glad to see others appreciate this hidden gem.

Mid far cry is space.

I really enjoyed the game but I got stuck in Byzantium on both playthroughs I attempted. I get to a point where I can't progress - the first time I thought it was a random bug, but it happened the second time as well. I can't take off and I can't talk to anyone and I can't be bothered to try a third time!

Yeahhh noooo. This game's average at best with mid writing and mid gunplay.

Generic FPS with RPG mechanics with choices that ultimately felt inconsequential and a narrative that can be summed up as "Capitalism is bad Morty, we need to kill the Captialists Morty!" The thing that really got me was there were no romance options but you can unironically get cucked by an "asexual" lesbian and the "good choice" is helping her hook up with another chick... I'm not even mad that the game itself was the definition of mid mechanics wise and it's at best AA in terms of scope, I'm just wondering what happened to the quality of Obsidian's writing went? (oh that's right, they got rid of their best writers)

Meh game, it's not bad but it was way too short and rather bland. But if you can get it cheap on steam then give it a go.

Hmmm, I played through twice. I've also played BioShock. I find this to be closer to Fallout but I do see the Bioshock comparison. I've also played Starfield through to NG+.....I kept wishing it was as good as Outer Worlds, which it isn't. I agree the Spacers Choice version is oversaturated. Weapons could use better scaling. Overall, an underappreciated game. I loved it.

Honestly, I’m glad there’s not too much forced story. I create my own narrative for each play through. You can approach it differently each time. And with mods there’s a ton of ways to enjoy it. Does it have everything? No. Can we imagine more? Of course. But for what it is, I think it’s brilliant. They never promised social dynamics like CK3. They didn’t promise any sort of city builder or city sim. They made an awesome medieval battle game. The only thing I could think they could have done better on was making a bit more reason to go into cities and towns. But on the other hand, the shortcuts are just a choice. I could easily just go inside and it’s actually nice they provide an option to skip it if you want. At the end of the day, each one of these medieval rpgs have their limits. I don’t think we can judge this game badly because it has some. Plus, if it were too much more in depth my laptop would have no chance running it. Lol

Quirky game, but enjoyable I liked the gunplay there could be more weapons that's what I agree to

It's certainly from another dimension, why? No bugs lol. What do you think about The Outer Worlds? Did you find it enjoyable?

Bannerlord is one of the best games ever made. But after several hundred hours in it, it does have some flaws which start to become irritating. It needs more small unit mission types with variety, as the repeat Bandit Hideouts get tedious.

I'm huge fan of this game but this game has major problems. There is no proper deplomacy, when you become a king or queen you don't get a crown until your kids become of age, you fight the same enemies over and over again and if your kingdom has any power you end up fighting multiple wars because vessels and the current ruler doesn't want to make peace. On PC I think the game is fine because mods fix those problems but as consoles player we don't get any of that until tailworlds adds it which at this point they probably never will because they let modders do their job for them. This game had potential of being one of the most unique games but they completely dropped the ball.

They are both great in their own way witch why I love them

To sum up the experience of still playing Bannerlord after its official release: TalesWorld: Congratulations! You helped me to get another patch for M&B: Bannerlord! Fans: Oh great! And what do we get? TW: Nothing! Now get out! Fans: What? TW: GET OOOUT!!!

I got into the game after full release. And now after 599 hours I finally started to use more advanced mods. And with Banner Kings and RBM its like a whole new game to me! So I hope I get another 500 hours out of it. For all its flaws I belive the community makes up for much of it. Edit: Also recently installed Fourbrie which really gives you a reason to interact with the world more

i disagree with your take, but i respect that it seems your position is well thought out, to each their own!

Game is great but is held back due to the open world being based on the outdated and crappy Ubisoft design

Fact. No game has ever captured me like witcher did. I quit so many games because they're boring as shit, but I love wandering around in this world. Everything they did is perfect. Honestly I like the guiding wind, and that there is no mini map on screen, it keeps me engaged 100%

I'd really like to play another modded run... I just can't stand the unresolvable crashes.

Thanks for the video! I'm glad that RTS is still alive in some way. I'm going to wait a bit more until it's polished and play it then 😊

Hey there! Thanks for watching, don't forget to leave a like and subscribe :) What do you think about Manor lords?

I wouldn't say this game is better than The Witcher 3, not even close. How could you betray your proud Slavic heritage to even suggest such a thing? But seriously, to be clear, I love both games to distraction. And Ghost undoubtedly has a much better, deeper, and more robust combat system. It's also much easier to manage, as Witcher 3's menu is a poorly organized mess. I don't play action/adventure games to look at menus. Less is more. Also, this is a personal opinion, but I just don't like leveling. To my mind, levels are just a lazy means to lock off parts of a supposedly open-world game. "You can go anywhere, except if you're level one, you can't kill level 2 anything. Not even level 2 chickens." Regardless, I think as an over-all game experience, WItcher 3 has the slightly greater impact. Ghost of Tsushima is a great story, but Witcher 3 is a whole sprawling world. Because Ghost focuses on the specific point of view of a very specific character, Ghost must sacrifice a certain omniscience that Witcher can maintain. Jin has a moral position and stakes in every aspect of the story. Geralt, as an outsider, has the freedom to decide what side, if any, to take. And this reveals the advantage of Witcher 3's branching choices as a means of involving the player. Much as I love Jin's story, Geralt's story is the one I choose for him. He makes decisions as I would. And I play the story as an invested participant. While I simply watch Jin's story play out. I love both experiences, but I feel like Witcher 3 is an experience unique to games, while Ghost is more like watching a movie or reading an engaging action adventure novel. I think, too, Witcher 3 goes deeper into its stories. Ghost is richer and deeper than most games, but there's no character in it quite like the Bloody Baron. And I think too, this may be because your choices decide his outcome, so you get more nuance, more dimension to his character. If there was one improvement I'd make to Ghost, it would be to let the player decide how Jin handles things. For example, I thought his relationship with Ryuzo had a ton of potential. But because we as players are locked out of Jin's choices, beyond just conversational options, we don't have the option of deciding to forgive him or not, to see where that might go. Ryuzo's point of view reflected the larger story of the game beautifully. Jin's greatest enemy wasn't the Mongols, but the imperial hierarchy that forced his uncle to turn on him, that gave him no choice but to die or betray his identity. And Ryuzo, being of lower status, faced an even more dire situation, his men being asked to fight to the death for a country that lets them starve. The grim truth is that, by switching loyalty to the Mongols, they're trading one heartless dictator for another. But his betrayal was completely understandable. After all, Jin certainly chose himself over Ryuzo, ruining his former friend's prospects just so he could prove he was the best swordsman. It was all great backstory, but because we didn't get to choose how to react to Ryuzo, we're stuck with Jin just dismissing his former friend's suffering, and don't really explore the deeper complexities Ryuzo's story attempts to open up. I feel like the whole game was like that, all these stories about the way feudal society stripped people of choice, agency, and humanity. But ultimately, those stories go nowhere. They're portraits, because they never really change Jin. He remains resolved, and never even quite acknowledges how his own dilemma makes him akin to the rest of them. It's very Japanese, I guess. But when comparing to the Witcher 3, where you can choose how to react to each story, and direct its outcome, it doesn't quite compare. Now this isn't to say I think Ghost did it wrong. They made a choice in making the kind of game they made, and I love what they did. All I'm saying is that, given the choice, I'd rather more games like Witcher 3, with branching choices that dig deeper into the stories and characters, than more games that, even if their world is open, their story is on rails.

Bro definitely didn't compare MidGhost with the GOATwitcher? Ghost is 8/10 at most. It's a great Ubisoft game that today's Ubish*t can only dream if accomplishing

The Witcher is better for 3 big reasons. The first is that they are both very narrative/story heavy games, yet only one, that released 5 years earlier than the other, let's nearly all of your decisions actually impact the story. The only story choice in GOT was the very last cutscene. The second is combat variety. The individual mechanics of GOT are better, however using those mechanics to fight the same 4 mongols and 1 ronin over and over again is simply dreadful game design. The amount of golf armored Mongol with a shield that I fought for a 2022 game is outrageous. The third is quest content. Almost of all GOTs quests are just (1) follow NPC for 3 minutes while they talk (2) kill X mongols. There is absolutely no variety in any of the side, and most main content. The Witcher has you interacting with multiple mechanics, piecing stories together through environment, or letters found around, instead of an NPC telling me everything, and the end of those quests actually effects how the main story plays out. TW3 > GOT any day

I have 833 hours in Bannerlord, and many many more in Warband and Mount & blade, considering I was an early access backer. I don't use any mods at all. And I thoroughly enjoy it, I don't know why people seem to expect more from the game than it offers. It isn't meant to be CK3 or an RPG. It's a game for people who enjoy combat on horseback, and it gives you an excuse to do that.

I don't think you can call yourself a veteran with only 300 hours of play time